Quote:
(A) whether the maintenance of a chemical waste dump inflicts significant damage on forests and wildlife
Nope, both admits putting the dump is disastrous for forests and wildlife - Incorrect
Quote:
(B) whether it is extremely costly to clean up a chemical waste dump in order to replace it by a woodland
Cost is not a matter of discussion
Quote:
(C) whether the public should be consulted in determining the public health risk posed by a chemical waste dump
public consultation is not discussed between them
Quote:
(D) whether the town has an obligation to redress damage to local forests and wildlife if that damage poses no significant health hazard to people
- Correct. Both are talking about the damage to forests and wildlife. Alexander sees it as an obligation even if the hazard is not a risk for people whereas Teresa disagrees saying town should not spend resources on correcting it since it doesn't pose any risk to health
Quote:
(E) whether destroying forests and wildlife in order to establish a chemical waste dump amounts to an environmental disaster -
Town hasn't destroyed forests to establish waste dump, its the waste dump that is destroying the forest - Incorrect
Answer - D