Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:24 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
HarshaBujji
Joined: 29 Jun 2020
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 695
Own Kudos:
885
 [1]
Given Kudos: 247
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 695
Kudos: 885
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
bronaugust
Joined: 06 Jun 2024
Last visit: 29 Aug 2024
Posts: 233
Own Kudos:
315
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 233
Kudos: 315
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kavyavishnoi02
Joined: 09 Dec 2023
Last visit: 30 Jun 2025
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
61
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 43
Kudos: 61
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rsrobin864
Joined: 21 Aug 2020
Last visit: 10 Jan 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
77
 [1]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 77
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Quote:
 
(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.--This is related to monitoring air quality, but it does not directly impact whether the fine on diesel vehicles will reduce pollution. It is not directly necessary for the claim.

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level--If the number of diesel vehicles increases despite the fine, it could undermine the effectiveness of the fine in reducing pollution. This is a relevant assumption.

(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.--Industrial pollution is a separate issue from diesel vehicles. While important for overall air quality, it does not directly affect the claim about reducing pollution from diesel vehicles.

(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.--This addresses vehicles entering the city, not those already within it using diesel. It's not directly relevant to the effectiveness of the fine on local diesel vehicles.

(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.--This assumes that traffic volume remains constant. However, it does not address specifically whether the fine on diesel vehicles will reduce pollution from those vehicles.

So ans is B
User avatar
boomer1ang
Joined: 13 Oct 2022
Last visit: 12 Oct 2025
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 50
Kudos: 57
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
Not relevant - even if funding for monitoring decreases, it does not affect actual pollution.

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
The fine is to discourage people, so this is not an assumption for fine to work.

(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
Not relevant, tangential.

(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
Doesn't matter where they enter from.

(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.
This is correct assumption since if overall traffic increases then just fining diesel vehicals wont be effective.

Answer (E)
User avatar
Chimz
Joined: 19 May 2024
Last visit: 03 Jul 2025
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
Posts: 91
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fine on diesel cehicles within city limits

Why? Fine will discourage vehicle user and bring down Air pollution

Assumptions : 1) No of vehicles in city of diesel should remain constant, option B satisfies

A) Funding : Irrelevant
C) Industrial pollution, Irrelevant and vague
D) No of vehicles entering : Passage is targeting within city limit vehicles so ruled out
E) Traffic Volume : Traffic Volume will also include other vehicles which are non diesel, hence invalid
User avatar
jairovx
Joined: 30 Mar 2023
Last visit: 06 Oct 2024
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: Peru
Posts: 48
Kudos: 57
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.


  • This option is about monitoring air quality, not directly about the use of diesel vehicles or their impact on pollution. The claim is about reducing pollution, not monitoring it. Therefore, this is not a necessary assumption for the claim.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.


  • This is critical. If the number of diesel vehicles increases, the fine may not effectively reduce pollution. The effectiveness of the fine relies on reducing the number of diesel vehicles or keeping it the same. This is a necessary assumption.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.


  • While an increase in industrial pollution could offset the benefits of reducing diesel vehicle pollution, the claim targets explicitly the impact of diesel vehicles. Therefore, this is not a direct assumption necessary for the claim about diesel vehicles.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.


  • This could be relevant, but the focus of the claim is on vehicles within the city limits. If vehicles from nearby areas increase, it might impact the air quality, but it is not directly related to the current diesel vehicles within the city.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.


  • This is a broader consideration, but the claim specifically targets diesel vehicles. If traffic volume increases with non-diesel vehicles, the assumption may not directly impact the claim. It is more about the specific impact of diesel vehicles.
Conclusion

The best assumption that directly impacts the claim made by the environmental officer is:

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.

This assumption is crucial because the fine's effectiveness in reducing pollution relies on the number of diesel vehicles staying the same or decreasing, not increasing.
User avatar
Suboopc
Joined: 14 Mar 2023
Last visit: 02 Jul 2025
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
138
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 82
Kudos: 138
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
This affects the ability to measure the air quality. Hence is irrelevant to the conclusion about air quality.

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
While it is true that increase in the number of diesel vehicles will lead to the increase in pollution, the claim is with regards to the fines imposed on the use of diesel vehicles and the decrease over the next year. Even with number of diesel vehicles increasing, the fine could have the desired effect.

(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
To claim that the air pollution will reduce in the city, it has to be assumed that other factors will not increase air pollution. This gives us an alternate reason to believe that even with fines, the air pollution might not decrease. In this case, if with fines have the desired effect, the air pollution might not decrease.

(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
This does not specify which type of vehicles enter the city. 

(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.
Overall traffic informatino does not tell us about number of diesel vehicles.
User avatar
diasdexter766
Joined: 15 Sep 2023
Last visit: 30 Mar 2025
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
23
 [1]
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
Posts: 33
Kudos: 23
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option B is the best suited answer!
User avatar
thelastskybender
Joined: 26 Dec 2022
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
75
 [1]
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 132
Kudos: 75
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?
To be honest I didn't like any of the options here but lets choose the best one. 

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level. [Change in Funding is not our concern]
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level. [Negation of this fails the whole plan]
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level. [Industrial pollution need not to be in the form of air pollution only]
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year. [Even if it does but what if that increment in number of vehicles is less than the reduction in the number of diesel vehicles?]
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level. [Negation of this kind of breaks the conclusion but assuming increment in overall volume isn't from the types of vehicle which are much less polluting compared to diesel ones i.e. electric vehicles. Hence I think option B is much better] ­
User avatar
gaubeo308
Joined: 07 Jul 2024
Last visit: 30 Jul 2024
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 19
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer: We are looking for an assumption that will destroy the argument if it is not true. Therefore, we negate each choice and see if the negation will destroy the argument. 

(A) Even if the funding for air quality monitoring decreases, the fine on diesel vehicles could still help to improve air quality. Perhaps the decrease in funding for air quality monitoring suggests better efficiency in that activity. 

(B) This will destroy the argument. If the fine is imposed, but the number of diesel vehciles continues to climb, then the fine is useless in preventing more pollution from diesel vehicles. 

(C) This is irrelevant because even if industrial pollution increases, this could be offset by the decrease in pollution by diesel vehicles after the fine is imposed. 

(D) This is irrelevant because even if more cars come into the city, all of these cars could be electric cars that are not subject to the diesel-vehicle fine. 

(E) This is also irrelevant because traffic volume could increase because there are more non-diesel vehicles that have nothing to do with the fine. 
User avatar
aviraj1703
Joined: 27 May 2024
Last visit: 10 Mar 2025
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
122
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 98
Kudos: 122
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­Falsification question: What could be the reason for not significant reduction in level of air polution within one year.

Falsification scenario: 
1) Only few vehicles in the city are diesel vehicles.
2) At leasr one another source of air polution will increase from its current level within next year.

Pre-thought assumptions by negating falsification scenarios:
1) Most of the vehicles in the city are diesel vehicles.
2) No other source of air polution will increase from its current level.

(C) Correct: Alligns with the 2nd pre-thought assumption.

(A) Incorrect: Out of scope.
(B) Incorrect: As heavy duty is applied on diesel vehicles within city limits they will decrease.
(D) Incorrect: As within city limits heavy fine is imposed it will decrease.
(E) Incorrect: If most of the citizens will reduce use of desiel vehicles then traffic volume may not increase air polution.
User avatar
Akkiiii
Joined: 01 May 2022
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
63
 [1]
Given Kudos: 855
Location: India
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 109
Kudos: 63
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Among the options, option (B) directly addresses the assumption needed for the environmental officer's claim.

Negate: If the number of diesel vehicles increases, the fine might not have the intended impact.
User avatar
MT___
Joined: 31 Oct 2023
Last visit: 26 Jan 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 241
Posts: 29
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.


Explaination:

(B) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.

This explains the reason why, even after imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits, the pollution won't reduce


 
User avatar
Catman
Joined: 03 Aug 2017
Last visit: 12 Feb 2025
Posts: 320
Own Kudos:
328
 [1]
Given Kudos: 219
Products:
Posts: 320
Kudos: 328
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion- "this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year."

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.- Argument depends on fine collection and not on state funding.

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level. - If the diesel vechiles increased despite the fine than there will not be any significant reduction in the city.

(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level. - Argument is about air polution. Industrial pollution is the superset of this. But its increase may also lead to reduction in air pollution.

(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year. - Argument is about the diesel vechiles within city limits.

(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level. - Overall traffic can be increased from vechiles other than diesel.­

IMO B.­
avatar
DG1989
Joined: 16 Feb 2023
Last visit: 24 Dec 2024
Posts: 140
Own Kudos:
303
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: Kellogg '26
GPA: 4
Schools: Kellogg '26
Posts: 140
Kudos: 303
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?The officer's claim is based on the idea that the fine will lead to fewer diesel vehicles operating within the city, thus reducing air pollution. The assumption must ensure that the reduction in diesel vehicle use will indeed lead to a significant drop in air pollution.

=16px(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.

Explanation: This is not directly related to the reduction in diesel vehicles or air pollution. Monitoring air quality does not affect the level of pollution itself. INCORRECT
 
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
Explanation: This assumption is directly related to the claim. If the number of diesel vehicles increases, the fine may not reduce overall diesel vehicle use, thus not reducing pollution as claimed. CORRECT

(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
Explanation: Industrial pollution might be relevant to overall air quality but it is not necessarily the sole or major reason for contributing to air pollution. Industrial pollution may very well be contributing to air, soil, water, and other types of pollution. The argument focuses specifically on the impact of reducing diesel vehicle use. An increase in industrial pollution would not necessarily undermine the specific claim about diesel vehicles. INCORRECT

(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
Explanation: This could affect overall traffic but does not directly challenge the reduction of diesel vehicles within the city. The new vehicles may not be diesel vehicles at all and may not be contributing to air pollution. It's less directly related to the claim about diesel vehicle fines. INCORRECT

(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.
Explanation: Similar to option D, the overall traffic volume may not be contributing to the increase in air pollution and hence doesn't relate to the claim. INCORRECT
User avatar
SKDEV
Joined: 25 Feb 2024
Last visit: 23 Jul 2025
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
104
 [1]
Given Kudos: 124
Status:a smooth sea never made a skilled sailor
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q85 V81 DI82
GPA: 3.5
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q85 V81 DI82
Posts: 75
Kudos: 104
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO C) *EDIT - This is a wrong choice

I fell for the trap here!! 
this options is not related to the author's plan. he is talking about the pollution from diesel vehicles, and assumes that deisel vehicles wont increase!
User avatar
Rahul_Sharma23
Joined: 05 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
82
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V83 DI83
GPA: 2.5
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V83 DI83
Posts: 114
Kudos: 82
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Environmental officer's claim will hold only if there is no increase in pollution from any other source during the period. Hence, option C is correct
User avatar
said.tojiboev
User avatar
PhD Forum Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2018
Last visit: 20 Oct 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
60
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Uzbekistan
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Stanford '27
GPA: 4.49
WE:Project Management (Education)
Schools: Stanford '27
Posts: 65
Kudos: 60
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

­(A) Funding for monitoring doesn't impact diesel pollution reduction.
(B) Not increasing diesel vehicle numbers does not ensure the reduction of the level of air pollution. Maybe the pollution level will stay the same instead of decreasing.
(C) Industrial pollution must stay the same to see a net reduction in air pollution. The officer assumes that while the pollution level from other sources at least stays the same, the air pollution level will significantly reduce because of the decrease in pollution-emitting diesel vehicles due to heavy taxes. CORRECT
(D) Incoming vehicle increase isn't directly related to existing diesel vehicle reduction.
(E) Overall traffic volume isn't directly tied to diesel vehicle reduction.­
User avatar
IstudyGMAT
Joined: 04 May 2024
Last visit: 08 Jun 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
51
 [1]
Given Kudos: 74
Posts: 15
Kudos: 51
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.

This one was kinda tricky due to it not containing an answer I expected. The officer claims that the fine will reduce pollution when it regulates diesel vehicles within city limits. This means our response or his argument is based on the assumption that more diesel vehicles wont enter city limits. The answer closest to this is D. Though I feel you could argue E is correct too
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts