It is currently 15 Dec 2017, 02:24

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Wharton R1 | Stanford R1 | Tuck R1 | Ross R1 | Haas R1 | UCLA R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: MI
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Dec 2003, 11:07
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (00:00) correct 50% (02:05) wrong based on 3 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city revenues will surely increase, since studies have conclusively shown that, if such parking regulations are put into effect, there is an increase in parking violations, and an increase in parking violations will result in a greater number of parking fines collected.

21. Which one of the following is closest, in terms of its logical features, to the reasoning used in the argument above?

(A) Last year┬б┬пs increase in revenues can be easily explained. That was the year the city council instituted new parking regulations. No doubt the new law brought with it an increase in the number of parking violations.

(B) If taxes were increased, this act would naturally result in increased revenues for the city, and increased revenues would make some desirable social programs possible. So, if taxes were increased, some desirable social programs would become possible.

(C) Henry says that, if the city council goes into closed session, an important matter of personnel policy is being discussed. However, no personnel matters were discussed at the council meeting, so if Henry is right, the council did not go into closed session.

(D) All cars parked on the north side of the street were ticketed last night, and the same cars were towed away this morning. So beware A car ticketed in this city also gets towed away.

(E) Allen says that, if the city council institutes new parking regulations, it is unlikely that revenues for the city will increase. If Allen is right, then the parking regulation plan should not be instituted.

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

Location: 55405
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Dec 2003, 12:05
The argument: If X, then Y, because studies show that X leads to Z, which leads to y.

D is closest (IMO) but it seems counterintuitive.

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: MI
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Dec 2003, 14:18
:no

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: MI
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Dec 2003, 16:16
:no

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: MI
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2003, 07:09
:yes

Can you explain ?

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: Aus
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2003, 07:32
Even I vote for B.

Stimulus can be written as

If City council institutes new parking regulation -----> result in increased revenue. And an evidence is given to support this.

Only in B we have the similar structure
If taxes were increased ------> result in increased revenues

By process of elimination I got B.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2003, 12:19
I also got B with the following logic

Stem of the question says

Parking Regulation -> Parking Violations -> More Revenues
hence
Parking Regulation -> More Revenues

in B
Increase in Taxes -> More Revenue -> Support for Social Programs
Hence
Increase in Taxes -> Support for Social Programs

D is next closest but D uses the word some instead of all.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2016, 02:51
In my opinion B is the most logical one in this case.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city   [#permalink] 11 Apr 2016, 02:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.