Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 11:23 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 11:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
45,029
 [13]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,029
 [13]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Senthil7
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Last visit: 05 Mar 2017
Posts: 322
Own Kudos:
219
 [1]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.8
WE:Operations (Commercial Banking)
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
Posts: 322
Kudos: 219
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CounterSniper
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Last visit: 14 Apr 2023
Posts: 611
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Posts: 611
Kudos: 859
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sagarnamo1
Joined: 09 Dec 2014
Last visit: 28 Dec 2025
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 325
Posts: 133
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
this argument demonstrates causal relationship.
to weaken causal relationship we can use two methods.
1.alternate cause
2.reverse relationship.
these two things can go long way if u want to ace cr.as soon as you see causal relationship you should be salivating for the answer choice that demonstrates theses relationship.
having said all that ,you can clearly see answer d executing the first method.although i must agree that it is not explicitly mentioned but see what if out of three beaches that choosen for tourist attractions , the juhu beach is one of them ,so that completely dislodges the conclusion .remember gmat will not give u alternate cause on platter ,you have to infer it in most of the cases.
User avatar
ynk
Joined: 18 Aug 2013
Last visit: 02 Nov 2017
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 127
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
GPA: 3.92
WE:Operations (Transportation)
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
Posts: 106
Kudos: 131
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 for D.

Tourist attractions opened in last three months can be the plausible reason for increase in the No. of tourists visiting the juhu beach.

To weaken the Argument we should try to get any other cause for the same effect and D does exactly the same.
User avatar
goforgmat
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Last visit: 02 Nov 2019
Posts: 235
Own Kudos:
108
 [1]
Given Kudos: 232
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 235
Kudos: 108
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 D for as well.
In order to weaken we are seeking an alternative cause in this case.
Hence D.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: increase in tourists in Juhu beach is directly related to epidemic.
To weaken it we need to attack the cause of the conclusion.
Pre thinking: 1) some event which attracted a big crowd was organised this year in August at Juhu beach.
2) There was no effect of the epidemic at Juhu beach
3) government reduced the entry fee for Juhu beach or any other reason which make our belief stronger that epidemic is not the cause here.

Option D matches with our pre thinking 1. You can eliminate rest of the option easily.

Cheers!!
RT
User avatar
SafSin28
Joined: 16 Aug 2022
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 84
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
FEW or A FEW? If it said "A few of the much awaited tourist attractions have been opened in last three months in the three top beaches of country X", it could be correct. But since "Few" means "Nearly not" this choice is irrelevant
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,928
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,914
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,928
Kudos: 811,593
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Solution:


Marine and Juhu Beach, located 5 miles apart, are the top two beaches in Country X. After an epidemic at Marine Beach in August, the number of tourists at Juhu Beach has since increased compared to the same period in previous years. It is therefore concluded that the increase in tourists at Juhu Beach is directly related to the epidemic at Marine Beach.

Which of the following, if true, would weaken this argument?


A. In spite of epidemic at Marine beach, there was little effect on tourists who visited country X.
B. The influx of tourists is normally higher in the months following August compared to the rest of the year.
C. There were several cases of drowning at Juhu Beach in the month of August this year.
D. Several highly anticipated tourist attractions have opened in the past three months at the top three beaches of Country X.
E. Although the two beaches are only 5 miles apart, there have been no reported cases of the infection in the area around Juhu Beach.


A. The argument is about the visitors in Juhu beach, not about total visitors in country X.

B. The passage states that the visitors to Juhu beach this year is higher than that last year (during the same time). That in general the no. of visitors in August is high does not explain or refute the difference between the numbers in two years.

C. The conclusion of the passage is that the increase in number of visitors is the effect of epidemic in marine beach. Number of drownings in Juhu beach does not affect this causal relation.

D. Correct. If the conclusion is that X causes Z, then weakening statement would be something else Y causes Z, since this statement gives reason to doubt the conclusion: Y, not X causes Z. Here X = Epidemic in Marine beach, Z = increase in visitors in Juhu beach, and Y = opening of other tourist attractions.

E. The reasoning is same as that in option C: this statement does not oppose the causal relation.


Answer: D
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
507 posts
363 posts