Doubt with solution to it
Doubt
There are only three possible scenarios if Harvey stops within three flips: T, HT, and HHT. Since we want the cases where he did not get tails on the third flip, wouldn't the favorable cases be T and HT, giving a probability of 2/3?
Also, I remember solving other probability questions by first restricting the sample space to all valid cases under the given condition, treating that as the new universe, and then counting the favorable cases within that universe. Why does that approach not work here?
Solution
Yes, but that works only when the cases in your population are equally likely.
You are remembering the rule:
P(E) = (Number of favorable cases) / (Total number of possible cases)
This formula is valid only if every case in the denominator has the same probability.
---
Here, the three stopping outcomes are:
T with probability 1/2
HT with probability 1/4
HHT with probability 1/8
These are not equally likely, so you cannot say:
P(HHT) = 1/3
---
When counting cases DOES work:
Suppose the question were:
A fair coin is flipped exactly twice. What is the probability of getting exactly one tail?
The sample space is:
HH
HT
TH
TT
Each outcome has probability 1/4, so counting works:
P(exactly one tail) = 2/4 = 1/2
---
Another example with conditioning:
If we know that at least one head occurred in two flips, the reduced sample space becomes:
HH
HT
TH
These three outcomes are still equally likely because each originally had probability 1/4, so we can count within this new universe.
For example:
P(both heads | at least one head) = 1/3
---
The key test is:
Whenever you create a new "universe" after conditioning, ask:
Are all the remaining cases equally likely?
If yes, simple counting is valid.
If no, use probabilities (weights), as in this coin-stopping problem.
Here, T, HT, and HHT have probabilities 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8, respectively, so:
P(HHT | stop in <= 3 flips) = (1/8) / (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8) = 1/7.