GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Mar 2019, 11:31

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Single
Joined: 05 Jun 2011
Posts: 98
Location: Shanghai China
The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Jul 2011, 04:54
4
19
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

85% (01:43) correct 15% (02:20) wrong based on 1058 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclist seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purpose of competition in bicycle races.

Which of following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

(A) The market for cheap, traditional bicycle cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.

(B) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.

(C) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purpose of competition.

(D) The technology conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacturer a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.

(E) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.

OG2012 CR28 P493

Why is C, pls explain and pls also teach how to tackle assumption question since I am very weaken at this part. Thank you.
Senior Manager
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 460
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Jul 2011, 07:39
6
C for me.

Breaking down the argument
Premise: bicycle racers are the only ones who are willing to support Innovation.
Conclusion: Innovation is limited by what the sport authorities will allow in bicycle races.

Clearly the assumption necessary to bridge the gap in premise and conclusion is :
bicycle racers only want innovations which will be permitted in races.... => C

Crick
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 290
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Jul 2011, 01:49
Conclusion: Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purpose of competition in bicycle races.

Only C links standard purpose of competition to bicycle racers. Thus the assumption.
Manager
Status: Single
Joined: 05 Jun 2011
Posts: 98
Location: Shanghai China
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Jul 2011, 05:06
So it just means that racers only interested in innovation technology, right, other stuff that they are no interested, right?~~

crick20002002 wrote:
C for me.

Breaking down the argument
Premise: bicycle racers are the only ones who are willing to support Innovation.
Conclusion: Innovation is limited by what the sport authorities will allow in bicycle races.

Clearly the assumption necessary to bridge the gap in premise and conclusion is :
bicycle racers only want innovations which will be permitted in races.... => C

Crick
Manager
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 58
Location: India
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Jul 2011, 12:16
Premise: The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclist seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers.
Conclusion:Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purpose of competition in bicycle races.

According to the premise, since only bicycle racers are interested in innovations and are willing to pay for it, they are the sole drivers of innovation in bicycles. However, if the racers also led to innovations beyond those permitted by the authorities, it would weaken the conclusion.

Hence, our assumption is as given in C, that the racers dont lead to any other innovations.

Note: this is a classic case of using negation for assumption questions.
_________________
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1789
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Jul 2011, 12:22
1
tracyyahoo wrote:
So it just means that racers only interested in innovation technology, right, other stuff that they are no interested, right?~~

Actually the opposite:

Manufacturers think that since the racers use only "Type A" bikes for competition, the innovation will be needed only for "Type A" bikes. However, it may not be true because the racers may demand "Type B" bikes for other purposes than competition; maybe for mountain biking, to give gifts, to train others, for pleasure.
_________________
Manager
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 64
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Aug 2011, 13:33
1
Assumption questions revolve around filling in the logic gap between the premise and the conclusion AND strengthening the conclusion thereby.
On a tie between two choices, negating the correct choice (assumption) will make the conclusion fall apart.

The answer here is C because
Premise: Tech conservatism of bicycle manufac is reflection of demand type.
Premise: Only racers are interested in and willing to pay for innovation
Conclusion: Innov is limited by what authorities accept as [u]standard for racing

What is the logic gap? Premises say that only racers are interested in innov. Conc says that hence, standards accepted by authorities will decide the innov.
The gap is the assumption, i.e., Racers' demands are limited by standards chalked out by authorities!

Hope this helps.
_________________

Hope this post helps!
Your kudos will let me know.

Manager
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 64
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Aug 2011, 04:13
Also choice E is a red herring choice. It might seem to support. However whether the authorities keep informed about innovation is out of scope. It may so happen that authorities do keep informed but do not accept the innovations as standards!
_________________

Hope this post helps!
Your kudos will let me know.

Manager
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 121
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 30 Mar 2013, 10:05
The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclist seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purpose of competition in bicycle races.

Which of following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

a) The market for cheap, traditional bicycle cannnot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.

b) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.

c) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recoginized as standard for purpose of competition.

d) The technology conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacturer a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.

e) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.

Why is C, pls explain ................

Originally posted by mun23 on 29 Mar 2013, 23:28.
Last edited by mun23 on 30 Mar 2013, 10:05, edited 1 time in total.
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3363
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Mar 2013, 04:22
3
2
Hi Mun

You for Cr have to follow my strategy (indeed is the strategy to tackle CR is not my invention)

Break the argument, step by step , sentence by sentence. Otherwise YOU will not pick the right one NEVER.

The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet.

So this sentence says: the manufatures do not produce innovative bycicles because nobody asks them. Try to personalise the argument: you want a bycicle hyper fast, hyper light that is not cheap: it cost even 1 million of \$ (is true, it exists)......no you do no really care: you need a standard bycicle. that's it. From now at the top of your head suddenly jumps what, for instance: the vast majority of people want a standard thing.........and so on

The only cyclist seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers.

This stat for me is obviously clear and straight

Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purpose of competition in bicycle races.

Conclusion: from the premises follow what we already in somehow know: who purchase the top notch are the racers

Which of following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

a) The market for cheap, traditional bicycle cannnot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.

Is false. we do not know the size of the market share of cheap bycicles but for sure if the vast majority of the people BUY the cheap one or so because the argument says that the high performance b are not purchesed. basically

b) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.

what accour in small workshop is completely unrelated to our scope

c) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recoginized as standard for purpose of competition.

This perfectly fit the bill. Is clear and try to make always in your words: I do not buy a new one unless I'm a racer but I am one in a million, so is impossible that I or other 10 people generate a strong demand for high performance bycicles

d) The technology conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacturer a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.

Weird as response but I'm quite sure that in the argument nothing is said about national market and so on............nope

e) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.

Design.........mmmmmm no I re-read the argument and I didn't find clues about........nope

Let me know if all is clear for you

Regards
_________________
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3363
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Mar 2013, 04:24
1
Changed the tag. this is not a sub 600 level question.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 302
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Apr 2013, 22:30
All duplicate threads on this topic have been merged.

Please check and follow the Guidelines for Posting in Verbal GMAT forum before posting anything.
Intern
Joined: 09 May 2013
Posts: 46
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jun 2013, 09:34
I dint understood sentence structure of option "D"
what it is trying to convey?

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 189
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 5: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 6: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 7: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 8: 730 Q50 V39
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Apr 2014, 16:44
Which of following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

a) The market for cheap, traditional bicycle cannnot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.

Wrong:
Argument is not about expanding market or even that of traditional bikes.

b) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.

Wrong:
How high-tech bikes are developed is out of scope.

c) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recoginized as standard for purpose of competition.

Correct (at the very least, it is the best answer):

Negating this kills the argument, because the negation would show that innovation would not be limited by the standards set by the authorities.

d) The technology conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacturer a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.

Wrong: Different national markets is out of scope.

e) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.

Wrong: being informed about high-tech bikes is irrelevant
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Posts: 114
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 May 2015, 05:10
I seriously struggle with CR, but have found that really personalizing the passage can help A LOT.

What I mean is that I break it down to a really simple level.

For this question, this is kinda what went through my mind when I read the passage:

Bicyle store guy: We'll only manufacture standard bikes, because that's whats gonna sell.

Racer: Dude, no.. I'll buy a pro bike, I really need a high-tech bike.

Bicole store guy: Okay, we'll produce a high-tech bike. You race right? We'll produce a bike that racers use in official competitions. Trust us, we got you covered bro. The bike you need will DEF be in our store.

Racer (here goes the assumption): Well, dude.. how do you know what type of bike I need?

This might seem a little childish and weird, but seriously, it can really help you grasp what is actually going on in the passage. Try it out. Simplify as much possible.
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2015
Posts: 223
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 May 2015, 08:12
C
Conclusion - innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purpose of competition in bicycle races
Premises - Only bicycle racers are interested in innovative bicycles
Assumption - bicycle racers are interested only for standard for purpose of competition in bicycle races
_________________

Apoorv

I realize that i cannot change the world....But i can play a part

Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Posts: 39
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Jul 2017, 00:51
Innovation = Type of demand. Innovation = bicycle Racers Bicycle racers = Standards So: Innovation = Standards

The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclist seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purpose of competition in bicycle races.

Which of following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

(A) The market for cheap, traditional bicycle cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.
Out of context. We are not talking about cheap market for a bicycle or anything. Here the topic is about innovations adhering to the standards. Probably those innovations might not even come to mass market because they are specifically designed for the professionals.

(B) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.
Out of context. We are not even concerned about the manufacturing site for innovation. We are concerned about the type of innovation.

(C) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purpose of competition.
This answer came through POE because this is not the best assumption according to me. So we have assumed that bikers don't create a good demand for outside the policy and so therefore the company has to follow the guidelines.

(D) The technology conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacturer a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.
National market: No talks about it. This statement goes against the conclusion. Like a negation test.

(E) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.
This is a tempting answer. But it's actually a premise and not an assumption. It is one of the reason as to why there aren't any new innovation... because of communication gap. But this is not an assumption.
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2018
Posts: 140
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Oct 2018, 23:33
GMAC official explanation:

Argument Construction

Situation Bicycle racers are the only consumers willing to pay for innovations in bicycle technology. Manufacturers therefore limit innovation to the standards established for competitive bicycle racing.
Reasoning What is being assumed in this argument? This argument implies a connection between what bicycle racers want and what bicycle manufacturers make. The passage states that only racers are interested in innovation and willing to pay for it. Bicycle manufacturers have determined it is not worthwhile to produce innovative bicycles that do not meet official standards. What is the implied interaction? It is reasonable to assume that racers must not be interested in buying models that, while innovative, do not meet official standards for racing; they will pay only for those innovations that are acceptable in competition.
A The argument concerns innovation in bicycle technology. It is not about the entire market for all bicycles, so no assumption is made about traditional bicycles.
B The passage does not discuss where the best innovations are likely to be created, so no assumption about small workshops versus large manufacturers is made.
C Correct. This statement properly identifies the conclusion’s underlying assumption that bicycle racers do not buy bicycles they cannot use for racing.
D The passage does not discuss different national markets; no assumption can be made about them.
E The passage does not indicate what the authorities do or do not know; this statement is extraneous to the passage and cannot be assumed.
_________________

Please award kudos, If this post helped you in someway.

Intern
Joined: 05 Oct 2017
Posts: 46
Concentration: Accounting, Social Entrepreneurship
The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Oct 2018, 05:21
[quote="tracyyahoo"]The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclist seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purpose of competition in bicycle races.

Which of following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

(A) The market for cheap, traditional bicycle cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.

(B) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.

(C) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purpose of competition.

(D) The technology conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacturer a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.

(E) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.

OG2012 CR28 P493
How negation technique works here ? I can't understand how the argument fails when I negate choice (C). Please help GMATinsight
_________________

Board of Directors
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4404
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Oct 2018, 08:50
1
rashedBhai wrote:
tracyyahoo wrote:
The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclist seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purpose of competition in bicycle races.

Which of following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

(A) The market for cheap, traditional bicycle cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.

(B) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.

(C) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purpose of competition.

(D) The technology conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacturer a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.

(E) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.

OG2012 CR28 P493
How negation technique works here ? I can't understand how the argument fails when I negate choice (C). Please help GMATinsight

Negation of option (C) will be - Bicycle racers generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purpose of competition.

Now if Cycle racers are interested in innovative cycles falling outside the officially recognized bycycles then it will act as an incentive for the manufactureres to manufacture such Cycles, thus Answer must be (C)
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Re: The technological conservatism of bicycle manaufacturers is   [#permalink] 31 Oct 2018, 08:50

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 24 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by