Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
16 Jul 2024, 11:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
The correct answer is (E).
A. if it is true, it actually lengthen the training, thus strengthen the argument not the weakening.
B. This is irrelevant to the argument, because it is not about the Fitness club, nor the sessions time
C. Tricky!, if they are inexperienced, they could be bad at training, which results bad satisfaction, but our focus is sessions time, so it is really attractive.
D. Irrelevant, This does not address the thoroughness or the rushing of training sessions
E. Directly challenges the sessions time by saying that they have limited or fixed time, which results somehow bad satisfaction for the clients. If trainers are required to adhere to strict time slots, they might still rush through sessions to ensure they stay within the allocated time.
Thus correct answer is (E)
A. if it is true, it actually lengthen the training, thus strengthen the argument not the weakening.
B. This is irrelevant to the argument, because it is not about the Fitness club, nor the sessions time
C. Tricky!, if they are inexperienced, they could be bad at training, which results bad satisfaction, but our focus is sessions time, so it is really attractive.
D. Irrelevant, This does not address the thoroughness or the rushing of training sessions
E. Directly challenges the sessions time by saying that they have limited or fixed time, which results somehow bad satisfaction for the clients. If trainers are required to adhere to strict time slots, they might still rush through sessions to ensure they stay within the allocated time.
Thus correct answer is (E)
16 Jul 2024, 11:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
<b>Premise1:</b> Other health clubs pay trainers based on the number of clients, encouraging them to rush sessions.<br />
<b>Premise2:</b> Fitness Hub pays trainers a fixed salary, removing the incentive to rush sessions.<br />
<b>Conclusion:</b> At Fitness Hub, <b>clients receive thorough and unrushed training sessions, maximizing fitness results.</b><br />
<br />
To weaken this we need check for option that undermines our conclusion.<br />
<br />
(A) Trainers at Fitness Hub are evaluated based on client satisfaction, which can lead to trainers spending more time with each client to ensure positive feedback. - Incorrect - This is strengthening option. <br />
<br />
(B) Other health clubs in the area offer a wider range of fitness classes than Fitness Hub, attracting a broader clientele. - Irrelevant we are not concerned about clientele.<br />
<br />
(C) Many of the personal trainers at Fitness Hub are inexperienced and recently certified, which could affect the quality of the training sessions. - Hmm weakens somewhat. So what they dont have experience but they are qualified enough as they are certified.. but still lets keep this one on hold as quality of the session is also important. <br />
<br />
(D) Fitness Hub has a significantly higher membership fee compared to other local health clubs, which could deter potential members. - Irrelevant as we are not concerned about costs.<br />
<br />
<color option="#27ae60" style="color:#27ae60;"><b>(E) Fitness Hub allocates a fixed amount of time for each session, and trainers are required to adhere strictly to these time slots. - Correct This is our answer. Since the whole argument was about against the rush training sessions that are provided by other health clubs So if fitness hub does the same then whats the point of joining them. So, this statement directly undermines the claim that sessions are unrushed, as it indicates that sessions are time-constrained regardless of client needs. Way better than option C.<br />
<br />
I think Answer is E.</b></color>
<b>Premise2:</b> Fitness Hub pays trainers a fixed salary, removing the incentive to rush sessions.<br />
<b>Conclusion:</b> At Fitness Hub, <b>clients receive thorough and unrushed training sessions, maximizing fitness results.</b><br />
<br />
To weaken this we need check for option that undermines our conclusion.<br />
<br />
(A) Trainers at Fitness Hub are evaluated based on client satisfaction, which can lead to trainers spending more time with each client to ensure positive feedback. - Incorrect - This is strengthening option. <br />
<br />
(B) Other health clubs in the area offer a wider range of fitness classes than Fitness Hub, attracting a broader clientele. - Irrelevant we are not concerned about clientele.<br />
<br />
(C) Many of the personal trainers at Fitness Hub are inexperienced and recently certified, which could affect the quality of the training sessions. - Hmm weakens somewhat. So what they dont have experience but they are qualified enough as they are certified.. but still lets keep this one on hold as quality of the session is also important. <br />
<br />
(D) Fitness Hub has a significantly higher membership fee compared to other local health clubs, which could deter potential members. - Irrelevant as we are not concerned about costs.<br />
<br />
<color option="#27ae60" style="color:#27ae60;"><b>(E) Fitness Hub allocates a fixed amount of time for each session, and trainers are required to adhere strictly to these time slots. - Correct This is our answer. Since the whole argument was about against the rush training sessions that are provided by other health clubs So if fitness hub does the same then whats the point of joining them. So, this statement directly undermines the claim that sessions are unrushed, as it indicates that sessions are time-constrained regardless of client needs. Way better than option C.<br />
<br />
I think Answer is E.</b></color>
16 Jul 2024, 12:50
Kudos
Bookmarks
Let's analyse each option:
A. Client satisfaction evaluations could actually incentivize trainers to provide better sessions. This would actually strengthen the argument by suggesting that trainers are motivated to provide thorough sessions.
B. The range of classes offered is irrelevant to the payment structure and training quality. This does not address the core issue of whether sessions are rushed or thorough at Fitness Hub.
C. Inexperienced trainers could affect quality, but it doesn't directly relate to the payment structure. This could imply that the quality of sessions might be lower due to inexperience, but it does not directly address whether sessions are rushed or not.
D. Higher membership fees don't necessarily impact the training sessions' quality. This is about the cost of membership and does not address the thoroughness or rushing of training sessions.
E. This statement weakens the advertisement's reasoning because it suggests that even though trainers are paid a fixed salary, they are still required to fit each session into a fixed time slot, which could lead to rushed sessions, negating the supposed benefit of the fixed salary. This undermines the claim that Fitness Hub's payment structure ensures thorough and unrushed training sessions.
Therefore, the answer is option (E).
A. Client satisfaction evaluations could actually incentivize trainers to provide better sessions. This would actually strengthen the argument by suggesting that trainers are motivated to provide thorough sessions.
B. The range of classes offered is irrelevant to the payment structure and training quality. This does not address the core issue of whether sessions are rushed or thorough at Fitness Hub.
C. Inexperienced trainers could affect quality, but it doesn't directly relate to the payment structure. This could imply that the quality of sessions might be lower due to inexperience, but it does not directly address whether sessions are rushed or not.
D. Higher membership fees don't necessarily impact the training sessions' quality. This is about the cost of membership and does not address the thoroughness or rushing of training sessions.
E. This statement weakens the advertisement's reasoning because it suggests that even though trainers are paid a fixed salary, they are still required to fit each session into a fixed time slot, which could lead to rushed sessions, negating the supposed benefit of the fixed salary. This undermines the claim that Fitness Hub's payment structure ensures thorough and unrushed training sessions.
Therefore, the answer is option (E).
