Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 00:46 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 00:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,156
 [15]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
778,156
 [3]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,156
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
RishS94
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Last visit: 27 Feb 2025
Posts: 266
Own Kudos:
141
 [1]
Given Kudos: 118
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: ISB '25 (D)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
Products:
Schools: ISB '25 (D)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 266
Kudos: 141
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AthulSasi
Joined: 25 Jun 2019
Last visit: 04 Nov 2025
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
77
 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V85 DI81
GPA: 8.5
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V85 DI81
Posts: 55
Kudos: 77
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
By enforcing a fine on diesel vehicle entering the city limits the E.O is expecting a significant reduction in the air pollution level in the city within one year.
Since it is a heavy fine, we can assume that the number of diesel vehicle entering the city will reduce and there by reducing the pollution caused by diesel vehicles. However for the overall air pollution level in the city to reduce significantly there should not be any increase in pollution in the city from a source other than diesel vehicle. Looking at the answer choices, the correct answer is C­
User avatar
Rucha.Shukla
Joined: 17 Jan 2024
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
74
 [1]
Given Kudos: 688
Location: India
Posts: 92
Kudos: 74
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.

IF the industrial pollution increases then the claim will not hold true because no action is taken against industrial pollution assuming it is not a major contributing factor to the pollution
User avatar
ashminipoddar10
Joined: 14 Jun 2024
Last visit: 07 Jul 2025
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
54
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 56
Kudos: 54
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.


a) the assumption made by the officer in making the claim has nothing to do with the fund allocated to monitoring. incorrect.

b) correct. the officer assumes that if taxes on the diesel vehicles currently running within the city are the major cause of the air pollution, then increasing taxes would discourage the use of such vehicles. however, if the number increases the claim would not stand.

c) the officer doesnt talk about industrial pollution hence wrong.

d) the officer specifically holds the diesel vehicles as the culprit for causing air pollution, hence the number of vehicles increasing/decreasing isnt related to his claim

e) similar to option D hence wrong
User avatar
siddhantvarma
Joined: 12 May 2024
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 539
Own Kudos:
715
 [1]
Given Kudos: 196
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q87 V82 DI75
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q87 V82 DI75
Posts: 539
Kudos: 715
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­We're given a claim that imposing a heavy fine on diesel vehicles will significantly reduce air pollution within one year. We need to identify an assumption that this claim relies on. 

Let's look at each option now:(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
The fine could work regardless of monitoring so this is not directly related to the effectiveness of the fine. We can ignore A. 

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
This is relevant, but the fine itself is expected to reduce the use of diesel vehicles. I don't think this classifies as an assumption but rather a consequence or an effect of the fine. We can eliminate B. 

(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
Let's say the pollution increases from industries which further affects overall air quality. This still isn't related to the fine on diesel vehicles. C is out. 

(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
If there's a significant increase in vehicles and let's say (I might assume that some of them could be diesel vehicles)from outside the city, it could offset the reduction achieved by the fine within the city. If you reverse this assumption to see if the conclusion holds, it breaks. D sounds pretty good. 

(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.
The overall traffic volume affects air quality. But again, the claim is about the effect of the fine on diesel vehicles, not overall traffic. We can eliminate E. 

The environmental officer's claim assumes that other factors won't counteract the effect of the fine. The most relevant factor here is the influx of vehicles from outside the city, which might not be subject to the fine but could still contribute to air pollution.

Therefore, the correct answer is (D). We can also think of it like this - if it were false (i.e., if there was a significant increase in vehicles from nearby areas), it could potentially negate the positive effect of the fine on air quality within the city.
User avatar
gaurav_raj2106
Joined: 07 Jun 2024
Last visit: 09 Jul 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Posts: 1
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA: C­
By using negation test. Negating A, B, D, E wouldn't change or effect the conclusion. Whereas negating C will effect the argument.
User avatar
divi22
Joined: 03 Jul 2024
Last visit: 31 Aug 2024
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
58
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 45
Kudos: 58
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
Accr. to me, this seems to be the answer
User avatar
tulee
Joined: 15 Jan 2024
Last visit: 15 Oct 2025
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 53
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Posts: 66
Kudos: 53
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
The city council is blaming diesel vehicles for pollution but there could be other causes. But he also thinks that if other causes of pollution will not increase then placing a heavy fine on diesel vehicles would lower pollution overall so I chose C. The overall traffic volume and other vehicles maybe EV and maybe they don't contribute to pollution in the city but "industrial pollution in the city" does.
User avatar
cm291093
Joined: 02 Jul 2019
Last visit: 26 Oct 2025
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 20
Kudos: 12
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am confused between B or D. I think B seems a bit logical.
User avatar
jpowwow
Joined: 13 Mar 2024
Last visit: 11 Sep 2025
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
9
 [1]
Posts: 9
Kudos: 9
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think B, because if the number of diesel vehicules does not reduce, then the fine is ineffective.
User avatar
Emkicheru
Joined: 12 Sep 2023
Last visit: 12 Sep 2025
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Location: Kenya
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
GPA: 3.7
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
Posts: 119
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Consideration of statistics and make an iteration we can see that the statement is true.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Shreya1211
Joined: 28 May 2021
Last visit: 23 Apr 2025
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
19
 [1]
Given Kudos: 305
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, International Business
Posts: 33
Kudos: 19
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

The officer is assuming that the pollution will not increase because of any other factor apart from diesel vehicles. Using negation technique allows us to eliminate option A, B, D & E.

Why option C is correct (negation)-
Quote:
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
Removing
Quote:
NOT
from the option proves that amount of industrial pollution will increase from its current level in the city, hence, becoming a factor for increasing pollution.
User avatar
param.24
Joined: 29 May 2024
Last visit: 07 Feb 2025
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
19
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GRE 1: Q169 V161
GPA: 4
WE:Programming (Technology)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To improve air quality, the city council is considering imposing a heavy fine on diesel vehicles within city limits. The environmental officer claims this will reduce air pollution significantly within a year. The claim relies on the assumption that the number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year, ensuring the fine's effectiveness in reducing diesel vehicle pollution within the city.
User avatar
sd2710
Joined: 11 Dec 2023
Last visit: 14 Oct 2025
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 36
Posts: 9
Kudos: 6
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Negating the options given will lead us to the answer. 
Option B, if the number of diesel vehicle increases in the city the plan won't work. 
User avatar
meet459
User avatar
Goizueta / Scheller Moderator
Joined: 03 Jun 2024
Last visit: 29 May 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
95
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q90 V81 DI79
GPA: 8.55
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?


(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level. -> Irrelevant 
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level. -> Good choice
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level. -> Irrelevant, we are talking about air pollution
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year. -> Good choice, but which type of vehicles isn't mentioned, it could be diesel, or non-diesal, hence not the answer. 
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.­ -> Irrelevant since we are talking about diesel vehicles. 
User avatar
Purnank
Joined: 05 Jan 2024
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 680
Own Kudos:
585
 [1]
Given Kudos: 166
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q88 V76 DI80
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q88 V76 DI80
Posts: 680
Kudos: 585
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Again I think D for this one as well,

(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
This assumes no increase in incoming vehicles, which could offset any reduction achieved by the fine.
Lets use negation, The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will significantly increase over the next year.
If more vehicles come from nearby areas, the fine within the city won't reduce pollution effectively. This is undermining the argument, making it invalid.
User avatar
a281983
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Last visit: 22 Jul 2024
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Posts: 9
Kudos: 4
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­C --> industrial pollution --> fines should deter, no matter the number of vehicles increase or not, funding is out of context
User avatar
Raxit85
Joined: 22 Feb 2018
Last visit: 02 Aug 2025
Posts: 766
Own Kudos:
1,177
 [1]
Given Kudos: 135
Posts: 766
Kudos: 1,177
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To improve air quality (Goal), the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits (City council's Proposal). The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year (Enviro. Officer/Author's conclusion). EO assumes that by implementing the proposal the goal can be achieved within 1 year.

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level. - This option states that funding for monitoring of air quality won't reduce, but it does not states anything about actual reduction of pollution because of heavy fine collection. So incorrect.

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level. - No. of diesel vehicles won't increase but current vehicles will pollute the air till its retirement but the goal will not be achieved in that case. Pollution can be reduced or same if this option implements. If it remains same, then the conclusion crumbles. In addition, this option does not correlate with heavy fine which was the line of reasoning of EO. So wrong.

(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level. - This option seems out of scope because passage says about heavy fines to diesel vehicle users not industry and it does not relates to impact of fine on diesel vehicle users to achieve pollution reduction. So incorrect.

(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year. -This option is related to no. of (general) vehicles, from nearby localities, won't increase in next year. We don't know how many of them are diesel vehicle. But if we consider the most of them are diesel vehicle, then air quality can be improved. Still let's evaluate E.

(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level. - This option seems out of scope the same as C because passage says about heavy fines to diesel vehicle users not the alternate cause of pollution and it does not relates to impact of fine on diesel vehicle users to achieve pollution reduction. So incorrect.

After evaluating E, final answer is D.
­
 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts