Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Can someone walk me through the below? Thanks so much.
4 < (7-x)/3
Quantity A Maximum value of -(5-x)
Quantity B Maximum value of 2x
Show more
esonrev - This looks way more like a Quantitative Comparison on the GRE® than it does a GMATTM-style question. You might want to try posting it on GREPrepClub instead. However, in the interest of helping out, here are my two cents:
1) Work the given inequality algebraically. \(4 < \frac{(7 - x)}{3}\) \(12 < (7 - x)\) (multiply both sides by 3 to get rid of the fraction) \(5 < - x\) (subtract 7 from both sides to isolate the unknown) \(-5 > x\) (divide by -1 and flip the inequality, or, alternatively, add x to both sides and subtract 5)
Now, if -5 is greater thanx, then x can be -5.01, -18, or whatever, as long as it does not get closer to 0 or anything positive than -5 does. Quantity A can therefore be reinterpreted as saying, "Maximum value of -(5 - [something less than -5])." This must be a net negative value. If we were to insert the forbidden number, -5, we would get -(5 -(-5)), or -(5 + 5), or -(10), or -10. Thus, it is conceivable that if we were to test a number ever so slightly smaller than -5, say, -5.000000000000000000001, we could derive an answer that would be ever so slightly below the pivotal value of -10.
Meanwhile, Quantity B could be reinterpreted as, "Maximum value of 2([something less than -5])." This must also be a net negative value, since a positive 2 times a negative number will yield a negative product. Once again, if we test our forbidden -5, we would get 2(-5), or -10. We could drag out our -5 with a decimal, twenty zeros, and a 1 at the end again, but we can see quite plainly that our maximum value will be ever so slightly below the pivotal value of -10.
What to do now? The answer would appear to be (C). However, with a little number sense, we can disprove such a notion. What if we were to try -5.000001 for x instead? In such a case, we would get -10.000001 for Quantity A. But look at what happens in Quantity B. 2(-5.000001) = -10.000002. This number is so close to the first one that it could split a hair, but that still means that the former number is larger. In fact, regardless of how many zeros we might want to place between our decimal and a 1 at the end, by doubling the value in the second expression, we effectively nudge it further from 0 than we would by taking the unadulterated number from the first expression. Taken together, then, we can conclude that (A), Quantity A will be greater. With no stipulation on what x may be, in terms of whether it needs to be an integer or just some number, it can help to test the restricted value for a quick comparison. (That is, a -5 with twenty zeros trailing a decimal with a 1 on the end will behave in many ways just like a -5, so we can use that integer value for a snapshot of how the expressions will behave right before the cutoff value.)
I hope that helps. Please let me know if you would like to discuss the matter further. Good luck with your studies, whether you are preparing for the GRE® or GMATTM.
- Andrew
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.