Just something I'd mention:
Without a good promotion or title change, your chances may actually be worse next year than they were this year. I know you mentioned you took on some new responsibilities this year, which is good to mention. However, if you're making the same salary (roughly) and have the same title that you did last year, it may not be enough.
What I mean is, if you had 2 promotions in 2 years, that is pretty impressive. You apply to schools, dont get in, decide to re-apply. Now you've had 2 promotions in 3 years, which is less impressive. That's just something to consider, maybe it doesn't apply to your case if the changes you've made at work are substantial.
You should also consider how friendly each program is to re-applicants. Stanford indicates 'reapplicants are at no disadvantage for having applied and been rejected' which I would tend to interpret as 'certainly no advantage, and possibly a slight disadvantage despite what we just said'. I think HBS may be more favorable towards re-applicants, but don't quote me on that.
For next year, you should decide whether it's "HBS or bust" or HBS or Stanford or bust", because you mention that you feel HBS rep is 10x that or Stanford/Penn, and that Stanford's curriculum is in line with your interests. But which one is more important to you? If next year you get denied at HBS but admitted at Stanford (or vice versa), are you going to be happy at Stanford? Or are you going to be in the same position again.