1. According to the passage author implies that Basques are similar to their neighbors in which way?->
'With their unique language, unrelated to all other European tongues, the continent’s oldest cave paintings, and their seafaring, gastronomic and choral traditions, the Basques have long had a strong sense of identity'-> Basques are different from neighbors: unique language, tongue, oldest cave paintings,& choral traditions.
Eliminate A,B, & C
->
In the first paragraph, NP claimed that the Basques descend from the biblical Noah. In the second paragraph, new evidence brings mixed for NP, and shows that the basques are genetically different from their neighbors. But the differences are recent. In the third paragraph, a finding shows that Basques and other Spaniards all descend from the same stone age migrants.A. Language
-> Different. Mentioned in 1st paragraph.
B. Cave painting timing
-> Different. Mentioned in 1st paragraph.
C. Choral traditions
-> Different. Mentioned in 1st paragraph.
D. Biblical origin
-> Tempting. NP claimed that the Basques descend from the biblical Noah. Based on new evidence, we only know that the Basques and other Spaniards descend from the stone age ancestor. But nowhere in the article is mentioned about the similarity of Biblical origin of the Basques and their neighbors.
E. Their genetic origin-> Yes. Basques and other Spaniards all descend from the same stone age migrants. Even if they are genetically different, their genetic origin is same because of their same ancestors.
2. Which of the following reasons are best supported by the article as an explanation of the differences in genetic composition between Basques and Spaniards?
->
Paraphrased Q: What is the explanation of the differences in genetic composition between Basques and Spaniards?A. Basques are a separate race that arrived in Europe during the Iron Age.
-> No, Basques and other Spaniards all descend from the same stone age migrants.
B. Basques followed Romans into the Iberian peninsula.
-> No. Actually, Romans conquered the Basque country. Basques did not follow Roman.
C. Ancient Iberians were the forefathers of the Spaniards.
-> Tempting. 'The ancient Iberians, too, spoke a non-Indo-European language (like Basque, Finnish, and Hungarian)'
Check the keyword 'too'. The similarity bewteen the ancient Iberians and the Spaniards was non-Indo-European language.
-> the forefathers of the Spaniards were the stone age migrants.
D. The Arab Berber invasions and Roman conquests did not reach the Basque country but did reach the rest of Spain.
-> Check the last paragraph. 'Recent research has found evidence that, contrary to myth, the Romans did conquer the Basque country'. So, the Romans actually reached the Basque country
E. Linguistic dissimilarities and difficulty in creating land trade routes .-> 'And the Arab-Barber invaders who occupied much of Iberia for seven century scarcely got the there(the core of Basque speaking areas). Impenetrable mountains and an incomprehensible language discouraged genetic mingling, the researchers surmise'
We can infer that the influence of Arabs and Romans was on much of Iberia except on the core of Basque speaking areas. That's why, there are differences in genetic composition between Basques and Spaniards