Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Aug 2009, 06:31
4
This post received KUDOS
19
This post was BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
55% (hard)
Question Stats:
61% (01:05) correct
39% (01:20) wrong based on 1470 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Voronia rose by fifteen percent or more annually. In order to curb these dramatic increases, the ministry of health prohibited drug manufacturers from raising any of their products' prices. Even though use of prescription drugs did not expand after this price freeze, per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the ministry's action did not achieve its goal?
(A) After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products.
(B) The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period.
(C) Improvements in manufacturing processes enabled drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze.
(D) In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions.
(E) After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia.
I cannot get my head round the reasonings of the OA. No matter how I look at it, D seems the best answer. If D is true, wouldn’t per capita expenditure of drugs increase?
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Aug 2009, 11:29
5
This post received KUDOS
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
I would go with A.
Although manufacturers did not increase price of their existing products, but they replaced existing ones with new medications, which cost more. Even though there is no expansion in use of prescription drugs, still per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.
In D, if doctor’s prescribe generic drugs which are cheaper than expensive brand-names then how would it justify the increase in per capita expenditure for prescription drugs. It will in fact decrease per capita expenditure for prescription drugs.
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Aug 2009, 11:34
3
This post received KUDOS
A. After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products - this has no effect on per capita expenditure
B. The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period - this would decrease per capita expenditure
C. Improvements in manufacturing processes enable drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze. - nothing to do with increase in per capita expenditure
D. In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions - people would have started to buy less expensive generic medicine and per capita expenditure would have gone done, therfore government's action would have worked. BUt the q is why government's action didn't work.
E. After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia. - as the usage of prescription drug didn't change, people would have started to buy these drugs outside voronia and pay additional shipping costs eventually rising the per capita expenditure. So the governmet's action didn't work.
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Aug 2009, 00:11
A. After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products B. The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period - per capita comparision so doesnt make a difference C. Improvements in manufacturing processes enable drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze. -- talking abt expenditure and not profit D. In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions - how does this explain the rise in per capita. E. After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia. - out of scope
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Aug 2009, 03:18
IMO...E, according to learner's explanation.
'A' would have been the answer if it was stated that the new medicines are more expensive than those currently existing in the market. 'B' and 'D' would decrease the per capita expenditure, and c is irrelevant, leaving us with 'E'. However, 'E' needs too much assumptions.
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Nov 2009, 17:08
I would go with A as well.
As far as your reasoning is concerned 'stopping to market' doest not necessarily mean 'stopping to sell'
learner wrote:
A. After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products - this has no effect on per capita expenditure
B. The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period - this would decrease per capita expenditure
C. Improvements in manufacturing processes enable drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze. - nothing to do with increase in per capita expenditure
D. In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions - people would have started to buy less expensive generic medicine and per capita expenditure would have gone done, therfore government's action would have worked. BUt the q is why government's action didn't work.
E. After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia. - as the usage of prescription drug didn't change, people would have started to buy these drugs outside voronia and pay additional shipping costs eventually rising the per capita expenditure. So the governmet's action didn't work.
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Nov 2010, 08:02
2
This post received KUDOS
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
sly:)... they found the loophole.
Law says: you can't increase the price.
Businessman: ok. I will manufacture a new product (with slight changes) and put it in the market and charge a high price to begin with - then the price ceiling can't stop me from charging the price I want.
We’ve given one of our favorite features a boost! You can now manage your profile photo, or avatar , right on WordPress.com. This avatar, powered by a service...
Sometimes it’s the extra touches that make all the difference; on your website, that’s the photos and video that give your content life. You asked for streamlined access...
A lot has been written recently about the big five technology giants (Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple, and Facebook) that dominate the technology sector. There are fears about the...
Post today is short and sweet for my MBA batchmates! We survived Foundations term, and tomorrow's the start of our Term 1! I'm sharing my pre-MBA notes...
61% (01:05) correct
