Last visit was: 27 Mar 2025, 10:13 It is currently 27 Mar 2025, 10:13
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Business|   Long Passage|                     
User avatar
GMATTarget720plus
Joined: 22 Dec 2022
Last visit: 25 Jul 2023
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Status:Preparing for GMAT
Location: India
GPA: 3.77
Posts: 10
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
helsinkipro
Joined: 22 Sep 2020
Last visit: 11 Dec 2023
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 61
Location: India
GPA: 3.02
Posts: 9
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 7,266
Own Kudos:
67,319
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,910
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,266
Kudos: 67,319
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nikitathegreat
Joined: 16 Dec 2021
Last visit: 23 Mar 2025
Posts: 192
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 90
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Products:
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Posts: 192
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
HI, there. I'm happy to help with this.

First of all, "according to the author" and "according to the passage" are essentially the same thing, as least as far as GMAT RC is concerned. I wouldn't worry about that distinction.

Prompt:
According to the passage, early chartered trading companies are usually described as

So, what does the paragraph say about these early charted trading companies?

Paragraph one = modern multinationals, and mentions only that, "Sixteenth- and seventeenth-century chartered trading companies, despite the international scope of their activities, are usually considered irrelevant to this discussion."

Paragraph two = a cogent argument about why the early charted trading companies are relevant to the discussion of modern multinationals. Folks often say they're irrelevant, but this passage argues otherwise.

Paragraph three = differences between early charted trading companies and & modern multinationals.

The main point of the passage: early chartered trading companies should be more seriously considered by scholars studying the origins of modern multinationals (this is Q1, answer C)

In every question, the main point of the passage should be kept in mind. Even details are mentioned to support a main point.

Now, the answer choices for Q4:
(A) irrelevant to a discussion of the origins of the modern multinational corporation
Yes, not only is this often argued, but in this passage, this author goes to great efforts to argue against it. The fact that he has to present such a strong argument why the early chartered trading companies are relevant is that most folks simply assume that they were irrelevant. Does that make sense? This is a very strong answer.

(B) interesting but ultimately too unusual to be good subjects for economic study
This contradicts the point of the passage --- the author says that studying the early chartered trading companies would be relevant and could be helpful in the economic study of modern multinationals. Contradicts the main point = OUT.

(C) analogues of nineteenth-century British trading firms
Weak. Yes, I suppose in some sense the 16- &17-cent chartered trading companies are analogues of the nineteenth-century British trading firms, but that's more or less irrelevant to the main point the author is making. In the study of modern multinationals, everyone looks at the nineteenth-century British trading firms and no one looks at the early chartered trading companies, and this author is saying: Wait! Look at the early chartered trading companies too. The point is not really about making sense of the nineteenth-century British trading firms --- it's about making sense of our modern multinationals. Irrelevant to main point = OUT

(D) rudimentary and very early forms of the modern multinational corporation
This contradicts the point of the passage ---- usually, when folks talk about where modern multinationals began, they look to the 19th cent, not to the early chartered trading companies. The early chartered trading companies get completely overlooked in the discussion of where the modern multinational corporation began. This author is trying to change that, but he is arguing against the irrelevance to which others have consigned the early chartered trading companies. Contradicts the main point = OUT

(E) important national institutions because they existed to further the political aims of the governments of their home countries
Unclear. This passage is a discussion about the origin of the modern multinational corporation, and the author is arguing that early chartered trading companies are relevant to this discussion. This is an economic discussion, delving into historical economic. ------ in Par. 3, when the author discusses differences between early chartered trading companies and modern multinationals, he mentions as a detail: "[The early chartered trading companies] depended heavily on the national governments of their home countries and thus characteristically acted abroad to promote national interests.." Does that make them important? Well, perhaps in another context, in a political discussion about the promotion of national interests in an international context -- in that discussion, this factoid might be important. Here, though, that's not the focus at all. This is about economics & economic history. The author is making a particular argument about how the early chartered trading companies are important in the study of the origins of modern multinationals. How the early chartered trading companies promoted the interests of their respective home countries is not of importance in this discussion. It might be important in another discussion, again, something about politics and international relationship, but not here. Therefore, according to this passage, in this context, it's not important. E is OUT.

(A) is a strong answer, and the other four are, for one reason or another, unacceptable. Therefore, (A) must be the correct answer.

Do not underestimate the importance of the main point of any passage. There will always be a question asking about the main point, but all other questions will, in one way or another, harken back to the themes of the main point.

Does all this make sense?

Here's another RC question, for further practice.
https://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/767
When you submit your answer, the next page will have a complete video explanation of the question. Each of Magoosh's 800+ GMAT questions has its own video solution. Magoosh also has 200 lesson videos, including a whole series on GMAT RC. I suggest that Magoosh could offer you invaluable assistance in your GMAT preparation.

Let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :)

How is according to author and according to the passage is same? Here according to the passage early trading companies are redundant for discussion because there's no similarity between the early trading companies and MNCs. but according to the author, we see some similarity between the two and suggest further study on the same
User avatar
nikitathegreat
Joined: 16 Dec 2021
Last visit: 23 Mar 2025
Posts: 192
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 90
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Products:
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Posts: 192
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja

Question 8


Dhwanii
I want to understand why for the 8th question answer is B and not C
Here's question 8:
Quote:
8. The passage suggests that one of the reasons that early chartered trading companies deserve comparison with early modern multinationals is
The author describes similarities between early chartered trading companies and modern multinationals in the second paragraph. Then, he/she describes differences between the two in the third paragraph.

So, to answer this question, we'll likely draw our evidence from the second paragraph.

Here's (B):
Quote:
(B) the similar nature of their management structures
In the second paragraph, the author states that the complexity of trading by chartered companies "seems to have necessitated hierarchical management structures."

This is similar to how the author describes the structure of modern multinationals in paragraph 1. There, he/she says that these modern companies are run by "teams of salaried managers organized into hierarchies."

So, the passage suggests that both types of companies had similar management structures. Keep (B).

Here's (C):
Quote:
(C) similarities in their top managements’ degree of ownership in the company
Degree of ownership is discussed in the third paragraph, where the author talks about differences between the two types of company. Specifically, we learn that in early chartered companies "top managers were typically owners with a substantial minority share," while in modern multinationals, "senior managers' holdings[...] are usually insignificant."

So, top management had very different degrees of ownership, rather than similar degrees of ownership.

(C) is out, and (B) is the correct answer to question 8.

I hope that helps!

Basis Q8 analysis, why isnt option E of the 1st question correct?? Please explain Q1 and E option choice too ?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 7,266
Own Kudos:
67,319
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,910
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,266
Kudos: 67,319
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 1


nikitathegreat
GMATNinja

Question 8


Dhwanii
I want to understand why for the 8th question answer is B and not C
Here's question 8:
Quote:
8. The passage suggests that one of the reasons that early chartered trading companies deserve comparison with early modern multinationals is
The author describes similarities between early chartered trading companies and modern multinationals in the second paragraph. Then, he/she describes differences between the two in the third paragraph.

So, to answer this question, we'll likely draw our evidence from the second paragraph.

Here's (B):
Quote:
the similar nature of their management structures
In the second paragraph, the author states that the complexity of trading by chartered companies "seems to have necessitated hierarchical management structures."

This is similar to how the author describes the structure of modern multinationals in paragraph 1. There, he/she says that these modern companies are run by "teams of salaried managers organized into hierarchies."

So, the passage suggests that both types of companies had similar management structures. Keep (B).

Here's (C):
Quote:
similarities in their top managements’ degree of ownership in the company
Degree of ownership is discussed in the third paragraph, where the author talks about differences between the two types of company. Specifically, we learn that in early chartered companies "top managers were typically owners with a substantial minority share," while in modern multinationals, "senior managers' holdings[...] are usually insignificant."

So, top management had very different degrees of ownership, rather than similar degrees of ownership.

(C) is out, and (B) is the correct answer to question 8.

I hope that helps!
Basis Q8 analysis, why isnt option E of the 1st question correct?? Please explain Q1 and E option choice too ?
Question 8 asks us for something pretty narrow -- it asks for one reason that chartered trading companies deserve comparison with early modern multinationals.

Question 1, on the other hand, is very broad. It asks us to find the author's main point in the passage as a whole.

Does (E) capture that overall main point?
Quote:
the management structures of early chartered trading companies are fundamentally the same as those of modern multinationals
The author does compare these management structures in the second paragraph. However, saying that there are similarities in the structures isn't saying that these structures are fundamentally the same. In fact, the author goes on to note a difference in the structures in the third paragraph. So, (E) is a bit of a stretch on those grounds.

Perhaps more importantly, the author's overall point in the passage isn't just about management structures. It's about a more broad comparison between chartered companies and modern multinationals, including aspects such as volume, complexity of transactions, etc. The author's overall argument is most clearly stated in the last line of the passage: "Despite these differences, however, early trading companies organized effectively in remarkably modern ways and merit further study as analogues of more modern structures."

That point aligns nicely with answer choice (C) for question 1:

Quote:
(C) early chartered trading companies should be more seriously considered by scholars studying the origins of modern multinationals
(E) is out because it's too narrow, and (C) is the correct answer to question 1.

I hope that helps!
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
HI, there. I'm happy to help with this.

First of all, "according to the author" and "according to the passage" are essentially the same thing, as least as far as GMAT RC is concerned. I wouldn't worry about that distinction.

Prompt:
According to the passage, early chartered trading companies are usually described as

So, what does the paragraph say about these early charted trading companies?

Paragraph one = modern multinationals, and mentions only that, "Sixteenth- and seventeenth-century chartered trading companies, despite the international scope of their activities, are usually considered irrelevant to this discussion."

Paragraph two = a cogent argument about why the early charted trading companies are relevant to the discussion of modern multinationals. Folks often say they're irrelevant, but this passage argues otherwise.

Paragraph three = differences between early charted trading companies and & modern multinationals.

The main point of the passage: early chartered trading companies should be more seriously considered by scholars studying the origins of modern multinationals (this is Q1, answer C)

In every question, the main point of the passage should be kept in mind. Even details are mentioned to support a main point.

Now, the answer choices for Q4:
(A) irrelevant to a discussion of the origins of the modern multinational corporation
Yes, not only is this often argued, but in this passage, this author goes to great efforts to argue against it. The fact that he has to present such a strong argument why the early chartered trading companies are relevant is that most folks simply assume that they were irrelevant. Does that make sense? This is a very strong answer.

(B) interesting but ultimately too unusual to be good subjects for economic study
This contradicts the point of the passage --- the author says that studying the early chartered trading companies would be relevant and could be helpful in the economic study of modern multinationals. Contradicts the main point = OUT.

(C) analogues of nineteenth-century British trading firms
Weak. Yes, I suppose in some sense the 16- &17-cent chartered trading companies are analogues of the nineteenth-century British trading firms, but that's more or less irrelevant to the main point the author is making. In the study of modern multinationals, everyone looks at the nineteenth-century British trading firms and no one looks at the early chartered trading companies, and this author is saying: Wait! Look at the early chartered trading companies too. The point is not really about making sense of the nineteenth-century British trading firms --- it's about making sense of our modern multinationals. Irrelevant to main point = OUT

(D) rudimentary and very early forms of the modern multinational corporation
This contradicts the point of the passage ---- usually, when folks talk about where modern multinationals began, they look to the 19th cent, not to the early chartered trading companies. The early chartered trading companies get completely overlooked in the discussion of where the modern multinational corporation began. This author is trying to change that, but he is arguing against the irrelevance to which others have consigned the early chartered trading companies. Contradicts the main point = OUT

(E) important national institutions because they existed to further the political aims of the governments of their home countries
Unclear. This passage is a discussion about the origin of the modern multinational corporation, and the author is arguing that early chartered trading companies are relevant to this discussion. This is an economic discussion, delving into historical economic. ------ in Par. 3, when the author discusses differences between early chartered trading companies and modern multinationals, he mentions as a detail: "[The early chartered trading companies] depended heavily on the national governments of their home countries and thus characteristically acted abroad to promote national interests.." Does that make them important? Well, perhaps in another context, in a political discussion about the promotion of national interests in an international context -- in that discussion, this factoid might be important. Here, though, that's not the focus at all. This is about economics & economic history. The author is making a particular argument about how the early chartered trading companies are important in the study of the origins of modern multinationals. How the early chartered trading companies promoted the interests of their respective home countries is not of importance in this discussion. It might be important in another discussion, again, something about politics and international relationship, but not here. Therefore, according to this passage, in this context, it's not important. E is OUT.

(A) is a strong answer, and the other four are, for one reason or another, unacceptable. Therefore, (A) must be the correct answer.

Do not underestimate the importance of the main point of any passage. There will always be a question asking about the main point, but all other questions will, in one way or another, harken back to the themes of the main point.

Does all this make sense?

Here's another RC question, for further practice.
https://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/767
When you submit your answer, the next page will have a complete video explanation of the question. Each of Magoosh's 800+ GMAT questions has its own video solution. Magoosh also has 200 lesson videos, including a whole series on GMAT RC. I suggest that Magoosh could offer you invaluable assistance in your GMAT preparation.

Let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :)

Hi Mike,
Thanks for the response --
I agree that scholars must consider seriously studying early trading companies but that's one part of the argument,
I wanted to check if Option E is contradicted, then the answer for the Last question(Comparison) is completely wrong.

It says "similar nature of management structure of early trading companies and multinationals".

Please help me understand.

I would also like to request you to provide your views on Q5 and Q7. Thank you!!
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 27 March 2025
Posts: 786
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Products:
Posts: 786
Kudos: 124
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question 6 is tricky, with option A a good trap. Of course, the higher volume necessitated the Hirecial management structure. Still, the author challenges the earlier point that they are irrelevant because the volume of their transactions was limited. So the author states that it seems like the volume was quite a lot, as opposed to the low stated earlier.
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 517
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 517
Kudos: 295
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The author's main point is that

(C) early chartered trading companies should be more seriously considered by scholars studying the origins of modern multinationals


­The passage discusses the origin of modern multinational corporations and compares them with early chartered trading companies of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
It argues that these early trading companies, despite their differences from modern multinationals, were able to manage complex operations using hierarchical management structures, similar to modern multinationals.

=> The author believes that these early trading companies deserve more attention from scholars studying the origins of modern multinationals.


2. With which of the following generalizations regarding management structures would the author of the passage most probably agree?

(B) Firms that routinely have a high volume of business transactions find it necessary to adopt hierarchical management structures.

Quote:
The modern multinational corporation is described as having originated when the owner-managers of nineteenth-century British firms carrying on international trade were replaced by teams of salaried managers organized into hierarchies. Increases in the volume of transactions in such firms are commonly believed to have necessitated this structural change.
3. The passage suggests that modern multinationals differ from early chartered trading companies in that

(E) the overseas operations of modern multinationals are not governed by the national interests of their home countries

Quote:
The early trading companies did differ strikingly from modern multinationals in many respects. They depended heavily on the national governments of their home countries and thus characteristically acted abroad to promote national interests.
4. According to the passage, early chartered trading companies are usually described as

(A) irrelevant to a discussion of the origins of the modern multinational corporation

Quote:
Sixteenth- and seventeenth century chartered trading companies, despite the international scope of their activities, are usually considered irrelevant to this discussion
5. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would characterize the activities engaged in by early chartered trading companies as being

(A) complex enough in scope to require a substantial amount of planning and coordination on the part of management


This option is consistent with the passage's description of the early trading companies. The passage highlights the complexity of their operations, necessitating substantial planning and coordination, which supports the adoption of hierarchical management structures.


6. The author lists the various activities of early chartered trading companies in order to

(C) refute the view that the volume of business undertaken by such companies was relatively low


The passage initially presents the common assumption that these early companies had low transaction volumes and primitive operations.

However, the author then details a wide range of activities undertaken by these companies, including purchasing and outfitting ships, building and operating infrastructure, manufacturing goods, maintaining trading posts, and procuring and selling goods both domestically and internationally.

This extensive list demonstrates that the volume of their business was substantial enough to necessitate hierarchical management structures.


7. The author mentions the artisan and peasant production systems of early chartered trading companies as an example of

(E) a characteristic that distinguishes these companies from modern multinationals


The passage mentions the use of artisan and peasant production systems as one of the characteristics that distinguish early chartered trading companies from modern multinationals.


8. The passage suggests that one of the reasons that early chartered trading companies deserve comparison with early modern multinationals is

(B) the similar nature of their management structures


The passage suggests that early chartered trading companies and modern multinationals can be compared because they both developed hierarchical management structures to handle complex operations.­
User avatar
doeswithgrace
Joined: 30 Sep 2024
Last visit: 06 Feb 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Main point question -

The modern multinational corporation is described as having originated when the owner-managers of nineteenth-century British firms carrying on international trade were replaced by teams of salaried managers organized into hierarchies. Increases in the volume of transactions in such firms are commonly believed to have necessitated this structural change.

^ In paragraph 1 it is said that modern MNC opted for hierarchical organization/structure.


The large volume of transactions associated with these activities seems to have necessitated hierarchical management structures well before the advent of modern communications and transportation.

^ Line 2 of paragraph 2 says hierarchical organization/structure.


So in spite of the difference in pay we still see both are hierarchical....is that they are fundamentally similar.

And C : mentions "studying the origins of modern multinationals". Is that mentioned anywhere in the passage?

mikemcgarry
Question #1 is a "main idea" question, the kind of question that the GMAT is guaranteed to ask about each RC passage.

1. The author's main point is that...

To attack this, first we look at the paragraphs

Paragraph one = discuss modern multinationals & their history, and mentions only that, "Sixteenth- and seventeenth-century chartered trading companies, despite the international scope of their activities, are usually considered irrelevant to this discussion."

Paragraph two = a cogent argument about why the early charted trading companies are relevant to the discussion of modern multinationals. Folks often say they're irrelevant, but this passage argues otherwise.

Paragraph three = differences between early charted trading companies and & modern multinationals.

So, in my own words, the main idea is: folks who study the history of multinationals tend to ignore the sixteenth- and seventeenth-century chartered trading companies, but they are more relevant to that history than folks realize.

Now, let's look at the whole question:

1. The author's main point is that
(A) modern multinationals originated in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries with the establishment of chartered trading companies

A bit too strong. The author is saying --- when folks study the origin of modern multinationals, the chartered trading companies have some relevance as precursors, but this statement is saying that, essentially, the chartered trading companies and the modern multinationals are the same thing. The author argues against that in paragraph 3. This is OUT.

(B) the success of early chartered trading companies, like that of modern multinationals, depended primarily on their ability to carry out complex operations
The passage didn't really talk about the success of chartered trading companies, or what contributed or didn't contribute to their success. This is OUT.

(C) early chartered trading companies should be more seriously considered by scholars studying the origins of modern multinationals
This is quite balanced, and very close to the summary I made above. The mention of "scholars" should not be surprising. The passage is about folks studying the origins of modern multinationals --- well, exactly who would that be? My aunt Hilda? Most ordinary folks are just not going to be interested in an obscure niche of history like this. If I person actively studies it, reading book after book about the topic, then it's likely that person is a professor or graduate student --- in other words, a scholar. Scholars are the folks who study the obscure topics that most folks don't find engaging or accessible. --- this is a strong candidate for the correct answer.

(D) scholars are quite mistaken concerning the origins of modern multinationals
In GMAT RC, a term like "quite mistaken" is as strong as somebody using the F-word for emphasis in casual speech. This is about as extremist as anything you see on GMAT RC. To say scholars are "quite mistaken" is to say: they don't have a clue, they have absolutely no idea about the origins of modern multinationals. That's way to strong for what is being argued here. Here, the author says --- scholars studying the the origins of modern multinationals usually start with the period when "when the owner-managers of nineteenth-century British firms carrying on international trade were replaced by teams of salaried managers organized into hierarchies." That's a perfectly sensible and appropriate thing to study, but the author is saying --- they would understand a little bit better if they also paid some attention to the early chartered trading companies. That not at all the same as saying they are "quite mistaken." This is OUT.

(E) the management structures of early chartered trading companies are fundamentally the same as those of modern multinationals
Directly contradicted by the passage. "[The early trading companies's] top managers were typically owners with a substantial minority share, whereas senior managers' holdings in modern multinationals are usually insignificant." This is OUT.

A & B & D & E are all deeply flawed, and C is a strong choice, so C is the answer.

Again, if the passage is about an academic topic, as many many RC passages are, then don't be the least bit surprised if the word "scholar" or "professor" or similar words don't appear in the passage but do appear in the answer choices.

Does that make sense? Let me know if you have any questions.

Mike :)
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7266 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14627 posts