Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 23:00 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 23:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,754
Own Kudos:
37,013
 [23]
Given Kudos: 4,856
Posts: 4,754
Kudos: 37,013
 [23]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ynk
Joined: 18 Aug 2013
Last visit: 02 Nov 2017
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
131
 [1]
Given Kudos: 127
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
GPA: 3.92
WE:Operations (Transportation)
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
Posts: 106
Kudos: 131
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CounterSniper
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Last visit: 14 Apr 2023
Posts: 613
Own Kudos:
832
 [2]
Given Kudos: 74
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Posts: 613
Kudos: 832
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unverifiedvoracity
Joined: 12 Jan 2016
Last visit: 14 Aug 2017
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
78
 [2]
Given Kudos: 71
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:Supply Chain Management (Consumer Electronics)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 56
Kudos: 78
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Only options B and C seem relevant to begin with. But the argument does not clearly state that historical changes. C looks like the better option.

C for me as well.
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,937
Own Kudos:
5,327
 [1]
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,937
Kudos: 5,327
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
carcass
A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the strength of unions was declining. The article’s evidence was the decreasing number and size of strikes as though the reason for the unions’ existence was to organize strikes. Surely, in a modern industrial society, the calling of a strike is evidence that the negotiating position of the union was too weak. Strong unions do not need to call strikes. They can concentrate their efforts on working with others in the labor market to achieve common goals, such as profitable and humane working conditions.

The argument criticizing the newspaper article employs which one of the followingstrategies?

(A) Questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses
(B) Detailing historical changes that make the newspaper articles’ analysis outdated
(C) Reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes
(D) Arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions
(E) Pointing to common interests among unions and management

Newspaper Evidence : Decreasing number and size of strikes = Declining strength of unions
Author : Calling of a strike = Weak negotiating position of the union
Thus declining no and size of strikes = More time for achieve common goals ( Of Unions & Management )

IMHO also with (C) will look for the OE for this question....
User avatar
Senthil7
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Last visit: 05 Mar 2017
Posts: 323
Own Kudos:
214
 [2]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.8
WE:Operations (Commercial Banking)
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
Posts: 323
Kudos: 214
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise : A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the strength of unions was declining. The article’s evidence was the decreasing number and size of strikes as though the reason for the unions’ existence was to organize strikes.
Counter-Premise: Surely, in a modern industrial society, the calling of a strike is evidence that the negotiating position of the union was too weak. They can concentrate their efforts on working with others in the labor market to achieve common goals, such as profitable and humane working conditions
Conclusion : Strong unions do not need to call strikes.
.
We are asked to find the method of reasoning by the critique of the news paper article. Hence this is a Method of Reasoning Question and information must flow from the stimuli only no new information allowed.

(A) Questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses - The counter premise does not question the accuracy of the statistical evidence at all rather it uses the same statistics to argue that it is a positive development. This choice is incorrect.
(B) Detailing historical changes that make the newspaper articles’ analysis outdated - There is no reference to history here. Do not be confused by the words "Modern Days" that does not have any historical context in this passage. Incorrect.
(C) Reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes - Correct! Th conclusion is based on a counter premise that re-interprets the same evidenc of decreasing strikes provided by the newspaper in a positive manner that is how the conclusion is reasoned by the counter premise. Hence this is the right answer.
(D) Arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions - There is no such argument. There is merely a statement made by the stimulus author in a sarcastic manner. Incorrect.
(E) Pointing to common interests among unions and management - broadens the scope of the argument hence incorrect.
.
Correct Answer choice is (C)
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,143
Own Kudos:
22,214
 [1]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
carcass

A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the strength of unions was declining. The article’s evidence was the decreasing number and size of strikes as though the reason for the unions’ existence was to organize strikes. Surely, in a modern industrial society, the calling of a strike is evidence that the negotiating position of the union was too weak. Strong unions do not need to call strikes. They can concentrate their efforts on working with others in the labor market to achieve common goals, such as profitable and humane working conditions.

The argument criticizing the newspaper article employs which one of the following strategies?

(A) Questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses
(B) Detailing historical changes that make the newspaper articles’ analysis outdated
(C) Reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes
(D) Arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions
(E) Pointing to common interests among unions and management

Source : LSAT PrepTest36 Q24

A newspaper article on Britain’s unions argued that their strength was declining. The article’s evidence was the decreasing number and size of strikes, as if the reason for the unions’ existence was to organize strikes. Surely, in a modern industrial society, the calling of a strike is evidence that the negotiating position of the union was too weak. Strong unions do not need to call strikes. They can concentrate their efforts on working with others in the labor market to achieve common goals, such as profitable and humane working conditions.

24. The argument criticizing the newspaper article employs which one of the following strategies?

(A) questioning the accuracy of the statistical evidence that the newspaper article uses
(B) detailing historical changes that make the newspaper article’s analysis outdated
(C) reinterpreting evidence that the newspaper article uses as indicating the opposite of what the newspaper concludes
(D) arguing that the newspaper article’s conclusion is motivated by a desire to change the role of unions
(E) pointing to common interests among unions and management which the newspaper article ignores

Quote:
The newspaper concludes that unions are declining in strength. The evidence put forward by the newspaper is the declining number and size of strikes. The author takes this same piece of evidence and twists it around to imply the denial of the conclusion. The author uses the fact that there are fewer and smaller strikes to suggest that the unions are not weaker and may in fact be stronger. This is perfectly summarized in answer choice (C).

(A) is not true. The author doesn't question the evidence, just the conclusion reached from it.
(B) states something that never happened. It's not that the evidence the newspaper used is outdated, rather, the author states that it leads to a different conclusion.
(C) is correct for the reasons above.
(D) states something that never happened. The author does not question the motivations of the newspaper article's conclusion.
(E) mentions common interests between unions and management. The author mentions common interests between unions and others. Not exactly the same thing!

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION FROM KAPLAN


Method of Argument

Come up with your own prediction of a method of argument answer before you get bogged down in the choices.

(C) has it right: The author takes the very evidence (few and tiny strikes) used by the paper to belittle unions, and shows that it can speak to unions’ strength.

Far from questioning the evidence’s accuracy (A) the author accepts it and uses it to his own ends. The author’s evidence is interpretive rather than historical (B) and no hint of “outdatedness” appears. In questioning the article’s conclusion the author does not impugn its writer’s motives (D) nor does he need to; (E) seems to put its toe in the water of impugning motives as well.
User avatar
mallya12
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Last visit: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 124
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93
Posts: 124
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Someone, please explain why C is the ans. How is the author reinterpreting evidence... of what the newspaper concludes??
User avatar
Harsh2111s
Joined: 08 May 2019
Last visit: 10 Feb 2021
Posts: 317
Own Kudos:
266
 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE:Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mallya12
Someone, please explain why C is the ans. How is the author reinterpreting evidence... of what the newspaper concludes??

Newspaper concludes "the strength of unions was declining" as it thinks strength depends upon the number of strikes by union but according to author "Strong unions do not need to call strikes" hence author author here is reinterpreting evidence.

Hope it will help. :)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts