Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 03:46 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 03:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 8,422
Own Kudos:
4,980
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,422
Kudos: 4,980
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yipmewmew
Joined: 26 May 2021
Last visit: 15 Jul 2025
Posts: 230
Own Kudos:
83
 [1]
Given Kudos: 792
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 230
Kudos: 83
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
PranavVyas
Joined: 13 Aug 2020
Last visit: 11 Sep 2025
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
107
 [1]
Given Kudos: 94
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 540 Q15 V29
WE:Operations (Manufacturing)
GMAT 1: 540 Q15 V29
Posts: 97
Kudos: 107
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 784
Own Kudos:
639
 [1]
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Goal- improve air quality
Fine on usage of diesel vehicles->reduction of air pollution in the city

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
-funding is out of scope for this qrguement

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
-Yes. If this increases, pollution will increase despite the fines


(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
-Even there is slight increase, this doesnot shatter the conclusion

(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
- we are talking about diesel vehicles only . hence Out
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.
Even if it does, we are not sure if the volume is more diesel driven. hence we can eliminate it
User avatar
A_Nishith
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 455
Own Kudos:
199
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 455
Kudos: 199
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To determine the assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends, we need to identify what must be true for the claim that the heavy fine on diesel vehicles will significantly reduce air pollution within a year to hold.

Let's analyze each option:

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
This relates to monitoring air quality rather than directly affecting the level of pollution. While it may impact the ability to measure improvements, it does not directly affect the reduction of pollution.

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
If the number of diesel vehicles were to increase, the fine might not be effective in reducing pollution. This is a strong candidate because it directly impacts the effectiveness of the fine in reducing pollution.

(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
Although an increase in industrial pollution could offset gains from reducing diesel vehicle pollution, this option is less directly related to the specific measure of imposing fines on diesel vehicles.

(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
This is related but more indirect. If more vehicles, regardless of fuel type, were to enter the city, it could complicate the pollution reduction efforts. However, this does not specifically address diesel vehicles, which are the focus of the fine.

(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.
Similar to option D, this is related but more general. An increase in overall traffic could affect air quality, but this assumption is broader and less directly tied to the specific measure regarding diesel vehicles.

Given the focus of the measure on diesel vehicles, the assumption that the number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level (option B) is essential for the claim. If the number of diesel vehicles were to increase, the fine might not lead to a reduction in pollution.

Thus, Answer: B
User avatar
zeognzeg
Joined: 30 Jun 2024
Last visit: 15 Jan 2025
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
40
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 38
Kudos: 40
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Answer C
 ­If another source was increased the pollution of the city (the industrial here), the reduction of pollution from cars would potentially not prevent the overall decrease in pollution in the city
User avatar
busygmatbee1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2023
Last visit: 18 Mar 2025
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
GPA: 10/10
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
Posts: 50
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
It's not directly relevant to our reasoning and hence can't be an assumption.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
If the number of diesel vehicles increases despite the fine, it would not improve the pollution. 
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
It's not directly relevant to our reasoning and hence can't be an assumption.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
It's not directly relevant to our reasoning and hence can't be an assumption.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.
This does directly address our reasoning but doesn't specify anything relevant. 
User avatar
hienthusiast
Joined: 30 Apr 2024
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
17
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 5
Kudos: 17
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Find assumption question
To improve air quality => conclusion
heavy fine on diesel vehicles => premise
plan to solve: need to make sure no other reasons intervene to desired outcome
A. Irrelevant, funding doesn't affect air quality
B. number of diesel vehicles not increase => but if increase, will be imposed heavy fine => exactly the target of the plan => not necessary to draw to conclusion
D, E. same logic.
C. number of industrial pollution not increase => point out other causes of air pollution. so fine diesel vehicles to reduce pollution from fuel, but if industrial pollution increase => overall air pollution might increase => affect the plan
=> Answer is C
User avatar
Elite097
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
553
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Posts: 771
Kudos: 553
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To strengthen the environmental officer's claim that imposing a heavy fine on diesel vehicles will significantly reduce air pollution within one year, we need to identify an assumption that must hold true for the claim to be valid.

The imposition of a fine on diesel vehicles assumes that the reduction in air pollution will primarily come from the decreased usage or presence of these vehicles. Let's evaluate the options:

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.

This is unrelated to the effectiveness of the fine on diesel vehicles in reducing air pollution. Monitoring funding doesn't impact the reduction of pollution caused directly by diesel vehicles.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.

This assumption directly supports the claim. If the number of diesel vehicles doesn't increase, the potential reduction in pollution due to the fine can be more effectively realized.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.

Industrial pollution is a separate category from vehicle emissions and doesn't affect the impact of the fine on diesel vehicles.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.

This relates to external factors affecting overall pollution levels in the city, not specifically the impact of the fine on diesel vehicles.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.

This assumption is important because an increase in traffic volume could offset any reduction achieved by targeting diesel vehicles with fines.
Among the options, (B) is the assumption that directly supports the environmental officer's claim. If the number of diesel vehicles remains constant (or decreases), then the fine can effectively reduce their contribution to air pollution within the city. Therefore, (B) is the correct answer.

ans B
User avatar
prashantthawrani
Joined: 07 Feb 2023
Last visit: 23 Jun 2025
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
93
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
Posts: 71
Kudos: 93
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?
It is assumed that curbing only the vehicular pollution (via fine) will significantly reduce air pollution, Accordingly, the contribution of other factors to air pollution is negligible.

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.
User avatar
temulenbatbayr90
Joined: 06 Sep 2022
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 45
Kudos: 53
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer is (B). Here is why.
The argument is focusing on imposing strict limits on the diesel consumption so that diesel using cars will be decreased, thereby lowering the air pollution. So we need the answer why the argument holds(the environmentalist's claim that air pollution will be decreased.)
(A) How the funding has direct effect on the diesel usage level. it is kinda unclear. Probably in the real world. But there is not direct linkage between diesel consumption and air pollution in here.
(B) If we use NEGATION technique in here, then the number of diesel car WILL INCREASE. This directly hurts the argument because if the numbers increases, despite the strict fine, many cars will cancel out the effect of it.
(C) not relevant. we are here find the linkage between air pollution and diesel car fine, but it is about industries.
(D) not relevant. same as (C)
(E) not relevant. same as (C).
So correct answer is (B).
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,794
Own Kudos:
5,509
 [1]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,794
Kudos: 5,509
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits.

The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?
Quote:
 (A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
The argument / claim is NOT concerned about funding allocated to air quality monitoring.
Incorrect
Quote:
 (B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
If the number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will increase from its current level, this fine will not significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year. 
If the assumption is negated, the argument falls apart.
Correct
Quote:
 (C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
The argument / claim is NOT concerned about industrial pollution in the city although it may impact air pollution.
Incorrect

Quote:
 (D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
The argument / claim is NOT concerned about the number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas but is concerned with number of diesel vehicles within city limits only.
Incorrect

Quote:
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.
­The argument / claim is NOT concerned about the overall traffic volume in the city but is concerned with number of diesel vehicles within city limits only.
Incorrect

IMO B
User avatar
ZIX
Joined: 30 Sep 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
144
 [1]
Given Kudos: 519
Posts: 91
Kudos: 144
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.

The core assumption of the author is that diesel vehicles cause majority of pollution. That's why he believes "imposing a heavy fine" will reduce their use and would consequently "significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city". This claim would fall apart if the number of diesel vehicles would actually increase (*surprised Pikachu face*)

(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.

These three are good enough assumptions too. However, we are essentially talking about pollution caused by diesel vehicles here and how reducing their number would also significantly reduce the level of pollution too. So these 3 points are irrelevant to this specific point raised here
User avatar
whatsarc
Joined: 26 Aug 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
102
 [1]
Given Kudos: 78
Products:
Posts: 109
Kudos: 102
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
Irrelevant - Eliminate
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
Yes, negate and it breaks the argument

(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
Industrial pollution is not equal to air pollution, it could mean water pollution also, who knows. Eliminate
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
Number of vehicles, what if they are electric? Eliminate
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.
Again volume could mean anything, not particularly Diesel vehicles. Eliminate
User avatar
Dsha
Joined: 16 Jun 2024
Last visit: 23 Sep 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
Posts: 6
Kudos: 10
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option B is the only relevant choice

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
captain0612
Joined: 10 Apr 2020
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
123
 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q84 V83 DI77
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 7
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q84 V83 DI77
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 91
Kudos: 123
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Choice C

Plan: Impose heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles
Goal: Improve air quality

Environmental officer conclusion: Fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year

The premise and evidence is related to improving the quality of air, while the conclusion is about reduction in overall levels of air pollution.

Question: Assumption

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level. Funding is out of scope. We don't know how funding impacts the overall plan or execution of the plan Incorrect

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level. For a significant reduction in levels of air pollution, there needs to be a proportional decrease in the number of vehicles that are used. So, just that the numbers will not increase won't help bridge the gap Incorrect

(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level. Correct The officer might be considering this when he concludes that Levels of air pollution would significantly reduce. While we know that fines are levied on the diesel vehicles and that to an extent fines might be effective, it is also crucial for other factors contributing to air pollution also not increase.

(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year. The reasoning is similar to that of B. Further this implies that if the number of diesel vehicles did not significantly decrease then the fine may not be effective to improve air quality/ reduce air pollution Incorrect

(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level. Out of scope. How traffic contributes to air pollution is not specified in the argument. Even if the traffic doesn't increase, the proportion of the vehicles that are highly contributing to the pollution may very well increase, so Incorrect
User avatar
Shwarma
Joined: 10 Sep 2023
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 212
Own Kudos:
190
 [1]
Given Kudos: 65
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q82 V83 DI84
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q82 V83 DI84
Posts: 212
Kudos: 190
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option B??

Not very sure
Conclusion: the fine on diesel vehicles will reduce air pollution in a year
Between B and C
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level. - Yes, negate it.... the number of diesel vehicles will increase, and then more fines will be levied but objectively air pollution is increasing ..?
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level. - does this mean air, water, or sound ..what type of pollution which is why I ELIMINATED THIS OPTION

It could be C also, not very sure
User avatar
Abhijeet24
Joined: 06 Apr 2023
Last visit: 23 Feb 2025
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
54
 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V79 DI80
GPA: 3.94
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V79 DI80
Posts: 48
Kudos: 54
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­To improve air quality, the city council of a metropolitan area is considering imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles within city limits. The city's environmental officer claims that this fine will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the environmental officer's claim depends?

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­To identify the assumption underlying the environmental officer's claim, we need to determine what must be true for the fine on diesel vehicles to effectively reduce air pollution.

The claim is that imposing a heavy fine on diesel vehicles will reduce air pollution within one year. This relies on the assumption that the fine will lead to fewer diesel vehicles operating within the city, and hence, lower levels of pollution from these vehicles.

Let's re-examine the options:

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.


  • This relates to the ability to monitor air quality but does not directly affect the reduction in pollution itself.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.


  • This ensures that the current level of diesel vehicles does not increase, which is relevant but doesn't directly ensure the fine will reduce the number of diesel vehicles.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.


  • This relates to industrial pollution, not vehicle pollution, and is less relevant to the claim about diesel vehicles.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.


  • This ensures that an influx of vehicles from outside the city does not counteract the fine's effect, which is relevant to maintaining lower pollution levels from diesel vehicles.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.


  • This pertains to overall traffic volume, which includes non-diesel vehicles, and is less directly related to the specific impact of the fine on diesel vehicle use.
Among these, the assumption that directly supports the environmental officer's claim that the fine will reduce air pollution is:

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.

This assumption is crucial because if the number of diesel vehicles were to increase, the fine might not lead to a significant reduction in pollution, undermining the claim. It directly addresses the impact of the fine on the level of diesel vehicle usage, which is central to reducing pollution.

Thus, the correct answer is:

(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.
User avatar
8Harshitsharma
Joined: 25 Oct 2017
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
142
 [1]
Given Kudos: 723
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
GPA: 9.25
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
Posts: 133
Kudos: 142
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­The environmental officer's claim that imposing a heavy fine on the use of diesel vehicles will significantly reduce the level of air pollution in the city within one year depends on certain assumptions. We need to identify the assumption that directly affects the connection between the fine on diesel vehicles and the expected reduction in air pollution.

Let's analyze each option:

(A) The funding allocated to air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease from its current level.


  • This option is about the monitoring of air quality, not the reduction of air pollution itself. While monitoring is important, the claim is about the reduction in pollution, not the ability to measure it.
(B) The number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level.


  • This assumption is crucial because if the number of diesel vehicles increases, the fine might not be effective in reducing overall pollution levels. The effectiveness of the fine depends on keeping the number of diesel vehicles at or below current levels.
(C) The amount of industrial pollution in the city will not increase from its current level.


  • This is related to other sources of pollution but does not directly address the impact of the fine on diesel vehicles. The officer's claim focuses specifically on reducing pollution from diesel vehicles.
(D) The number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas will not significantly increase over the next year.


  • While this could affect overall pollution, it does not directly relate to the effectiveness of the fine on diesel vehicles within the city.
(E) The overall traffic volume in the city will not increase from its current level.


  • This is somewhat relevant, but the key factor is specifically about diesel vehicles, not overall traffic volume.
User avatar
Jolex
Joined: 26 Apr 2024
Last visit: 15 Oct 2024
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
17
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 20
Kudos: 17
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option (A) suggests that the funding for air quality monitoring in the city will not decrease. While this is important for tracking the results of the fine, it doesn't directly affect whether the fine itself will reduce diesel vehicle usage and subsequent pollution.

Option (B) focuses on the number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city not increasing from its current level. This assumption is crucial because if more diesel vehicles enter the city despite the fine, the intended reduction in air pollution may not be achieved. This directly addresses the effectiveness of the fine in controlling diesel vehicle usage.

Option (C) discusses industrial pollution levels in the city, which, while important for overall air quality, doesn't directly relate to the impact of the fine on diesel vehicle usage.

Option (D) pertains to the number of vehicles entering the city from nearby areas. While this could impact overall traffic and air quality, it doesn't specifically address the fine's effectiveness in reducing diesel vehicle usage.

Option (E) talks about the overall traffic volume in the city. This includes all vehicles, not just diesel ones, and doesn't address whether the fine will specifically reduce diesel vehicle usage and subsequent pollution.

Conclusion:
The assumption critical to the environmental officer's claim is that the number of diesel vehicles currently used within the city will not increase from its current level (Option B). This assumption ensures that the fine on diesel vehicles can effectively reduce their usage, thereby reducing air pollution within the city. Therefore, the answer is B
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts