OE:
Grammatical construction; Verb formThe point of this sentence is to explain analysts’ common two-part belief
about the limited power of elected officials to control a national
economy. It presents this belief as the direct object in the main clause,
analysts believe, and introduces it with the subordinating conjunction
that, which governs both the positive dependent clause (decisions . . .
can hurt) introduced by whereas, and the subsequent negative
independent clause (no administration can . . . be said to control . . . ).
The additional appearances of that in some of the versions of the
sentence are ungrammatical.
A.
Correct. Introduced by the subordinating conjunction that, the
complex clause succinctly contrasts leaders’ powers to hurt the
economy with their inability to control all economic forces.
B. The idiom can be said to would be appropriate, but no
administration can be said that it is ungrammatical.
C. The repetition of that is ungrammatical, since both clauses are
governed by the initial appearance of that after [a]nalysts believe.
D. This version of the sentence combines the mistakes described in (B)
with those described in (C).
E. The repetition of that is ungrammatical, since both clauses are
governed by the first appearance of that. The appearance of it makes
the sentence unnecessarily wordy and convoluted.
The correct answer is A.