Bunuel
Health Club Advertisement: Other health clubs in the area pay their personal trainers based on the number of clients they see each day, which may encourage trainers to rush through sessions to fit in more clients. However, at Fitness Hub, our personal trainers are paid a fixed salary regardless of the number of clients they train each day, so they have no incentive to rush sessions. Therefore, when you join Fitness Hub, you can be sure that you will receive thorough and unrushed training sessions, maximizing your fitness results.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the advertisement's reasoning?
(A) Trainers at Fitness Hub are evaluated based on client satisfaction, which can lead to trainers spending more time with each client to ensure positive feedback.
(B) Other health clubs in the area offer a wider range of fitness classes than Fitness Hub, attracting a broader clientele.
(C) Many of the personal trainers at Fitness Hub are inexperienced and recently certified, which could affect the quality of the training sessions.
(D) Fitness Hub has a significantly higher membership fee compared to other local health clubs, which could deter potential members.
(E) Fitness Hub allocates a fixed amount of time for each session, and trainers are required to adhere strictly to these time slots.
To identify the option that most weakens the advertisement's reasoning, we need to look for a statement that undermines the claim that Fitness Hub's trainers will provide thorough and unrushed sessions because they are paid a fixed salary.
The advertisement's reasoning is based on the premise that paying trainers a fixed salary eliminates their incentive to rush sessions. Therefore, any statement showing that trainers might still have an incentive to rush or that fixed salaries do not guarantee thorough sessions would weaken the argument.
Let's examine each option:
(A) **Trainers at Fitness Hub are evaluated based on client satisfaction, which can lead to trainers spending more time with each client to ensure positive feedback.**
- This statement actually supports the advertisement's claim by suggesting that trainers have an incentive to spend adequate time with each client to ensure satisfaction.
(B) **Other health clubs in the area offer a wider range of fitness classes than Fitness Hub, attracting a broader clientele.**
- This statement does not directly address the reasoning about the thoroughness of training sessions at Fitness Hub. It talks about the variety of classes and client attraction, which is unrelated to the payment structure and session quality.
(C) **Many of the personal trainers at Fitness Hub are inexperienced and recently certified, which could affect the quality of the training sessions.**
- This statement addresses the quality of the trainers but not the specific reasoning about rushing sessions. It introduces a different concern about trainer competence rather than session thoroughness.
(D) **Fitness Hub has a significantly higher membership fee compared to other local health clubs, which could deter potential members.**
- This statement addresses the cost of membership, which is not related to the reasoning about the quality and thoroughness of training sessions due to the fixed salary structure.
(E) **Fitness Hub allocates a fixed amount of time for each session, and trainers are required to adhere strictly to these time slots.**
- This statement directly weakens the advertisement's reasoning by suggesting that even with a fixed salary, trainers might still be forced to rush sessions due to strict time allocations. If trainers must adhere to fixed time slots, they could be pressured to complete sessions within a set period, contradicting the claim that there is no incentive to rush.
Given this analysis, the option that most weakens the advertisement's reasoning is:
**(E) Fitness Hub allocates a fixed amount of time for each session, and trainers are required to adhere strictly to these time slots.**