Thanks
IanStewart and
Bunuel for your kind feedback.
I've still query on this topic.
IanStewart
But you could never see a question like this:
Is x > 0?
1. 20 < x < 30
2. 40 < x < 50
because there are no values of x that work for both statements; they are not logically consistent.
Why we are so serious to find the
overlapping value from both statements? This one is not the
value question; this is the
yes/no question. So, should not we be stick with answering the question of
value question by just either yes or no?
Suppose, there is a question like:
Is Washington DC the capital of United States?
1) yes
2) yes
Isn't this answer (yes) enough to answer this question? Why do we need an overlapping figure to answer this question, at least here?
Again,
Is x > 0?
1) sometimes
yes and sometimes
NO (e.g, x=100, x=500, and x=-100)
2) sometimes
yes and sometimes
NO (e.g, x=100, and x=-50)
Now, if we combine
(which directly indicates choice C) both statements, then we get
definite YES with one overlapping value.^^ in this question we're going to establish
choice C from the
color partQuote:
If x is an integer, Is x > 0?
1. 20 < x < 30
2. 20 < x < 22
^^ in this question, we're going to find a
definite YES with one overlapping value., too
^^ in this question we're going to establish
choice D from the
color partWith
a definite YES with one overlapping value==> Sometimes this bold part indicates choice C and sometimes this bold part indicates choice D.
But why?
Edited: the part that you did not understand
IanStewart. Could you explain a bit now. Thanks__