Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 01:32 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 01:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,874
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,269
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,874
Kudos: 685,677
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Luckisnoexcuse
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Aug 2016
Last visit: 16 Apr 2022
Posts: 529
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 198
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 740 Q51 V38
Products:
GMAT 2: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 529
Kudos: 622
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
elegantm
Joined: 28 May 2017
Last visit: 11 Sep 2018
Posts: 223
Own Kudos:
739
 []
Given Kudos: 12
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Posts: 223
Kudos: 739
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
nitimohan
Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Last visit: 24 Sep 2020
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rst>1?
Statement 1 - rs>t>1 -> rs>1 and t>1 --- > rst>1 (multiplying both equations as we know that both inequalities are +ve's and have same sign) - sufficient.
Statement 2 - rs^2 + t^2 > rst --> rs^2 +t^2 -rst>0 ---> plugging in numbers r= 1/2, s= 2, t= 1/2 ---> (1/2*2)^2 +
(1/2)^2 - (1/2*2*1/2) = 1+1/4-1/2 = 3/4 which is >0 but RST = 1/2*2*1/2 = 1/2 <1 so the answer is no.
for r= 6 s= 5 t=5 --> 30^2 +25 - 150 = 925-150>0 and rst>1 i.e. ans is yes . therefore statement 2 is insufficient.

Thus the answer should be A.
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 13 May 2024
Posts: 6,786
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert reply
Posts: 6,786
Kudos: 32,203
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is rst > 1?

(1) rs > t > 1

(2) (rs)² + t² > rst

Target question: Is 1 < rst
ASIDE: I prefer to rearrange inequalities so that the right side is greater than the left side.

Statement 1: 1 < t < rs
Let's use some number sense.
This tells us that rs is greater than 1
IF t were to EQUAL 1, then rst would be greater than 1 (since rs is already greater than 1)
So, since t is GREATER THAN 1, we can be certain that rst is greater than 1
In other words, 1 < rst
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: rst < (rs)² + t²
There are several values of r, s and t that satisfy statement 2. Here are two:
Case a: r = 2, s = 2 and t = 2. This satisfies the condition that rst < (rs)² + t². In this case rst = (2)(2)(2) = 8. So, 1 < rst (i.e., rst is greater than 1)
Case b: r = 1, s = 1 and t = 1. This satisfies the condition that rst < (rs)² + t². In this case rst = (1)(1)(1) = 1. So, 1 = rst (i.e., rst is NOT greater than 1)
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer:
Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
nks2611
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 06 Apr 2020
Posts: 194
Own Kudos:
67
 []
Given Kudos: 89
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE:Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
Posts: 194
Kudos: 67
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mynamegoeson
Bunuel
Is rst > 1?

(1) rs > t > 1

(2) (rs)^2 + t^2 > rst


(1) if t>1 and rs>t>1 then rst will be greater than 1..sufficient

(2) rst<(rs)^2 + t^2

since (rs)^2 + t^2>0 (Both (rs)^2 & t^2 are >0)
rst<0...sufficient

D


hi, putting my 2 cents into your solution , as you are correct about statement 1 but in statement 2 it is not necessary that rst>1, take r=s=t= -1/2 then the statement will be false or insufficient .

hope its clear

:-D :-D :-D
User avatar
Luckisnoexcuse
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Aug 2016
Last visit: 16 Apr 2022
Posts: 529
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 198
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 740 Q51 V38
Products:
GMAT 2: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 529
Kudos: 622
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mynamegoeson
Bunuel
Is rst > 1?

(1) rs > t > 1

(2) (rs)^2 + t^2 > rst


(1) if t>1 and rs>t>1 then rst will be greater than 1..sufficient

(2) rst<(rs)^2 + t^2

since (rs)^2 + t^2>=0 (Both (rs)^2 & t^2 are >=0)
rst<=0...sufficient

D

Can someone explain the flaw in the reasoning in the second part i.e.

(2) rst<(rs)^2 + t^2

since (rs)^2 + t^2>=0 (Both (rs)^2 & t^2 are >=0)
rst<=0...sufficient
User avatar
JeffTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 3,023
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,646
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert reply
Posts: 3,023
Kudos: 7,210
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is rst > 1?

(1) rs > t > 1

(2) (rs)^2 + t^2 > rst

We need to determine whether rst > 1.

Statement One Alone:

rs > t > 1

Since the product of rs is greater than 1 and since t is greater than 1, the product of r, s, and t must be greater than 1. Statement one is sufficient to answer the question.

Statement Two Alone:

(rs)^2 + t^2 > rst

If r = s = t = 1, then rst is not greater than 1. However, if r = s = t = 2, then rst is greater than 1. Statement two alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Answer: A
Moderator:
Math Expert
97874 posts