Strengths:

As an Italian non-native English speaker, I started at 455 and finished at 715 (V84, Q90, DI83) — a 260-point climb. What got me there wasn't grinding more questions; it was a system that mapped exactly what to fix and handed me the right tool for each gap. It began with the PSP (Personalized Study Plan): you enter your starting score and target — for me, 455 to a 715 goal — plus how many hours a week you can realistically study, and PSP builds a roadmap of which sections to attack, in what order, with time estimates tuned to your schedule rather than a generic calendar. Having a plan built around my real starting point and availability turned an impossible-looking leap into achievable steps, and the roadmap proved remarkably accurate to what I actually needed.

Would make the product better:

Each gain then traced to a specific feature. The core lessons teach a method for each question type instead of formula-cramming — in Verbal they retrained me to read for a passage's structure, fixing an RC habit that was costing me whole question sets. Cementing quizzes are short, exam-level quizzes after each topic with a threshold you must clear and re-clear before moving on; they turned Advanced Topics (permutations, combinations, sets) from my weakest area into my strongest. PRISM feedback made those quizzes more than scores — it showed me exactly where I lost points and what to do so I stopped leaving points on the table. Scholaranium, a bank of 3,000+ questions with deep analytics, exposed timing patterns I couldn't see myself; and NEURON, with 3,000+ questions and step-by-step solutions better than the Official Guide's own, gave me a wrong-to-right loop that drove much of my Quant accuracy, taking me from a Q63 to a perfect Q90.

The final piece was the LMP (Last Mile Push) program. In the closing stretch, having my mentor Dhruv review my data with me caught behavioral patterns I couldn't see on my own — small, costly habits that don't show up as a knowledge gap but quietly cap your score. An outside expert keeping my analysis honest and pointed at the real gap, rather than busywork, is what closed the last distance. The result wasn't just a higher number: Quant topics I used to dodge became ones I'd take on without flinching, and my biggest fear — Two-Part Analysis in Data Insights — came back at 100th percentile on test day, no mistakes. I recommend e-GMAT without hesitation to non-native speakers stuck in the low 400s–500s who don't lack ability but need a data-driven system — PSP to map the path, PRISM to fix the leaks, Scholaranium and NEURON to build mastery, and LMP to close the gap — to turn a low starting score into an elite one.

Read More

Strengths:

I spent ten months preparing for the GMAT Focus Edition across different resources and came away with a problem I could not solve on my own: I knew my scores but not my ability level. After my first official attempt I accepted that without a diagnostic foundation, I was guessing at what to fix. I chose e-GMAT because it offered something no other course had — a diagnostic engine that assessed my actual scoring ability section by section before I began, and a Personalized Study Plan built directly from that output. I was not handed a generic sequence. I was handed a plan that reflected where I was broken at the module level, before spending a single hour on new content. That distinction changed everything about how the next phase of preparation felt.

Would make the product better:

The e-GMAT course delivered measurable improvement across all three sections, and the progress was visible throughout — not just at the end. Working through the four Quant modules — Number Properties, Word Problems, Algebra, and Advanced Topics — with their process skill files, Scholaranium's block-wise analytics showed my L10 accuracy on hard Data Sufficiency questions moving from 67% to 87% and per-question time dropping from 2 minutes 24 seconds to 2 minutes flat. That kind of granular tracking meant I knew when a concept was genuinely mastered versus when I was still fragile under pressure. Neuron OG extended this further — practicing on official-style questions while the platform tracked my ability shift in real time gave me a completely different signal from mock scores alone. DI went from 82 to 88. Quant from 85 to 88. Verbal from 80 to 85.

The transformation that mattered most was not visible in the score numbers alone. MSR questions in DI and weaken/strengthen questions in CR — types I was consistently getting wrong across the first ten months — became reliable through targeted Neuron OG and Scholaranium practice. I could feel the shift from approaching those types with anxiety to approaching them with a clear process. The e-GMAT sectional mocks after each module acted as approval checkpoints, and the error log kept my post-mock analysis honest. On test day I scored 745 (V85, Q88, DI88) — 100th percentile. I would recommend e-GMAT specifically to students who are stuck above 700 and cannot diagnose why: the L10/L20 ability tracking and the platform's diagnostic depth will show you what self-prep cannot.

Read More

I came to the GMAT with what I thought was a solid foundation — an finance background and genuine confidence in Quant. My first few self-study attempts quickly showed that GMAT confidence and GMAT readiness are very different things. My accuracy on hard questions was inconsistent, my Critical Reasoning approach was essentially guessing, and my practice test scores were plateauing well below my target. I needed a course that could diagnose specifically where I was going wrong, not just provide more questions to practice. After researching options, I chose e-GMAT for its emphasis on analytics and structured concept learning. The promise of block-level performance tracking, process skill files, and an adaptive practice environment convinced me it would give me the data-driven approach I was clearly missing.
The e-GMAT course transformed how I approached all three sections. In Quant, the process skill files — spanning Number Properties, Word Problems, Geometry, and Statistics — broke the syllabus into achievable modules with a clear progression. The block-wise analytics on Scholaranium showed exactly which concept sub-types were dragging my accuracy down across every attempt, removing any temptation to rationalise poor performance. Targeted cementing quizzes at above-exam difficulty closed my algebra gap on hard questions. Quant improved from Q80 to Q87. In Verbal, the e-GMAT course introduced me to pre-thinking for Critical Reasoning — forming a prediction before engaging with answer choices — which turned my weakest section into a manageable one. For RC, a skim-and-locate strategy dramatically reduced wasted time. V79 to V83. For Data Insights (DI77), e-GMAT's clearly structured DI modules and sectional mocks gave me real timed conditions to build pacing and question-type familiarity.
The feature that made the biggest practical difference was the progression from sectional mocks to full mocks. e-GMAT eases you in by offering timed sectional tests after each module, which act as confidence checkpoints before a full exam. Knowing I could handle each section independently made the real test feel far less daunting. The error log kept me analytical through a difficult patch where my scores dropped to 595 just two days before exam day. Each post-mock review pointed to behavioural mistakes rather than content gaps, keeping me focused on execution rather than re-studying material I already knew. On test day, I scored 655 (V83, Q87, DI77). e-GMAT is a complete, self-sufficient platform — follow the course structure consistently, trust what the data tells you, and the results will come.

Read More

Strengths:

I feel like they’ve structured the entire course really well, which makes the preparation journey much less overwhelming. Instead of randomly jumping between topics or resources, you have a very clear path to follow, and that helps a lot with staying consistent and focused throughout your prep. The study plans, practice flow, and sequencing of topics make it easier to understand what to prioritize at each stage of preparation

Would make the product better:

More personalized feedback sessions would improve learning and Provide more concise revision notes and formula sheets

Overall, this is a really good course, especially if you’re just starting your GMAT preparation. It helps build a strong conceptual foundation and gives you a clear process to follow while solving questions. Once you develop that process, you naturally become much more confident in your approach and decision-making during the exam.

DI was one of the biggest highlights for me. The variety and volume of questions available, especially for topics like MSR where I initially struggled, really helped improve my confidence. If you already have a decent grasp of Quant, the sectional mocks can genuinely make a huge difference to your score.

Another major positive for me was the study plan. Since this was my second attempt, I didn’t want to start from scratch again. Having a structured strategy helped me focus on the right set of questions at the right pace instead of trying to do everything available. It made my preparation much more efficient and targeted.

The GMAT-style mock exams were also very helpful in replicating actual exam-day conditions, which made me feel more comfortable and prepared going into the test.

I was working with Dhruv as my mentor throughout my preparation, and he was amazing to work with. His feedback on my mocks, the way he identified my weak areas, and the guidance he provided on improving my strategy played a huge role in helping me achieve a good score. I’d especially recommend him to people who are capable of solving questions but need the right structure, planning, and guidance to push their score to the next level.

One area where the course could improve would be offering more personalized feedback sessions, along with more concise revision notes and formula sheets for quick review.

Overall, I would definitely recommend this course to anyone starting their GMAT prep or looking to build a better problem-solving process and exam strategy.

Read More

Strengths:

While as many do, I too initially thought that eGMAT is excellent with Verbal, it came as a surprise to me how strong eGMAT is on the Quant front too. DI is also very very good. Overall, eGMAT is a great platform, especially if you want to learn things in a systematic way.

Would make the product better:

Not much, eGMAT has an excellent product to offer. I used to think about an opportunity to be able to contact the mentors through mobile texting options such as WhatsApp, but they started doing that too now.

The e-GMAT platform is completely self-sufficient. The course structure, the Scholaranium cementing quizzes, the custom quiz builder, the skill tracking, the Ask the Expert section — all of it works as a system, and following it consistently delivers results without needing anything external. My Q88 came from trusting that system and staying with the process even when the improvement felt invisible. The eGMAT mentors also played a huge role in my preparation and I am very thankful to Dhruv for sticking with me all along.

The curve is not linear, but it compounds. If you are somewhere in the middle of your own prep right now and it feels like the work is not paying off yet — just stay with it. Good luck out there.

Read More

Strengths:

The platform offers a massive volume of practice material. They have a huge collection of questions, an abundance of sectional tests, seamless integration of Official Guide (OG) questions, and 5 full-length model tests. If you are strictly looking for a large repository to practice with, they deliver on quantity.

Would make the product better:

The course needs more time-effective solutions and streamlined approaches. The heavily branded "structured" strategies are too time-consuming to execute under real exam pressure. Additionally, the "Last Mile Push" program felt overhyped and did not provide the targeted, practical pacing help I actually needed for test day.

I started my GMAT preparation with a baseline practice score of 545 and eventually worked my way up to a peak practice score of 695 on e-GMAT's platform. The platform definitely has its strong suits: it provides an exhaustive question bank, plenty of sectional tests, and 5 solid model tests that give you more than enough material to practice with.

However, my actual test day experience was a major disappointment. I found the course material itself to be incredibly time-consuming, and the solutions they teach are not time-effective for the actual exam. While they heavily brand their approaches as structured, I found them clunky and unrealistic to apply under strict time limits. The "Last Mile Push" program also felt overhyped and didn't bridge that gap for me.

On the actual test day, the combination of e-GMAT's time-heavy strategies and standard exam center stress completely derailed my pacing. I was forced to guess randomly on a large number of questions just to finish the sections. This time mismanagement resulted in a final score that dropped below my baseline, ultimately causing me to miss my Deferred MBA application deadline. It is a good platform for accessing practice questions, but I highly caution against relying solely on their pacing and execution strategies.

Read More

Strengths:

I took the e-GMAT course for the GMAT Focus preparation . The course was amazing offering you a structured routine / timetable which is very useful in exams like GMAT.

In exams like GMAT it is never actually the knowledge about a subject that is being tested , it is majorly the management and pressure handling abilities which set you apart from the rest. What I like about the course is the well structured and recorded material available which enables students to focus less time on tutorials and more on practice and self study , which helps strategize the approach for the exam.

This really helps in the final days of the exam as I felt much more confident in the final days because of the ability to strategize my own approach with the help of my strategy mentor Abha Mohan.
The mentor support enables you to have a support if you face any problems with your preparation and strategy.

Would make the product better:

I'd say the course is very good and the maintaining the current standards should be the aim of the course.

Overall the course really helped me with a structured approach , maintaining a proper error log , review my mistakes and at last prepare a proper exam day strategy at the exam centre.

I took the e-GMAT course for the GMAT Focus preparation . The course was amazing offering you a structured routine / timetable which is very useful in exams like GMAT.

In exams like GMAT it is never actually the knowledge about a subject that is being tested , it is majorly the management and pressure handling abilities which set you apart from the rest. What I like about the course is the well structured and recorded material available which enables students to focus less time on tutorials and more on practice and self study , which helps strategize the approach for the exam.

This really helps in the final days of the exam as I felt much more confident in the final days because of the ability to strategize my own approach with the help of my strategy mentor Abha Mohan.
The mentor support enables you to have a support if you face any problems with your preparation and strategy.

Read More

I came into the GMAT with an engineering background and assumed I'd be fine. My first mock said otherwise — I scored in the 400s. That's when I realized I needed a structured course, and e-GMAT ended up being the right call.
What stood out most was how the course forced me to fix my thinking process, not just my content knowledge. For Quant, I wasn't missing concepts — I was missing entire categories of cases. The structured approach made me slow down and think through every possibility before committing to an answer. I completed the entire Quant course, PACE enabled. Each file had grading, which helped me help me tracking.
For CR, the pre-thinking technique was genuinely transformative. I'd never been taught to construct an expected answer before reading the choices, and it changed how I approached the section entirely.
The DI material was thorough — covering Data Sufficiency, MSR, and Two-Part Analysis with enough practice to build real-time accuracy, not just concept familiarity.
The Last Mile Push mentorship in my final two months added accountability and perspective I couldn't have given myself — particularly when I needed someone to tell me where I was wasting effort.
I went from 455 to 675 over six months. e-GMAT was central to that improvement.

Read More

Strengths:

My GMAT journey began at 455 — a score that reflected not just knowledge gaps but a fundamental misunderstanding of what the test was actually measuring. I had assumed that my engineering background would carry my Quant score, and that strong reading habits would handle Verbal. Neither assumption held. My first diagnostic made it clear that I needed a structured, concept-first approach, and I made the switch to e-GMAT after seeing how systematically it broke down each section. The decision to commit fully to the platform rather than piece together free resources turned out to be the right one. I had a three-month timeline, an aggressive target, and needed something that would build genuine understanding rather than surface familiarity.

Would make the product better:

The course architecture — Learn, Cement, Test — delivered exactly that progression. For Quant, the e-GMAT course introduced me to logic-first problem solving rather than the formula-heavy approach I had defaulted to. The Scholaranium cementing quizzes were where real improvement happened: I could not skip them or rush through, and the platform made that accountability unavoidable. My Quant improved from Q77 to Q87. In Verbal, the e-GMAT course introduced me to pre-thinking for Critical Reasoning — forming an expectation of the correct answer before evaluating options. This methodology, combined with the negation test for assumption questions, transformed my CR accuracy. For RC, I developed a paragraph-note strategy that eliminated re-reading and cut my per-question time significantly. My Verbal went from VAD1 to VAD4. The e-GMAT error log became a daily discipline — filling it in after every session and reviewing it before the exam gave me a personalized record of every pattern and constraint I had struggled with.

On the platform features: the Sigma-X sectional mocks were valuable not just for scoring but for building test-taking habits. The progression from condensed sectional tests to full-length mocks eased me in without overwhelming me early. The analytics showed me where time was being lost and where accuracy dropped under pressure. My last mock before the exam was a 495, which was difficult to see — but the sectional data showed Q87 and Q88 in Quant across separate mocks, and that gave me the confidence to trust the process on test day. I finished at 675 (V84, Q87, DI79), a 220-point improvement. The e-GMAT platform is self-sufficient, well-structured, and delivers results if you follow it consistently. I would recommend it without reservation to anyone serious about GMAT preparation.

Read More

Strengths:

I came into GMAT prep with a 515 baseline and a verbal section that was holding me back. Critical Reasoning was a particular struggle — I had no framework, and I was spending 4-5 minutes per question cycling through options without being able to confidently eliminate anything. Reading Comprehension was slow, with excessive note-taking eating time I did not have. Data Insights, at DI68, was a section I was largely guessing through. After some research, I chose e-GMAT specifically because of its reputation for building structured verbal skills and providing strong DI content. Over several months of focused prep using the platform, I brought my score from 515 to 655 (V86, DI83) — a 140-point improvement that felt unimaginable when I started.

Would make the product better:

The e-GMAT course transformed how I approached every section. For Critical Reasoning, the course introduced me to pre-thinking: understanding the premise, argument, and conclusion before touching the answer choices. This single shift eliminated two or three options before I even read them. My hard CR accuracy climbed from 45% to 85%, and average time dropped to 1.5-1.8 minutes per question. For RC, the course taught me to build mental hooks during a 3-minute first read rather than taking detailed notes — treating the passage as a reference document for targeted re-reads rather than something to fully absorb. For Data Insights, the course gave me a structured MSR approach: spend 20-30 seconds on a structural overview, then read only what each question requires. I realized that only 40-45% of the information in any MSR exhibit is actually needed — a realization that removed enormous pressure. The e-GMAT Scholaranium cementing quizzes reinforced all of this with consistent, high-quality practice across difficulty levels and question types.

The platform's broader ecosystem was equally strong. The sectional mocks helped me build time management instincts and exam composure progressively, before Sigma-X full mocks introduced full-test conditions. The analytics in Scholaranium helped me identify my weakest question types with precision, and the error log helped me distinguish conceptual gaps from execution errors under pressure. The quality of DI practice questions was genuinely impressive — often harder than official questions, which meant I arrived at the exam well-prepared for whatever appeared. I went in with confidence earned through preparation, not false optimism. For anyone serious about meaningful GMAT improvement, e-GMAT is a complete, self-sufficient platform. I recommend it without reservation.

Read More