Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 15:17 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 15:17 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. 
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
16 Jul 2024, 11:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
The correct answer is (E).
A. if it is true, it actually lengthen the training, thus strengthen the argument not the weakening.
B. This is irrelevant to the argument, because it is not about the Fitness club, nor the sessions time
C. Tricky!, if they are inexperienced, they could be bad at training, which results bad satisfaction, but our focus is sessions time, so it is really attractive.
D. Irrelevant, This does not address the thoroughness or the rushing of training sessions
E. Directly challenges the sessions time by saying that they have limited or fixed time, which results somehow bad satisfaction for the clients. If trainers are required to adhere to strict time slots, they might still rush through sessions to ensure they stay within the allocated time.
Thus correct answer is (E)
A. if it is true, it actually lengthen the training, thus strengthen the argument not the weakening.
B. This is irrelevant to the argument, because it is not about the Fitness club, nor the sessions time
C. Tricky!, if they are inexperienced, they could be bad at training, which results bad satisfaction, but our focus is sessions time, so it is really attractive.
D. Irrelevant, This does not address the thoroughness or the rushing of training sessions
E. Directly challenges the sessions time by saying that they have limited or fixed time, which results somehow bad satisfaction for the clients. If trainers are required to adhere to strict time slots, they might still rush through sessions to ensure they stay within the allocated time.
Thus correct answer is (E)
16 Jul 2024, 11:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
<b>Premise1:</b> Other health clubs pay trainers based on the number of clients, encouraging them to rush sessions.<br />
<b>Premise2:</b> Fitness Hub pays trainers a fixed salary, removing the incentive to rush sessions.<br />
<b>Conclusion:</b> At Fitness Hub, <b>clients receive thorough and unrushed training sessions, maximizing fitness results.</b><br />
<br />
To weaken this we need check for option that undermines our conclusion.<br />
<br />
(A) Trainers at Fitness Hub are evaluated based on client satisfaction, which can lead to trainers spending more time with each client to ensure positive feedback. - Incorrect - This is strengthening option. <br />
<br />
(B) Other health clubs in the area offer a wider range of fitness classes than Fitness Hub, attracting a broader clientele. - Irrelevant we are not concerned about clientele.<br />
<br />
(C) Many of the personal trainers at Fitness Hub are inexperienced and recently certified, which could affect the quality of the training sessions. - Hmm weakens somewhat. So what they dont have experience but they are qualified enough as they are certified.. but still lets keep this one on hold as quality of the session is also important. <br />
<br />
(D) Fitness Hub has a significantly higher membership fee compared to other local health clubs, which could deter potential members. - Irrelevant as we are not concerned about costs.<br />
<br />
<color option="#27ae60" style="color:#27ae60;"><b>(E) Fitness Hub allocates a fixed amount of time for each session, and trainers are required to adhere strictly to these time slots. - Correct This is our answer. Since the whole argument was about against the rush training sessions that are provided by other health clubs So if fitness hub does the same then whats the point of joining them. So, this statement directly undermines the claim that sessions are unrushed, as it indicates that sessions are time-constrained regardless of client needs. Way better than option C.<br />
<br />
I think Answer is E.</b></color>
<b>Premise2:</b> Fitness Hub pays trainers a fixed salary, removing the incentive to rush sessions.<br />
<b>Conclusion:</b> At Fitness Hub, <b>clients receive thorough and unrushed training sessions, maximizing fitness results.</b><br />
<br />
To weaken this we need check for option that undermines our conclusion.<br />
<br />
(A) Trainers at Fitness Hub are evaluated based on client satisfaction, which can lead to trainers spending more time with each client to ensure positive feedback. - Incorrect - This is strengthening option. <br />
<br />
(B) Other health clubs in the area offer a wider range of fitness classes than Fitness Hub, attracting a broader clientele. - Irrelevant we are not concerned about clientele.<br />
<br />
(C) Many of the personal trainers at Fitness Hub are inexperienced and recently certified, which could affect the quality of the training sessions. - Hmm weakens somewhat. So what they dont have experience but they are qualified enough as they are certified.. but still lets keep this one on hold as quality of the session is also important. <br />
<br />
(D) Fitness Hub has a significantly higher membership fee compared to other local health clubs, which could deter potential members. - Irrelevant as we are not concerned about costs.<br />
<br />
<color option="#27ae60" style="color:#27ae60;"><b>(E) Fitness Hub allocates a fixed amount of time for each session, and trainers are required to adhere strictly to these time slots. - Correct This is our answer. Since the whole argument was about against the rush training sessions that are provided by other health clubs So if fitness hub does the same then whats the point of joining them. So, this statement directly undermines the claim that sessions are unrushed, as it indicates that sessions are time-constrained regardless of client needs. Way better than option C.<br />
<br />
I think Answer is E.</b></color>
16 Jul 2024, 12:50
Kudos
Bookmarks
Let's analyse each option:
A. Client satisfaction evaluations could actually incentivize trainers to provide better sessions. This would actually strengthen the argument by suggesting that trainers are motivated to provide thorough sessions.
B. The range of classes offered is irrelevant to the payment structure and training quality. This does not address the core issue of whether sessions are rushed or thorough at Fitness Hub.
C. Inexperienced trainers could affect quality, but it doesn't directly relate to the payment structure. This could imply that the quality of sessions might be lower due to inexperience, but it does not directly address whether sessions are rushed or not.
D. Higher membership fees don't necessarily impact the training sessions' quality. This is about the cost of membership and does not address the thoroughness or rushing of training sessions.
E. This statement weakens the advertisement's reasoning because it suggests that even though trainers are paid a fixed salary, they are still required to fit each session into a fixed time slot, which could lead to rushed sessions, negating the supposed benefit of the fixed salary. This undermines the claim that Fitness Hub's payment structure ensures thorough and unrushed training sessions.
Therefore, the answer is option (E).
A. Client satisfaction evaluations could actually incentivize trainers to provide better sessions. This would actually strengthen the argument by suggesting that trainers are motivated to provide thorough sessions.
B. The range of classes offered is irrelevant to the payment structure and training quality. This does not address the core issue of whether sessions are rushed or thorough at Fitness Hub.
C. Inexperienced trainers could affect quality, but it doesn't directly relate to the payment structure. This could imply that the quality of sessions might be lower due to inexperience, but it does not directly address whether sessions are rushed or not.
D. Higher membership fees don't necessarily impact the training sessions' quality. This is about the cost of membership and does not address the thoroughness or rushing of training sessions.
E. This statement weakens the advertisement's reasoning because it suggests that even though trainers are paid a fixed salary, they are still required to fit each session into a fixed time slot, which could lead to rushed sessions, negating the supposed benefit of the fixed salary. This undermines the claim that Fitness Hub's payment structure ensures thorough and unrushed training sessions.
Therefore, the answer is option (E).
16 Jul 2024, 13:10
Kudos
Bookmarks
After the opening day of the week,
We're back to business.
I feel the luck is going to shift to our Green team as we get closer to the end of the Champions.
Let's get started with our explanation for this topic:
Identify the Question:
We are dealing with Weaken question. We should focus on premises and the conclusion of the argument. Deconstruct the Argument:
Health Club Advertisement: Other health clubs in the area pay their personal trainers based on the number of clients they see each day, - Counter Premise
which may encourage trainers to rush through sessions to fit in more clients. - Counter Conclusion
However, at Fitness Hub, our personal trainers are paid a fixed salary regardless of the number of clients they train each day, - Premise
so they have no incentive to rush sessions. - Intermidiate Conclusin
Therefore, when you join Fitness Hub, you can be sure that you will receive thorough and unrushed training sessions, maximizing your fitness results. - Conclusion
State the goal:
We are looking for statement which weaken the The Health Club Advertisement (HCA) conclusion. how can we do this? by attacking the gaps in the argument.
Gaps while reading: Rush between trainers is a bad thing? maybe it's great? they have high motivation? they want trainers to bring them either more trainers so they are being Exellent? The Health Club Advertisement (HCA) make an assumption that it better to pay fix price. But does it must be true? No.. So he jumps here to make a conclusion.
in order to weak that argument we can say that Based client trainers do better thorough and unrushed training sessions or other advantage related.
Or we can say that these trainer do not actually making the exercises more thorough and unrushed.
Elimination:
A) Opposite - If trainers spend more time with their clients this is exactly what the conclusion says. We want to weaken the argument, not strengthen it. - Eliminate.
B) No tie - Either if they attracting or not, It is not effecting our reasoning. We are talking about Trainers of Fitness Hub that makes clients maximize their fitness. - Eliminate.
C) Correct - ohh. It seems we just weakened the Conclusion. If the trainers aren't good, the clients CANNOT Maximize their fitness result - making this conclusion less likely to be true.
D) No tie - The cost / Fee is not related to our Conclusion. We are talking about Trainers of Fitness Hub that makes clients maximize their fitness. - Eliminate.
E) Opposite / UnclearImpact - If this is ture, we can say it strengthening the conclusion. if trainers has a fixed time with people and the HCA said in the argument that it will maximize the clients fitness so it will strengthen the conclusion. - Eliminate
THE END
I hope you liked the explanation, I have tried my best here.
Let me know if you have any questions about this question or my explanation.
We're back to business.
I feel the luck is going to shift to our Green team as we get closer to the end of the Champions.
Let's get started with our explanation for this topic:
Identify the Question:
We are dealing with Weaken question. We should focus on premises and the conclusion of the argument. Deconstruct the Argument:
Health Club Advertisement: Other health clubs in the area pay their personal trainers based on the number of clients they see each day, - Counter Premise
which may encourage trainers to rush through sessions to fit in more clients. - Counter Conclusion
However, at Fitness Hub, our personal trainers are paid a fixed salary regardless of the number of clients they train each day, - Premise
so they have no incentive to rush sessions. - Intermidiate Conclusin
Therefore, when you join Fitness Hub, you can be sure that you will receive thorough and unrushed training sessions, maximizing your fitness results. - Conclusion
State the goal:
We are looking for statement which weaken the The Health Club Advertisement (HCA) conclusion. how can we do this? by attacking the gaps in the argument.
Gaps while reading: Rush between trainers is a bad thing? maybe it's great? they have high motivation? they want trainers to bring them either more trainers so they are being Exellent? The Health Club Advertisement (HCA) make an assumption that it better to pay fix price. But does it must be true? No.. So he jumps here to make a conclusion.
in order to weak that argument we can say that Based client trainers do better thorough and unrushed training sessions or other advantage related.
Or we can say that these trainer do not actually making the exercises more thorough and unrushed.
Elimination:
A) Opposite - If trainers spend more time with their clients this is exactly what the conclusion says. We want to weaken the argument, not strengthen it. - Eliminate.
B) No tie - Either if they attracting or not, It is not effecting our reasoning. We are talking about Trainers of Fitness Hub that makes clients maximize their fitness. - Eliminate.
C) Correct - ohh. It seems we just weakened the Conclusion. If the trainers aren't good, the clients CANNOT Maximize their fitness result - making this conclusion less likely to be true.
D) No tie - The cost / Fee is not related to our Conclusion. We are talking about Trainers of Fitness Hub that makes clients maximize their fitness. - Eliminate.
E) Opposite / UnclearImpact - If this is ture, we can say it strengthening the conclusion. if trainers has a fixed time with people and the HCA said in the argument that it will maximize the clients fitness so it will strengthen the conclusion. - Eliminate
THE END
I hope you liked the explanation, I have tried my best here.
Let me know if you have any questions about this question or my explanation.
