Mar 23 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Christina scored 760 by having clear (ability) milestones and a trackable plan to achieve the same. Attend this webinar to learn how to build trackable milestones that leverage your strengths to help you get to your target GMAT score. Mar 27 03:00 PM PDT  04:00 PM PDT Join a free live webinar and learn the winning strategy for a 700+ score on GMAT & the perfect application. Save your spot today! Wednesday, March 27th at 3 pm PST Mar 29 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Right now, their GMAT prep, GRE prep, and MBA admissions consulting services are up to $1,100 off. GMAT (Save up to $261): SPRINGEXTRAGMAT GRE Prep (Save up to $149): SPRINGEXTRAGRE MBA (Save up to $1,240): SPRINGEXTRAMBA
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 555
Location: France
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)

What is the smallest possible common multiple of three distinct
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 29 Sep 2018, 23:51
Question Stats:
29% (01:39) correct 71% (01:52) wrong based on 49 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
What is the smallest possible common multiple of three distinct integers, all larger than 26? A) 1512 B) 729 C) 84 D) 2268 E) 108
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Everything will fall into place…
There is perfect timing for everything and everyone. Never doubt, But Work on improving yourself, Keep the faith and Stay ready. When it’s finally your turn, It will all make sense.
Originally posted by Helium on 29 Sep 2018, 04:03.
Last edited by Helium on 29 Sep 2018, 23:51, edited 1 time in total.



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 2719

Re: What is the smallest possible common multiple of three distinct
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2018, 04:25
Solution To find:• The smallest possible common multiple of three distinct integers, all larger than 26 Approach and Working:The least number larger that 26 is 27. To minimize the value of the common multiple, we should take other numbers also multiple of 27. • If we take 27, 54, and 81, their LCM is 162. • However, if we take 27, 54, and 108, their LCM is 108 only. Hence, the correct answer is option C. Answer: C
_________________
Register for free sessions Number Properties: Get 5 free video lessons, 50 practice questions  Algebra:Get 4 free video lessons, 40 practice questions Quant Workshop: Get 100 practice questions  Free Strategy Session: Key strategy to score 760
Success Stories Q38 to Q50 Interview call form Wharton  Q35 to Q50  More Success Stories
Ace GMAT Articles and Questions to reach Q51  Question of the week  Tips From V40+ Scorers  V27 to V42: GMAT 770  Guide to Get into ISBMBA
Must Read Articles Number Properties – Even Odd  LCM GCD  Statistics1  Statistics2  Remainders1  Remainders2 Word Problems – Percentage 1  Percentage 2  Time and Work 1  Time and Work 2  Time, Speed and Distance 1  Time, Speed and Distance 2 Advanced Topics Permutation and Combination 1  Permutation and Combination 2  Permutation and Combination 3  Probability Geometry Triangles 1  Triangles 2  Triangles 3  Common Mistakes in Geometry Algebra Wavy line  Inequalities Practice Questions Number Properties 1  Number Properties 2  Algebra 1  Geometry  Prime Numbers  Absolute value equations  Sets
 '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub  70 point improvement guarantee  www.egmat.com



Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2017
Posts: 59
Location: India

Re: What is the smallest possible common multiple of three distinct
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2018, 05:53
The smallest integer greater than 26 is 27. The temptation is to go for LCM (26, 27, 28). On second thoughts, there are other better options. If we can find 3 numbers such that they are 27a, 27b, 27c, the LCM will be 27 * LCM(a, b, c), where a, b, and c are distinct positive integers. The lower the value of LCM(a, b, c), lower will be the value of the LCM of 27a, 27b, and 27c Again the temptation is to take a, b, and c as 1, 2, and 3. The LCM of these 3 numbers is 6. What if the 3 numbers are 1, 2, and 4. The LCM of these 3 numbers is 4. We can infer that the least LCM possible for 3 distinct positive integers is 4. If one can remember this result, we can use it for posterity as well. Therefore, the required LCM will be 27 * LCM(1, 2, 4) = 27 * 4 = 108
_________________
An IIM C Alumnus  Class of '94 GMAT Tutor at Wizako GMAT Classes & Online Courses



Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2017
Posts: 59
Location: India

Re: What is the smallest possible common multiple of three distinct
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2018, 23:20
A rejoinder to my earlier discussion For the given 5 choices, 108 is the least number. However, the smallest possible common multiple of 3 distinct integers greater than 26 is 84 and NOT 108.Reason We started with 27 as the smallest integer greater than 26. Therefore, we went with 27a, 27b, and 27c being 27, 27*2 and 27*4. a, b, and c had to be integers. Else, 27, 27a, and 27b will not be integers. What if we started with 28. Because 28 is an even number, our a, b, and c need not be integers. We could opt for a = 1, b = 1.5 and c = 3. The LCM of 1, 1.5 and 3 is 3, which is lesser than the LCM of 1, 2, and 4 And because, 28 is even 28 * 1.5 will be an integer. i.e., the 3 numbers could be 28, 42 and 84. The LCM will be 84. If you are not convinced about a, b, and c being 1, 1.5 and 3, instead of considering it as 28a, 28b, 28c, think of the numbers as 14x, 14y, 14z where x, y, and z are 2, 3 and 6. 14*2 = 28, 14*3 = 42 and 14*6 = 84, all of which are greater than 26. 84 is the smallest possible common multiple of 3 distinct numbers greater than 26.
_________________
An IIM C Alumnus  Class of '94 GMAT Tutor at Wizako GMAT Classes & Online Courses



Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 555
Location: France
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)

Re: What is the smallest possible common multiple of three distinct
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2018, 23:50
WizakoBaskar wrote: A rejoinder to my earlier discussion
For the given 5 choices, 108 is the least number.
However, the smallest possible common multiple of 3 distinct integers greater than 26 is 84 and NOT 108.
Reason We started with 27 as the smallest integer greater than 26. Therefore, we went with 27a, 27b, and 27c being 27, 27*2 and 27*4. a, b, and c had to be integers. Else, 27, 27a, and 27b will not be integers.
What if we started with 28. Because 28 is an even number, our a, b, and c need not be integers. We could opt for a = 1, b = 1.5 and c = 3. The LCM of 1, 1.5 and 3 is 3, which is lesser than the LCM of 1, 2, and 4 And because, 28 is even 28 * 1.5 will be an integer. i.e., the 3 numbers could be 28, 42 and 84. The LCM will be 84.
If you are not convinced about a, b, and c being 1, 1.5 and 3, instead of considering it as 28a, 28b, 28c, think of the numbers as 14x, 14y, 14z where x, y, and z are 2, 3 and 6. 14*2 = 28, 14*3 = 42 and 14*6 = 84, all of which are greater than 26.
84 is the smallest possible common multiple of 3 distinct numbers greater than 26. Very insightful ... Updated the options accordingly.
_________________
Everything will fall into place…
There is perfect timing for everything and everyone. Never doubt, But Work on improving yourself, Keep the faith and Stay ready. When it’s finally your turn, It will all make sense.



Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2018
Posts: 52

Re: What is the smallest possible common multiple of three distinct
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Oct 2018, 06:52
WizakoBaskar wrote: A rejoinder to my earlier discussion
For the given 5 choices, 108 is the least number.
However, the smallest possible common multiple of 3 distinct integers greater than 26 is 84 and NOT 108.
Reason We started with 27 as the smallest integer greater than 26. Therefore, we went with 27a, 27b, and 27c being 27, 27*2 and 27*4. a, b, and c had to be integers. Else, 27, 27a, and 27b will not be integers.
What if we started with 28. Because 28 is an even number, our a, b, and c need not be integers. We could opt for a = 1, b = 1.5 and c = 3. The LCM of 1, 1.5 and 3 is 3, which is lesser than the LCM of 1, 2, and 4 And because, 28 is even 28 * 1.5 will be an integer. i.e., the 3 numbers could be 28, 42 and 84. The LCM will be 84.
If you are not convinced about a, b, and c being 1, 1.5 and 3, instead of considering it as 28a, 28b, 28c, think of the numbers as 14x, 14y, 14z where x, y, and z are 2, 3 and 6. 14*2 = 28, 14*3 = 42 and 14*6 = 84, all of which are greater than 26.
84 is the smallest possible common multiple of 3 distinct numbers greater than 26. What if we consider least three integer after 26, i.e. 27,28 and 29, and break it down to its prime factors. We will find that the common multiple must have 2,3 and 7 among its multiples. Which renders option B and E useless. Now between remaining options we can select the smallest but it still doesn't answer about 29, which is a prime number. Could you please elaborate if my reasoning is correct ?



Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 555
Location: France
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)

Re: What is the smallest possible common multiple of three distinct
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Oct 2018, 09:14
suelahmed wrote: WizakoBaskar wrote: A rejoinder to my earlier discussion
For the given 5 choices, 108 is the least number.
However, the smallest possible common multiple of 3 distinct integers greater than 26 is 84 and NOT 108.
Reason We started with 27 as the smallest integer greater than 26. Therefore, we went with 27a, 27b, and 27c being 27, 27*2 and 27*4. a, b, and c had to be integers. Else, 27, 27a, and 27b will not be integers.
What if we started with 28. Because 28 is an even number, our a, b, and c need not be integers. We could opt for a = 1, b = 1.5 and c = 3. The LCM of 1, 1.5 and 3 is 3, which is lesser than the LCM of 1, 2, and 4 And because, 28 is even 28 * 1.5 will be an integer. i.e., the 3 numbers could be 28, 42 and 84. The LCM will be 84.
If you are not convinced about a, b, and c being 1, 1.5 and 3, instead of considering it as 28a, 28b, 28c, think of the numbers as 14x, 14y, 14z where x, y, and z are 2, 3 and 6. 14*2 = 28, 14*3 = 42 and 14*6 = 84, all of which are greater than 26.
84 is the smallest possible common multiple of 3 distinct numbers greater than 26. What if we consider least three integer after 26, i.e. 27,28 and 29, and break it down to its prime factors. We will find that the common multiple must have 2,3 and 7 among its multiples. Which renders option B and E useless. Now between remaining options we can select the smallest but it still doesn't answer about 29, which is a prime number. Could you please elaborate if my reasoning is correct ? Mate please go thorough the discussion above..it already has answer for your query... Reread the question prompt  i.e. smallest possible common multiple of three distinct integers, all larger than 26. So we are looking for smallest LCM possible with 3 distinct numbers greater than 26. Numbers need not be 27, 28 and 29. As discussed in this thread above.. Numbers we are looking for are 28, 42 and 84. ( These are 3 distinct numbers and also 84 is smallest possible common multiple.) Does this help?
_________________
Everything will fall into place…
There is perfect timing for everything and everyone. Never doubt, But Work on improving yourself, Keep the faith and Stay ready. When it’s finally your turn, It will all make sense.



Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2018
Posts: 52

Re: What is the smallest possible common multiple of three distinct
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Oct 2018, 09:50
Harshgmat wrote: suelahmed wrote: WizakoBaskar wrote: A rejoinder to my earlier discussion
For the given 5 choices, 108 is the least number.
However, the smallest possible common multiple of 3 distinct integers greater than 26 is 84 and NOT 108.
Reason We started with 27 as the smallest integer greater than 26. Therefore, we went with 27a, 27b, and 27c being 27, 27*2 and 27*4. a, b, and c had to be integers. Else, 27, 27a, and 27b will not be integers.
What if we started with 28. Because 28 is an even number, our a, b, and c need not be integers. We could opt for a = 1, b = 1.5 and c = 3. The LCM of 1, 1.5 and 3 is 3, which is lesser than the LCM of 1, 2, and 4 And because, 28 is even 28 * 1.5 will be an integer. i.e., the 3 numbers could be 28, 42 and 84. The LCM will be 84.
If you are not convinced about a, b, and c being 1, 1.5 and 3, instead of considering it as 28a, 28b, 28c, think of the numbers as 14x, 14y, 14z where x, y, and z are 2, 3 and 6. 14*2 = 28, 14*3 = 42 and 14*6 = 84, all of which are greater than 26.
84 is the smallest possible common multiple of 3 distinct numbers greater than 26. What if we consider least three integer after 26, i.e. 27,28 and 29, and break it down to its prime factors. We will find that the common multiple must have 2,3 and 7 among its multiples. Which renders option B and E useless. Now between remaining options we can select the smallest but it still doesn't answer about 29, which is a prime number. Could you please elaborate if my reasoning is correct ? Mate please go thorough the discussion above..it already has answer for your query... Reread the question prompt  i.e. smallest possible common multiple of three distinct integers, all larger than 26. So we are looking for smallest LCM possible with 3 distinct numbers greater than 26. Numbers need not be 27, 28 and 29. As discussed in this thread above.. Numbers we are looking for are 28, 42 and 84. ( These are 3 distinct numbers and also 84 is smallest possible common multiple.) Does this help? ok... thanks for xplaination..




Re: What is the smallest possible common multiple of three distinct
[#permalink]
03 Oct 2018, 09:50






