Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 00:18 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 00:18
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
emmak
Joined: 09 Feb 2013
Last visit: 08 Jul 2014
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
4,729
 [37]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 103
Kudos: 4,729
 [37]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
28
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATSPARTAN
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Last visit: 21 Jan 2016
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
62
 [10]
Given Kudos: 53
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GPA: 3.6
WE:Project Management (Computer Software)
Products:
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VeritasPrepRon
User avatar
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 11 Dec 2012
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 306
Own Kudos:
695
 [6]
Given Kudos: 66
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 306
Kudos: 695
 [6]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
mau5
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Last visit: 31 Dec 2024
Posts: 479
Own Kudos:
3,340
 [5]
Given Kudos: 141
Posts: 479
Kudos: 3,340
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
emmak
On planet Simplon, each year has 12 months, each of which consists of exactly 30 days. If Simplon experiences a political scandal every 2/3 of a year, an environmental crisis every 1/6 of a year, and a terrible movie opening every 1/36 of a year, then what is the ratio of the number of political scandals to the number of environmental crises to the number of terrible movie openings experienced over a five year period on Simplon? (Assume that all three events happen 2/3, 1/6, and 1/36 of a year after the beginning of the first year, and recur at their respective rates after that.)

24 : 4 : 1

1 : 4 : 24

4 : 15 : 90

1 : 6 : 36

3 : 10 : 72

So , the political scandal occurs every 8 months, the environmental crisis every 2 months and the terrible movie opening every (1/3) a month. We just have to find out the ratio between
\(5*\frac{12}{8} : 5*\frac{12}{2} : 5*\frac{12}{(1/3)} = \frac{1}{8} : \frac{1}{2} : 3\)

On multiplying across by 8 , 1:4:24

B.
User avatar
Transcendentalist
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Last visit: 04 Dec 2023
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
1,059
 [2]
Given Kudos: 73
Concentration: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
WE:Business Development (Internet and New Media)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 130
Kudos: 1,059
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If a scandal occurs every 8 months over a 5 year period exactly 7 scandals would have occurred. So shouldnt the ratio be

7:30:180?
User avatar
Zarrolou
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Last visit: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 846
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 219
Status:Far, far away!
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 846
Kudos: 5,145
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Transcendentalist
If a scandal occurs every 8 months over a 5 year period exactly 7 scandals would have occurred. So shouldnt the ratio be

7:30:180?

Hi Transcendentalist,

you missed something. \(5years*12months= 60 months\) one scandal every 8 months means \(\frac{60}{8}=7.5\) scandals
.5 is what makes your option wrong.

This should clarify, let me know
User avatar
Transcendentalist
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Last visit: 04 Dec 2023
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
1,059
 [1]
Given Kudos: 73
Concentration: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
WE:Business Development (Internet and New Media)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 130
Kudos: 1,059
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Zarrolou
Transcendentalist
If a scandal occurs every 8 months over a 5 year period exactly 7 scandals would have occurred. So shouldnt the ratio be

7:30:180?

Hi Transcendentalist,

you missed something. \(5years*12months= 60 months\) one scandal every 8 months means \(\frac{60}{8}=7.5\) scandals
.5 is what makes your option wrong.

This should clarify, let me know

How does .5 of a scandal occur?

Lets say there are 1 scandal every 5 months

In one year - 2 scandals will occur
2 years - 4 scandals will occur
3 years - 7 scandals will occur
User avatar
mau5
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Last visit: 31 Dec 2024
Posts: 479
Own Kudos:
3,340
 [1]
Given Kudos: 141
Posts: 479
Kudos: 3,340
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Transcendentalist
If a scandal occurs every 8 months over a 5 year period exactly 7 scandals would have occurred. So shouldn't the ratio be

7:30:180?

Lets assume what you said is correct. The ratio is 7:30:180. So now for every 30 environmental crisis, 7 scandals occur. Thus, for 60 crisis, we should have 14 scandals. But if you go by what is given in the problem, we would have 15 scandals. Any guesses?
User avatar
Transcendentalist
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Last visit: 04 Dec 2023
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 73
Concentration: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
WE:Business Development (Internet and New Media)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 130
Kudos: 1,059
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vinaymimani
Transcendentalist
If a scandal occurs every 8 months over a 5 year period exactly 7 scandals would have occurred. So shouldn't the ratio be

7:30:180?

Lets assume what you said is correct. The ratio is 7:30:180. So now for every 30 environmental crisis, 7 scandals occur. Thus, for 60 crisis, we should have 14 scandals. But if you go by what is given in the problem, we would have 15 scandals. Any guesses?

Nope the ratio holds true only for 5 years. If the period being considered is 10 years, then the ratio changes. I haven't calculated it out but for every change in no of years the ratio changes accordingly. Makes sense?
User avatar
mau5
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Last visit: 31 Dec 2024
Posts: 479
Own Kudos:
3,340
 [2]
Given Kudos: 141
Posts: 479
Kudos: 3,340
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Transcendentalist
vinaymimani
Transcendentalist
If a scandal occurs every 8 months over a 5 year period exactly 7 scandals would have occurred. So shouldn't the ratio be

7:30:180?

Lets assume what you said is correct. The ratio is 7:30:180. So now for every 30 environmental crisis, 7 scandals occur. Thus, for 60 crisis, we should have 14 scandals. But if you go by what is given in the problem, we would have 15 scandals. Any guesses?

Nope the ratio holds true only for 5 years. If the period being considered is 10 years, then the ratio changes. I haven't calculated it out but for every change in no of years the ratio changes accordingly. Makes sense?

I can-not in any way imagine how a given ratio can change depending upon the number of years. Say red:blue balls ratio --> 2:3. So are you telling me that for every 1 red ball the ratio should be 1:1.5(and as per your logic by dropping the 0.5 )-->1:1? So for 1 red ball, the ratio is 1:1, for 2 red balls, the ratio is 2:3 and for 4 red balls, the ratio is again 2:3?

The fact that 1.5 balls can't exist is correct. But the fact that ratio can be presented in myriad ways is also correct. So when I say that the ratio of red:blue balls = 2:3 = 1:1.5 --> it is all correct. It is just that the latter ratio is an intermediate value, something which is mathematically correct yet not feasible,physically. The fact that for 10 years , the value 7.5=15/2 when multiplied by 2 gives an integral value is the reason why we have 15 scandals over 10 years, which is not possible for 5 years as it gives a non-integral value(7.5);which is mathematically correct, yet not feasible in the physical world.
User avatar
Transcendentalist
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Last visit: 04 Dec 2023
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
1,059
 [1]
Given Kudos: 73
Concentration: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
WE:Business Development (Internet and New Media)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 130
Kudos: 1,059
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vinaymimani

I can-not in any way imagine how a given ratio can change depending upon the number of years. Say red:blue balls ratio --> 2:3. So are you telling me that for every 1 red ball the ratio should be 1:1.5(and as per your logic by dropping the 0.5 )-->1:1? So for 1 red ball, the ratio is 1:1, for 2 red balls, the ratio is 2:3 and for 4 red balls, the ratio is again 2:3?

The fact that 1.5 balls can't exist is correct. But the fact that ratio can be presented in myriad ways is also correct. So when I say that the ratio of red:blue balls = 2:3 = 1:1.5 --> it is all correct. It is just that the latter ratio is an intermediate value, something which is mathematically correct yet not feasible,physically. The fact that for 10 years , the value 7.5=15/2 when multiplied by 2 gives an integral value is the reason why we have 15 scandals over 10 years, which is not possible for 5 years as it gives a non-integral value(7.5);which is mathematically correct, yet not feasible in the physical world.

Lets just start with a blank slate.. Would you please answer the following problem for me?

On planet Simplon, each year has 12 months, each of which consists of exactly 30 days. If Simplon experiences a political scandal every 2/3 of a year, an environmental crisis every 1/6 of a year, and a terrible movie opening every 1/36 of a year (Assume that all three events happen 2/3, 1/6, and 1/36 of a year after the beginning of the first year, and recur at their respective rates after that.)

Can you please calculate the ratio of the No of following events over a 5 year period to that over a 10 year period?

1, Political Scandal
2, Environmental Crises
3, Terrible
User avatar
jlgdr
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Last visit: 24 Jul 2015
Posts: 1,311
Own Kudos:
2,863
 [2]
Given Kudos: 355
Concentration: Finance
Posts: 1,311
Kudos: 2,863
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Actually, we only need to take the ratio of 3/2:6:36 which are the denominators and one will get 1:4:24.

Thus answer is B
avatar
frozenpaladin
Joined: 10 Oct 2015
Last visit: 09 Nov 2015
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I know it's been a while, but I'd like to back up Transcendentalist here. Here's why he's right:

What is the ratio of Mondays to Tuesdays in an 8 day period starting and ending with Monday?
The answer here is not 1:1. Let's look at the sample space:
M T W TH F S S M
We see that 2 Mondays, but only one Tuesday. Therefore the ratio is 2:1.
For 9 days we would see:
M T W TH F S S M T
Making the ratio 1:1 again.

A simple example:
What is the ratio of odds to evens in the range 1-101 inclusive? In 1-100?
I think we can all tell that there are 51 odds and 50 evens in the first part of the question, making the ratio 51:50. In the second part there are 50 of each giving 50:50 or 1:1.

Another analogous problem:
Bob is pushing a boulder up a 100 meter long hill. Every day he pushes it up 20 meters. Then when he rests, it rolls down 11 meters. How many days would it take Bob to push to boulder up to the top of the hill? Answer as an integer, and assume the boulder no longer rolls down once the top of the hill is reached.
Hastily, we would calculate the average rate of 20-11=9 meters per day. 11 x 9 = 99, and that's not quite enough, so the answer must be 12 days (12 x 9 = 108 meters).
Let's go back a step. Before he starts pushing on the beginning of the 10th day, Bob's boulder is at 9 x 9 = 81 meters. Now he pushes the boulder up 20 meters, reaching 101 meters. The answer here is therefore 10 days, not 12.

The point in these three examples is that, depending on the problem, using a constant ratio or rate doesn't work. The ratio changes depending on the period we're looking at.
avatar
praneet87
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Last visit: 03 Jun 2018
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Canada
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q45 V35
GPA: 3.66
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 660 Q45 V35
Posts: 43
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I guess we needed to take 7.5 as a value.

I thought we can't really take the .5 hence thought it would 7:30:180 and C was the closest option.
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 987
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 987
Kudos: 1,923
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I do not think this is a good question even though the source is `Veritas.
I am also not convincing that B is the answer.
It is because in the last year, the first event cannot occur while the other events keep happening.
Also, I am not sure on what day of a year each event will first takes place.
User avatar
houston1980
Joined: 30 May 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 226
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,274
Location: United States
Schools: HBS '22
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GRE 1: Q168 V164
GPA: 3.57
Products:
Schools: HBS '22
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GRE 1: Q168 V164
Posts: 226
Kudos: 2,142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is not a good question.

Transcendentalist is correct. If a scandal occurs every 8 months over a 5 year period exactly 7 scandals would have occurred. So the ratio should be

7:30:180.
User avatar
foryearss
Joined: 09 Jun 2017
Last visit: 06 Apr 2022
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V35
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V35
Posts: 83
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Transcendentalist is correct
the number of scandals that happend during the 5 years period is 7 , not 7.5
c is the closest
User avatar
BunuelWannabe
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Last visit: 04 Dec 2022
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Location: Spain
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 14
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Totally agree with Transcendentalist

I consider that this question is not well fundamented and does have a wrong answer. My reason to say that is that question is asking "what is the ratio of the number of political scandals to the number of environmental crises to the number of terrible movie openings experienced over a five year period"

Over a 5 year period, Simplon's habitants would experience 7 political scandals as it impossible to experience half a political scandal, therefore, the ratio would be 7:30:180.
avatar
artiom01
Joined: 12 Sep 2018
Last visit: 02 Jan 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 21
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BunuelWannabe
Totally agree with Transcendentalist

I consider that this question is not well fundamented and does have a wrong answer. My reason to say that is that question is asking "what is the ratio of the number of political scandals to the number of environmental crises to the number of terrible movie openings experienced over a five year period"

Over a 5 year period, Simplon's habitants would experience 7 political scandals as it impossible to experience half a political scandal, therefore, the ratio would be 7:30:180.

I think the key is the assumption in the brackets that suggest starting to count the recurrence from time 0. This way we get 7:30:180.

In case the question asked for the ratio over a random 5 year period, the most appropriate answer (the average, I guess) would be B.
User avatar
udaypratapsingh99
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 399
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 372
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Transcendentalist
If a scandal occurs every 8 months over a 5-year period exactly 7 scandals would have occurred. So shouldn't the ratio be

7:30:180?

Hi Transcendentalist,

I proceeded the same way and I believe yours would have been the correct solution in case it was asked for the first 5 years. However, as the question-asked ratio for any 5 years period, we need to calculate the average, i.e. consider the 7.5 political scandals. Why does it matter? consider another scenario of the second "5-year period" from the beginning. In this 5 years period, we will get to observe 8 political scandals ((there will be 7 & 8 political scandals in alternate 5 years periods, respectively)). Here, 7:30:180 fails... rather, it's 8:30:180 in this case.

Therefore, when we define in general, it makes sense to consider 7.5:30:180, which clarifies that all the alternate 5-year periods will have 8 political scandals.
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105408 posts
Tuck School Moderator
805 posts