AdityaHongunti
GMATNinja for the primary purpose : i thot the passage is examining the scope or extent of relevance of the explanation for the adherance of firms !
You're right that the passage is primarily concerned with why and how firms adhere. But
adhere to what? To their
strategic plans.OK, so now we have a complete statement of what the author wants us to consider. But all we've done is identify the topic of the passage. In order to understand the
purpose of this passage and eliminate answer choices, let's...
Quote:
the i1st para gives us an explanation , the second para qualifies and further explains the scope and where actually it is useful .
so isnt the author evaluating the explanation?
...ah, you're way ahead of me

But as with the statement of purpose, this breakdown of the paragraphs is a bit incomplete. An explanation of what? The scope of what? Where what is useful? This is a tough, wordy passage with a giant second paragraph, so if we're going to tackle this, then let's get more precise.
- In P1 the author sets up the question: Why do firms adhere to or deviate from their strategic plans?
- Then the author identifies one potential reason that firms adhere to strategic plans (decision-sharing).
- In P2 the author suggests that strategic mission is another input that could influence whether firms adhere to strategic plans.
- Then the author explains two types of strategic missions (harvest and build) and describes how each type of mission relates to each type of decision-making (decision-sharing or individual leadership).
By the end of the passage, the author has presented four different factors and discussed how they all might interact to determine whether a firm adheres to its strategic plan. (E) is the best answer choice available because it reflects this precisely.
Quote:
why is choice C wrong? is it because of the last term "strategic mission"?
Quote:
(C) evaluate the utility of top management decision-sharing as a method of implementing the strategic mission of a business
(C), on the other hand, is very narrow. The purpose of the passage was not solely to evaluate the utility of a single factor. So once we see "evaluate the utility of top management decision-sharing" we can already be skeptical about this one.
That said, you're right to question the use of "strategic mission."
Adherence to a strategic plan is not at all the same as
strategic mission. The former (adherence to strategic plan) is the outcome that this author is interested in explaining. The former (strategic mission) is an input, which can influence the outcome -- depending on what kind of mission the company pursues (harvest, build, or something in between).
I hope this helps!