teaserbae wrote:
workout
Can you please Q5 , I marked B as OA as there was increase in the opportunity so most probably teachers were persuaded by the essay
vp680 wrote:
for qustion 5 why not option c?
proabhinav wrote:
Regarding Q5;
Please can you help the key differentiators between A & C that would have helped me/all choose A over C.
I chose C because passage sentence referenced that practical education for women had many " advocates before the revolution" , while as C though quite close to the context of what' being conveyed i.e. ideas for women' eduction and realisation after the revolution, somehow I found that right answer should speak about the ideas and support the cause had and how it was realised later.
Please do advice, if you believe rational shared by me needs correction. Thank You
Looks like question #5 is causing lots of pain. Here it is again:
Quote:
5) The passage suggests that Woody would have agreed with which of the following claims regarding “An Essay on Woman”?
Remember that in this passage, the author is analyzing the views of two different writers. In paragraph 1, the author tells us about Kerber's work in order to explain the "republican motherhood" thesis. In paragraph 2, the author tells us about Woody's work in order to question historians' reliance on that thesis.
This question is asking us which of the following five claims
Woody (not Kerber, not the author) would have agreed with, regarding "An Essay on Woman" (not the thesis of republican motherhood in general). We'll eliminate any choice that doesn't specifically line up with Woody's view regarding this specific essay.
And what was Woody's view?
"Examining newspaper advertisements for academies, Woody found that educational opportunities increased for both girls and boys around 1750. Pointing to “An Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting a shift in view, Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates before the Revolution."
OK, Woody! Time for POE.
Quote:
(A) It expressed attitudes concerning women's education that were reflected in new educational opportunities for women after 1750.
(A) seems to match Woody's view in a very straightforward way. After all, Woody found that educational opportunities did increase for both genders around 1750. Woody also pointed to the essay (which was published in 1753) as reflecting a shift in view (i.e, a change in attitude) with regards to practical education for females. We'll keep this around until we find a better choice or eliminate everything else.
Quote:
(B) It persuaded educators to offer greater educational opportunities to women in the 1750s.
There's nothing to support the claim that Woody saw the essay this way. When describing Woody's claims, the author doesn't suggest any persuasive impact of the essay
on educators and what those educators offered during the 1750s. Sure, Woody points to many advocates for practical education, but this is quite different from describing literal educators. Eliminate (B).
Quote:
(C) It articulated ideas about women's education that would not be realized until after the American Revolution.
(C)
sounds good, but what exactly is it saying?
- The essay articulated ideas about women's education. Fair enough.
- These ideas would not be realized until after the American Revolution. Wait, what?
This totally clashes with what Woody claimed: That educational opportunities began increasing around 1750, that this shift in view was reflected by the essay in 1753, and that practical education had many advocates before the Revolution. Choice (C) paints a different picture, where no concrete change took place until at least 1783. That might have been in line with Kerber's thesis, but it's not what Woody believed.
That's why we eliminate (C).
Quote:
(D) It offered one of the most original arguments in favor of women's education in the United States in the eighteenth century.
Nope. Nothing in the passage tells us that Woody viewed the essay as "one of the most original arguments in favor of women's education." Eliminate (D).
Quote:
(E) It presented views about women's education that were still controversial in Woody's own time.
This very well could be true, but there's absolutely nothing in the passage that gives us a clue to how
controversial Woody's ideas were. We only know that Woody's ideas were a notable exception among educational historians. Eliminate (E).
(A) is a boring choice, but it's the best one available. Every other choice either contradicts the passage, focuses on the wrong point of view, or makes a statement that drifts so far form the passage that it can't be supported.
I hope this helps!