Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 23:24 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 23:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,365
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,966
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,365
Kudos: 778,133
 [12]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
honneeey
Joined: 23 Aug 2016
Last visit: 06 Apr 2022
Posts: 93
Own Kudos:
173
 [2]
Given Kudos: 818
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 2.84
WE:Other (Energy)
Products:
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 93
Kudos: 173
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
938
 [1]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yipmewmew
Joined: 26 May 2021
Last visit: 15 Jul 2025
Posts: 230
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 792
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 230
Kudos: 83
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
I understand why D is right, makes the most sense. But can an expert confirm if my reasoning for eliminating B is correct?
I think that the reason we should eliminate B is because that if the manufacturer is not concerned with the competition finding out their trade secrets in the swedish market, then why are they concerned with the same thing in the US market? hence this option doesnt provide any kind of rationale for the manufacturer's actions.
User avatar
TOBEATHATPERSON
Joined: 09 Jan 2024
Last visit: 14 Nov 2024
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 83
Location: India
Posts: 94
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray KarishmaB 

would you help me how we can remove option B Also is this explanation problem?­
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,984
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,984
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Bunuel
For the safety-conscious Swedish market, a United States manufacturer of desktop computers developed a special display screen that produces a much weaker electromagnetic field surrounding the user than do ordinary screens. Despite an advantage in this respect over its competitors, the manufacturer is introducing the screen into the United States market without advertising it as a safety improvement.

Which of the following, if true, provides a rationale for the manufacturer's approach to advertising the screen in the United States?


(A) Many more desktop computers are sold each year in the United States market than are sold in the Swedish market.

(B) The manufacturer does not want its competitors to become aware of the means by which the company has achieved this advance in technology.

(C) Most business and scientific purchasers of desktop computers expect to replace such equipment eventually as better technology becomes available on the market.

(D) An emphasis on the comparative safety of the new screen would call into question the safety of the many screens the manufacturer has already sold in the United States.

(E) Concern has been expressed in the United States over the health effects of the large electromagnetic fields surrounding electric power lines.

 
A company has produced much safer screens for the safety-conscious Swedish market.
The company is introducing these screens in US too.
This is an advantage the company has over its competitors. 
Still, they are marketing without advertising it as a safety improvement.


It doesn't make sense, right? If they have developed something much safer and if it is a competitive advantage, why wouldn't you market this safety feature? Why wouldn't you tell the customers that yoru screens are much safer?
We need an explanation for why he is not doing so, something that will help us make sense of the company's actions.

­(A) Many more desktop computers are sold each year in the United States market than are sold in the Swedish market.

Irrelevant. Tell us nothing about why he isn't marketing as safe to increase his sales.

(B) The manufacturer does not want its competitors to become aware of the means by which the company has achieved this advance in technology.

Marketing it as safer will not tell the competitors how he has achieved this advancement. It will only tell the competitors that he has achieved this advancement. The means by which he achieved it (the specific tech) his competitors will not get to know. They will only know that his screens are safer. How they are made safer, they wouldn't know. Hence this is not a reason for not marketing the advantage. 
EDDIE98

(C) Most business and scientific purchasers of desktop computers expect to replace such equipment eventually as better technology becomes available on the market.

Even if this is relevant, it is a reason to advertise, to tell them that they have developed safer screens through better tech. It is likely that the businesses will replace their current equipment and buy the company's new equipment. 

(D) An emphasis on the comparative safety of the new screen would call into question the safety of the many screens the manufacturer has already sold in the United States.

Now this could be a valid problem. If the company says wehave developed much safer screens, the government or people may ask, "So what have you been selling till now?" 
If the company emphasizes the safety of new screens, it may raise questions on the safety of the current screens sold and that may get the company in trouble. This could be a reason that the company is avoiding advertising the safety of the new screens. 

(E) Concern has been expressed in the United States over the health effects of the large electromagnetic fields surrounding electric power lines.

Irrelevant.­

Answer (D)
User avatar
TOBEATHATPERSON
Joined: 09 Jan 2024
Last visit: 14 Nov 2024
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 83
Location: India
Posts: 94
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
 
Bunuel
For the safety-conscious Swedish market, a United States manufacturer of desktop computers developed a special display screen that produces a much weaker electromagnetic field surrounding the user than do ordinary screens. Despite an advantage in this respect over its competitors, the manufacturer is introducing the screen into the United States market without advertising it as a safety improvement.

Which of the following, if true, provides a rationale for the manufacturer's approach to advertising the screen in the United States?


(A) Many more desktop computers are sold each year in the United States market than are sold in the Swedish market.

(B) The manufacturer does not want its competitors to become aware of the means by which the company has achieved this advance in technology.

(C) Most business and scientific purchasers of desktop computers expect to replace such equipment eventually as better technology becomes available on the market.

(D) An emphasis on the comparative safety of the new screen would call into question the safety of the many screens the manufacturer has already sold in the United States.

(E) Concern has been expressed in the United States over the health effects of the large electromagnetic fields surrounding electric power lines.

 
A company has produced much safer screens for the safety-conscious Swedish market.
The company is introducing these screens in US too.
This is an advantage the company has over its competitors. 
Still, they are marketing without advertising it as a safety improvement.


It doesn't make sense, right? If they have developed something much safer and if it is a competitive advantage, why wouldn't you market this safety feature? Why wouldn't you tell the customers that yoru screens are much safer?
We need an explanation for why he is not doing so, something that will help us make sense of the company's actions.

­(A) Many more desktop computers are sold each year in the United States market than are sold in the Swedish market.

Irrelevant. Tell us nothing about why he isn't marketing as safe to increase his sales.

(B) The manufacturer does not want its competitors to become aware of the means by which the company has achieved this advance in technology.

Marketing it as safer will not tell the competitors how he has achieved this advancement. It will only tell the competitors that he has achieved this advancement. The means by which he achieved it (the specific tech) his competitors will not get to know. They will only know that his screens are safer. How they are made safer, they wouldn't know. Hence this is not a reason for not marketing the advantage. 
EDDIE98

(C) Most business and scientific purchasers of desktop computers expect to replace such equipment eventually as better technology becomes available on the market.

Even if this is relevant, it is a reason to advertise, to tell them that they have developed safer screens through better tech. It is likely that the businesses will replace their current equipment and buy the company's new equipment. 

(D) An emphasis on the comparative safety of the new screen would call into question the safety of the many screens the manufacturer has already sold in the United States.

Now this could be a valid problem. If the company says wehave developed much safer screens, the government or people may ask, "So what have you been selling till now?" 
If the company emphasizes the safety of new screens, it may raise questions on the safety of the current screens sold and that may get the company in trouble. This could be a reason that the company is avoiding advertising the safety of the new screens. 

(E) Concern has been expressed in the United States over the health effects of the large electromagnetic fields surrounding electric power lines.

Irrelevant.­

Answer (D)

Ahh! I understand KarishmaB the point is that B says "the means!" It can't be known by advertisements but just results(safer scren).
Is this proper understand? Thanks!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 784
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB

Quote:

Quote:

Irrelevant.­

Answer (D)
Ahh! I understand KarishmaB the point is that B says "the means!" It can't be known by advertisements but just results(safer scren).
Is this proper understand? Thanks!

Posted from my mobile device
Yes, exactly.
­A weird question from my side. Why are you not saying as per option D, what screens were sold in past is irrelevant ?­
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts