Last visit was: 19 Jul 2025, 10:13 It is currently 19 Jul 2025, 10:13
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Strengthen|                           
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 429
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 429
Kudos: 92
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinjaTwo
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 235
Own Kudos:
1,077
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,070
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V48
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 235
Kudos: 1,077
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 429
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 429
Kudos: 92
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 429
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 429
Kudos: 92
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zoezhuyan
GMATNinjaTwo
Responding to a question from the retired thread...

zoezhuyan, (B) does not say that customers will not REALIZE the sale price. It just means that they won't grow accustomed to it. In other words, if you are NOT accustomed to a sale price, you will be excited by the discount. But once you grow accustomed to it, you will EXPECT the lower price. If you are accustomed the sale price and the price is then RAISED back to the original, you might not want to buy the product anymore. You became so used to the sale price that the original price now seems like a rip off!

I hope that helps.

Ohhh, no, I misunderstood it again.
in fact, B says the duration of promotion is so short that people haven't accustomed to the sales price, people soon buy commidities on regualr price,

so maybe people won't buy commidities because they want to wait another promotion, maybe they will buy commidities because they can't wait another promotion.
so it does not bearing on the argument, right?

Please point out

Thanks in advance

Have a nice dya
>_~

hi GMATNinjaTwo.

my new interpretation on B
because of the short duration of promotion, the customers do not become used the sale price and the impact of promotion is weak, so they think buying commidities on regualr price is common action,
while, if the duration of promotion is long enough that customer view the low/sale price is normal new price, if the price goes back to formal regular price, which is higher than sale price, then customer would unwilling to buy them, leading decrease the sales.

another question come up,
my above new interpretation seems impact on retailers, I dont think it impacts on the manufacture's profits.

As per D,
I can think two scenarios -- promotion and non promotion, according to D, the total amount of production is the same when promotion as when no promotion
Scenario #1 promotion, -- the manufactures low their price to be $10 , then result in increase dramtic amount of productions, say 100, then the profit = 10*100 - cost
Scenario #2 non promtion -- the manufactures regular price is 15, the amount of prodctions is 100 as well, then the profit = 12*100 - cost,

so , we can see the profit during promotion is lower than that during non promotion.

Would you please point out my fault?

BTW, can you tell me the link that I can search SC and CR QOTDs ?
I get a link https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-question-of-the-day-2017-edition-239951.html from signature of GMATNinja, a one not easy to search,
I also get a link from GMATNinja's reply, https://gmatclub.com/forum/search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=1196, there are only SC QOTDs and search tag's spectrum does not narrow to the SC list of the link,


Thank in advance

Have a nice day
>_~
User avatar
GMATNinjaTwo
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 235
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,070
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V48
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 235
Kudos: 1,077
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zoezhuyan
zoezhuyan
GMATNinjaTwo
Responding to a question from the retired thread...

zoezhuyan, (B) does not say that customers will not REALIZE the sale price. It just means that they won't grow accustomed to it. In other words, if you are NOT accustomed to a sale price, you will be excited by the discount. But once you grow accustomed to it, you will EXPECT the lower price. If you are accustomed the sale price and the price is then RAISED back to the original, you might not want to buy the product anymore. You became so used to the sale price that the original price now seems like a rip off!

I hope that helps.

Ohhh, no, I misunderstood it again.
in fact, B says the duration of promotion is so short that people haven't accustomed to the sales price, people soon buy commidities on regualr price,

so maybe people won't buy commidities because they want to wait another promotion, maybe they will buy commidities because they can't wait another promotion.
so it does not bearing on the argument, right?

Please point out

Thanks in advance

Have a nice dya
>_~

hi GMATNinjaTwo.

my new interpretation on B
because of the short duration of promotion, the customers do not become used the sale price and the impact of promotion is weak, so they think buying commidities on regualr price is common action,
while, if the duration of promotion is long enough that customer view the low/sale price is normal new price, if the price goes back to formal regular price, which is higher than sale price, then customer would unwilling to buy them, leading decrease the sales.

another question come up,
my above new interpretation seems impact on retailers, I dont think it impacts on the manufacture's profits.

As per D,
I can think two scenarios -- promotion and non promotion, according to D, the total amount of production is the same when promotion as when no promotion
Scenario #1 promotion, -- the manufactures low their price to be $10 , then result in increase dramtic amount of productions, say 100, then the profit = 10*100 - cost
Scenario #2 non promtion -- the manufactures regular price is 15, the amount of prodctions is 100 as well, then the profit = 12*100 - cost,

so , we can see the profit during promotion is lower than that during non promotion.

Would you please point out my fault?

BTW, can you tell me the link that I can search SC and CR QOTDs ?
I get a link https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-question-of-the-day-2017-edition-239951.html from signature of GMATNinja, a one not easy to search,
I also get a link from GMATNinja's reply, https://gmatclub.com/forum/search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=1196, there are only SC QOTDs and search tag's spectrum does not narrow to the SC list of the link,


Thank in advance

Have a nice day
>_~
zoezhuyan, your new interpretation of B sounds good! Yes, this would directly affect retailers. And if retailers are selling less product, then they would buy less product from the manufacturers. So, it would impact manufacturers' profits as well.

As for (D), the profit PER item might be lower, but if the manufacturers are selling much more product, then their overall profits will still be higher. Make sense?
User avatar
AkshdeepS
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,441
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,001
Status:It's near - I can see.
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Products:
Posts: 1,441
Kudos: 1,825
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
souvik101990

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 228: Critical Reasoning


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here

Manufacturers sometimes discount the price of a product to retailers for a promotion period when the product is advertised to consumers. Such promotions often result in a dramatic increase in amount of product sold by the manufacturers to retailers. Nevertheless, the manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim above about the manufacturers' profit?

(A) The amount of discount generally offered by manufacturers to retailers is carefully calculated to represent the minimum needed to draw consumers' attention to the product.

(B) For many consumer products the period of advertising discounted prices to consumers is about a week, not sufficiently long for consumers to become used to the sale price.

(C) For products that are not newly introduced, the purpose of such promotions is to keep the products in the minds of consumers and to attract consumers who are currently using competing products.

(D) During such a promotion retailers tend to accumulate in their warehouses inventory bought at discount; they then sell much of it later at their regular price.

(E) If a manufacturer falls to offer such promotions but its competitor offers them, that competitor will tend to attract consumers away from the manufacturer's product.


Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.

Conclusion: The manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.

Any answer choice that shows the negative side of promotions on profits of manufacturer is our answer.

(A) The amount of discount generally offered by manufacturers to retailers is carefully calculated to represent the minimum needed to draw consumers' attention to the product. If it is carefully calculated chances of loss is less.

(B) For many consumer products the period of advertising discounted prices to consumers is about a week, not sufficiently long for consumers to become used to the sale price. Weakner

(C) For products that are not newly introduced, the purpose of such promotions is to keep the products in the minds of consumers and to attract consumers who are currently using competing products. Weakner

(D) During such a promotion retailers tend to accumulate in their warehouses inventory bought at discount; they then sell much of it later at their regular price. Correct. if this happens the profit of manufacturer gets affected.

(E) If a manufacturer falls to offer such promotions but its competitor offers them, that competitor will tend to attract consumers away from the manufacturer's product. Weakner
User avatar
dcummins
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,069
Own Kudos:
2,283
 [1]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Manufacturers sometimes discount the price of a product to retailers for a promotion period when the product is advertised to consumers. Such promotions often result in a dramatic increase in amount of product sold by the manufacturers to retailers. Nevertheless, the manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.

The argument is that manufacturers can make more profit by not discounting the price of their products for sale to retailers. The evidence used to argue this point is pretty weak as it doesn't really tie in rogue pieces of info presented in the conclusion. We are told that during such promotions, retailers often "advertise" the products to consumers.

We aren't told whether the discounts are passed onto consumers by retailers and the argument assumes that retailers will continue to buy from manufacturer's whether the manufacturer's products are discounted or not.

A is incorrect as it just tells us how the discount is calculated. This isn't relevant to the argument.
B neither helps nor weakens he argument. It just tells us that if retailers discount their products as well then it would be effective as consumers don't get used to this sale price.
C is incorrect as it does nothing to the argument.
D is correct because it tells us that the retailers stockpile product at this discounted price instead of selling it straight too consumers. This infers the retailers may not necessarily be passing on the discounts to the consumers, so the manufacturer's are losing out on profit that they could have otherwise made.
E is incorrect because it doesn't explain why offering a discount in the first place would lead to lower profits than would selling at the regular price in relation to the scenario presented. E presents an alternate scenario that MAY or MAY NOT reduce the profitability of the manufacturer.
User avatar
santorasantu
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Last visit: 06 Apr 2023
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Netherlands
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: ISB '21 LBS '22
GPA: 3.9
WE:Analyst (Energy)
Schools: ISB '21 LBS '22
Posts: 242
Kudos: 454
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Manufacturers - want to increase profits by promotion, conclusion - the manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.
Why: if retailers who buy the products hold and do not attract the customers, then there is no profit for manufacturer.


ps_dahiya
Manufacturers sometimes discount the price of a product to retailers for a promotion period when the product is advertised to consumers. Such promotions often result in a dramatic increase in amount of product sold by the manufacturers to retailers. Nevertheless, the manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim above about the manufacturers' profit?



(A) The amount of discount generally offered by manufacturers to retailers is carefully calculated to represent the minimum needed to draw consumers' attention to the product.

(B) For many consumer products the period of advertising discounted prices to consumers is about a week, not sufficiently long for consumers to become used to the sale price.

(C) For products that are not newly introduced, the purpose of such promotions is to keep the products in the minds of consumers and to attract consumers who are currently using competing products.

(D) During such a promotion retailers tend to accumulate in their warehouses inventory bought at discount; they then sell much of it later at their regular price.

(E) If a manufacturer falls to offer such promotions but its competitor offers them, that competitor will tend to attract consumers away from the manufacturer's product.


Verbal Question of The Day: Day 228: Critical Reasoning


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here

Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 68
Page: 143
Difficulty:
User avatar
himanshurajawat
Joined: 05 Aug 2018
Last visit: 11 Jan 2021
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 138
Posts: 32
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer is 'D'.

We need to prove that manufacturers could make more profits without these promotions. Option 'D' tells us that retailers buy excess goods at discounted price. They then sell most of these goods later at the good's regular price. If the retailers don't buy excess goods at the discounted price. After the promotions they will have to buy again from the manufacturer at the goods regular price. Thus, when manufacturers do not hold such promotions, they will make more profits .
User avatar
gmatt1476
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 334
Own Kudos:
24,320
 [1]
Given Kudos: 62
Posts: 334
Kudos: 24,320
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ps_dahiya
Manufacturers sometimes discount the price of a product to retailers for a promotion period when the product is advertised to consumers. Such promotions often result in a dramatic increase in amount of product sold by the manufacturers to retailers. Nevertheless, the manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim above about the manufacturers' profit?


(A) The amount of discount generally offered by manufacturers to retailers is carefully calculated to represent the minimum needed to draw consumers' attention to the product.

(B) For many consumer products the period of advertising discounted prices to consumers is about a week, not sufficiently long for consumers to become used to the sale price.

(C) For products that are not newly introduced, the purpose of such promotions is to keep the products in the minds of consumers and to attract consumers who are currently using competing products.

(D) During such a promotion retailers tend to accumulate in their warehouses inventory bought at discount; they then sell much of it later at their regular price.

(E) If a manufacturer falls to offer such promotions but its competitor offers them, that competitor will tend to attract consumers away from the manufacturer's product.

CR23661.01

Official Explanation

Argument Evaluation

Which of the answer choices provides the strongest evidence for the claim that the manufacturers could indeed make more profit by not holding promotions?

To promote a product during a period when it is advertised to consumers, manufacturers sometimes sell the product to retailers at a discounted price. This often results in a large boost in manufacturers' sales to retailers. However, we are told that manufacturers could make more profit by not offering the promotions.

The manufacturers' total profits on the product increase during the period of reduced-price sales to retailers; note that the price reduction results in a dramatic increase in the volume of sales to retailers.

Nevertheless, it is possible that this temporary increase in sales volume would reduce future sales volume to retailers at non-discounted prices. In such a case, it would be more likely that the manufacturers' overall profits on the product would be reduced.

A. It is reasonable for manufacturers to calculate the minimum needed to draw attention to a product if they wished to minimize the costs of the product promotion. However, this information gives little if any support for the claim that manufacturers could make more profit by not discounting prices to retailers.

B. The argument does not provide any information to suggest that the length of the promotion affects manufacturers' profits. According to the passage, many promotions last a short time, so consumers do not come to routinely expect a lower price on a product and thereby avoid purchasing it at the higher post-promotion price. However, this new information gives little if any support for the claim that manufacturers could make more profit by not discounting prices to retailers.

C. This choice implies that the manufacturer would risk making less overall profit, not more, if these promotions were not held.

D. Correct. The retailer profits by purchasing large volumes of the product at a manufacturer's discounted price and selling it to consumers at the higher post-promotion price. It follows that the increase in sales at the discount might in fact detract from non-discount sales. As noted above, this gives the strongest support for the claim about the manufacturers' profits.

E. This suggests that sales promotions are essential for manufacturers to compete in relevant markets. However, it gives little if any support for the claim made about manufacturers' profits.

The correct answer is D.
User avatar
peanuts
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 May 2020
Last visit: 29 May 2021
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Manufacturers sometimes discount the price of a product to retailers for a promotion period when the product is advertised to consumers. Such promotions often result in a dramatic increase in amount of product sold by the manufacturers to retailers. Nevertheless, the manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.

Premise 1: in promotion period, mfg offers discount to retailers.
Premise 2: the amount of product sold increase dramatically
Conclusion: Nevertheless, mfg could make more profit by not holding promotion


Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim above about the manufacturers' profit?

To strengthen the claim, we should point out that the increase in product sale to retailer has some negative effects on the mfg sale of product later.

(A) The amount of discount generally offered by manufacturers to retailers is carefully calculated to represent the minimum needed to draw consumers' attention to the product. This weakens the claim. The mfg should promote more

(B) For many consumer products the period of advertising discounted prices to consumers is about a week, not sufficiently long for consumers to become used to the sale price. We don't care about consumer getting used to the sale price

(C) For products that are not newly introduced, the purpose of such promotions is to keep the products in the minds of consumers and to attract consumers who are currently using competing products. we don't care about the purpose of promotion. We care about profit

(D) During such a promotion retailers tend to accumulate in their warehouses inventory bought at discount; they then sell much of it later at their regular price. Oh yes. If retailers accumulate product when the goods are cheap, then they will not buy products in other periods. This action will hurt the profit of manufacturer in the long run. So, it's better not to hold promotion

(E) If a manufacturer falls to offer such promotions but its competitor offers them, that competitor will tend to attract consumers away from the manufacturer's product. This one weaken the argument. Mfg should hold promotion more often
User avatar
ShankSouljaBoi
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Last visit: 17 Apr 2024
Posts: 622
Own Kudos:
593
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4,090
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 620 Q47 V30
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.1
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Moderators,

Please correct the spelling of falls to fails in option E... leads to confusion.


Best !
User avatar
omkarkhanvilkar
Joined: 18 Feb 2021
Last visit: 01 Dec 2022
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
GPA: 3.75
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 22
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The author’s argument that promotions are not needed can be strengthened by giving more reasons why such promotional campaigns hurt the manufacturers more- say it reduces brand value or someone else is reaping profits or the profits from added sales doesn’t compensate for the discount losses, etc. Option D implies that retailers would be getting the material at lower price and then selling them at higher prices later. Thus, the intended effect of increasing sales by offering discount to consumers is brought in danger. Also, since the retailers stock their inventories at lower cost, they would be averse to buy when the prices are raised later. So it might hurt the manufacturer in future. Hence D is the answer
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinja

Quote:
Consumers might get excited during the sale, but they will not get accustomed to the sale price. This suggests that consumers will continue buying the product when the sale is over. This should HELP the manufacturers' profits, so eliminate (B).

Wouldn't B have similar effect as D?

Because imagine, our manufacturer sold an amount of product to retailers, however; during 1 week of promotion retailer barely made any sell or couldn't make any because consumer couldn't get accustomed to discounted prices. So products bought from discounted prices piled up. Once the promotion period will be over customers will buy products from original price and of course it will take a while to erode the products that didn't sell during the promotion period, preventing retailers to buy from manufacturers for a while...

In option D we have a similar scenario where retailers will not buy from manufacturers because they stocked plenty products and it will be long before reordering from manufacturers since it will take time to deplete the inventory

Thank you for your valuable reply :D
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,304
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,304
Kudos: 283
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyTargetTestPrep IanStewart - how would you re-phrase B ?

I thought B strengthened the argument because
  • Customers are NOT used to the discounted price
  • Thus, when the discounted price GOES BACK UP to the original price, customers are not surprised
  • Given customers are NOT SURPRISED (when the discounted price goes back up to the original price) , customer will buy the higher priced product in the same quantity as the customer has always been buying the higher priced product
  • Thus, i thought this strengthens the argument because when there is no promotion
    --> we know customers will buy the higher priced product in the same quantity as customers have always been buying the higher priced product

Thus, the above thinking gives a little more assurance that customers are willing to buy higher priced product (when there is no promotion), thereby strengthening the argument (not by a lot but strengthening, neverthless)

Thoughts ?
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,489
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,489
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
MartyTargetTestPrep IanStewart - how would you re-phrase B ?

I thought B strengthened the argument because
  • Customers are NOT used to the discounted price
  • Thus, when the discounted price GOES BACK UP to the original price, customers are not surprised
  • Given customers are NOT SURPRISED (when the discounted price goes back up to the original price) , customer will buy the higher priced product in the same quantity as the customer has always been buying the higher priced product
  • Thus, i thought this strengthens the argument because when there is no promotion
    --> we know customers will buy the higher priced product in the same quantity as customers have always been buying the higher priced product

Thus, the above thinking gives a little more assurance that customers are willing to buy higher priced product (when there is no promotion), thereby strengthening the argument (not by a lot but strengthening, neverthless)

Thoughts ?
The conclusion the correct answer must support is the following:

    The manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.

In other words, the conclusion is that the promotions cause a reduction in profits.

The fact that consumers do not become used to the sale price does not indicate that manufacturers could make more profit by not holding the promotions. If anything, it indicates that the promotions don't reduce profits by causing consumers to expect a lower price.
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,304
Own Kudos:
283
 [1]
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,304
Kudos: 283
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyTargetTestPrep
jabhatta2
MartyTargetTestPrep IanStewart - how would you re-phrase B ?

I thought B strengthened the argument because
  • Customers are NOT used to the discounted price
  • Thus, when the discounted price GOES BACK UP to the original price, customers are not surprised
  • Given customers are NOT SURPRISED (when the discounted price goes back up to the original price) , customer will buy the higher priced product in the same quantity as the customer has always been buying the higher priced product
  • Thus, i thought this strengthens the argument because when there is no promotion
    --> we know customers will buy the higher priced product in the same quantity as customers have always been buying the higher priced product

Thus, the above thinking gives a little more assurance that customers are willing to buy higher priced product (when there is no promotion), thereby strengthening the argument (not by a lot but strengthening, neverthless)

Thoughts ?
The conclusion the correct answer must support is the following:

    The manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.

In other words, the conclusion is that the promotions cause a reduction in profits.

The fact that consumers do not become used to the sale price does not indicate that manufacturers could make more profit by not holding the promotions. If anything, it indicates that the promotions don't reduce profits by causing consumers to expect a lower price.

Hi MartyTargetTestPrep
Per the blue – I agree, we don’t know anything 'conclusively' about profits (what are the profits when products are discounted vs what are the profits when products are NOT discounted)

But in strengthen questions – we don’t need to prove anything 'conclusively'.
As long as the OA strengthens, even just a little bit – that should suffice for the purposes of the OA.

I thought the following was enough of strengthener
(1) During non promotions – customers are willing to pay the higher price
(2) This is what B is implying (I think)

Why do you think, (1) is not enough of a strengthener ? [for the argument that profits are better during non promotions]

Is it because, we need to know about ‘quantity of products sold’ when it comes to profits ?

If so, where do you draw the line between strengthening a little bit vs need more information

I personally thought (1) fell under the category of ‘just a little bit of a strengthener’, even a tiny bit

I know, it would be better if we were given information about ‘quantity of products sold’ but bullet (1) was a bit of a strengthener, regardless.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,489
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,489
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
MartyTargetTestPrep
jabhatta2
MartyTargetTestPrep IanStewart - how would you re-phrase B ?

I thought B strengthened the argument because
  • Customers are NOT used to the discounted price
  • Thus, when the discounted price GOES BACK UP to the original price, customers are not surprised
  • Given customers are NOT SURPRISED (when the discounted price goes back up to the original price) , customer will buy the higher priced product in the same quantity as the customer has always been buying the higher priced product
  • Thus, i thought this strengthens the argument because when there is no promotion
    --> we know customers will buy the higher priced product in the same quantity as customers have always been buying the higher priced product

Thus, the above thinking gives a little more assurance that customers are willing to buy higher priced product (when there is no promotion), thereby strengthening the argument (not by a lot but strengthening, neverthless)

Thoughts ?
The conclusion the correct answer must support is the following:

    The manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.

In other words, the conclusion is that the promotions cause a reduction in profits.

The fact that consumers do not become used to the sale price does not indicate that manufacturers could make more profit by not holding the promotions. If anything, it indicates that the promotions don't reduce profits by causing consumers to expect a lower price.

Hi MartyTargetTestPrep
Per the blue – I agree, we don’t know anything 'conclusively' about profits (what are the profits when products are discounted vs what are the profits when products are NOT discounted)

But in strengthen questions – we don’t need to prove anything 'conclusively'.
As long as the OA strengthens, even just a little bit – that should suffice for the purposes of the OA.

I thought the following was enough of strengthener
(1) During non promotions – customers are willing to pay the higher price
(2) This is what B is implying (I think)

Why do you think, (1) is not enough of a strengthener ? [for the argument that profits are better during non promotions]

Is it because, we need to know about ‘quantity of products sold’ when it comes to profits ?

If so, where do you draw the line between strengthening a little bit vs need more information

I personally thought (1) fell under the category of ‘just a little bit of a strengthener’, even a tiny bit

I know, it would be better if we were given information about ‘quantity of products sold’ but bullet (1) was a bit of a strengthener, regardless.
The conclusion is not that companies make greater profits during times when promotions are not held.

The conclusion is that promoting products by temporarily reducing prices causes overall reductions in profits.

The fact that consumers will still pay the higher price does not mean that the promotion caused a reduction in profits. Quite the contrary. It indicates that companies can promote products by reducing prices without worrying that consumers will become used to the new price.

For all we know, when the price is lower, the companies gain new customers and sell high volumes of products, and (B) does not give us any reason to believe that they don't.
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,304
Own Kudos:
283
 [1]
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,304
Kudos: 283
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyTargetTestPrep
The conclusion is not that companies make greater profits during times when promotions are not held.
The conclusion is that promoting products by temporarily reducing prices causes overall reductions in profits.

The fact that consumers will still pay the higher price does not mean that the promotion caused a reduction in profits. Quite the contrary. It indicates that companies can promote products by reducing prices without worrying that consumers will become used to the new price.

For all we know, when the price is lower, the companies gain new customers and sell high volumes of products, and (B) does not give us any reason to believe that they don't.

Thank you so much for your response MartyTargetTestPrep - Between the red conclusion and the blue conclusion - i unfortunately dont see any real difference.

Isn't saying the red -- the same as --- saying the blue ?

Whats the difference ?

When i read the highlight in the yellow below, i actually thoguht the conclusion in red stated above was more directly inferrable (From the yellow) ?

Quote:
Manufacturers sometimes discount the price of a product to retailers for a promotion period when the product is advertised to consumers. Such promotions often result in a dramatic increase in amount of product sold by the manufacturers to retailers. Nevertheless, the manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim above about the manufacturers' profit?
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,489
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,489
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
MartyTargetTestPrep
The conclusion is not that companies make greater profits during times when promotions are not held.
The conclusion is that promoting products by temporarily reducing prices causes overall reductions in profits.

The fact that consumers will still pay the higher price does not mean that the promotion caused a reduction in profits. Quite the contrary. It indicates that companies can promote products by reducing prices without worrying that consumers will become used to the new price.

For all we know, when the price is lower, the companies gain new customers and sell high volumes of products, and (B) does not give us any reason to believe that they don't.

Thank you so much for your response MartyTargetTestPrep - Between the red conclusion and the blue conclusion - i unfortunately dont see any real difference.

Isn't saying the red -- the same as --- saying the blue ?

Whats the difference ?

When i read the highlight in the yellow below, i actually thoguht the conclusion in red stated above was more directly inferrable (From the yellow) ?

Quote:
Manufacturers sometimes discount the price of a product to retailers for a promotion period when the product is advertised to consumers. Such promotions often result in a dramatic increase in amount of product sold by the manufacturers to retailers. Nevertheless, the manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim above about the manufacturers' profit?
For all we know from what the passage says, profits are higher during the times when promotion are held than during times when full prices are charged. Right? Where does the passage say that profits are lower during the times when the promotions are held? It doesn't.

The conclusion is that, regardless of what occurs when the promotions are held, the profits are lower overall because of the promotions.

We need a reason to believe that conclusion, and check this out. You are assuming that the reason is that profits are lower when the promotions are held. You are adding the support yourself. The passage does not say that.
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts