Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 21:36 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 21:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
guerrero25
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Last visit: 13 Nov 2019
Posts: 244
Own Kudos:
5,202
 [17]
Given Kudos: 325
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
Posts: 244
Kudos: 5,202
 [17]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mba1382
Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Last visit: 20 Aug 2017
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
1,418
 [4]
Given Kudos: 172
GPA: 3.46
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Posts: 132
Kudos: 1,418
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
guerrero25
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Last visit: 13 Nov 2019
Posts: 244
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 325
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
Posts: 244
Kudos: 5,202
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mba1382
Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Last visit: 20 Aug 2017
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
1,418
 [1]
Given Kudos: 172
GPA: 3.46
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Posts: 132
Kudos: 1,418
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks. Indeed a good question and quite representative of real GMAT CR question. Keep posting such questions as it helps people improve :-)
guerrero25
Nice logic . I fell for for D in the test . Check the The OA & OE in case you want to review .
avatar
Shalabh09
Joined: 30 Jun 2014
Last visit: 12 Dec 2017
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Posts: 18
Kudos: 33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

If the main concern is the economic burden, wouldn't option D be helpful in solving that (that too both in short and long term), and thereby, in weakening the conclusion? Option E resolves the issue in long term.

@guerrero25 : Please post the OE.

Thank you.
avatar
veronicapratt
Joined: 04 Apr 2015
Last visit: 06 Apr 2015
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
guerrero25
Universal preschool is a misguided use of public funds. This early academic focus will undermine the social, emotional, and mental development associated with a carefree early childhood. Furthermore, the economic burden on the state to fund such an ambitious undertaking will be overwhelming in both the short-term and long-term, since the state has no way to offset the program’s costs.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the idea that universal preschool will be an economic burden on the state?

A)Students who attend preschool are more likely to complete high school than students who do not attend preschool.

B) Preschool educated children fare much better in kindergarten than do children without preschool.

C)Part of the high cost of universal preschool stems from its requirement that preschool teachers must have a bachelor's degree and a teaching credential.

D)The taxes necessary to fund universal preschool can come from a variety of sources, including property taxes and bond measures.

E)Students who attend preschool are less likely to require special education, an expensive public service.


I think E could do as student who attend preschool don't need more special education, as they get lot to learn in their early ages at preschool.
User avatar
warriorguy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Last visit: 08 Feb 2023
Posts: 377
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Posts: 377
Kudos: 364
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Narrows down to Option D and Option E since we are looking for something to prove that Universal PS will not be an economic burden

D:
The taxes necessary to fund universal preschool can come from a variety of sources, including property taxes and bond measures.

What if even though the taxes collected will be enough to fund the universal PS but still remain as an economic burden to the state. Doesn't give enough fodder to go against the stem.

E:

Students who attend preschool are less likely to require special education, an expensive public service.

Option states that students attending preschool can avoid an expensive public service. Since the service is expensive and funded by govt. it destroys the conc.


However, I had a query - the option talks about preschool and we are talking about Universal PS. Is it ok to make a general statement?
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,572
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
warriorguy
Narrows down to Option D and Option E since we are looking for something to prove that Universal PS will not be an economic burden

D:
The taxes necessary to fund universal preschool can come from a variety of sources, including property taxes and bond measures.

What if even though the taxes collected will be enough to fund the universal PS but still remain as an economic burden to the state. Doesn't give enough fodder to go against the stem.

E:

Students who attend preschool are less likely to require special education, an expensive public service.

Option states that students attending preschool can avoid an expensive public service. Since the service is expensive and funded by govt. it destroys the conc.


However, I had a query - the option talks about preschool and we are talking about Universal PS. Is it ok to make a general statement?

The link could be as follows:

If Universal preschools do not exist, then there are some who do not attend preschools at all. But when the concept of Universal preschools is implemented, then everyone will attend the preschool (hence the name Universal). This links your query with the question.
User avatar
warriorguy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Last visit: 08 Feb 2023
Posts: 377
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Posts: 377
Kudos: 364
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
warriorguy
Narrows down to Option D and Option E since we are looking for something to prove that Universal PS will not be an economic burden

D:
The taxes necessary to fund universal preschool can come from a variety of sources, including property taxes and bond measures.

What if even though the taxes collected will be enough to fund the universal PS but still remain as an economic burden to the state. Doesn't give enough fodder to go against the stem.

E:

Students who attend preschool are less likely to require special education, an expensive public service.

Option states that students attending preschool can avoid an expensive public service. Since the service is expensive and funded by govt. it destroys the conc.


However, I had a query - the option talks about preschool and we are talking about Universal PS. Is it ok to make a general statement?

The link could be as follows:

If Universal preschools do not exist, then there are some who do not attend preschools at all. But when the concept of Universal preschools is implemented, then everyone will attend the preschool (hence the name Universal). This links your query with the question.


Thanks! Could there be more than one public preschool in that area? If yes, there is a chance that the other preschool's curriculum is not as ambitious as this one and hence not a burden to fund. Also, isn't Universal just a name? like the one where I studied was named Pune Institute - though it was in Mumbai :D
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,572
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
warriorguy
sayantanc2k
warriorguy
Narrows down to Option D and Option E since we are looking for something to prove that Universal PS will not be an economic burden

D:
The taxes necessary to fund universal preschool can come from a variety of sources, including property taxes and bond measures.

What if even though the taxes collected will be enough to fund the universal PS but still remain as an economic burden to the state. Doesn't give enough fodder to go against the stem.

E:

Students who attend preschool are less likely to require special education, an expensive public service.

Option states that students attending preschool can avoid an expensive public service. Since the service is expensive and funded by govt. it destroys the conc.


However, I had a query - the option talks about preschool and we are talking about Universal PS. Is it ok to make a general statement?

The link could be as follows:

If Universal preschools do not exist, then there are some who do not attend preschools at all. But when the concept of Universal preschools is implemented, then everyone will attend the preschool (hence the name Universal). This links your query with the question.


Thanks! Could there be more than one public preschool in that area? If yes, there is a chance that the other preschool's curriculum is not as ambitious as this one and hence not a burden to fund. Also, isn't Universal just a name? like the one where I studied was named Pune Institute - though it was in Mumbai :D

Probably not. The first sentence indicates that it is a concept rather than a particular school.
User avatar
manhasnoname
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Last visit: 03 Feb 2025
Posts: 138
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Products:
Posts: 138
Kudos: 75
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The conclusion that needs to be weakened here is that the idea of universal preschool will be an economic burden on the state

"taxes" are more related than a student requiring a special education. How can one guess that a state is sponsoring special education?

And, let us assume a state is sponsoring special education. Let us also assume it costs for that state $100K a year. How do we know this same amount or less, without causing any economic burden on the state, is sufficient for the universal preschool?

Can someone argue?
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,572
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
manhasnoname
The conclusion that needs to be weakened here is that the idea of universal preschool will be an economic burden on the state

"taxes" are more related than a student requiring a special education. How can one guess that a state is sponsoring special education?

And, let us assume a state is sponsoring special education. Let us also assume it costs for that state $100K a year. How do we know this same amount or less, without causing any economic burden on the state, is sufficient for the universal preschool?

Can someone argue?

The last line states: "special education, an expensive public service". This answers your first question.

As for your second question, it does not matter how much the state spends - this is not an assumption question. A must be true scenario is required only for assumption question. For strengthening and weakening just a could be true scenario would suffice.

Universal pre-school COULD offset the cost of special education: this "could" scenario is enough to weaken.
User avatar
sleepynut
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 905
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
Posts: 162
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi expert,
Have some doubts with the correct option.
Conclusion : Univ preschool is a misguided use of public funds.
Prem1 : undermine some development associated with a carefree childhood
Prem2 : economic burden

Option E give us another piece of information that attending preschool make it less likely for students to require special education.Still,it is an economic burden to establish the univ preschool.Is it safe to assume that the money saved from not having to maintain special education will be used to offset the initial cost of univ preschool?
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
15,572
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,572
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sleepynut
Hi expert,
Have some doubts with the correct option.
Conclusion : Univ preschool is a misguided use of public funds.
Prem1 : undermine some development associated with a carefree childhood
Prem2 : economic burden

Option E give us another piece of information that attending preschool make it less likely for students to require special education.Still,it is an economic burden to establish the univ preschool.Is it safe to assume that the money saved from not having to maintain special education will be used to offset the initial cost of univ preschool?

Yes, it is OK. For strengthening / weakening questions, a "must be true" scenario need not be satisfied - a "could be" scenario is sufficient to qualify an answer as correct. Option E presents a new fact that COULD make the conclusion wrong. Hence it is a valid weakening statement.
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 963
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,561
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 963
Kudos: 1,936
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the question is interesting. Because of "furthermore", the first sentences play no roles in find the answer for the question.

Let's look at the question and the main conclusion, the argument discusses how short-term and long-term benefits from the program will not "offset" the cost -> E is the answer.
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 814
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 814
Kudos: 615
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Imo E
If children are not preschooled then they would have to be in special education which is very expensive , hence E is the answer .
avatar
seves10
Joined: 14 Jul 2017
Last visit: 20 Jul 2017
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello
I will definitely go with first on i.e Students who attend preschool are more likely to complete high school than students who do not attend preschool.
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,481
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,481
Kudos: 5,779
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
seves10
Hello
I will definitely go with first on i.e Students who attend preschool are more likely to complete high school than students who do not attend preschool.

Hello seves10 ,

Welcome to GMATClub :)

I can understand why you are saying so.

You are assuming that if they complete high school, they mat be beneficial to the economy. You are trying to link economy with high school completion.

This is wrong. We should not bring an outside assumptions to strengthen/weaken our point.

What happens if these students leaves the country? Shouldn't it be a loss?

I hope that makes sense. :)
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Jan 2026
Posts: 1,135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
guerrero25
Universal preschool is a misguided use of public funds. This early academic focus will undermine the social, emotional, and mental development associated with a carefree early childhood. Furthermore, the economic burden on the state to fund such an ambitious undertaking will be overwhelming in both the short-term and long-term, since the state has no way to offset the program’s costs.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the idea that universal preschool will be an economic burden on the state?

(A) Students who attend preschool are more likely to complete high school than students who do not attend preschool.

(B) Preschool educated children fare much better in kindergarten than do children without preschool.

(C) Part of the high cost of universal preschool stems from its requirement that preschool teachers must have a bachelor's degree and a teaching credential.

(D) The taxes necessary to fund universal preschool can come from a variety of sources, including property taxes and bond measures.

(E) Students who attend preschool are less likely to require special education, an expensive public service.

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


The argument posits that universal preschool is a poor idea for children and an overwhelming economic burden for the state. In order to weaken the idea that preschool is an economic burden, the answer choice must demonstrate that preschool somehow directly allows the state to save money in another capacity.

(A) This choice demonstrates an academic benefit of preschool, but not an economic benefit.

(B) Similar to answer choice A, this choice strictly refers to an academic benefit of preschool.

(C) This choice provides a partial explanation of why preschool is so expensive, but does not weaken the idea that preschool will be an economic burden on the state.

(D) This choice simply indicates that the funding for preschool can come from a variety of sources, but in no way undermines the economic burden that preschool imposes.

(E) CORRECT. This choice indicates that special education, an expensive public service, will be made less necessary by the introduction of universal preschool. Thus, spending money on preschool now will save money later.
avatar
zanaik89
Joined: 19 Aug 2016
Last visit: 29 Nov 2019
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 30
Posts: 54
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hazelnut
guerrero25
Universal preschool is a misguided use of public funds. This early academic focus will undermine the social, emotional, and mental development associated with a carefree early childhood. Furthermore, the economic burden on the state to fund such an ambitious undertaking will be overwhelming in both the short-term and long-term, since the state has no way to offset the program’s costs.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the idea that universal preschool will be an economic burden on the state?

(A) Students who attend preschool are more likely to complete high school than students who do not attend preschool.

(B) Preschool educated children fare much better in kindergarten than do children without preschool.

(C) Part of the high cost of universal preschool stems from its requirement that preschool teachers must have a bachelor's degree and a teaching credential.

(D) The taxes necessary to fund universal preschool can come from a variety of sources, including property taxes and bond measures.

(E) Students who attend preschool are less likely to require special education, an expensive public service.

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


The argument posits that universal preschool is a poor idea for children and an overwhelming economic burden for the state. In order to weaken the idea that preschool is an economic burden, the answer choice must demonstrate that preschool somehow directly allows the state to save money in another capacity.

(A) This choice demonstrates an academic benefit of preschool, but not an economic benefit.

(B) Similar to answer choice A, this choice strictly refers to an academic benefit of preschool.

(C) This choice provides a partial explanation of why preschool is so expensive, but does not weaken the idea that preschool will be an economic burden on the state.

(D) This choice simply indicates that the funding for preschool can come from a variety of sources, but in no way undermines the economic burden that preschool imposes.

(E) CORRECT. This choice indicates that special education, an expensive public service, will be made less necessary by the introduction of universal preschool. Thus, spending money on preschool now will save money later.

Hi

Im still confused about option D becz it says -"The taxes necessary to fund universal preschool can come from a variety of sources, including property taxes and bond measures."

In this case if more taxes are collected won't the taxes be enough to reduce the economic burden of the state?

Please help

Thanks !
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts