GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Jun 2018, 01:18

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 764
Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 15 Jun 2018, 09:02
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

62% (00:46) correct 38% (00:57) wrong based on 170 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner in each of the four previous years. We can conclude from this that Maria trained hard.

The conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?


(A) Sue did not train as hard as Maria trained.

(B) If Maria trained hard, she would win the sailboat race.

(C) Maria could beat a four-time winner only if she trained hard.

(D) If Sue trained hard, she would win the sailboat race.

(E) Sue is usually a faster sailboat racer than Maria.

Originally posted by vshaunak@gmail.com on 06 Jul 2007, 03:25.
Last edited by Bunuel on 15 Jun 2018, 09:02, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic, edited the question and added the OA.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 125
Reviews Badge
Re: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2007, 14:33
I go for C
if not assumed the conclusion does not follow
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 97
Re: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2007, 15:09
1
C it is .
Use of word "only if" .
If there are more reasons other than hard training when Maria can beat sue then we cannot conclude that training hard is the only reason for Maria's win
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 820
Re: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2007, 08:12
B is a trap and weakens the argument.
C is the answer.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 333
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2014, 08:23
1
Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner in each of the four previous years. We can conclude from this that Maria trained hard.
The conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?


This is a CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP-----
Assumptions- Training hard ONLY led to Maria's win.......
Nothing else led to Maria's win



(A) Sue did not train as hard as Maria trained....cant say what applies for Sue... we only know what applies for Maria.
(B) If Maria trained hard, she would win the sailboat race.....cant say about future..... this time she won because she trained hard...WOULD does not invoke a total sence of certainty.....
(C) Maria could beat a four-time winner only if she trained hard..... .... Training hard ONLY led to Maria's win.......
Nothing else led to Maria's win.....correct

(D) If Sue trained hard, she would win the sailboat race..... ..cant say what applies for Sue... we only know what applies for Maria.
(E) Sue is usually a faster sailboat racer than Maria.......not an assumption.

IMO "C"...............

KUDOS IF YOU PLEASE............
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 226
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Re: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jan 2014, 16:02
Agree with C.

If X happens than Y will happen;

here it only works in one direction.

therefore, if Y happens, than X did not necessary happen too.

Answer C.
_________________

Think outside the box

Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 387
Location: France
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
WE: Real Estate (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Nov 2015, 04:15
Paris75 wrote:
Agree with C.

If X happens than Y will happen;

here it only works in one direction.

therefore, if Y happens, than X did not necessary happen too.

Answer C.


not thAn, thEn dear :-D

Otherwise, C as well. This is the conditional clause that validates the conclusion without a doubt.
_________________

New Application Tracker : update your school profiles instantly!

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 666
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2017, 08:15
Now let's look at B vs C.

B) If Maria trained hard, she would win the race.

Does this prove that Maria MUST HAVE trained hard? No - just because training hard is one way to win the race doesn't mean that it's the ONLY way to win the race. For example, maybe Sue broke her leg at the starting line. Since (B) doesn't eliminate other possible paths to victory, it doesn't PROVE the conclusion.

C) Maria could beat a four-time winner ONLY IF she trained hard.

Well, we know that Maria beat Sue, a four-time winner. If we add in a new piece of evidence that the ONLY WAY to do so is to train hard, then it MUST BE TRUE that Maria trained hard. Accordingly, (C) proves the conclusion.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Status: Target 760
Joined: 20 Aug 2014
Posts: 63
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Economics
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.25
WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Reviews Badge
Re: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2018, 01:32
Okay ! so the contention of doubt is between B and C.
Before that, always remember that winning does not necessarily mean that the person has worked hard, may be the competitor gave up or was not prepared.

B: "if" .. This is a mistaken reversal of what is needed. We know this, but does it necessarily mean that she worked hard? If leads us to a probabilistic situation
C: Adding this choice to premise takes us to the conclusion.
CR Forum Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 210
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.32
Reviews Badge
Re: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2018, 08:17
For anyone wondering, this is actually an LSAT JUSTIFY question, and NOT an assumption question. The OA is correct, but it is worth pointing out in case there is any confusion moving forward
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Apr 2018
Posts: 106
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jun 2018, 21:27
Conclusion: Because Maria trained hard, she could beat Sue, who was champion for 4 years.

Assumption: If Maria did not train hard, she couldn't beat Sue in the race.

(A) Sue did not train as hard as Maria trained. - Negating this statement does not break conclusion.

(B) If Maria trained hard, she would win the sailboat race. - Cannot tell about this based on given premise.

(C) Maria could beat a four-time winner only if she trained hard. - Yes, clearly the assumption.

(D) If Sue trained hard, she would win the sailboat race. - Cannot comment on Sue from given Premise.

(E) Sue is usually a faster sailboat racer than Maria. - We cannot comment who is fast from the given premise.
Re: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner   [#permalink] 17 Jun 2018, 21:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating Sue, the winner

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.