Last visit was: 17 Jul 2024, 12:08 It is currently 17 Jul 2024, 12:08
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 337
Own Kudos [?]: 2476 [59]
Given Kudos: 20
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 869
Own Kudos [?]: 8615 [21]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Intern
Joined: 24 Nov 2013
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 67 [6]
Given Kudos: 115
General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2011
Posts: 142
Own Kudos [?]: 142 [0]
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
GMAT 1: 440 Q33 V13
GPA: 3
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
gmatbull wrote:
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance remains functional without breaking down. Sixty years
ago, average refrigerator durability was 15 years, whereas now refrigerators operate continuously for more than
40 years on average. Thus, at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their
operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

A: Today, many more households own refrigerators than did households sixty years ago.
B: Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the
number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership.
C: Many of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology
that was not available sixty years ago.
D: The proportion of refrigerators that break down when they are between 35 years and 40 years old is significantly
smaller today than is the proportion of refrigerators that break down after 40 years.
E: More refrigerators sixty years ago received regular service than receive it today.

Y not C here???

C seems to be more Weaken the argument for me...
If there was good tech 60 yrs ago they would have had better life time for refrigerators....

Isn't this undermining argument???
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Status:Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Posts: 729
Own Kudos [?]: 1897 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
shanmugamgsn wrote:
gmatbull wrote:
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance remains functional without breaking down. Sixty years
ago, average refrigerator durability was 15 years, whereas now refrigerators operate continuously for more than
40 years on average. Thus, at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their
operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

A: Today, many more households own refrigerators than did households sixty years ago.
B: Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the
number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership.
C: Many of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology
that was not available sixty years ago.
D: The proportion of refrigerators that break down when they are between 35 years and 40 years old is significantly
smaller today than is the proportion of refrigerators that break down after 40 years.
E: More refrigerators sixty years ago received regular service than receive it today.

Y not C here???

C seems to be more Weaken the argument for me...
If there was good tech 60 yrs ago they would have had better life time for refrigerators....

Isn't this undermining argument???

Hi there

og-critical-reasoning-1-i-disagree-107699.html
refer to the link similar question....the above question is an interpretation of the question 1 CR section of OG 12 dealing with life expectancy....
hope that helps
Intern
Joined: 06 Aug 2012
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 35
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V32
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
Could someone please explain this through options. I thought D was close.
Intern
Joined: 06 Aug 2012
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 35
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V32
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
hi pqhai,
Thanks so much. It does help. I found the question a little twisted with clarity lacking in its stimulus and the question stem.
Intern
Joined: 26 May 2013
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 72 [0]
Given Kudos: 243
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
shanmugamgsn wrote:
gmatbull wrote:
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance remains functional without breaking down. Sixty years
ago, average refrigerator durability was 15 years, whereas now refrigerators operate continuously for more than
40 years on average. Thus, at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their
operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

A: Today, many more households own refrigerators than did households sixty years ago.
B: Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the
number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership.
C: Many of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology
that was not available sixty years ago.
D: The proportion of refrigerators that break down when they are between 35 years and 40 years old is significantly
smaller today than is the proportion of refrigerators that break down after 40 years.
E: More refrigerators sixty years ago received regular service than receive it today.

Y not C here???

C seems to be more Weaken the argument for me...
If there was good tech 60 yrs ago they would have had better life time for refrigerators....

Isn't this undermining argument???

I too fell for "C", but I guess "C" would be more appropriate had the question asked us to weaken/undermines the CONCLUSION but not the argument..
Intern
Joined: 20 Jul 2013
Posts: 41
Own Kudos [?]: 161 [3]
Given Kudos: 57
Location: United States (DE)
GMAT 1: 730 Q46 V44
GPA: 3.5
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Amit0507 wrote:
shanmugamgsn wrote:
gmatbull wrote:
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance remains functional without breaking down. Sixty years
ago, average refrigerator durability was 15 years, whereas now refrigerators operate continuously for more than
40 years on average. Thus, at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their
operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

A: Today, many more households own refrigerators than did households sixty years ago.
B: Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the
number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership.
C: Many of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology
that was not available sixty years ago.
D: The proportion of refrigerators that break down when they are between 35 years and 40 years old is significantly
smaller today than is the proportion of refrigerators that break down after 40 years.
E: More refrigerators sixty years ago received regular service than receive it today.

Y not C here???

C seems to be more Weaken the argument for me...
If there was good tech 60 yrs ago they would have had better life time for refrigerators....

Isn't this undermining argument???

I too fell for "C", but I guess "C" would be more appropriate had the question asked us to weaken/undermines the CONCLUSION but not the argument..

Well, the conclusion is basically stating the author's claim ---> which is the heart of the argument.
So, the conclusion is pretty much the argument.

C would be correct if this were a strengthen question. This choice is just an additional fact that aids the author's argument --- telling us that refrigerators do indeed live longer nowadays.

B tells us that the cutdown on faulty refrigerators after the first year is one of the reasons for the improvement in refrigerator durability.
This tells us that even recently, there were refrigerators that don't last 40 years. In fact, they don't even live past the first year.
This fact completely destroys the argument, telling us that there are refrigerators nowadays that can't live past 40 years.
Intern
Joined: 10 Dec 2014
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT Date: 12-30-2014
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
Was confused between B and C.. But finally picked B
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 15121
Own Kudos [?]: 66694 [1]
Given Kudos: 436
Location: Pune, India
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Success2015 wrote:
I chose B (Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership) with the following reasoning.

In the past, few refrigerators were breaking down in the 1st year itself. This brought down the avg to 15 yrs. So there were refrigerators which were functional past 15/20 years.

In the current time period, refrigerators which break down in the 1st year have been removed.

The argument says "at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.". This means that if somebody had a refrigerator which was 15 yrs old, they would have thought that its nearing its end. However the avg(15 yrs) has been brought down significantly because of refrigerators which were breaking down in 1st yr. Option B addresses this and thus weakens the conclusion.

hope this reasoning is correct

Responding to a pm:
The reasoning is correct.
Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2017
Posts: 66
Own Kudos [?]: 156 [1]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V34
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
1
Kudos
We can weaken the argument in the following way-

There is no significant technological advances in refrigeration in last 60 years. Assume 60 years back 2 types of refrigerators were one that had life span of only 1 year and one with the lifespan of more than 40 years. Now obviously overall average drops. And today (after 60 years ) manufacturers have stopped manufacturing refrigerator which had 1 years of life expectancy.

Now tell what do you understand? Many people 60 years back would have considered there refrigerator life expectancy at 40 ( Not 15 years), and today also many people will consider 40 years to be the end of the refrigerators cycle. HENCE OPTION B. which indirectly states that change in durability is not because of technological advances but we have just removed the faulty refrigerators ( which brings down the average durability) from a mere mathematical equation, and that both the generations experienced similar level of satisfaction and durability from its refrigerator.
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1009
Own Kudos [?]: 1801 [0]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
B is better than C
b/c in C, "many" and "extremely" only refers to some exceptional refrigerators, and this cannot explain the average or all refrigerators.
Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Posts: 663
Own Kudos [?]: 735 [0]
Given Kudos: 362
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
GPA: 3.4
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
That was a pretty though nut to crack, below my rational with regards to the answer choices

gmatbull wrote:
....

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

A: Today, many more households own refrigerators than did households sixty years ago.
Contextual information which is fairly uselss with regards to undermining the argument as we talk about considered life expectancy.

B: Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the
number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership.
This gives us the best info to attack the argument. As previously refrigerators were mainly troubled by first year breakdowns we can assume that the perception ater surrviving the first year might not have been that different compared to what it is with todays longer lifecycle/durability

C: Many of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology
that was not available sixty years ago.
This is tempting as it gives us information about technical differences between the nowadays refrigerators and those of the past. However, if we further evaluate this statement we notice that the premise does not change by this information. We were already told about the longer durability of todays machines in the original information, this statements just adds background information.

D: The proportion of refrigerators that break down when they are between 35 years and 40 years old is significantly
smaller today than is the proportion of refrigerators that break down after 40 years.
Again a fairly useless statement as we are not really considering the details of of todays machines towards the end of their lifecycle. This piece of information does not help us in undermining the argument.

E: More refrigerators sixty years ago received regular service than receive it today.
Very tempting choice as it gets very close to the actual context. However, just because refrigerators in the past received regular service does not mean that peoples perception of their life expectancy was influenced.
Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2018
Posts: 141
Own Kudos [?]: 290 [0]
Given Kudos: 156
Concentration: Technology, Nonprofit
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
WE:Analyst (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Posts: 182
Own Kudos [?]: 88 [0]
Given Kudos: 87
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V37
GPA: 4
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
KarishmaB wrote:
Success2015 wrote:
I chose B (Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership) with the following reasoning.

In the past, few refrigerators were breaking down in the 1st year itself. This brought down the avg to 15 yrs. So there were refrigerators which were functional past 15/20 years.

In the current time period, refrigerators which break down in the 1st year have been removed.

The argument says "at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.". This means that if somebody had a refrigerator which was 15 yrs old, they would have thought that its nearing its end. However the avg(15 yrs) has been brought down significantly because of refrigerators which were breaking down in 1st yr. Option B addresses this and thus weakens the conclusion.

hope this reasoning is correct

Responding to a pm:
The reasoning is correct.

KarishmaB , MartyMurray

C also looks like a weakener. Can we eliminate it on the grounds that "many of the refrigerators" part in option C may talk about an insignificant number of refrigerators which maynot impact our conclusion??
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 3480
Own Kudos [?]: 5205 [0]
Given Kudos: 1431
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
Prateek176 wrote:
KarishmaB , MartyMurray

C also looks like a weakener. Can we eliminate it on the grounds that "many of the refrigerators" part in option C may talk about an insignificant number of refrigerators which maynot impact our conclusion??

C is not a weakener. C is a trap choice worded to read as if it weakens the argument, though, in actuality, it has no effect on the support for the conclusion.

To test your idea that, perhaps, C does not weaken the argument because it says "many of the refrigerators", let's change "many" to "all".

Here's our new version of C:

(C, New Version) All of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology
that was not available sixty years ago.

Does this statement make any difference?

What's the conclusion of the argument?

Conclusion: at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.

Does the fact that refrigerators last longer now only because of engineering technology that was not available sixty years ago make any difference?

Regardless of why refrigerators made today last longer, they last longer. So, the conclusion, that people didn't expect them to last as long sixty years ago, stands, regardless of why they last longer today.

Thus, even our new version of C has zero impact on the argument.

To avoid choosing an answer like C, you have to carefully consider how each choice actually affects the support for the conclusion. Many choices will be worded in ways that make them seem to affect arguments if you don't look closely. So, when choosing a critical reasoning answer choice, you need to go beyond choosing a choice that kind of seems to have the effect you are seeking to supporting your choice with a very clear rationale.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 15121
Own Kudos [?]: 66694 [0]
Given Kudos: 436
Location: Pune, India
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
Prateek176 wrote:
KarishmaB wrote:
Success2015 wrote:
I chose B (Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership) with the following reasoning.

In the past, few refrigerators were breaking down in the 1st year itself. This brought down the avg to 15 yrs. So there were refrigerators which were functional past 15/20 years.

In the current time period, refrigerators which break down in the 1st year have been removed.

The argument says "at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.". This means that if somebody had a refrigerator which was 15 yrs old, they would have thought that its nearing its end. However the avg(15 yrs) has been brought down significantly because of refrigerators which were breaking down in 1st yr. Option B addresses this and thus weakens the conclusion.

hope this reasoning is correct

Responding to a pm:
The reasoning is correct.

KarishmaB , MartyMurray

C also looks like a weakener. Can we eliminate it on the grounds that "many of the refrigerators" part in option C may talk about an insignificant number of refrigerators which maynot impact our conclusion??

(C) is not a weakener.
Note that we don't care WHY the refrigerators are more durable today. What the argument tries to establish is that they ARE more durable today. That they actually do last longer today. So, if previously people would consider end of life at 15 yrs, today they expect many more working years.
(B) tells us that the reason we are seeing an improved Durability number is that the ones pulling down the average have been removed. So it is possible that a typical refrigerator lasts just as long as it did before but the "average age" has improved by taking care of the "bad" pieces.

(C) gives us a reason why refrigerators last longer today (because of technology not available before). It actually helps establish that refrigerators perhaps do last longer today. If anything, it might strengthen the argument by making it more plausible.
Manager
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 173
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [0]
Given Kudos: 28
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
Can you please provide a more detailed explanation as to why b is the answer? Maybe with a few numbers? My understanding is that because of a number of devices breaking down at 1 year, the average was brought down though the real life of the ones that didn't break down at first year was in fact more than 15
Now that the 1st year ones are removed,the average is back to being high.
chetan2u KarishmaB

Posted from my mobile device
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 15121
Own Kudos [?]: 66694 [1]
Given Kudos: 436
Location: Pune, India
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
rahulkashyap wrote:
Can you please provide a more detailed explanation as to why b is the answer? Maybe with a few numbers? My understanding is that because of a number of devices breaking down at 1 year, the average was brought down though the real life of the ones that didn't break down at first year was in fact more than 15
Now that the 1st year ones are removed,the average is back to being high.
chetan2u KarishmaB

Posted from my mobile device

Avg of
1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 15, 25, 30, 30, 35, 60 is about 18

Avg of
2, 15, 25, 30, 30, 35, 60 is about 30

We just took out the ones that broke in the 1st year and the average has been bumped up. The rest of the things have stayed as it is.
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink]
1   2
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6984 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts