Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:06 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
thelastskybender
Joined: 26 Dec 2022
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 132
Kudos: 75
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rsrobin864
Joined: 21 Aug 2020
Last visit: 10 Jan 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
77
 [1]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 77
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bomberjack
Joined: 22 Nov 2023
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 122
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q84 V81 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 675 Q88 V82 DI80
GMAT Focus 3: 715 Q88 V86 DI83
GMAT Focus 3: 715 Q88 V86 DI83
Posts: 67
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
riturajsingh21
Joined: 12 Aug 2014
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 165
Posts: 31
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Given:
1. In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates.
2. The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies
a. stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labour
b.boosts secondary employment in supporting industries.

Next steps : The government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.

Question - Why govt is giving incentives to tech companies in economically depressed regions?? The answer is required.

A. No mention of reason (Out)
B. Incentive will lower unemployment will contradict the fact mentioned above (Out)

C. Already mentioned in the argument (out)
D. Out of Scope
E. Bingo. As mentioned in Pre-thinking

Ans-E
User avatar
busygmatbee1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2023
Last visit: 18 Mar 2025
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
GPA: 10/10
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
Posts: 50
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
This cannot be derived to be always true from the passage.
(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
"significantly" term here without more conditions specified seems to be a stretch given the tone in the passage. 
(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
Yes, this can exactly be inferred from the passage. The requirements mentioned to become a tech powerhouse are skilled labor and supporting industries. 
(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
"Always" word cannot be justified given the passage. 
(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
This is nowhere specified in the passage and can't be derived to be true at all. 
 ­
avatar
DG1989
Joined: 16 Feb 2023
Last visit: 24 Dec 2024
Posts: 140
Own Kudos:
303
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: Kellogg '26
GPA: 4
Schools: Kellogg '26
Posts: 140
Kudos: 303
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates. The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries. Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
Explanation: According to the argument the tech companies stimulate local economies by creating jobs. However, it does not guarantee that this effect will be the same in regions lacking tech companies. Other factors could influence the outcome. Therefore, this statement cannot be concluded definitively based on the given information. INCORRECT

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
Explanation: While the given information indicates a correlation between tech companies and lower unemployment rates, it does not guarantee that merely attracting tech companies through incentives will have a significant impact. Other economic conditions and factors may play a role. Thus, this statement cannot be definitively concluded. INCORRECT

(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
Explanation: This option is promising. Per argument, the report specifically states that the presence of tech companies stimulates local economies by creating high demand for skilled labor and boosting secondary employment in supporting industries. Therefore, this statement must be true based on the given information. CORRECT

(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
Explanation: We cannot conclude this statement from the given information. While the presence of tech companies indicates positive effects on unemployment rates and secondary employment, it does not state that the overall economy is always improved without exception. Hence, this statement cannot be definitively concluded. INCORRECT

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
Explanation: The given information does not address the availability of skilled labor in economically depressed regions and does not provide details about the existing labor market conditions. Thus, this statement cannot be definitively concluded. INCORRECT

The correct answer is Option C­
User avatar
OmerKor
Joined: 24 Jan 2024
Last visit: 10 Sep 2025
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
150
 [1]
Given Kudos: 150
Location: Israel
Posts: 129
Kudos: 150
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
­Okay, we're almost at the end.
I will miss this competition, for sure.
The orange team looks invincible but we will fight until the end.
Let's start with our explanation of this topic:

Identify the Question:
We are dealing with an Inference question. We would see only facts. No conclusion here.
We should focus on the facts and what Must have to be True!

Deconstruct the Argument:
­In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates. - Background.
The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries. - Background.
Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions. - Premise. State the goal:
In Inference question we are looking for the answer choice which MUST have to be true. there are some options of wrong answer choice in inference questions.
such as: Real world knowledge, One word Off, Mixing words, Extreme,  etc..
Inference questions fall into 2 big common type of right answer choice: synthesis or reverse.
With that in our mind, let's see what the answer choices have to offer.

Elimination
A) One Word Off - This sentence will be 100% correct only if we add the word "Many/Multi/High Density" of tech companies. if we only add some tech Co's we don't know for sure that they will benefit the region. - Eliminate.
B) Mix words - The argument kind if making an proposal at the end. but we don't know if the plan will work. This question suppose it 100% going to work. We don't know that. - Eliminate.
C) Correct - Exactly what has been said in the argument. This answer choice fall in my 1st category of Inference Synthesis.
D) Extreme - We know that the effect is decreased of the unemployment, but this answer choice jumps too far to overall economy. Also, the same as answer choice A, it talks about companies and not high density of them. - Eliminate.
E) Mix words - We don't know that. Even if we "assume" (and we cannot do that in inference questions) that it doesn't have to be true. Pharps the regions that flourished by the high density of tech companies was depressed before? and they came without goverment incentives? - Eliminate.



THE END
I hope you liked the explanation, I have tried my best here.
Let me know if you have any questions about this question or my explanation.
 
User avatar
nikaro
Joined: 10 Dec 2023
Last visit: 20 Nov 2024
Posts: 179
Own Kudos:
253
 [1]
Given Kudos: 42
Location: India
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 179
Kudos: 253
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B, D and E are extreme options and should be eliminated. Out of A and C, C seems to be a better fit although it repeats what is given in the passage.­
User avatar
Argh123
Joined: 16 Aug 2022
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
27
 [1]
Given Kudos: 120
Posts: 24
Kudos: 27
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates. The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries. Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there. – Not sure eliminate

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions. incentives cannot lower unemployment rates, eliminate

(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries. true

(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies. The para states about local economy, not overall economy, eliminate

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives. Not sure, eliminate

Hence, answer is option C
User avatar
Kattu404
Joined: 03 Jan 2022
Last visit: 13 Nov 2025
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
106
 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Energy)
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
Posts: 141
Kudos: 106
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's check each option:

(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
This is a reasonable hypothesis based on the report's findings, but it is not a certainty. The report does not guarantee that introducing tech companies in new regions will have the same effect. Therefore, this is not a "must be true" statement.

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
While this statement aligns with the report's suggestion, it makes a definitive claim about the outcome of the incentives. The report does not provide conclusive evidence that incentives will definitely lead to significantly lower unemployment rates, only that there is a correlation between tech company density and lower unemployment. Therefore, this is not necessarily true.

(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
This statement aligns directly with the information provided in the report. The report specifically mentions that tech companies stimulate local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which in turn provides jobs within these companies and boosts secondary employment. Therefore, this statement must be true based on the given information.

(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
This statement is too absolute. While the report indicates that regions with a high density of tech companies have lower unemployment rates, it does not claim that the overall economy is "always" improved in every case. There could be other factors affecting the economy that the report does not address.

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
The report does not provide information about the availability of skilled labor in economically depressed regions or suggest that a lack of skilled labor is the reason for their economic status. Thus, this statement cannot be concluded from the report.

Hence C.
User avatar
CKHE
Joined: 11 Mar 2019
Last visit: 02 Jan 2025
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V36
Posts: 83
Kudos: 83
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates. The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries. Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions. Plan is to incentivize tech companies to establish opperations in economically depressed regions.  The correct answer choice will be conclusion / goal that can be drawn from the above statements. Government's goal as implied by the passage is to reduce unemployment rates.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there. This may be true but the conclusion needs to be about economically depressed regions 

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions. Correct. This is the goal implied by the passage.

(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries. This is not a conclusion but a fact discussed in the passage.

(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies. Too broad a conclusion

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives. There is no mention of lack of skilled labour in the passage
User avatar
smile2
Joined: 17 Jul 2018
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
85
 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 59
Kudos: 85
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
     we don't know for sure if the companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation when tech companies are introduced in regions without a high density of tech companies. There could be some other factors that are not accounted in the given statements. 

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
    From the given statements, we cannot be sure of the effect that incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions. Can we say it with CERTAINITY? no. Moreover, will it be SIGNIFICANTLY lower? we don't know.
    
(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
      This is inferrable from the given set of statements that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries.


(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
     Can we infer if it is ALWAYS? no. We cannot from the given statements. 

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
     We cannot infer from the passage about the lacking of skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies in economically depressed regions. Moreover, we don't know without government incentives, these regions lack the mentioned skilled labor. 

The right ans choice is C. 
 ­
User avatar
Suboopc
Joined: 14 Mar 2023
Last visit: 02 Jul 2025
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
138
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 82
Kudos: 138
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates. The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries. Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.

(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.

(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
­A. We don't know what the circumstances are with the regions without high density of tech companies. So we cannot speculate.
B. We cannot speculate this. If there is a dearth of skilled labor in these regions, then the unemployment rate might not decrease.
C. This goes along with the explanation provided in the report mentioned in the passage.
D. It is a stretch to say always. The passage states that "regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates" meaning it is not always the case.
E. While it may be true, we cannot say this from the given information.
avatar
Rider210
Joined: 07 Jul 2024
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Location: India
Posts: 34
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there. As indicated in the passage that these companies "stimulates local economies". Hence true

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.cannot be dettermined

(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries. Already mentioned

(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies. Always can not be true.

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives. Cant be determined not mentioned
User avatar
said.tojiboev
User avatar
PhD Forum Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2018
Last visit: 20 Oct 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
60
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Uzbekistan
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Stanford '27
GPA: 4.49
WE:Project Management (Education)
Schools: Stanford '27
Posts: 65
Kudos: 60
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates. The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries. Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.

(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.

(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­
  • Regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates.
  • The presence of tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, providing jobs within these companies, and boosting secondary employment in supporting industries.

(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
  • This option suggests a cause-effect relationship implied by the report, but it is not necessarily guaranteed by the given information. The report does not provide evidence to conclusively state that introducing tech companies will have the same effect in every new region.

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
  • While this is a goal based on the report's findings, the information does not guarantee this outcome. The success of such incentives depends on various factors not addressed in the report.

(C) CORRECT. Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
  • This option directly aligns with the report's findings. The report explicitly states that tech companies stimulate local economies by creating high demand for skilled labor and boosting secondary employment in supporting industries.

(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
  • The report does not provide sufficient information to make such an absolute claim. While it mentions positive effects on employment, it does not guarantee overall economic improvement in every case.

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
  • This option is not supported by the information in the report. The report does not discuss the availability of skilled labor in economically depressed regions or whether government incentives are necessary to address this.
 ­
User avatar
TheNikunjAgarwal
Joined: 03 Nov 2022
Last visit: 14 Sep 2025
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
37
 [1]
Given Kudos: 388
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q85 V89 DI78
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V42
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q85 V89 DI78
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V42
Posts: 32
Kudos: 37
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates. The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries. Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there. (Not must be true condition)

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions. ( The argument only tells to reduce unemployment rates but we cant say about significantly lower unemployment rates, thus not must be true condition)

(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries. (Must be true)

(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.( Overall economy is not the point of discussion thus it may be true or may be not but not must be true)

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives. (Not must be true )
User avatar
shivangi_31
Joined: 27 Nov 2023
Last visit: 11 Jun 2025
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 41
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­The correct option is B - Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.

It talks about what incentives can do
User avatar
VivekSri
Joined: 01 May 2022
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 468
Own Kudos:
721
 [1]
Given Kudos: 117
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Posts: 468
Kudos: 721
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates. The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries. Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.

(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.

(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­
Attachments

Screenshot_20240719_160912_Samsung Notes.jpg
Screenshot_20240719_160912_Samsung Notes.jpg [ 432.4 KiB | Viewed 764 times ]

User avatar
Spectre26
Joined: 20 May 2023
Last visit: 19 Jun 2025
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
127
 [1]
Given Kudos: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q85 V81 DI79
GPA: 8.5/10
WE:Project Management (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q85 V81 DI79
Posts: 104
Kudos: 127
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The presence of these tech companies create a high demand for skilled labor.

Also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries.

Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.

(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.

Same is inferred in the passage. Industries create demand for skilled labour, which in turn increases employment due to requirement in tech as well as allied industries.

Correct Option: C

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
d_patel
Joined: 16 May 2024
Last visit: 24 Nov 2024
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
70
 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q89 V84 DI79
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q89 V84 DI79
Posts: 57
Kudos: 70
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question stem gives us following info,
Regions with a higher density of tech companies -> lower unemployment rates
presence of tech compnies -> stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor and boosts secondary employment in supporting industries
The government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.

We need to find statement which must be true based on given information,

(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
This does not always need to be true. If if there is some density of tech compnies, more tech compnies could always generate economic stimulation. Eliminate

(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
This does not always need to be true. Even if tech companies are attracted by incentives, without supporting industires in region unemployment rates will not signifcantly go down. Eliminate

(C) Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
This needs to be true. If they do not create more jobs when they are concentrated, the plan of governemtn will fail as economically depressed regions will not get required jobs for economic stimulation. Keep it 

(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
Not need to be true always. Always is a little extreme. We do not know external factors.Sometimes not having required supporting industries could stop the economic improvement. Eliminate

(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
No mention of lack of skilled labor in given information. We do not know if government incentives will attract labor or not. Maybe companies just prefer other regions because of some other incentives and region lacks tech industry despite having plenty of skilled labor. This statement does not need to be true always. Eliminate­
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts