BillyZ
The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with
extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970s.
(A) extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than
(B) extinction; its numbers are now five times more than
(C) extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were
(D) extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they had
(E) extinction, now with numbers five times greater than
Note : It is different from this LINK 1 & LINK 2The sentence tells us that the gyrfalcon has survived a close brush with extinction. Its numbers now are five times greater than the numbers in early 1970’s.
We are using gyrfalcon as singular so a pronoun reference to it must be singular too.
C) extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were
(D) extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they hadOptions (C) and (D) use ‘their’ and ‘they’ to refer to the gyrfalcon so both these options are incorrect.
(A) extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than
(B) extinction; its numbers are now five times more thanOptions (A) and (B) are very similar. (A) uses ‘greater than’ and (B) uses ‘more than.’ To compare the magnitude of numbers, we have learned that we use ‘greater than.’ Hence (B) is incorrect.
We can use ‘more’ with numbers in a different context. Say ‘I am unable to analyse the financials of this company. I need to know some more of its numbers.’
(A) extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than
(E) extinction, now with numbers five times greater thanBetween (A) and (E) was a tough call. (
SlowTortoise )
Option (A) is clean and correct. When comparing something over two different time periods, we often give just the time period after the comparison.
For example, ‘Today she is happier than yesterday.’
Hence, (A) is perfectly acceptable. Further in (A), two independent clauses are correctly joined with a semi colon.
On the other hand, (E) is vague. We are not given exactly what the numbers are.
(A) tells us they are the bird’s numbers (its numbers - how many birds there are). But (E) just says ‘with numbers…’ (number of what?)
Also, the first clause says that the bird has survived the brush with extinction and uses present perfect to show that it has survived. To give a current fact with simple present, it does make more sense to use a new clause. Mind you, I wouldn’t outright reject option (E). Just that (A) is better and clearer and hence would prefer it.
Answer (A)