OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONFor the purposes of the competition, we should not conveniently ignore one of the three pillars of the Verbal section, right? We ought to relish the opportunity to get better at answering all Verbal questions,
any Verbal questions. On the legal end, this passage is adapted from Milton and Rose Friedman,
Free to Choose ©1980.
For those of you who may want some extra RC tips, I will quote another post I wrote on the topic in the spoiler below. If you just want to get this part of the competition out of the way, that is fine, too, but you may find the information in the spoiler useful after the fact.
The content of the passage hardly matters when you keep an eye on the following:
1) Authorial presence: How does the author present the information? Is the passage informational? Persuasive? Does it present two sides, only for the author to champion one of them?
2) What is the relationship of each paragraph to the one that preceded it, and, in a longer passage, to each of the other paragraphs? Ask yourself why the author chose to break the information at that point. Typically, a shift in focus occurs at such a paragraph break. A topic sentence—the opening sentence of the paragraph—can cue you in on where the paragraph is going.
3) Watch for transitions. If you see for example, then you know that even if you did not grasp the meaning of the previous sentence, it is okay: you are about to get an illustration of that point. If you see nevertheless, then you can anticipate that despite X, a condition that would lead to a certain logical outcome, Y occurred instead. The transition trail, as I like to call it, often lays out the key ideas of the passage in a more digestible manner, keeping you from getting bogged down in the details.
4) Look for strong, emotional language. Judgmental language such as poor or excellent, as well as absolute markers such as never or always, can reveal the tone of a passage or how someone mentioned feels about such and such. Questions are often based on such emotional responses.
5) Make every word count in an answer choice. There are many ways to take a correct line of thought and spin it into an incorrect answer. If you align the keywords of the question stem, the passage, and the answer choice you wish to select, then you will start to notice an uptick in your number of correct responses. If you go into each answer choice looking to disprove something, anything at all, based on what the passage presents, then you will be much less likely to fall into the trap of selecting a half-correct answer. (I like to say that an answer choice that is even 90 percent correct is still 100 percent wrong.)
6) Understand that you do not have to make a determination on a given answer choice as soon as you read it. Sometimes the test throws a mealymouthed response at you, one that is hard to make heads or tails of. Just skip it and move on. See if you can make an on-the-spot assessment of other answer choices. If you work from a place of comfort, again, your accuracy will often go up, even as your timing will start to go down. Too often, students are reluctant to let go of a response before they feel they have a definitive answer, Yes/No, but the GMAT™ is not that sort of test, and some questions and answer choices warrant a closer inspection. I use a green, yellow, and red light system that maps onto the universal traffic signal colors to acknowledge that a yellow-light read is fine and ensure that I do not waste too much time or mental energy looking to qualify that answer before I have had a look at others.
7) Spend time on a question if you need to. Focus on your timing for a passage as a whole instead. If I get a four-question set in practice, I look at my timing for that cluster of questions only after I have completed the set. I have even spent 4 minutes on a single question (not even the first question) because I knew from practice that my timing averages out to roughly 2 minutes per question anyway. I typically observe a tapering effect from the first question to the last of a given set, but sometimes I encounter a difficult inference question three deep, and I give it whatever time I feel I need to arrive at an accurate conclusion.
8) Get your understanding up first. Let timing be a secondary consideration. If your accuracy starts to go up, your timing will go down with practice. But if you dedicate equal weight to the two, then that tug-of-war will always be playing out in your mind, and you will make no genuine progress while you exhaust more and more practice questions. You can learn more from a passage or two than you can from a dozen taken in haste just to get your timing down.
9) Work on improving your timing on other types of questions. That sounds like an odd recommendation for RC, right? But trust me when I say that if you can get your timing down on SC especially, it can take a lot of pressure off you when you hit an RC passage. When you are caught up thinking about other junk, for lack of a better way to put it, you cannot focus as well on the task at hand. Again, I know from practice that my timing on SC questions tends to hover around a minute, so each SC question on average buys me about 45 seconds, time that I can apply to breaking down longer or more complex RC passages and accompanying questions.
QUESTION 1Quote:
1. The authors of the passage repeat “40 percent” (line 5 and line 22) most likely in order to Right away, we need to focus on the authorial presence via an inference question. How do the authors feel about the topic the passage discusses? What do the two lines in question tell us?
1)
Currently, more than 40 percent of our income is disposed of on our behalf by government at federal, state, and local levels combined.2)
We participate in the political process that has resulted in government’s spending an amount equal to more than 40 percent of our income.Evidently, the authors of the passage are none too thrilled that the
government gets to spend
more than 40 percent of our income. That sounds almost like a personal attack or, dare I say, a robbery. Which answer choice best reflects these sentiments?
Quote:
(A) support a claim they believe many people will doubt.
There is nothing about this answer choice that I can get behind. I guess we are to understand that the
claim in question is that the government spends money on behalf of its citizens, but that is a stretch, not to mention that we have no evidence to indicate the part about
many people doubting such governmental spending. The figures mentioned in the passage seem to be factual, the opinions based on those figures, well, those of the authors.
Red light.
Quote:
(B) emphasize a number they believe is too large.
The opening line of the passage makes it clear that the authors favor the
freedom to choose how to use our income. Combined with the two lines quoted above, we can deduce that they would like governmental spending to be reigned in. This one looks like a keeper.
Green light.
Quote:
(C) correct a perception they believe is incorrect.
I do not get it: is there some
perception that the government spends less than what is mentioned in the passage? If so, I cannot find any textual evidence for it. Keep looking.
Red light.
Quote:
(D) ensure the reader understands how they arrived at their calculations.
Repetition does not
ensure anything. Neither can we speculate on how the authors
arrived at their calculations. Those figures are simply presented as fact.
Red light.
Quote:
(E) provide the reader raw data from which to draw a conclusion.
This is a second best answer, in my view, but it does not help to answer the question that is being asked:
why do the authors repeat this 40 percent figure? If there were no point other than to provide information, then what are we to make of the opening line of the passage, or of the notion of Personal Independence Day? The authors seem to share a distinctly negative view of the amount of money the government gets to spend without direct input by its citizens.
Red light.
QUESTION 2Quote:
2. It can be inferred from the passage that, over time, Personal Independence Day would occur later in the year because Another inference question, and these tend to be trickier for test-takers. But
an inference on the GMAT™ does NOT mean to "read between the lines." There are actually only two types of inference questions on the test. The first is a reiteration of information from the passage using slightly different language. For example, if the passage said that someone was a bright student, the correct answer might say that that someone was a high-achieving or intelligent student. The second type of inference question is one that may draw from different parts of the passage and cobble together information in a way that does not directly appear in the text. Returning to our example from before, one sentence might say that someone was a bright student, while another might indicate that that student was a star athlete. The correct answer to a related inference question might be that the student was both academically and athletically inclined. That is it. Inference questions really can be simple.
Looking at
this question, we should focus on paragraph one, since that is where Personal Independence Day is discussed. In fact, we get a handy definition of the very term in question right after it is mentioned for the first time:
‘Personal Independence Day—that day in the year when we stop working to pay the expenses of government... and start working to pay for the items we severally and individually choose in light of our own needs and desires.’The line after that traces how that switchover date from governmental to personal spending has, through time, continually been getting pushed back, from February of one year to May in another to a projected July in the future (well, the future of that time). All we have to do here is find the answer choice that necessarily stems from the definition provided by the passage.
Quote:
(A) people are unaware of how much of their income goes to taxes each year.
Right idea, but awareness has nothing to do with the problem. That is, whether people are aware of or ignorant of the portion of their income that will be forked over to the government each year, the government will still take what it wants. This does not explain why Personal Independence Day would occur later and later.
Red light.
Quote:
(B) people’s incomes are not growing as rapidly as they were in the past.
Misdirected comparisons keep popping up in trap answers through this Verbal series we have been working our way through, and this one is no different. We cannot say whether people are or are not making money more or less
rapidly than they were at one point in time. That concern is actually irrelevant when the real issue is the portion of personal income that the government decides to take for its own expenditures. Do not lose sight of the definition of Personal Independence Day.
Red light.
Quote:
(C) people are spending a greater percentage of their income each year on taxes.
Yes, this one makes sense. The word
spending might make you scratch your head, but in a sense, people are spending money on whatever the government chooses to buy with those tax dollars. Keep this one for now; it matches up well with the definition.
Green light.
Quote:
(D) people misunderstand the underlying desires that motivate their spending.
Like (A) before, awareness or understanding on the individual level has nothing to do with why Personal Independence Day would fall later in the year than it had before. Worse yet, this answer choice focuses on individual spending, not on the governmental spending that we need to single out.
Red light.
Quote:
(E) people in the minority have to wait for the next opportunity to vote.
Although this information draws from the second paragraph of the passage, Personal Independence Day is not directly based on voting, so its appearance later and later in a calendar year cannot be explained by such a consideration.
Red light.
QUESTION 3Quote:
3. According to the passage, one result of the current political process for determining government spending is that Finally, a detail question. The tag
according to the passage tells us that we can relax, that the answer will be found directly in the passage. We just have to find the right keywords, and
the current political process... points more to paragraph two.
Quote:
(A) the government has more funds than it needs to operate efficiently.
We might pick up on the notion that the authors feel as though the greedy government is taking a bigger slice of the pie than it needs, but we cannot point to any particular line from the passage that states what this answer choice conveys. That makes it an automatic
red light.
Quote:
(B) the government is unable to secure the public’s confidence.
Are we supposed to feel sorry for the government now? The authors do not discuss such a problem after bringing up
the political process at the beginning of paragraph two. This is another
red light answer. Your goal is not to read into the text, but to repeat what it says.
Quote:
(C) voters who are in the majority tend to be highly satisfied.
This is a dangerous presumption for test-takers who want to negate the line from the middle of the second paragraph:
If you are in the minority, you must conform to the majority vote and wait for your turn to come.However, the majority of voters are referred to directly a few lines earlier:
If you are in the majority, you will at best get both the items you favored and the ones you opposed but regarded as on balance less important. Generally, you end up with something different from what you thought you voted for.In other words, a best-case scenario still presents a compromise, and in general, even for those in the majority, what you get is not
what you thought you voted for. That does not sound like
highly satisfied voters to me.
Red light.
Quote:
(D) voters rarely get exactly what they want.
Good thing we just examined the very line we can point to to back this one up. If it is
generally true that
you end up with something different from what you thought you voted for, then it can be said to be less generally or
rarely true that voters, even those in the majority, end up with
exactly what they want. This is just what we are going for.
Green light.
Quote:
(E) non-voters must conform to the majority vote.
Where are
non-voters discussed in the passage? The second paragraph outlines how
you enter the voting booth once a year, presumably to cast votes. This trap answer replaces voters in the minority with people who abstain from voting altogether.
Red light.
QUESTION 4Quote:
4. The authors’ remark in lines 36-38 (“The ballot... conformity”) most likely serves which purpose? Rather than look exclusively at the lines in question, you may find it useful to adopt what I call an epicenter approach. An earthquake is strongest at its epicenter, and tremors get weaker the farther away they travel from that epicenter. In my analogy, the answers to these sorts of qualifying questions tend to be in the lines immediately surrounding the one referenced, and you often need to lean on context to place that line. Our passage:
When you vote daily in the supermarket, you get precisely what you voted for, and so does everyone else. The ballot box produces conformity without unanimity; the marketplace, unanimity without conformity. That is why it is desirable to use the ballot box, so far as possible, only for those decisions where conformity is essential.Keep in mind, the opening
when line here outlines a different type of vote from the earlier
when line in the same paragraph:
when you enter the voting booth... The line we need to qualify comments on both processes, each in turn. Our answer should follow a similar line of reasoning.
Quote:
(A) To suggest that conformity is more desirable than unanimity.
The last line of the passage calls for the restricted use of
those decisions where conformity is essential, so conformity does not sound all that desirable. Furthermore, this comparison, once again, is a distortion of what the passage says. The right words appear, but in a tangled up mess. In fact, I get the impression that the authors
wish the once-a-year voting process were more like the everyday shopping experience, the one in which
you get precisely what you voted for, and so does everyone else.
Red light.
Quote:
(B) To caution that unanimity and conformity are incompatible aims.
I like this one up to a point, but that point is the second word:
caution. Is the line in question meant to serve as some sort of warning sign? It appears to offer nothing more than a terse and witty observation. Then, are we to read mutual exclusivity (i.e. incompatibility) into the line? I have my doubts. I might
yellow light this one on first pass, but I sense that
caution is too strong.
Quote:
(C) To point out that two activities have similar flaws.
If the flaws are so similar, then why is the order of
conformity and
unanimity reversed? The order is central to the point the authors are aiming to make: voting produces one outcome (largely a compromise), while shopping produces another (getting just what
you want, but not what others may want).
Red light.
Quote:
(D) To emphasize a sharp contrast between two familiar activities.
The vague, cautious language stands out to me here in
two familiar activities, and the
contrast could not be any more different, with what you get versus what you sacrifice completely switching places, depending on whether you, the
you of the passage, are voting or shopping. This is our answer.
Green light.
Quote:
(E) To persuade the reader to vote only in certain situations.
Although the last line of the passage dovetails into this idea, the line in question could essentially be removed, and that is not what we want in our answer. If I were on the fence between this one and (D), I would go with the harder-to-argue-against option in the former answer. After all, why would the authors bother to mention
conformity and
unanimity in a specific order to make the point that (E) broaches? First pass:
yellow light. Second pass: second best (i.e.
red light).
Phew, that was a lengthy one, but there was a lot to discuss. I hope you may take something useful from the set of questions and the above analysis. And if you have read this far after the reveal, I would like to wish you a
Merry Christmas, even if that just means another day off or a day of free
GMAT Club tests.
Cheers, everyone.
- Andrew