Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1262
Location: Madrid

Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 May 2008, 13:54
15
This post received KUDOS
19
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
35% (03:20) correct
65% (02:12) wrong based on 603 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two components, a fixed component of $1000, and a variable component of $C for each set of encyclopaedias that she sells in that month over a sales target of n sets, where n>0. How much did she earn in March? (1) If Laura had sold three fewer sets in March, her income for that month would have been $600 lower than it was. (2) If Laura had sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her income for that month would have been over $4000.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.



CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2950

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 May 2008, 19:17
Smells like an E trap... I'll come back to this one after lunch.
+1 for good question kevincan.



Director
Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 793

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 May 2008, 20:10
It feels like a total trap, especially with that inequality. I want to say E soooo bad...but with the inequality it's gotta be C somehow.



Director
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 783

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 May 2008, 20:32
kevincan wrote: Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two components, a fixed component of $1000, and a variable component of $C for each set of encyclopaedias that she sells in that month over a sales target of n sets, where n>0. How much did she earn in March?
(1) If Laura had sold three fewer sets in March, her income for that month would have been $600 lower than it was. (2) If Laura had sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her income for that month would have been over $4000. These conditions don't fit with each other The best case scenario for Laura is n = 1, her base minimum sale. So according to the statement 2, she made $1000 base salary and over $3000 for the 9 additional books that she sold. That would make her average commission on each additional book at more than $334/book. Statement 1 (and 2 together), it says that the average commission for sold books #8, 9, 10 is only $200/book. So it appears that (up to a certain number of books) the more books laura sells, the lesser her commission rate per book. Her commission rate depends on the exact number of books she sells, and that rate is not given. I vote for E



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39622

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Feb 2010, 08:24
15
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
11
This post was BOOKMARKED
kevincan wrote: Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two components, a fixed component of $1000, and a variable component of $C for each set of encyclopaedias that she sells in that month over a sales target of n sets, where n>0. How much did she earn in March?
(1) If Laura had sold three fewer sets in March, her income for that month would have been $600 lower than it was. (2) If Laura had sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her income for that month would have been over $4000. This is very good question, +1. And I think answer is not E, it's C. Laura's income \(I=1000+c(sn)\), where \(s\) is number of sets she sold and \(n\) is target number (\(sn\leq{0}\) > \(I=1000\)). (1) Three cases: \(sn=1\) > \(c=600\) (surplus of 600$ was generated by 1 set); \(sn=2\) > \(c=300\) (surplus of 600$ was generated by 2 set); \(sn\geq3\) > \(c=200\) (surplus of 600$ was generated by 3 set). If \(sn\) equals to 1, 2, or 3, then income for March will be 1600$, BUT if \(sn>3\), then income will be more then 1600. Or another way: if we knew that c=300 or 600, then we couldd definitely say that \(I=1600\) BUT if \(c=200\), then \(I=1600\) (for \(sn=3\)) or more (for \(sn>3\)). Not sufficient. (2) \(1000+c(10n)>4000\) > \(c>\frac{3000}{10n}\) > \(0<n<10\) > as the lowest value of \(n=1\), then \(c>333.(3)\). Not sufficient. (1)+(2) as from (2) \(c>333.(3)\), then from (1) \(c=600\) > \(I=1600\). Sufficient. Answer: C.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 164

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Feb 2010, 23:12
what is the OA and source



Intern
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 5
Schools: ISB, HBS, LSB, Johnson

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Feb 2010, 03:14
Great trap....Nice one.....



Manager
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Posts: 123

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Feb 2010, 03:47
I'm with Bunuel on this one, I did something similar.
BTW Bunuel if you don't mind sharing, what did you get on the GMAT (or specifically on the quant section)?



Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 359

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Feb 2010, 03:23
1
This post received KUDOS
Bunuel wrote: kevincan wrote: Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two components, a fixed component of $1000, and a variable component of $C for each set of encyclopaedias that she sells in that month over a sales target of n sets, where n>0. How much did she earn in March?
(1) If Laura had sold three fewer sets in March, her income for that month would have been $600 lower than it was. (2) If Laura had sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her income for that month would have been over $4000. This is very good question, +1. And I think answer is not E, it's C. Laura's income \(I=1000+c(sn)\), where \(s\) is number of sets she sold and \(n\) is target number (\(sn\leq{0}\) > \(I=1000\)). (1) Three cases: \(sn=1\) > \(c=600\) (surplus of 600$ was generated by 1 set); \(sn=2\) > \(c=300\) (surplus of 600$ was generated by 2 set); \(sn\geq3\) > \(c=200\) (surplus of 600$ was generated by 3 set). Bunuel.... not too clear so as to why you consider 3 cases here. In the S1 one (highlighted part in red) it clearly states that the Laura did sell 3 fewer sets. So if Laura previous sold S sets... as per statement one, it should be S3 only.... why do you consider.... 3 or less than 3 sets! The statement doesn't say this at all! Please comment.
_________________
Cheers! JT........... If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!!
Do not post questions with OAPlease underline your SC questions while postingTry posting the explanation along with your answer choice For CR refer Powerscore CR BibleFor SC refer Manhattan SC Guide
~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39622

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Feb 2010, 11:19
jeeteshsingh wrote: Bunuel wrote: kevincan wrote: Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two components, a fixed component of $1000, and a variable component of $C for each set of encyclopaedias that she sells in that month over a sales target of n sets, where n>0. How much did she earn in March?
(1) If Laura had sold three fewer sets in March, her income for that month would have been $600 lower than it was. (2) If Laura had sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her income for that month would have been over $4000. This is very good question, +1. And I think answer is not E, it's C. Laura's income \(I=1000+c(sn)\), where \(s\) is number of sets she sold and \(n\) is target number (\(sn\leq{0}\) > \(I=1000\)). (1) Three cases: \(sn=1\) > \(c=600\) (surplus of 600$ was generated by 1 set); \(sn=2\) > \(c=300\) (surplus of 600$ was generated by 2 set); \(sn\geq3\) > \(c=200\) (surplus of 600$ was generated by 3 set). Bunuel.... not too clear so as to why you consider 3 cases here. In the S1 one (highlighted part in red) it clearly states that the Laura did sell 3 fewer sets. So if Laura previous sold S sets... as per statement one, it should be S3 only.... why do you consider.... 3 or less than 3 sets! The statement doesn't say this at all! Please comment. "If Laura had sold three fewer sets in March..." > Laura sold \(s\) and had \(income=I\), but if she had sold \(s3\) then her income would have been \(I600\). Now: If \(s\) is 1 more than \(n\) (or as I wrote \(sn=1\)), then it would mean that 600$ was generated by only 1 set; If \(s\) is 2 more than \(n\) (or as I wrote \(sn=2\)), then it would mean that 600$ was generated by 2 sets; If \(s\) is more than 3 more than \(n\) (or as I wrote \(sn\geq3\)), then it would mean that 600$ was generated by all 3 sets; In first two cases income for March will be 1600$, BUT for third case income can be 1600$ or more. So this statement is not sufficient. Hope it's clear.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1514
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Dec 2010, 05:49
i completely agree with Bunuel's explanation. I actually had this question wrong, and would appreciate some comments on my approach: Laura's income was: I=1000+c(sn) If she had sold 3 fewer set, that is s'=s3, she would have earned 600$ less, that is I'=I600. Putting this words in a formula, we have: I'=1000+c(s3n)=1000+c(sn)600 From here you can easily obtain that c=200, so I dont know neither n nor s, so I dont know I, so therefore A is out. B) same as Bunuel: c>3000/10n Not sufficient (A)+(B) Since c=200, I can substitute above and I obtain that n<5, which makes no sense and I therefore chose E. Any thoughts on my approach? Thanks in advance!
_________________
The sky is the limit 800 is the limit
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Senior Manager
Status: Bring the Rain
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 401
Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Michigan (Ross)  Class of 2014
GPA: 3.13
WE: Corporate Finance (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Dec 2010, 06:34
I had the same issue as SVP and chose E
_________________
Go Blue!
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Intern
Joined: 05 Nov 2009
Posts: 32

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Dec 2010, 19:37
I agree that the answer should be C. Very tricky question as I wanted to pick E at first. Same train of thought as Bunuel.



Manager
Status: Preparing for GMAT  March 2011
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 148
Location: London
Schools: INSEAD, RSM, HEC, St. Gallen, IF, IESE
WE 1: Finance 6 years

Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Dec 2010, 06:13
I got the same answer C. Tricky Q.
_________________
In The World Full Of Duplicates,, I Am The Only Masterpiece.. Girl Power http://gmatclub.com/forum/beatthebeastwithnonnativespeaker108349.html



Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 23

Re: Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jan 2012, 11:05
1
This post received KUDOS
After I spent 45 min at midnight  I got the answer and agree with Bunuel that the correct ans is C .
Let me simplify the trap . The trap is we don’t know the threshold n . Hence selling 3 fewer sets does not readily translate in distribution of 600 into 3 sets .
Say if the threshold is 10 and the no. of sale were 11 , the extra variable contribution is actually coming from 1 set . So even if we sell 3 fewer sets the less income of 600 is actually because of one set . On the other hand if the threshold is 10 and the initial sale were 12  selling 3 fewer sets >corresponding reduction in variable part will be because of 2 sets . Hope this will clarify the future reader!
Thanks, VCG



Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Posts: 107
Location: United States

Re: Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jan 2012, 11:47
Wow! a trap question. 1. 1000 + (tn3))c = 1000 + (tn)c  600, gives us c. However, we don't even know if the 3 insufficient is below n. insuff. 2. 1000 + (10n)c >= 4000, clearly insuff since we don't know n and c The S2 ineq makes things complicated to provide a clear soution. Guess is E.
_________________
I am the master of my fate. I am the captain of my soul. Please consider giving +1 Kudos if deserved!
DS  If negative answer only, still sufficient. No need to find exact solution. PS  Always look at the answers first CR  Read the question stem first, hunt for conclusion SC  Meaning first, Grammar second RC  Mentally connect paragraphs as you proceed. Short = 2min, Long = 34 min



Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2012
Posts: 7
Location: United States
WE: Marketing (Other)

Re: Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jan 2012, 12:03
Definitely C; nice explanation by Bunuel.



Intern
Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Posts: 37

Re: Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Feb 2013, 23:26
Hi all,
I would be grateful if you could pls tell answer my query. I totally understand Buneul's approach but i wanted to ask, why is it done that ways?as in why do we have to take three cases? why cant we do it like the question says her income would be equal to 1000+c(sn)
as per statement 1: assuming the no of sets she sold in march as M the equation of net income turns out to be as > 1000 + c(Mn)  [1000 + c(M3n)]=600 =>3c=600 =>c=200
which doesnt seem sufficient to estimate her sales in March Hence insufficient.
As per statement 2: 1000 + c(10n)>4000
again insufficient
Using both statemnt 1 &2 we get value of n as < 5, which is invalid as per given conditions. Hence answer is E
kindly tell me where i m going wrong in this approach!



Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 90
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GPA: 3.2
WE: Education (Education)

Re: Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Feb 2013, 20:17
5
This post received KUDOS
Hi Swarman, There are two things wrong with this method. Firstly, when you combine both the statements together, you get the value of n t be less than 5. However, we know that n denotes the number of set of books and thus, cannot be negative. So, the answer does not stand. However, what this negative value does tell you is that the value of c is not 200. Secondly, while evaluating the first statement you got c=200 because you considered all three sets of encyclopedias to be above the sales target of n sets. However, there are three possibilities. 1. All three of them are above the sales target in which case 3c=600 implying c=200 2. Two of them are above the sales target in which case 2c=600 implying c=300 3. Only one of them is above the sales target in which case c=600 Since, one is already proved to be wrong, the answer has to be one out of 2 and 3. Substituting c=300 in the statement 2 gives us a value of n=0. Hence, not possible. The answer is the c=600 and hence we need to use this value to work further with this problem. Hope this helped! Let me know in case of any further doubts/concerns. swarman wrote: Hi all,
I would be grateful if you could pls tell answer my query. I totally understand Buneul's approach but i wanted to ask, why is it done that ways?as in why do we have to take three cases? why cant we do it like the question says her income would be equal to 1000+c(sn)
as per statement 1: assuming the no of sets she sold in march as M the equation of net income turns out to be as > 1000 + c(Mn)  [1000 + c(M3n)]=600 =>3c=600 =>c=200
which doesnt seem sufficient to estimate her sales in March Hence insufficient.
As per statement 2: 1000 + c(10n)>4000
again insufficient
Using both statemnt 1 &2 we get value of n as < 5, which is invalid as per given conditions. Hence answer is E
kindly tell me where i m going wrong in this approach!



Intern
Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Posts: 37

Re: Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Feb 2013, 10:05
oh god YES!! you are absolutely right!! perfect.. thank u sooo much.. God Bless




Re: Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two
[#permalink]
28 Feb 2013, 10:05



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 23 posts ]




