It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 17:18

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In North America there has been an explosion of public

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

5 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 1032 [5], given: 136

In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2012, 06:16
5
This post received
KUDOS
26
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

42% (01:23) correct 58% (01:30) wrong based on 1218 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of,opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America, 45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years.

The reasoning above assumes which one of the following?

(A) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.
(B) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.
(C) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.
(D) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.
(E) The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Kudos [?]: 1032 [5], given: 136

Expert Post
14 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7676

Kudos [?]: 17369 [14], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2012, 10:56
14
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
imhimanshu wrote:
In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of,opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America,45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years.

The reasoning above assumes which one of the following?

a) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.

b) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.

c) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.

d) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.

e) The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

Can someone provide a reasoning over choice E


You have to focus on the conclusion.
Conclusion: Over the last 30 years, there has been an explosion of interest in Opera.

What does that mean? It means that the interest has increased manifold in the last 30 yrs (focus on the word 'increased')

How does the author support his argument? By saying that out of the current 70 opera companies, 45 were founded in the last 30 yrs i.e. much more than half were found in the last 30 yrs.
What is the assumption? 50 opera companies did not shut shop in the last 30 yrs i.e. more than 45 companies did not close down. You need your assumption to be true for the conclusion to be true. If 50 companies had shut down in the past 30 yrs, we can't say that opera is gaining a following.

Think about it: You say, "Popularity of pizza is increasing every day. Every week, one new pizza place opens up in my neighborhood."
What is your assumption? That 2 pizza places do not shut down everyday in your neighborhood. It that were the case, then we cannot say that pizza is becoming more popular.

You don't need option (E) to be true for the conclusion to be true. Say, even if all 45 were not established as a result of enthusiasm (say, only 40 were established as a result of enthusiasm), even then it is possible that interest in opera has increased. You don't need (E) to be true to prove the conclusion. Hence it is not an assumption.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17369 [14], given: 232

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 1032 [0], given: 136

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2012, 18:31
Thanks Karishma for the explanation..:-)
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
imhimanshu wrote:
In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of,opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America,45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years.

The reasoning above assumes which one of the following?

a) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.

b) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.

c) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.

d) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.

e) The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

Can someone provide a reasoning over choice E


You have to focus on the conclusion.
Conclusion: Over the last 30 years, there has been an explosion of interest in Opera.

What does that mean? It means that the interest has increased manifold in the last 30 yrs (focus on the word 'increased')

How does the author support his argument? By saying that out of the current 70 opera companies, 45 were founded in the last 30 yrs i.e. much more than half were found in the last 30 yrs.
What is the assumption? 50 opera companies did not shut shop in the last 30 yrs i.e. more than 45 companies did not close down. You need your assumption to be true for the conclusion to be true. If 50 companies had shut down in the past 30 yrs, we can't say that opera is gaining a following.

Think about it: You say, "Popularity of pizza is increasing every day. Every week, one new pizza place opens up in my neighborhood."
What is your assumption? That 2 pizza places do not shut down everyday in your neighborhood. It that were the case, then we cannot say that pizza is becoming more popular.

You don't need option (E) to be true for the conclusion to be true. Say, even if all 45 were not established as a result of enthusiasm (say, only 40 were established as a result of enthusiasm), even then it is possible that interest in opera has increased. You don't need (E) to be true to prove the conclusion. Hence it is not an assumption.

_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Kudos [?]: 1032 [0], given: 136

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 7

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: WBS '15
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.36
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2012, 23:19
so everything here is based on the conclusion

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 7

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 190

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 7

Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2012, 04:07
A good one... I also went for E. Above explanation makes me come back to B.
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-guide-to-the-official-guide-13-for-gmat-review-134210.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 7

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Posts: 44

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Location: New York, NY
Schools: Columbia, NYU, Wharton, UCLA, Berkeley
WE 1: 2 Yrs mgmt consulting
WE 2: 2 yrs m&a
Reviews Badge
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2012, 09:58
I read somewhere that there is an assumption negation technique. Can I use that here?

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7676

Kudos [?]: 17369 [2], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2012, 00:57
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
meatdumpling wrote:
I read somewhere that there is an assumption negation technique. Can I use that here?


You might have read about it in Veritas CR book. Assumption is a necessary missing premise. It is necessary for the conclusion to be true. Assumption negation technique considers the options one by one. You negate the option and see whether your conclusion can still hold. If it can, it means the option is not an assumption (because assumption is a premise that SHOULD be true for the conclusion to be true)

You do not use this technique on all the options. Say, two options are looking good. Use it only on those two (it takes some time so you would be using too much time to answer the question if you use it on every option)

Your assumption here is " There were [highlight]fewer than 45[/highlight] professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years."

Negate it " There were [highlight]more than 45[/highlight] professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years."

Can you still say there has been an explosion of interest in the last 30 yrs?
45 new companies were founded in the last 30 yrs but more than 45 (or equal to 45, doesn't matter) closed down. Now your conclusion cannot be true; hence, this option is the assumption.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17369 [2], given: 232

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 193

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 22

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2012, 02:47
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
meatdumpling wrote:
I read somewhere that there is an assumption negation technique. Can I use that here?


You might have read about it in Veritas CR book. Assumption is a necessary missing premise. It is necessary for the conclusion to be true. Assumption negation technique considers the options one by one. You negate the option and see whether your conclusion can still hold. If it can, it means the option is not an assumption (because assumption is a premise that SHOULD be true for the conclusion to be true)

You do not use this technique on all the options. Say, two options are looking good. Use it only on those two (it takes some time so you would be using too much time to answer the question if you use it on every option)

Your assumption here is " There were [highlight]fewer than 45[/highlight] professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years."

Negate it " There were [highlight]more than 45[/highlight] professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years."

Can you still say there has been an explosion of interest in the last 30 yrs?
45 new companies were founded in the last 30 yrs but more than 45 (or equal to 45, doesn't matter) closed down. Now your conclusion cannot be true; hence, this option is the assumption.


Thank you Karishma. Your explanation is extremely helpful in understanding the concept.

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 22

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 1032 [0], given: 136

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2012, 06:14
Thanks Karishma for explaining the ANT.
I understand the above explanation given for ANT. I have read in the Veritas CR book that after Negate the choice in such a manner that newly created choice should be logically opposite of the original choice.

I tried this ANT for choice E.
Original Choice -
The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

As per me, after applying ANT, choice E becomes,
The 45 most recently founded companies were NOT all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
However, as per your below explanation, the ANT should be focusing on the number 45, not on verb = were established.
Can you discuss this in detail. I understand the below quoted reasoning, nonetheless.

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
You don't need option (E) to be true for the conclusion to be true. Say, even if all 45 were not established as a result of enthusiasm (say, only 40 were established as a result of enthusiasm), even then it is possible that interest in opera has increased. You don't need (E) to be true to prove the conclusion. Hence it is not an assumption.

_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Kudos [?]: 1032 [0], given: 136

Expert Post
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7676

Kudos [?]: 17369 [0], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2012, 09:11
imhimanshu wrote:
Thanks Karishma for explaining the ANT.
I understand the above explanation given for ANT. I have read in the Veritas CR book that after Negate the choice in such a manner that newly created choice should be logically opposite of the original choice.

I tried this ANT for choice E.
Original Choice -
The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

As per me, after applying ANT, choice E becomes,
The 45 most recently founded companies were NOT all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
However, as per your below explanation, the ANT should be focusing on the number 45, not on verb = were established.
Can you discuss this in detail. I understand the below quoted reasoning, nonetheless.



Your negation is correct. You have negated the 45 as well. "All" stands for the 45 companies. "were not all" (it means not all 45) established as a result of enthusiasm...

I could have negated the correct option as
"There were not fewer than 45 ..." which is awkward. So instead, I made it "more than (or equal to) 45"
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17369 [0], given: 232

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 325

Kudos [?]: 259 [0], given: 33

Location: India
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2012, 04:25
chose B as the answer. It took some time. i eliminated A C D because they were off the scope. between E & B, B seemed a stronger assumption. Also E had the phrase all 45 which was a little extreme. Had the answer option some of the 45.. then it would have been a real tough one.

Kudos [?]: 259 [0], given: 33

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 325

Kudos [?]: 259 [0], given: 33

Location: India
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2012, 04:28
on second thoughts, i think if there was the modified option E as stated above it would have been a tie between B&E. Any ideas on this guys?

Kudos [?]: 259 [0], given: 33

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 19

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2012, 04:06
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
imhimanshu wrote:
Thanks Karishma for explaining the ANT.
I understand the above explanation given for ANT. I have read in the Veritas CR book that after Negate the choice in such a manner that newly created choice should be logically opposite of the original choice.

I tried this ANT for choice E.
Original Choice -
The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

As per me, after applying ANT, choice E becomes,
The 45 most recently founded companies were NOT all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
However, as per your below explanation, the ANT should be focusing on the number 45, not on verb = were established.
Can you discuss this in detail. I understand the below quoted reasoning, nonetheless.



Your negation is correct. You have negated the 45 as well. "All" stands for the 45 companies. "were not all" (it means not all 45) established as a result of enthusiasm...

I could have negated the correct option as
"There were not fewer than 45 ..." which is awkward. So instead, I made it "more than (or equal to) 45"


hello karishma, excellent explanation. I was stuck between B and E.

I, however, eliminated E by the extreme word all. My resoning for the same is below.

The 45 most recently founded companies were NOT all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

This statement implies that not all but few companies established as a result of increased enthusiasm on the part of audience. This statement in fact supports the argument rather than weakning the same.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 19

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 888

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2012, 00:43
imhimanshu wrote:
In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of,opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America,45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years.

The reasoning above assumes which one of the following?

a) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.

b) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.

c) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.

d) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.

e) The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

Can someone provide a reasoning over choice E


Conclusion: There has been an explosion of public interest in opera over the last 30 years. Evidence: 70 professional opera companies currently active in NA, 45 were found over 30 years.

Negate choice B: there were MORE THAN (or EQUAL TO) 45 opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years. With this negated statement, over than half of opera ceased operation during the last 30 years will be against the argument.

In choice E, the 45 most recently founded companies were NOT all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience. => This negated statement does not affect anything to the argument because this answer choice talk about the enthusiasm, not the opera, which is the center of the conclusion.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 6

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2012, 03:55
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
imhimanshu wrote:
In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of,opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America,45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years.

The reasoning above assumes which one of the following?

a) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.

b) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.

c) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.

d) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.

e) The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

Can someone provide a reasoning over choice E


The giveaway word is ALL. If E were framed in this way "SOME of the 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience" that response would be a stronger contender for a correct assumption than E is.

Negating B, the correct answer, basically rips the argument because it would imply that having 70 active professional opera companies is nothing spectacular or historic and thus cannot be used an indicator of a recent boom in operatic interest.
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 6

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 82

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 29

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.4
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2012, 22:58
Karishma/OldFritz

d) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.

how did you eliminate option D

if I negate D it will look like

The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has decreased over the past three decades.

This weakens the conclusion that there has been a explosion of interest

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 29

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 198

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 12

Location: New Delhi, India
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jun 2012, 10:13
Thanks Karishma for the great explanation... nice question
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 12

1 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3356

Kudos [?]: 9063 [1], given: 1154

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2013, 16:34
1
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of, opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America, 45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years.

The reasoning above assumes which one of the following?

(A) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.
(B) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.
(C) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.
(D) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.
(E) The 45 most recently founded opera companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Kudos [?]: 9063 [1], given: 1154

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 5

Concentration: Entrepreneurship
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2013, 16:46
E seems to be be the solid choice here

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 5

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1120

Kudos [?]: 2327 [1], given: 219

Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2013, 16:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
IMO B

(A) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.
The argument doesn't mention the "commericial" aspect, this adds informations and the conclusion cannot be based on added information in the answer.
(B) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.
Correct (IMO)
(C) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.
This is a good one... but since the passage doesn't mention any other art, I discard this and pick B.
(D) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.
This option mention the "average", not the "number". Moreover the text links the increase of the number of bands to the explosion of public interest, and does not say anything about the audience.
(E) The 45 most recently founded opera companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
The word "all" makes this answer too extreme
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Kudos [?]: 2327 [1], given: 219

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public   [#permalink] 28 Mar 2013, 16:48

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 46 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

In North America there has been an explosion of public

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.