Last visit was: 16 Jul 2025, 16:32 It is currently 16 Jul 2025, 16:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Bold Face CR|                           
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,147
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
31
Kudos
Add Kudos
268
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 16 July 2025
Posts: 7,359
Own Kudos:
68,560
 [46]
Given Kudos: 1,968
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,359
Kudos: 68,560
 [46]
37
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
akshayk
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Last visit: 21 Sep 2020
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
402
 [17]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 273
Kudos: 402
 [17]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 4,601
Own Kudos:
32,360
 [10]
Given Kudos: 687
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,601
Kudos: 32,360
 [10]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BillyZ
Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market. For one thing, the discovery of the scandal confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system, as the following considerations show. In any stock market, some fraudulent activity is inevitable. If a stock market is well regulated, any significant stock-trading fraud in it will very likely be discovered. This deters potential perpetrators and facilitates improvement in regulatory processes.

In the argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?


(A) It is the argument's only conclusion.

(B) It is the conclusion for which the argument provides support and which itself is used to support the argument's main conclusion.

(C) It is argument's main conclusion and is supported by another explicitly stated conclusion for which further support is provided.

(D) It is an assumption for which no explicit support is provided and is used to support the argument's only conclusion.

(E) It is a compound statement containing both the argument's main conclusion and an assumption used to support that conclusion.


Question No.: CR 651

Solution
Understand the passage

Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market.
    The author starts with his main conclusion/makes a claim. Recently there has been a stock-trading scandal but the author believes it should not reduce the investors’ faith in the country’s stock market.

For one thing, the discovery of the scandal confirms that Country has a strong regulatory system, as the following considerations show.
    The author makes another claim to provide his reasoning behind the main conclusion.
    He says that if a scandal in the stock market has been brought to light, then that proves that the country’s regulatory system is strong. He goes on to elaborate his reasoning

In any stock market, some fraudulent activity is inevitable.
    He presents another observation. Every stock market is bound to have some fraud or the other.

If a stock market is well regulated, any significant stock-trading fraud in it will be very likely be discovered.
    But if a stock market works within a sound regulatory system, then any significant stock trading fraud will probably be discovered.

This deters potential perpetrators and facilitates improvement in regulatory processes.
    And this discourages potential frauds and makes it easier to improve the regulatory processes.

Pre-thinking

Bold Face 1
Role = secondary claim /conclusion
Relationship with main conclusion = acts as the intermediate conclusion and is used to support the main conclusion

Answer Choice Analysis

A
It is the argument's only conclusion.
No. It is not the only conclusion. It acts as the premise for the main conclusion.
Thus, this is not the correct choice

B
It is the conclusion
    Yes. It is a conclusion

for which the argument provides support
    Yes. The rest of the argument contains observations that support this conclusion

and which itself is used to support the argument's main conclusion.
    Yes. This conclusion acts as the premise to support the author’s main claim

Thus, this is the correct choice.

C
It is the argument's main conclusion
    No. It is the intermediate conclusion.

and is supported by another explicitly stated conclusion
    No. Rather it supports the main conclusion of the passage.

for which further support is provided.
    Yes. There is support provided for the main conclusion of the passage.
Thus, this is not the correct answer.

D
It is an assumption
    No. It is not an assumption

for which no explicit support is provided
    No. Support is provided for this intermediate conclusion in the second half of the passage.

and is used to support the argument's only conclusion.
    No. It is definitely used to support the argument’s main conclusion but that conclusion is not the only conclusion of the argument.

Thus, this is not the correct answer.
E
It is a compound statement
    No. It is not a compound statement.

containing both the argument's main conclusion
    No. It just contains the intermediate conclusion

and an assumption used to support that conclusion
    No. It does not contain any assumption.

Thus, this is not the correct choice
General Discussion
avatar
sidagar
Joined: 04 Aug 2014
Last visit: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V28
GPA: 3.2
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V28
Posts: 16
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i am confused with option D.why it is not an assumption.What actually is the assumption in boldface questions please clarify.
User avatar
akshayk
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Last visit: 21 Sep 2020
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
402
 [4]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 273
Kudos: 402
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sidagar
i am confused with option D.why it is not an assumption.What actually is the assumption in boldface questions please clarify.

Hey Bud, Not sure if you still have this question!

An assumption is an unstated premise that the author accepts to be true.

For e.g.
Tom loves chocolates. Thus, Tom will love the new Hagen Das chocolate truffle ice-cream.

Here, the unstated premise or assumption is that Tom loves chocolate, so he will love it in all it's variations, be it a chocolate, or a chocolate flavoured ice-cream. The author accepts this as true to make the conclusion above.

Another e.g.
Manchester United dominated West Ham and won the First League game 4-0. We can effectively say that Manchester United are the team to beat this season.
What's the assumption here?

The above examples are not GMAT Level, but they can give you a fair indication of what an assumption is. An assumption is never directly stated in the argument. It is however, an unstated fact that the author presumes to be true, to draw a conclusion.

Hope this helps!
See these articles for an insight!
https://gmat.economist.com/gmat-advice/ ... -questions
https://gmatclub.com/forum/inference-vs ... l#p1177826
User avatar
vijaisingh2001
Joined: 17 Aug 2015
Last visit: 16 May 2020
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
103
 [1]
Given Kudos: 834
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 55
Kudos: 103
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
always try to find what author wants to convince us - main conclusion.
And the main conclusion is - Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market

the bold face is another fact or conclusion which supports the main conclusion above.

to support this conclusion- author provides many reasoning or premises later
User avatar
OllyAks
Joined: 01 Sep 2019
Last visit: 29 Nov 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
4
 [4]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 1
Kudos: 4
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A good approach here is to use the "Why?" strategy for finding conclusions.

The SCANDAL should not diminish investors' confidence -> WHY ? -> Because the discovery of it (scandal) confirms a strong regulatory system.
Therefore, the boldface part serves as evidence for the first sentence

The second part is a little bit trickier because at first glance the boldface part might look like a fact, not a stance. One should pay attention to the "as the following considerations show" which is a CLUE.

The discovery confirms a strong regulatory system -> WHY ? -> Since in well-regulated systems frauds are discovered.

Premise never has anything it can direct question WHY to
Evidence always tells you WHY you should believe the conclusion

Hope that helps :blushing
avatar
Nonktp
Joined: 14 Aug 2017
Last visit: 15 Apr 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 13
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja Could you please help explain why the bold-faced statement is not an assumption (As what choice D and E state) ? Thanks for your collaboration.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,489
 [5]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,489
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nonktp
GMATNinja Could you please help explain why the bold-faced statement is not an assumption (As what choice D and E state) ? Thanks for your collaboration.
An assumption would be an unsupported statement that would support the conclusion.

The boldfaced portion is a conclusion, not an assumption.

We can tell the the boldfaced portion is a conclusion, not an assumption, because it is supported by everything that comes after it.

Notice, that the passage states the boldfaced portion and then says, "as the following considerations show."

We can see, therefore, that what comes after "as the following considerations show," shows that the boldfaced portion, a conclusion, is true.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,212
Own Kudos:
247
 [1]
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,212
Kudos: 247
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneaky intermediary conclusion.

Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market. For one thing, the discovery of the scandal confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system, as the following considerations show. In any stock market, some fraudulent activity is inevitable. If a stock market is well regulated, any significant stock-trading fraud in it will very likely be discovered. This deters potential perpetrators and facilitates improvement in regulatory processes.

In the argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?


(A) It is the argument's only conclusion.

No. The BF is a second (intermediary) conclusion.

(B) It is the conclusion for which the argument provides support and which itself is used to support the argument's main conclusion.
Correct

(C) It is argument's main conclusion and is supported by another explicitly stated conclusion for which further support is provided.

No. The main conclusion is: Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market.

(D) It is an assumption for which no explicit support is provided and is used to support the argument's only conclusion.

No. It is a conclusion on its own.

(E) It is a compound statement containing both the argument's main conclusion and an assumption used to support that conclusion.
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 06 Apr 2025
Posts: 1,353
Own Kudos:
707
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,658
Posts: 1,353
Kudos: 707
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I believe the author is using the word “confirms” in the sense that, in the author’s mind and in the author’s opinion, this supporting evidence “confirms” X. In the end though, it’s still just an author’s opinion-claim, which as we’ve seen is often full of logical holes.

In this context, it’s a claim or a conclusion that the author is making (not the Main Conclusion). By saying the facts “confirm” X, the author is likely making a logical fallacy in his opinionated argument: no different than when we look at passages involved in the Weaken/Strengthen question types.

I don’t think it’s intended (maybe in the author’s mind) that the facts 100%, categorically confirm the statement as an inference type of conclusion.

rohan2029
GMATNinja
The author makes the following general statements:

  • "In any stock market, some fraudulent activitity is inevitable"
  • "If a stock market is well regulated, any significant stock-trading fraud in it will be very likely be discovered."
  • When significant stock-trading fraud is discovered, it deters potential perpetrators and facilitates improvement in regulatory processes.

If this general pattern is true, then "the discovery of the scandal [in Country X] confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system." Thus, the statement in bold can be concluded based on the ensuing statements. This intermediate conclusion is used in support of the author's main conclusion, which is that "Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market." In other words, investors should view the discovery as evidence that the country has a well-regulated stock market. The scandals are inevitably going to happen, so if scandals were never discovered, that would suggests that the stock market is not well-regulated, which should worry investors more than the discovery of a single scandal should.

Quote:
(B) It is the conclusion for which the argument provides support and which itself is used to support the argument's main conclusion.
So statement (B) accurately describes the function of the boldfaced portion.

Hey GMATNinja,
I had a question regarding whether the statements following the boldface sentence actually support the claim made by the boldface statement. In the construction 'if A, then B', B occurring does not guarantee A occurring. So, how can we say here that the discovery of the scandal CONFIRMS that country X has a strong regulatory system?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Basshead
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Last visit: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 927
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 432
Location: United States
Posts: 927
Kudos: 287
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need to identify the main conclusion of the argument.

The main conclusion: Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market.

Therefore, any sentence that states the boldface is the main conclusion is incorrect. We can eliminate A, C, and E.

Let's compare B and D:

Quote:
(D) It is an assumption for which no explicit support is provided and is used to support the argument's only conclusion.

Clearly, support is given for this statement ('as the following considerations show'). D is out.

Quote:
(B) It is the conclusion for which the argument provides support and which itself is used to support the argument's main conclusion.

This statement concludes Country X has a strong regulatory system AND is used to support the main conclusion, which is the prior sentence. Perfect.

B is the correct choice.
User avatar
Dinesh654
Joined: 08 Jun 2021
Last visit: 11 Aug 2024
Posts: 155
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Status:In learning mode...
Location: India
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Posts: 155
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello experts,
have a little trouble with D,
I agree that "no explicit support is provided" part is wrong- because author presents some facts to support the intermidiate conclusion.
but can we say its an assumption?
looks ok to me - an assumption can be an opinion!
after begining with the main conclusion, author is assuming that country X has strong regilatory system (also be called as a claim) and later provides some evidence to support this assumption!

So is this an assumption or not?
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
529
 [2]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 529
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dcoolguy
Hello experts,
have a little trouble with D,
I agree that "no explicit support is provided" part is wrong- because author presents some facts to support the intermidiate conclusion.
but can we say its an assumption?
looks ok to me - an assumption can be an opinion!
after begining with the main conclusion, author is assuming that country X has strong regilatory system (also be called as a claim) and later provides some evidence to support this assumption!

So is this an assumption or not?

I would say not. An assumption, by definition, is something that is just presumed to be true, without justification. The fact that there is justification (the 'explicit support' that is provided) makes me think this is not an assumption.

Also, on the GMAT, assumptions are almost always implicit. Boldface questions might bend this definition a little bit, but in general, an 'assumption' on the GMAT is 'something that is not stated but must be true for a conclusion to hold.'
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 519
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 519
Kudos: 118
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A few questions:
-What does the "as the following considerations show" refer to in the argument? Is it the following sentences? The placement of this phrase is a bit strange in my view.

-Would Choice (D) be correct if it read as follows: "It is an assumption for which explicit support is provided and is used to support the argument's main conclusion." I am just a bit confused here on how you can make this conclusion (although not the main conclusion) given that someone could have accidently stumbled upon the fraud? This does not necessarily show that Country X has a strong regulatory system. Or perhaps I am thinking about what the GMAT defines as an assumption. Is this basically a statement that is then supported by the following sentences, so in of itself given that the statement has support... that makes it a conclusion and not an assumption?

I may be overthinking this, but this boldfaced portion of the argument seemed just like a hasty generalization.

Thank you for bearing through my questions :)
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 16 July 2025
Posts: 7,359
Own Kudos:
68,560
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1,968
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,359
Kudos: 68,560
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woohoo921
A few questions:
-What does the "as the following considerations show" refer to in the argument? Is it the following sentences? The placement of this phrase is a bit strange in my view.

-Would Choice (D) be correct if it read as follows: "It is an assumption for which explicit support is provided and is used to support the argument's main conclusion." I am just a bit confused here on how you can make this conclusion (although not the main conclusion) given that someone could have accidently stumbled upon the fraud? This does not necessarily show that Country X has a strong regulatory system. Or perhaps I am thinking about what the GMAT defines as an assumption. Is this basically a statement that is then supported by the following sentences, so in of itself given that the statement has support... that makes it a conclusion and not an assumption?

I may be overthinking this, but this boldfaced portion of the argument seemed just like a hasty generalization.

Thank you for bearing through my questions :)
As you suggest, the statement that "the discovery of the scandal confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system" is supported by the sentences that follow. More specifically, it's supported by the statement that some fraudulent activity is inevitable, and that it will be discovered in a well-regulated market. So you're correct that "the following considerations" refers to the sentences that come next.

As you also point out, the fact that the boldface statement is supported means that it's by definition a conclusion, not an assumption. It's also true that the boldface conclusion relies on certain assumptions. It assumes, as you say, that the fraud was discovered as a result of the regulations, and not simply by accident. But that doesn't make the boldface statement an assumption itself. Rather, it tells us that the conclusion (i.e. the boldface statement) relies on an assumption.

From another angle: as you point out, the author's statement that "the discovery of the scandal confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system" isn't airtight. Maybe other instances of fraud in Country X weren't caught? We really don't know. But whether it's true or not, the boldface statement is an inference supported by evidence. So even if it isn't an airtight conclusion, and even if it relies on assumptions, it's still a conclusion.

Let's now take a look at (D):

Quote:
In the argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?

(D) It is an assumption for which no explicit support is provided and is used to support the argument's only conclusion.
One problem with (D) is that the boldface statement is a conclusion. Another problem is that explicit support is provided. More specifically, the author supports the boldface statement by telling us that "some fraudulent activity is inevitable," and that a well regulated market will likely discover the fraud. So (D) is incorrect.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
PriyamRathor
Joined: 17 Aug 2021
Last visit: 24 May 2024
Posts: 152
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 167
Location: India
WE:Corporate Finance (Accounting)
Posts: 152
Kudos: 117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BillyZ
Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market. For one thing, the discovery of the scandal confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system, as the following considerations show. In any stock market, some fraudulent activity is inevitable. If a stock market is well regulated, any significant stock-trading fraud in it will very likely be discovered. This deters potential perpetrators and facilitates improvement in regulatory processes.

In the argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?


(A) It is the argument's only conclusion.

(B) It is the conclusion for which the argument provides support and which itself is used to support the argument's main conclusion.

(C) It is argument's main conclusion and is supported by another explicitly stated conclusion for which further support is provided.

(D) It is an assumption for which no explicit support is provided and is used to support the argument's only conclusion.

(E) It is a compound statement containing both the argument's main conclusion and an assumption used to support that conclusion.


Question No.: CR 651

Hello Experts,
GMATNinja
karishma
MartyTargetTestPrep


Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market

I assumed this to be an intermediate conclusion or just an opinion of the author.

In any stock market, some fraudulent activity is inevitable

I though this to be the Main Conclusion

Q1 .How to find MAIN CONCLUSION in any passage ?
Q2. How to differentiate between MAIN CONCLUSION and INTERMEDIATE CONCLUSION ?

Thanks
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 16 July 2025
Posts: 7,359
Own Kudos:
68,560
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,968
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,359
Kudos: 68,560
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PriyamRathor
BillyZ
Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market. For one thing, the discovery of the scandal confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system, as the following considerations show. In any stock market, some fraudulent activity is inevitable. If a stock market is well regulated, any significant stock-trading fraud in it will very likely be discovered. This deters potential perpetrators and facilitates improvement in regulatory processes.

In the argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?


(A) It is the argument's only conclusion.

(B) It is the conclusion for which the argument provides support and which itself is used to support the argument's main conclusion.

(C) It is argument's main conclusion and is supported by another explicitly stated conclusion for which further support is provided.

(D) It is an assumption for which no explicit support is provided and is used to support the argument's only conclusion.

(E) It is a compound statement containing both the argument's main conclusion and an assumption used to support that conclusion.


Question No.: CR 651

Hello Experts,
GMATNinja
karishma
MartyTargetTestPrep


Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market

I assumed this to be an intermediate conclusion or just an opinion of the author.

In any stock market, some fraudulent activity is inevitable

I though this to be the Main Conclusion

Q1 .How to find MAIN CONCLUSION in any passage ?
Q2. How to differentiate between MAIN CONCLUSION and INTERMEDIATE CONCLUSION ?

Thanks
A conclusion is a statement for which the author provides some kind of support. For example, consider this argument: "It's nice out, so we will go to the park."

Here, the conclusion is that "we will go to the park," and the support for that conclusion is that "it's nice out."

To find the main conclusion of an argument, ask yourself why the author wrote the passage as a whole. What, at the end of the day, are they trying to convince the reader of? What does all of the evidence in the passage lead up to?

Here's another example: "It's nice out, so we will go to the park. That means that we'll have an awesome day."

The main conclusion is now "we'll have an awesome day." The reason why I wrote this argument is to lead up to this conclusion. The other sentence provides support for this main conclusion.

Because I've inserted a more important conclusion, "we will go to the park" is now just an intermediate conclusion. It is still supported by the fact that "it's nice out," but it doesn't capture the heart of why I wrote the argument as a whole.

Looking at the official question:
Quote:
Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market. For one thing, the discovery of the scandal confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system, as the following considerations show. In any stock market, some fraudulent activity is inevitable. If a stock market is well regulated, any significant stock-trading fraud in it will very likely be discovered. This deters potential perpetrators and facilitates improvement in regulatory processes.
At the end of the day, why did the author write this argument?

Well, he/she starts with a pretty strong statement: "Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country's stock market." Is this just an intermediate conclusion, as you've suggested? That really depends on the structure of the rest of the argument.

Immediately after the first sentence, the author launches into some supporting evidence. Why should investors still be confident? Because "the discovery of the scandal confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system."

Then, the author provides a chain of logic to support this statement. Why does the scandal confirm that Country X has a strong regulatory system? The author explains why in the last three sentences.

Overall, the last three sentences support the second sentence, which supports the first sentence. That makes the first sentence the main conclusion and the second sentence an intermediate conclusion.

(B) is the correct answer.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Anirudhkoppurauri
Joined: 31 Mar 2025
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Schools: ISB '26
Schools: ISB '26
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premises:

Fraud is inevitable.

In well-regulated markets, fraud gets detected.

Fraud was discovered in Country X.

From that, the author concludes:

“The discovery of the scandal confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system.”
✅ This is a conclusion, because it's inferred from earlier premises.
✅ It is not the main conclusion, but an intermediate one.

Then, the author uses that conclusion to support:

“Investor confidence should not decline.”
✅ This is the main conclusion.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts