Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:10 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:10
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
7,148
 [25]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 7,148
 [25]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
24
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
fmik7894
Joined: 30 Jan 2017
Last visit: 30 Apr 2018
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
354
 [2]
Given Kudos: 61
Location: India
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 3: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.9
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 3: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 64
Kudos: 354
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
lostin
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Last visit: 15 Nov 2021
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Location: United States
Posts: 73
Kudos: 115
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sunny91
broall
Throughout European history famines have generally been followed by period of rising wages, because when a labor force is diminished, workers are more valuable in accordance with the law of supply and demand. The Irish potato famine of the 1840s is an exception; it resulted in the death or emigration of half of Ireland's population, but there was no significant rise in the average wages in Ireland in the following decade.

Which one of the following, if true, would LEAST contribute to an explanation of the exception to the generalization?

(A) Improved medical care reduced the mortality rate among able-bodied adults in the decade following the famine to below prefamine levels.

(B) Eviction policies of the landowners in Ireland were designed to force emigration of the elderly and infirm, who could not work, and to retain a high percentage of able-bodied workers.

(C) Advances in technology increased the efficiency of industry and agriculture, and so allowed maintenance of economic output with less demand for labor.

(D) The birth rate increased during the decade following the famine, and this compensated for much of the loss of population that was due to the famine.

(E) England, which had political control of Ireland, legislated artificially low wages to provide English-owned industry and agriculture in Ireland with cheap labor.

Source: LSAT

Hi Broall,
Why option C as OA is incorrect.
In option D,Lots more babies born during the decade after. Are those babies going to replace the workers that were lost? Not within that decade - they're babies / little kids. So you apparently still have fewer workers than needed... so why didn't the wages go up?


Question is about has LEAST useful to the explanation and as per your thinking - Having babies born is least useful to explain the given exception.
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 7,148
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sunny91
broall
Throughout European history famines have generally been followed by period of rising wages, because when a labor force is diminished, workers are more valuable in accordance with the law of supply and demand. The Irish potato famine of the 1840s is an exception; it resulted in the death or emigration of half of Ireland's population, but there was no significant rise in the average wages in Ireland in the following decade.

Which one of the following, if true, would LEAST contribute to an explanation of the exception to the generalization?

(A) Improved medical care reduced the mortality rate among able-bodied adults in the decade following the famine to below prefamine levels.

(B) Eviction policies of the landowners in Ireland were designed to force emigration of the elderly and infirm, who could not work, and to retain a high percentage of able-bodied workers.

(C) Advances in technology increased the efficiency of industry and agriculture, and so allowed maintenance of economic output with less demand for labor.

(D) The birth rate increased during the decade following the famine, and this compensated for much of the loss of population that was due to the famine.

(E) England, which had political control of Ireland, legislated artificially low wages to provide English-owned industry and agriculture in Ireland with cheap labor.

Source: LSAT

Hi Broall,
Why option C as OA is incorrect.
In option D,Lots more babies born during the decade after. Are those babies going to replace the workers that were lost? Not within that decade - they're babies / little kids. So you apparently still have fewer workers than needed... so why didn't the wages go up?

You could find the explanation in fmik7894's post above.

I will set an example to illustrate each option.
Normally, a country could produce 100 products with 100 workers. Due to famines, half of poplation die so the number of remaining workers is 50. Hence, the products produced will be 50. According to supply and demand rule, the price will increase so the wage will increase as well.

In C, because of advances in technology, even with famines, the output is still 100 products so the price remains unchanged. Hence, the wage won't increase as expected. Choice C is good at explaning the exception.

In D, there is a gap between this answer choice and the argument: the argument focuses on the workers, who are adults and could work, not the whole population, including the older and babies, who cannot work. Thus, even if the population increases, the labor supply still decreases so the wage is supposed to increase. This answer choice can't explain the exception as the correct answer.

Hope this helps.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
sunny91
broall
Throughout European history famines have generally been followed by period of rising wages, because when a labor force is diminished, workers are more valuable in accordance with the law of supply and demand. The Irish potato famine of the 1840s is an exception; it resulted in the death or emigration of half of Ireland's population, but there was no significant rise in the average wages in Ireland in the following decade.

Which one of the following, if true, would LEAST contribute to an explanation of the exception to the generalization?

(A) Improved medical care reduced the mortality rate among able-bodied adults in the decade following the famine to below prefamine levels.

(B) Eviction policies of the landowners in Ireland were designed to force emigration of the elderly and infirm, who could not work, and to retain a high percentage of able-bodied workers.

(C) Advances in technology increased the efficiency of industry and agriculture, and so allowed maintenance of economic output with less demand for labor.

(D) The birth rate increased during the decade following the famine, and this compensated for much of the loss of population that was due to the famine.

(E) England, which had political control of Ireland, legislated artificially low wages to provide English-owned industry and agriculture in Ireland with cheap labor.

Source: LSAT

Hi Broall,
Why option C as OA is incorrect.
In option D,Lots more babies born during the decade after. Are those babies going to replace the workers that were lost? Not within that decade - they're babies / little kids. So you apparently still have fewer workers than needed... so why didn't the wages go up?

You could find the explanation in fmik7894's post above.

I will set an example to illustrate each option.
Normally, a country could produce 100 products with 100 workers. Due to famines, half of poplation die so the number of remaining workers is 50. Hence, the products produced will be 50. According to supply and demand rule, the price will increase so the wage will increase as well.

In C, because of advances in technology, even with famines, the output is still 100 products so the price remains unchanged. Hence, the wage won't increase as expected. Choice C is good at explaning the exception.

In D, there is a gap between this answer choice and the argument: the argument focuses on the workers, who are adults and could work, not the whole population, including the older and babies, who cannot work. Thus, even if the population increases, the labor supply still decreases so the wage is supposed to increase. This answer choice can't explain the exception as the correct answer.

Hope this helps.

Thanks Braoll,
I failed to notice that the question asked about least contribution and fell in trap to answer OA as C. D makes sense as it does not explain the discrepancy.
User avatar
sony1000
Joined: 31 May 2015
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 206
Own Kudos:
298
 [1]
Given Kudos: 220
Location: Fiji
Schools: IE
GPA: 1
Schools: IE
Posts: 206
Kudos: 298
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D is ok as long as minors were not employed.
User avatar
ArtVandaley
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Last visit: 05 Feb 2022
Posts: 286
Own Kudos:
423
 [1]
Given Kudos: 120
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 286
Kudos: 423
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I see considerable issue with A.

Even though the mortality rate is below pre-famine rate, the famine must have reduced the population.

I.e pre famine there were 1000 people, of which 100 were dying.
Mortality rate being 10%

Post famine, there are 500 people, of which 10 are dying.
Mortality rate being 2%.

But even then, the the number of able-bodied man may have gone down. Mortality rate itself doesn't say anything.

Pls explain.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
exc4libur
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Mar 2022
Posts: 1,686
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 607
Location: United States
Posts: 1,686
Kudos: 1,447
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Choice (B), in my understanding, says that eviction policies drove away the population that couldn't work and kept many of able-bodied workers??? <= so after the famine, labor supply would actually DECREASE. This does not contribute to the explanation of the generalization.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
exc4libur
Choice (B), in my understanding, says that eviction policies drove away the population that couldn't work and kept many of able-bodied workers??? <= so after the famine, labor supply would actually DECREASE. This does not contribute to the explanation of the generalization.
We are trying to explain why wages did not increase despite the population decreasing in Ireland, during the decade following the potato famine.

(B) tells us that eviction policies forced the elderly and infirm to emigrate, while a high percentage of able bodied workers remained in Ireland. So even though the overall population decreased, the labor supply did NOT decrease that much in comparison. The supply of labor was not heavily impacted by emigration, which provides one explanation for stagnant wages in Ireland in the decade following the famine.

Because (E) contributes to the explanation, it is not the correct answer.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
sanjitscorps18
Joined: 26 Jan 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 635
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 128
Location: India
Schools: IMD'26
Products:
Schools: IMD'26
Posts: 635
Kudos: 623
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
One of the possible reasons for wages not increasing would be if the workforce does not diminish in numbers and hence no supply shortage occurs in the first place.

Let's look at the options.

(A) Improved medical care reduced the mortality rate among able-bodied adults in the decade following the famine to below prefamine levels.
-- This supports the premise of the workforce not reducing post famine. Strong support for low/consistent wages

(B) Eviction policies of the landowners in Ireland were designed to force emigration of the elderly and infirm, who could not work, and to retain a high percentage of able-bodied workers.
-- This supports the premise of the workforce not having other livelihood or civil struggles such as those faced by others. Strong support for low/consistent wages

(C) Advances in technology increased the efficiency of industry and agriculture, and so allowed maintenance of economic output with less demand for labor.
-- Changes the dynamics and fulfils less workforce supply with technology. Strong support for low/consistent wages

(D) The birth rate increased during the decade following the famine, and this compensated for much of the loss of population that was due to the famine.
-- Increased birth rate post famine would only increase population in the lower age group that does not participate in the workforce. Hence this would probably not contribute to the argument.

(E) England, which had political control of Ireland, legislated artificially low wages to provide English-owned industry and agriculture in Ireland with cheap labor.
-- Strong support for low/consistent wages

Option D
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,721
Own Kudos:
2,258
 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,721
Kudos: 2,258
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Throughout European history famines have generally been followed by period of rising wages, because when a labor force is diminished, workers are more valuable in accordance with the law of supply and demand. The Irish potato famine of the 1840s is an exception; it resulted in the death or emigration of half of Ireland's population, but there was no significant rise in the average wages in Ireland in the following decade.

Which one of the following, if true, would LEAST contribute to an explanation of the exception to the generalization?

(A) Improved medical care reduced the mortality rate among able-bodied adults in the decade following the famine to below prefamine levels. - WRONG. So, relatively more people were available to work. Explains the reason of low wages.

(B) Eviction policies of the landowners in Ireland were designed to force emigration of the elderly and infirm, who could not work, and to retain a high percentage of able-bodied workers. - WRONG. Again explains so wrong.

(C) Advances in technology increased the efficiency of industry and agriculture, and so allowed maintenance of economic output with less demand for labor. - WRONG. Two factor highlighted help explain the reason for low wages.

(D) The birth rate increased during the decade following the famine, and this compensated for much of the loss of population that was due to the famine. - CORRECT. If so, then it is not necessary that people were of working age. Least helps explain.

(E) England, which had political control of Ireland, legislated artificially low wages to provide English-owned industry and agriculture in Ireland with cheap labor. - WRONG. So, suppressed wages were because of a legislation. Helps explain thus wrong.

Answer D.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,836
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,836
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts