Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 08:35 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 08:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,270
 [69]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
64
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [12]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [12]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chrisbender
Joined: 02 May 2019
Last visit: 23 Sep 2020
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 42
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
The hypothesis is that VD caused the deafness in Beethoven. Whether Beethoven suffered from VD can be corroborated if there is a proof that he did take mercury to cure VD. If his hair contained traces of mercury, then we can confirm that he took mercury. C is the only one that connects mercury with deafness via VD. All other choices talk about irrelevant thing such as his psychological problems, people other than Beethoven, elimination of mercury from the body and mercury as the cause of deafness rather than VD.

I believe D is the answer that links deafness with mercury. That said thanks for the work you put into the forum.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Chris,
Isn't the hypothesis about VD and deafness rather than mercury and deafness?
User avatar
chrisbender
Joined: 02 May 2019
Last visit: 23 Sep 2020
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 42
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
Chris,
Isn't the hypothesis about VD and deafness rather than mercury and deafness?
You are correct I misread the conclusion.
User avatar
rocky620
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Nov 2018
Last visit: 11 May 2023
Posts: 501
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 229
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V22
WE:Other (Retail: E-commerce)
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V22
Posts: 501
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh (C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease vs Mercury was the only known effective treatment for venereal disease vs Mercury was used only as a effective treatment for venereal disease.

I think the original is pretty confusing as he might have ingested mercury accidentally. If so it cannot be an assumption.

I am confused here, can you help?
User avatar
chrisbender
Joined: 02 May 2019
Last visit: 23 Sep 2020
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 42
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rocky620
daagh (C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease vs Mercury was the only known effective treatment for venereal disease vs Mercury was used only as a effective treatment for venereal disease.

I think the original is pretty confusing as he might have ingested mercury accidentally. If so it cannot be an assumption.

I am confused here, can you help?
I misread the problem initially but it made me look back on it. The only way the hypothesis can be correct is if VD caused deafness(I initially misread this). So even if he ingested mercury another way the hypothesis would be wrong. In order to strengthen the hypothesis, we need something that states any mercury found would be as a result of VD. So your theory actually acts as a strengthener for C.
User avatar
rocky620
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Nov 2018
Last visit: 11 May 2023
Posts: 501
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 229
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V22
WE:Other (Retail: E-commerce)
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V22
Posts: 501
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chrisbender the official answer says its B, I also opted for D.

But I am still confused, could not understand.

The hypothesis says VD caused Deafness. Now if the researchers found mercury in his hair, according to the premise "Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease," Option D is an assumption.

He must have used Mercury to treat VD, but that led to his deafness.

Also, Option C is a reworded statement of the above premise, and since an Assumption should present new information it cannot be the answer.
User avatar
ArtyomYom
Joined: 01 Oct 2018
Last visit: 23 Feb 2021
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 103
Posts: 26
Kudos: 79
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Historian: We can learn about the medical history of individuals through chemical analysis of their hair. It is likely, for example, that Isaac Newton's psychological problems were due to mercury poisoning; traces of mercury were found in his hair. Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven's hair. Although no convincing argument has shown that Beethoven ever had a venereal disease, some people hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness. Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian's argument depends?

(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
(B) Some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury.
(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.
(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.
(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton's.

Assumption = must be true

(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated. WRONG. It can be true or false. So if true, mercury in Beet's hair will be. If false, in theory, mercury can stay in Beet's hair and logic of the passage will be valid.
(B) Some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury. RIGHT. It must be true. Because if it isn't, then several variants can exist: 1. all people didn't ingest, 2. all people ingest, 3. 0 people ingest (same as '1'), 4. 0 people didn't ingest (same as '2') 5. some people ingest (it is the same as our variant 'B', so cross it out). So there are 2 variants, let's prove that these variants don't make sense.
1. All people didn't ingest. This statement can't be true because of evidence in passage "Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease".
2. All people ingest. If this statement true, then either all people have VD or people ingest mercury for other reasons. The first point doesn't valid according to common sense. The second ruin the passage logic, coz if it true, then we can't conclude that this hypothesis is correct.
So, we just prove that only 'B' can co-exist with the passages' pieces of evidence and ''must be true'' in the logic of the passage.
(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease. WRONG. It can be true or false. The deal isn't in an effective treatment, it's in what people THINK in there mind about the effectiveness of treatment. They can think that it's effective, but in fact, it is not. So 2 variant can exist. 1. Mercury is an effective treatment + People think that it is effective = they ingest mercury. 2. Mercury isn't an effective treatment + People think that it is effective = they ingest mercury.
So, logically, 'C' can be true or false and passage logic will be valid.
(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease. WRONG. It can be true or false. 1. TRUE: MP can cause deafness, passage logic is ok. 2. FALSE: VD itself can cause deafness, without MP. passage logic is ok.
(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton's. WRONG. It can be true or false. There is no influence on the passage's logic.

ANSWER B
User avatar
dharam44
Joined: 03 Nov 2018
Last visit: 19 Mar 2021
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
151
 [2]
Given Kudos: 209
Location: India
Schools: LBS '21
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
GPA: 3.44
Schools: LBS '21
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
Posts: 71
Kudos: 151
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How b is correct answer and A is incorrect ?

Here author concludes that if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.

Therefore, author assumes that at that time, Beethoven consumed mercury only to treat venereal disease.
GMATNinja egmat
avatar
shrgmat
Joined: 11 Nov 2020
Last visit: 25 Dec 2021
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
18
 [2]
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 44
Kudos: 18
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is sneaky good question and amazing question! I have seen explanations here but nobody got it correct.
B is right. Why?

If everyone took mercury, how will you know that Beethoven ingested mercury to cure VD (note - ingest mercury to cure VD, not just ingest mercury)? Also, note the evidence - Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease - just before the conclusion (which says that the hypothesis is correct).

Hypothesis is - VD caused Beethoven's deafness.

So, some people didn't ingest mercury - B - is the answer.
May be we need to draw couple of arrows here as the passage talks a lot of things (irrelevant) but we need to focus on conclusion.
User avatar
udaypratapsingh99
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 399
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 372
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Historian: We can learn about the medical history of individuals through chemical analysis of their hair. It is likely, for example, that Isaac Newton's psychological problems were due to mercury poisoning; traces of mercury were found in his hair. Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven's hair. Although no convincing argument has shown that Beethoven ever had a venereal disease, some people hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness. Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian's argument depends?

(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
(B) Some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury.
(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.
(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.
(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton's.

Excellent question:

If everyone had mercury ingested, we won't be able to relate and confirm the hypothesis that the mercury was ingested by a particular person to treat the particular disease.

Option B is Correct
User avatar
Asan92
Joined: 18 Jan 2025
Last visit: 13 Nov 2025
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi! Sorry for resurrecting an old thread. This is my first ever response in this forum because I am THAT confused on why B is not incorrect!

If we negate B, the statement becomes "Everyone in Beethoven's time ingested mercury", which further implies that likely everyone had venereal disease.

However, the above statements do not conflict with Beethoven's having venereal disease too, just like everyone else, and consequentially got his deafness.

I am not sure how the negated version of B destroys the argument. Is it because if everyone ingested mercury, it means there is way more uses of mercury than for venereal disease? And that possibility breaks the connection of mercury and venereal disease?



KarishmaB
Bunuel
Historian: We can learn about the medical history of individuals through chemical analysis of their hair. It is likely, for example, that Isaac Newton's psychological problems were due to mercury poisoning; traces of mercury were found in his hair. Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven's hair. Although no convincing argument has shown that Beethoven ever had a venereal disease, some people hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness. Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian's argument depends?

(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
(B) Some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury.
(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.
(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.
(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton's.


Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven's hair.
Mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease,

Hypothesis - Venereal disease caused Beethoven's deafness.

Conclusion: If researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.

We need an assumption, a missing necessary premise for the argument.

Based on finding Mercury in his hair, we are concluding that VD caused B's deafness.
So it is an assumption that everyone doesn't have Mercury in hair, that Mercury in hair is a sign of ingesting Mercury for some specific purpose such as treating VD.
Think about it - what if everyone had Mercury in hair? Then can we conclude that VD caused B's deafness. No. Then presence of Mercury cannot be a sign of treating VD or anything else.

(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.

Not necessary. All we are looking for are traces of Mercury. Some Mercury could have been eliminated.

(B) Some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury.

Correct. We are assuming that at least some people do not ingest Mercury. So Mercury in body is not normal and not everyone ingests it.

(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.

We don't know whether it is effective or not. We don't need it to be effective. We just know that it was a treatment used in those days.

(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.

Incorrect. Our argument talks about VD causing deafness. Mercury is used for treating VD. We do not NEED to assume that mercury can cause deafness. If we know that Mercury CANNOT cause deafness, that doesn't impact our conclusion.

(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton's.

Irrelevant. No connection.

Answer (B)
User avatar
shubhim20
Joined: 03 Feb 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 156
Posts: 114
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hi, but is this not weakning the argument aren't we supposed to choose one which says mercury caused it , please help me understand where I'm going wrong KarishmaB
KarishmaB
Bunuel
Historian: We can learn about the medical history of individuals through chemical analysis of their hair. It is likely, for example, that Isaac Newton's psychological problems were due to mercury poisoning; traces of mercury were found in his hair. Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven's hair. Although no convincing argument has shown that Beethoven ever had a venereal disease, some people hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness. Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian's argument depends?

(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
(B) Some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury.
(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.
(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.
(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton's.


Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven's hair.
Mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease,

Hypothesis - Venereal disease caused Beethoven's deafness.

Conclusion: If researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.

We need an assumption, a missing necessary premise for the argument.

Based on finding Mercury in his hair, we are concluding that VD caused B's deafness.
So it is an assumption that everyone doesn't have Mercury in hair, that Mercury in hair is a sign of ingesting Mercury for some specific purpose such as treating VD.
Think about it - what if everyone had Mercury in hair? Then can we conclude that VD caused B's deafness. No. Then presence of Mercury cannot be a sign of treating VD or anything else.

(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.

Not necessary. All we are looking for are traces of Mercury. Some Mercury could have been eliminated.

(B) Some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury.

Correct. We are assuming that at least some people do not ingest Mercury. So Mercury in body is not normal and not everyone ingests it.

(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.

We don't know whether it is effective or not. We don't need it to be effective. We just know that it was a treatment used in those days.

(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.

Incorrect. Our argument talks about VD causing deafness. Mercury is used for treating VD. We do not NEED to assume that mercury can cause deafness. If we know that Mercury CANNOT cause deafness, that doesn't impact our conclusion.

(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton's.

Irrelevant. No connection.

Answer (B)
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
No, we are supposed to find the option that is an assumption for 'venereal disease caused his deafness'. For that the proof we are looking for is whether he has mercury in his hair because in those days treatment of venereal diseases involved ingesting mercury. So if we find mercury, it means he was likely treated for venereal disease which means he had venereal disease and that strengthens that his deafness was caused by venereal disease.

For that it must be true that some people did not ingest mercury in those days. Otherwise our "proof" is illogical. If everyone was tossing in mercury in breakfast in those days, everyone would have mercury in their hair, whether they had venereal disease or not. Hence finding mercury in hair would not make it more likely that the person had venereal disease.


shubhim20
hi, but is this not weakning the argument aren't we supposed to choose one which says mercury caused it , please help me understand where I'm going wrong KarishmaB
KarishmaB
Bunuel
Historian: We can learn about the medical history of individuals through chemical analysis of their hair. It is likely, for example, that Isaac Newton's psychological problems were due to mercury poisoning; traces of mercury were found in his hair. Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven's hair. Although no convincing argument has shown that Beethoven ever had a venereal disease, some people hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness. Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian's argument depends?

(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
(B) Some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury.
(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.
(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.
(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton's.


Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven's hair.
Mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease,

Hypothesis - Venereal disease caused Beethoven's deafness.

Conclusion: If researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.

We need an assumption, a missing necessary premise for the argument.

Based on finding Mercury in his hair, we are concluding that VD caused B's deafness.
So it is an assumption that everyone doesn't have Mercury in hair, that Mercury in hair is a sign of ingesting Mercury for some specific purpose such as treating VD.
Think about it - what if everyone had Mercury in hair? Then can we conclude that VD caused B's deafness. No. Then presence of Mercury cannot be a sign of treating VD or anything else.

(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.

Not necessary. All we are looking for are traces of Mercury. Some Mercury could have been eliminated.

(B) Some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury.

Correct. We are assuming that at least some people do not ingest Mercury. So Mercury in body is not normal and not everyone ingests it.

(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.

We don't know whether it is effective or not. We don't need it to be effective. We just know that it was a treatment used in those days.

(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.

Incorrect. Our argument talks about VD causing deafness. Mercury is used for treating VD. We do not NEED to assume that mercury can cause deafness. If we know that Mercury CANNOT cause deafness, that doesn't impact our conclusion.

(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton's.

Irrelevant. No connection.

Answer (B)
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts