GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Aug 2019, 22:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior PS Moderator
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 748
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2019, 07:45
1
7
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

64% (02:04) correct 36% (02:09) wrong based on 217 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The level and rate of growth of aggregate output are the most significant indicators, but unemployment and inflation rates are also important. Further, Switzerland, Austria, Israel, Ireland, Denmark, and Finland all have viable economics, but none has a very large population. Switzerland and Austria each have populations of about seven million; the other populations are at least one-fourth smaller.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

(A) A nation’s economic viability is independent of the size of its population.
(B) Having a population larger than seven million ensures that a nation will be economically viable.
(C) Economic viability does not require a population of at least seven million.
(D) A nation’s population is the most significant contributor to the level and rate of growth of aggregate output.
(E) A nation’s population affects the level and rate of growth of aggregate output more than it affects unemployment and inflation rates.

_________________
Regards,
Gladi

“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)
Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2017
Posts: 10
Concentration: Human Resources, Marketing
Re: A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2019, 03:03
A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation???s economy. The level and rate of growth of aggregate output are the most significant indicators, but unemployment and inflation rates are also important. Further, Switzerland, Austria, Israel, Ireland, Denmark, and Finland all have viable economics, but none has a very large population. Switzerland and Austria each have populations of about seven million; the other populations are at least one-fourth smaller.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

(A) A nation???s economic viability is independent of the size of its population.
(B) Having a population larger than seven million ensures that a nation will be economically viable.
(C) Economic viability does not require a population of at least seven million.
(D) A nation???s population is the most significant contributor to the level and rate of growth of aggregate output.
(E) A nation???s population affects the level and rate of growth of aggregate output more than it affects unemployment and inflation rates.
IS THE OA A??
Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2017
Posts: 199
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V32
GPA: 4
Re: A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2019, 03:25
1
Gladiator59 wrote:
A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The level and rate of growth of aggregate output are the most significant indicators, but unemployment and inflation rates are also important. Further, Switzerland, Austria, Israel, Ireland, Denmark, and Finland all have viable economics, but none has a very large population. Switzerland and Austria each have populations of about seven million; the other populations are at least one-fourth smaller.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

(A) A nation’s economic viability is independent of the size of its population.
(B) Having a population larger than seven million ensures that a nation will be economically viable.
(C) Economic viability does not require a population of at least seven million.
(D) A nation’s population is the most significant contributor to the level and rate of growth of aggregate output.
(E) A nation’s population affects the level and rate of growth of aggregate output more than it affects unemployment and inflation rates.

I think it should be C. The last line - Switzerland and Austria each have populations of about seven million; the other populations are at least one-fourth smaller. - supports option C.
_________________
Regards,

Vaibhav

Sky is the limit. 800 is the limit.

~GMAC
Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 86
Re: A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2019, 23:27
Although i choose C , I still do not know why A is incorrect?

Expert please shed the light on this question.

Thank you.
Intern
Joined: 27 Jun 2018
Posts: 23
Location: Pakistan
Re: A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2019, 04:47
2
ballest127 wrote:
Although i choose C , I still do not know why A is incorrect?

Expert please shed the light on this question.

Thank you.

A states that economic viability is independent of the size of the population. The size of the population can be small or large. In the question stem, we are given information ONLY about smaller populations, and therefore, cannot reach conclusions about larger populations.

C reaches a conclusion on the basis of information provided, which is why it is a much better option than A.

Cheers.
_________________
Need Kudos to unlock next tier. Please give Kudos if you found my reply helpful. TIA!
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2017
Posts: 83
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2019, 05:01
Why C weighs more than A is explained very nicely at below link.

https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q16-a-number-of-measures-indicate-t5804.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kudos if helpful!
VP
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 1001
Location: India
Re: A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2019, 21:07
1
Gladiator59 wrote:
A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The level and rate of growth of aggregate output are the most significant indicators, but unemployment and inflation rates are also important. Further, Switzerland, Austria, Israel, Ireland, Denmark, and Finland all have viable economics, but none has a very large population. Switzerland and Austria each have populations of about seven million; the other populations are at least one-fourth smaller.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

(A) A nation’s economic viability is independent of the size of its population.
(B) Having a population larger than seven million ensures that a nation will be economically viable.
(C) Economic viability does not require a population of at least seven million.
(D) A nation’s population is the most significant contributor to the level and rate of growth of aggregate output.
(E) A nation’s population affects the level and rate of growth of aggregate output more than it affects unemployment and inflation rates.

Out of A and C,Lets see which one wins

(B) Having a population larger than seven million ensures that a nation will be economically viable.
Nowhere this is mentioned.

(D) A nation’s population is the most significant contributor to the level and rate of growth of aggregate output.
Population is not at all given as a reason for any aggregation.

(E) A nation’s population affects the level and rate of growth of aggregate output more than it affects unemployment and inflation rates.
Population is not at all given as a reason for any aggregation.

(A) A nation’s economic viability is independent of the size of its population.
IMO, this is a very strong claim.
Nowhere in the argument they are saying that it is independent or even dependent on the population.

(C) Economic viability does not require a population of at least seven million.
This actually is is sync with the last line of the argument
Further, Switzerland, Austria, Israel, Ireland, Denmark, and Finland all have viable economics, but none has a very large population. Switzerland and Austria each have populations of about seven million; the other populations are at least one-fourth smaller..

So we can infer that from those lines.
_________________
If you notice any discrepancy in my reasoning, please let me know. Lets improve together.

Quote which i can relate to.
Many of life's failures happen with people who do not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.
Intern
Joined: 22 Jan 2018
Posts: 10
Re: A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2019, 19:14
A is too extreme. It may happen that some low cutoff of population is required (let's say 2mn, which every mentioned country satisfies) to be economically viable.
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2016
Posts: 69
Location: United States (NY)
Schools: Johnson '22
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2019, 20:29
A good way to eliminate A is to remember that if you don't see a relationship between two things in the stimulus, you can't comment on the relationship. So below two statements cannot be inferred:
1.A nation’s economic viability is independent of the size of its population.
2.A nation’s economic viability is dependent on the size of its population.
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Posts: 256
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Re: A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2019, 03:06
TAKE ON FROM THE STATEMENT: 1) Population may contribute, but it is not most important factor.}
2) Nations with Population of 7B or less can be viable. No Info about more

(A) A nation’s economic viability is independent of the size of its population.((cant be inferred.))
(B) Having a population larger than seven million ensures that a nation will be economically viable.((None viable nations are mentioned with 7B+ population))
(C) Economic viability does not require a population of at least seven million.((Yes, as last line suggests))
(D) A nation’s population is the most significant contributor to the level and rate of growth of aggregate output.((No, as mentioned. it is level and rate of growth of aggregate output))
(E) A nation’s population affects the level and rate of growth of aggregate output more than it affects unemployment and inflation rates. ((cant be inferred))

So the correct answer is C
_________________
In case my post helps you, please provide me with kudos. Thank you
Re: A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The   [#permalink] 08 Mar 2019, 03:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A number of measures indicate the viability of a nation’s economy. The

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne