VanshikaBagdy
Hi folks!
I just gave my GMAT yesterday. It was a flustering experience. I started with Quant and did fairly well, but struggled to manage time in Verbal, having to skim through the last 10 questions. I even skipped 1-2 questions. I'm quite disappointed, as I was aiming for a 720+.
Anyway, I have been studying (not so consistently) for the GMAT, through the
OG +
eGMAT resource for ~4-5 months. In the past 2 weeks, I doubled down on a few Quant gaps, and Verbal tricks.
Here is an account of my GMAT Offficial Mock Test Prep Scores (~4 taken in the last month or so), for your reference:
- GMAT Official Practice Exam 1: 710 Q49/ V38 02/20/2022
- GMAT Official Practice Exam 2: 720 Q47/ V 42 05/21/2022
- GMAT Official Practice Exam 3: 710 Q49/ V 38 06/07/2022
- GMAT Official Practice Exam 4: 720 Q49/ V 40 06/10/2022
- GMAT Official Practice Exam 5: 710 Q48/ V 38 06/13/2022
Questions for the experts:
A. Does Verbal have a predictable logic which I can solidify, similar to Quant?
B. How do I make a 100 point improvement in 20-30 days? Could I aim for a Q50, V40-42? How many hours do I need to put in, and how?
Hello,
VanshikaBagdy. It is unfortunate that the test did not go your way yesterday. The consistency across your mocks is remarkable, so a 710-720 is within your grasp if you can simply approach the real exam in a similar manner to those mocks. Working on
Quant gaps is a good idea. The difference between a 49 and a 50 can be marginal. Studying
Verbal tricks, on the other hand, is often counterproductive. If you place stock in a trick, then you are looking to shortcut the logic of a given passage or sentence. Consider that V42 mock. How did you approach those questions? My guess is that you went into the section with the thought that you would give it your best shot and see how things turned out. The real exam should be treated no differently. (And to earn a 42 in the section, you have to know your stuff pretty well.) Yes, the Verbal section follows a fairly patent question design. GMAC™ is not reinventing grammar or throwing never-before-seen logical pathways in front of test-takers. You want to practice Weaken questions, for example, until you understand just how to weaken an argument, hypothesis, or plan. A few questions at a time is enough for practice and review. Do not worry about covering 50 questions a day or some such nonsense. That approach will not help you.
No one can tell you how many hours to put in to earn an extra 100 points. If there were a linear formula, I think Indian test-takers would be among the first to find the winning combination. You should place quality over quantity, though. And let go of this 100-point-improvement necessity. It is okay to establish goals. But you are way more likely to meet or exceed such a goal if you focus on what it takes to make an improvement,
any improvement, and that starts with mastering Easy and Medium questions, not all the Hard material that people obsess over. I have seen test-takers earn 730+ scores by studying no Hard questions. This is a process that works from the ground up, not the other way around. So, just go through a few questions at a time (Medium), see if you can hit 5/5, and go back and pick those questions apart two, three days later. When you develop positive and productive ways of assessing questions, your performance improves. That is just how the process works.
Good luck with your studies.
- Andrew