GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 03 Apr 2020, 16:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Status: Dedicates 2013 to MBA !!
Joined: 06 Jul 2012
Posts: 29
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 07 Nov 2018, 03:32
6
7
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

75% (02:02) correct 25% (02:17) wrong based on 809 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states.

(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating.

(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute.

(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.

(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.

Source: OG11 Q115

Originally posted by CharuKapoor on 22 Apr 2013, 06:20.
Last edited by Bunuel on 07 Nov 2018, 03:32, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 100
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2013, 06:39
4
D suits the bill in best way------> it gives a reason to understand why i ,as an automobile rider ,might agree to pay for the development of rail road . the fact that this money put by me will ultimately help to reduce the congestion ,which is in fact a big problem at the moment , might become a solid reason as why i sud contribute (in terms of money ) to the development of this project
Director
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 821
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2013, 10:40
CharuKapoor wrote:
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states.
(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating.
(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute.
(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.
(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.

hi charu..
i think the answer must be D..
If I m nt wrong u chose B....if that is the case..than u shud think..conclusion is "its unfair to charge drivers for financing the rail project" We need to weaken the conclusion"so if we say that we do not have any other alternative to raise the fund ...that does not weaken......if there is none who could be charged...than why these truck drivers shud be a safe bait.....ti does not make sense to say , if nthn works than we are goin to ask truck drivers...."
On ther hand D says there are cases, where the drivers have benefited , if there is no congestion on the highway...so it make us to think that when the rail system will be improved the mass transit will be less and drivers will be those who will benifit max out f it..

Consider kudos if my post helps!!!!!!

Archit
Current Student
Joined: 27 Jan 2013
Posts: 61
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 3
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2013, 15:04
4
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states. irrelevant (no mention of other states)
(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating.
it is about why drivers have to pay not why rail riders must not.
(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute. stimules states why drivers have to absorb the ENTIRE COST.Hence we need to choose option which impacts either automobile drivers or rail riders.
(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.CORRECT
(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.same as C
Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 231
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2013, 17:29
CharuKapoor wrote:
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states.
(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating.
(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute.
(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.
(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.

In order to answer this question , think about how automobile owners benefit from the toll increase. D clearly answers that.
Princeton Review Representative
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 155
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2013, 08:38
CharuKapoor wrote:
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states.
(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating.
(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute.
(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.

we have to counter the claim that asking drivers to pay is unfair specifically because drivers get no benefit. Thus, the best way to counter this is to show how drivers would benefit D shows exactly how they would benefit while the other answers focus on other topics that are irrelevant.
Intern
Joined: 24 Jan 2012
Posts: 26
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2013, 06:08
Conclusion: Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

What we need to do:
1. Should not be rejected
2. Explain why: because there can be a benefit to the drivers

(D) answers it perfectly. drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit. - In Scope and weakens the conclusion.
Manager
Status: Final Call! Will Achieve Target ANyHow This Tym! :)
Joined: 05 Jan 2016
Posts: 79
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.8
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2017, 02:03
1
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states. Eventhough the proposed toll increase would be less than the tolls charged in neighboring states, it does not answer the question why to unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.
This option does not provide any solution to the objection raised. Therefore, INCORRECT.

(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating. so what?? then why should the automobile drivers suffer the loss of decreased ridership of rails. This option even does not provide any solution to the objection raised.

(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute. If for bridge maintenance, both automobile and rail commuters contribute. Then for maintaining commuter rail line why only the automobile drivers suffer. It deepens the paradox. This option even does not provide any solution to the objection raised.

(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.
Only this option provides a solution to the objection raised. It says that the proposed plan would benefit the automobile drivers as well. So, the plan is good.
It provides the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair.

(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.
It provides an alternative solution. Therefore, irrelevant.
Director
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 983
Location: India
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2019, 02:51
CharuKapoor wrote:
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

We have to say that the plan is a good plan

Argument -> the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

It shouldn't be rejected, because D -> The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states.
Why are we concerned about other states ?? OOS

(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating.
decrease in ridership -> This is talking about trains -> OUT

(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute.
Ideally, they should charge the automobile commuters, how will it benefit the rail commuters ??

(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.
Same as E -> Out
_________________
If you notice any discrepancy in my reasoning, please let me know. Lets improve together.

Quote which i can relate to.
Many of life's failures happen with people who do not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 6: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 7: 710 Q47 V41
GPA: 3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2019, 20:17
The stem states that Drivers would receive no benefit yet would need to pay for the entire cost of the development.
We are then asked to provide a counter - the counter would be the logical counter i.e. the easiest thing to counter this argument would be to state that the drivers actually don't need to use the highways, but choose to because they have some sort of benefit from it.

D does this perfectly.
_________________
Here's how I went from 430 to 710, and how you can do it yourself:
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain imp   [#permalink] 05 Jul 2019, 20:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by