My recent GMAT attempt was on Jan 6, 2026. I scored 100 percentile in Quant, with V82 and DI 78. This was my second GMAT (Focus Edition) attempt. In my previous attempts (10th gen GMAT), I had never scored a 100 percentile in Quant.

This time, my prep time was 10 focused days. Since I had already completed the eGMAT course earlier, my goal was to fix my strategy and improve my approach to tackling questions, rather than relearning concepts.

Because I planned to take the GMAT within 10 days, I prioritised Quant and RC in Verbal (my weaker areas). I did not focus much on DI.

Quant

eGMAT’s Scholaranium was really helpful. Though the quiz questions are on the higher difficulty side, IMO it prepared me well for the actual exam day.

A few things worth noting about the Scholaranium platform:

1. It helped me identify my weak topics clearly
2. It improved my time management by showing detailed time statistics
3. The mixed tests (Cementing and Test Readiness) are very helpful in preparing for the overall section

Verbal

Thanks to Rashmi Vaidya (my GMAT mentor), I was able to improve my RC sub-section performance from the mid-50s to 90.

The same Scholaranium advantages apply here, but personally, what made the real difference was Rashmi’s guidance:

1. I started approaching RCs in a much more systematic way. I refined my process from over-focusing on details to understanding the purpose of each paragraph and how it connects to the overall passage
2. With the Neuron platform (Official Question Bank), I was able to apply these concepts on challenging RC topics. This practice on Neuron really stabilized my RC approach
3. Since CR was a strong area for me, I didn’t practice it much. But hindsight, this turned out to be a mistake. I made a few silly errors. Evidence: with just 5 mistakes in Verbal, I scored 82, which felt a bit harsh. Nonetheless, Rashmi and I were able to identify that these were likely careless mistakes

The real strength of eGMAT lies in its platform: Scholaranium and Neuron (Official Question Bank).

I will definitely try another attempt, this time fully leveraging both the platform and Rashmi’s guidance.

I would recommend eGMAT to anyone looking to improve their GMAT score.

Read More

Strengths:

Personal Mentorship, Strategic Guidance, Course Content, User Interface & Features

Would make the product better:

Quality of Some Questions

The personal mentorship that e-GMAT has to offer is absolutely amazing. I was enrolled on the LMP (Last Mile Push) Program under Abha Mohan, who guided me through each and every step of achieving my dream score. The questions can at times feel too hard, but they prepare you for 705-805 level questions more than any other test prep company in the market.

I enrolled after having given one attempt & studied with some other test prep company.

I got a test prep subscription in December 2024 and eventually ended up giving the exam in July 2025, scoring a 645. While the score is not bad by any means, coming from an overrepresented demographic & having a conventional profile, I knew I would have to bump this up by at least another 20-30 points.

I came across a lot of success interviews from e-GMAT on YouTube, and I realised that even though my concepts getting to a 645 with almost 6-7 months of good prep were not bad, I needed strategic guidance to be able to progress further. I took a month-long break from the GMAT and got right back on the horse. On day 1, I got the subscription with e-GMAT and joined a random session they happened to be having that day. I explained my whole situation there, and was recommended for the LMP Program, which was specifically designed for people who were just looking for that last push. Abha Mohan guided me through all the steps I needed to take, both in the short term and long term, to achieve my target score.

Since I had already done a decent amount of prep, I did not need to review each & every course file again; it was just about strategic practice wherever I felt I was weak. However, the process turned out to be longer than I thought. After starting again in July, I ended up giving the test on the 2nd of January, 2026, and got a 715.

While at times, doing the sectionals and the scholararium quizzes on e-GMAT felt excessively challenging, they got me in the habit of doing 705-805 level questions correctly. I would really recommend anyone using e-GMAT to make full use of the scholararium & the sectionals, without judging yourself for the score, since they are really good practice for people looking to achieve 95+ percentile scores.

Seeing the score pop up on the screen was a feeling that made the effort feel worth it. Thanks, Abha & e-GMAT!

Read More

My GMAT journey started with a disappointing 575 on my first attempt, scoring Q80 and V79. Despite being comfortable with English from daily work use, I completely lacked any structured approach to the exam. I would read CR passages and jump straight to answer choices, hoping something would feel right. I'd speed through RC passages only to waste time rereading sections. For Quant, I practiced questions randomly without ever understanding why I was getting them wrong. After that humbling wake-up call, I researched prep options extensively and chose e-GMAT because of their methodology-focused approach. The emphasis on building fundamental skills rather than just drilling endless practice questions convinced me this was genuinely different from other prep materials I had tried previously.
The transformation in my verbal score from V79 to V86 came directly from e-GMAT's structured course design. The CR module introduced me to breaking every argument into premises and conclusions - something that seems basic now but was the missing foundation for everything else I was attempting. Pre-thinking became a natural habit through their deliberate practice approach. For RC, their slow reading methodology and emphasis on identifying author opinion and transition words completely eliminated my constant rereading problem. In Quant, where I improved from Q80 to Q85 despite never being naturally strong at math, Scholaranium's topic-wise cementing quizzes exposed exactly where I was struggling. The Skill Data analytics revealed specific weak areas within broad categories, and NEURON let me drill those precise question types repeatedly until they became genuinely familiar and automatic.
The platform features tied everything together into a complete preparation system that truly worked. Sectional mocks built my timing confidence before I attempted full-length tests, teaching me exactly where I should be at the 25-minute and 35-minute marks. The Sigma-X mocks revealed my biggest enemy - dwelling on questions - and the comprehensive error log helped me identify patterns I simply couldn't see on my own. The detailed analytics across accuracy, speed, and question type gave me honest truth about my preparedness that gut feeling never could provide. On test day, I walked in knowing I had systematically addressed every single weakness. My final score of V86, Q85, DI73 represents not just simple point improvements but a complete transformation in how I approach problems under pressure. I would very strongly recommend e-GMAT to anyone who wants real methodology over memorization and genuine deep understanding over quick tricks.

Read More

Strengths:

1. Last mile push 1-1 mentorship program
2. Neuron portal that has access to all official GMAT questions
3. Scholaranium has thousands of practice quizzes and so many sectional mocks.
4. Sigmax mocks that have the standard of the official GMAT exam standards.
5. 24/7 expert support to address any queries/doubts within a span of a few hours.
6. Wide range of difficulty and topics covered in all sections

Would make the product better:

I don't think there are any improvements needed on the e-GMAT platform

Rashmi Vaidya is my mentor in the last-mile push mentorship program on the e-GMAT platform; she guided me for the last 6 months. She is very supportive and encouraged me to get a good GMAT score. She always believed in me, even in times when I could not see hope (when I reached learning plateaus in the preparation stage). Overall, I owe a lot to my mentor and e-GMAT. Only with their help, I improved from a 615-ish score to a 665 official score
Thanks to the whole team for supporting me throughout. You are the best GMAT preparation platform. This is not a paid review, by the way.
Definitely would recommend it to all the students.
Do try it out, guys!!!!

Read More

I recently completed the e-GMAT Club Course for my GMAT prep, and it was a game-changer. The structured approach helped me go from feeling overwhelmed to feeling in control of my prep. Concepts—especially in CR—were broken down so clearly that even my weak areas started to feel manageable.

The personalized quizzes and error-tracking tools made it easy to target specific gaps. Instead of blindly practicing, I focused only on what mattered, which saved time and boosted accuracy.

What really set this course apart was the mentor and community support. Whether it was guidance on strategy or feedback on questions I got wrong, I never felt stuck for long. A big shout out to my egmat mentor Abha Mohan. She has been really supportive in my GMAT journey and has always mentored like a true coach!

I ended up making to ISB's flagship PGP for co'27, thanks to egmat for their structured GMAT prep!

Read More

Before e-GMAT, I was stuck in a frustrating cycle. Despite a strong quantitative background from engineering and entrance exams, I could not break past Q88 on the GMAT. I kept approaching it like other math-heavy tests, focusing on speed and formula recall. After researching preparation options, I chose e-GMAT because of their structured module approach and the analytics capabilities I had read about. The decision transformed my preparation entirely.
The course content fundamentally shifted how I approached GMAT Quant. The e-GMAT modules taught me that GMAT tests problem-solving ability, not calculation skills. Their concept files covered familiar topics but introduced more efficient solving methods I had never considered. The PACE engine helped me identify exactly which sub-topics needed work through diagnostic quizzes. Cementing quizzes then solidified my understanding before moving to timed practice. I learned to aim for 60-70% accuracy during cementing because those missed questions revealed critical gaps. Through Scholaranium, I practiced extensively with questions that matched actual GMAT difficulty and style. The pre-thinking methodology for Critical Reasoning and the structured RC approach complemented my Quant preparation, with verbal skills surprisingly improving my word problem translation ability.
The Scholaranium analytics became my secret weapon for reaching Q90. After each practice session, I could see detailed accuracy and timing breakdowns by topic and sub-topic. This data broke my biases, revealing that topics I felt confident about actually showed poor performance while feared topics were strengths once practiced properly. The error log feature was invaluable. I tracked every mistake with its error type, and in the final days before my exam, I stopped doing new questions and just reviewed this log. When similar patterns appeared on test day, my awareness kicked in automatically. The sectional mocks prepared me for actual test timing and helped me develop my 30-second rule for question assessment. After 3-4 months of disciplined preparation following the e-GMAT structure, I achieved Q90 and a 655 overall. For anyone with decent fundamentals who needs that final push to elite scores, e-GMAT provides everything required. The platform is completely self-sufficient, no external help needed. Just follow the structure with discipline and trust the process.

Read More

Strengths:

The verbal section is particularly effective because it provides a clear, step-by-step framework for approaching each question. This structured method reduces reliance on guesswork and helps students make well-reasoned choices.

695: V82, Q90, DI81) with e-GMAT
When I started my GMAT preparation, my quant concepts were solid but careless errors kept dragging my scores down. Verbal was worse – I was solving CR questions by randomly evaluating answer choices without any structured approach. I needed a course focused on process and strategy, not just content. After researching options, e-GMAT stood out for three reasons: their pre-thinking methodology for verbal that promised to eliminate guesswork, their Scholaranium analytics platform that could pinpoint exactly where I was losing points, and their structured progression from cementing quizzes to sectional mocks to full-length Sigma-X tests. The promise of data-driven weakness identification rather than generic practice convinced me to switch. I wanted a platform that would diagnose my specific problems and fix them systematically.
The e-GMAT features delivered transformative results. The Scholaranium cementing quizzes isolated probability and circular arrangements as my weak areas – something I never would have identified on my own. The error log became indispensable; weekly reviews prevented me from repeating mistakes, and my advanced topics accuracy jumped from 60% to 95%. For verbal, the pre-thinking methodology revolutionized my CR approach. Instead of scanning answer choices hoping something would click, I learned to identify conclusions first and anticipate answers before looking at options. The NEURON platform provided official-style question practice that built real exam confidence. For DI, the visualization approach taught me to combine verbal comprehension with quantitative analysis – exactly what the section demands.
What sets e-GMAT apart is how the platform features work together. The sectional mocks let me build stamina progressively before attempting full-length Sigma-X mocks, which perfectly replicated actual exam pressure. The analytics dashboard showed precisely where I was bleeding points – not vague topic areas, but specific question types and error patterns. The cementing-to-mocks progression prevented the overwhelming jump that derails many test-takers. On test day, I scored 695 (V82, Q90, DI81) on my first attempt – Q90 representing the 100th percentile. The platform is completely self-sufficient. I wholeheartedly recommend e-GMAT to anyone serious about maximizing their GMAT score.

Read More

Strengths:

The PACE Engine was a game-changer from day one. Instead of wasting time on concepts I already knew, PACE identified my strengths and weaknesses upfront, saving me nearly 20-30% of preparation time. This meant I could focus entirely on my actual gaps rather than reviewing familiar material. The course structure is brilliantly designed – each module builds progressively from foundational concepts to application files to cementing quizzes. What impressed me most was how comprehensive the Quant modules are, covering everything from basic algebra to advanced topics like permutation, combination, and probability with crystal-clear explanations. The video content is engaging and thorough, and the practice questions after each module reinforce understanding before moving forward. For someone returning to structured math after two decades, this systematic, building-block approach was exactly what I needed to rebuild my foundation.

Would make the product better:

The Scholaranium cementing quizzes are where e-GMAT truly shines. The progression from medium to hard difficulty mirrors the actual GMAT experience – these quizzes don't just test you, they show you exactly where your gaps are. My hard accuracy improved from 60% to 87% through this rigorous approach. The pre-thinking methodology taught in the CR module transformed how I approach verbal questions – learning to anticipate answers before viewing options reduced my time per question significantly and improved accuracy dramatically. The RC module's focus on noting only alignment and direction instead of lengthy notes helped me complete 4-question passages in under 8 minutes consistently. The DI course deserves special mention – while other platforms treat Data Insights as an afterthought, e-GMAT provides dedicated strategies for each TPA variant, data sufficiency type, and graphical interpretation question.

The error log feature became my constant companion throughout preparation – it revealed patterns in my mistakes I couldn't see myself, particularly my tendency to spend excessive time on difficult questions. The sectional mocks build stamina progressively, while the Sigma-X full-length mocks replicate actual test conditions with remarkable accuracy. What I appreciated most was how completely self-sufficient the platform is – following the structured progression delivers results without needing any external guidance or additional resources. The NEURON practice with official questions ensured I was always working with realistic difficulty levels that matched the actual exam. After three attempts using multiple prep resources, e-GMAT was the only platform that successfully addressed my fundamental gaps. Final score: 715 (V85, Q90, DI81) with a perfect Q90 representing 100 percentile. I wholeheartedly recommend e-GMAT to anyone serious about achieving GMAT success.

Read More

Strengths:

As an engineer preparing for the GMAT, verbal was my biggest obstacle. My initial attempts yielded a disappointing V79, and every question felt like an isolated battle with no consistent approach. I was scrambling through random GMAT Club questions and free resources, treating each problem as its own puzzle without any mental models or frameworks to guide me. The chaos in my head was overwhelming, and I felt stuck. After realizing I had hit a plateau with self-study, I researched structured preparation options and decided to invest in e-GMAT. What convinced me was their reputation for building strong fundamentals rather than just throwing practice questions at students hoping something sticks.

Would make the product better:

The transformation began immediately with the Master Comprehension course, which taught me to slow down and process content as complete units rather than skimming hastily for keywords. This mindset shift extended well beyond GMAT preparation into my daily reading habits. The e-GMAT Critical Reasoning modules then introduced me to pre-thinking, which became my biggest unlock. Instead of jumping to answer choices and getting confused by overlapping options, I learned to anticipate what correct answers should look like before seeing them. My CR accuracy improved dramatically from that single change. For Reading Comprehension, the course taught me summary mapping, where I create quick mental notes for each paragraph. My timing dropped from 5-6 minutes for the first question to just 4 minutes, with subsequent questions taking under a minute. The PACE methodology helped me identify exactly where conclusions and premises diverged, clearing up persistent confusion between similar answer choices.

The Scholaranium cementing quizzes were absolute game-changers for retention. Taking them immediately after course material locked in concepts that would otherwise fade within days. The structured progression from concept videos to cementing quizzes to sectional mocks built genuine skill development, not just question exposure. Practicing at higher difficulty early gave me confidence that translated directly to calmer test-day performance. The analytics dashboard helped me identify weak areas with surgical precision, and the error log became my constant companion for tracking recurring mistakes and patterns. On test day, I scored 675 (V86, Q85, DI80), transforming my verbal from V79 to V86. For anyone struggling with verbal fundamentals, especially engineers like myself, I wholeheartedly recommend e-GMAT. The course structure is comprehensive enough that following it systematically delivers results without any external help needed. My only regret is not discovering and starting with e-GMAT sooner.

Read More

Strengths:

The biggest strength of this eGmat course is its extremely structured and in-depth approach. Every topic is covered in great detail and explained comprehensively, which helps build strong fundamentals rather than just focusing on shortcuts. The learning flow is very effective—starting with concept learning, followed by cementing quizzes, sectional tests, and finally full-length mock tests—ensuring steady progress and confidence building.

Another major strength is the high quality of practice questions and tests, which closely resemble actual GMAT-level questions and prepare you well for the exam. Additionally, the course provides exceptional mentorship. The mentors are highly responsive, consistently supportive, and continuously guide and push you forward, which makes a huge difference in staying motivated and on track throughout the preparation journey.

Would make the product better:

None

This e-GMAT course played a crucial role in helping me achieve a 675 score, and I would highly recommend it to anyone aiming for a strong performance on the exam. One of the biggest highlights of the program is how in-depth and comprehensive it is. Every topic is covered in extreme detail, ensuring that you truly understand the concepts rather than just memorising formulas or shortcuts.

The course is also very well structured, which makes the preparation journey smooth and logical. You first focus on learning and mastering individual topics, followed by cementing quizzes that reinforce your understanding. After that, you progress to sectional tests and eventually full-length mock tests, which helps you gradually build exam readiness and confidence.

The quality of the tests and practice questions is excellent and closely aligned with actual GMAT standards, making the transition to the real exam much easier. Another standout feature is the mentorship. The mentors are exceptional—always prompt, highly supportive, and constantly guiding and motivating you to push your limits. Their consistent feedback and encouragement made a significant difference in my preparation. Overall, this course offers a well-rounded, disciplined, and highly effective approach to GMAT prep.

Read More