GMATNinja
I hate to be the bad guy who keeps saying this, but you're looking at a deeply, deeply flawed question here. It doesn't resemble a real GMAT CR question at all -- and either (C) or (D) can be defended here. That's not how the actual GMAT works. The correct answer might be hard to spot on a real GMAT CR question, but it will be 100% unambiguous.
Seriously, please don't waste any more of your precious time on this mess!
Hi,
Agreed "The Q is completely flawed", but I don't think you can defend C..
Four areas for evaluation from 1-10. Only one area it is same. Whose average or for that matter TOTAL in four areas is more.
(C) Steve’s lowest score was less than or equal to Robert’s highest score.
Two scenarios out of 100s-
i) Steve's all scores are lower than Robert's. It is nowhere mentioned ONLY one score is lower than Robert's highest.
Steve's score - 1,2,3,4 and Robert's - 4,5,6,9...... R has greater average.
ii) Steve's one score is lesser, one equal to R's highest.
S- 4,7,9,10 and R-1,2,3,7....S is more.
So noway to establish whose average is more.
If ONLY is inserted in (C) Steve’s lowest score was
the only score less than or equal to Robert’s highest score.
OR
(C) Steve’s
lowest ONLY ONE score was less than or equal to Robert’s highest score.
(D) Robert received a score of 10 in three areas and Steve did not score higher than 8 in any area.
So R has 30+x, and max of S 8*3+x.... x is the same score..
So S is always going to be less by ATLEAST 30-24=6..
So ONLY D can be defended.