lemonmelon wrote:
EMPOWERgmatVerbal wrote:
Hello Everyone!
Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow down our options quickly so we know how to answer questions like this when they pop up on the GMAT! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences between the options in orange:
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be no less challenging than the previous one had been for the company's C.E.O.
(A) the coming year to be no less challenging than the previous one had been
(B) the coming year to be no less challenging compared to the previous one
(C) that the coming year would be no less challenging compared to the previous one
(D) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one had been
(E) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one
After a quick glance over the options, there are a few key differences we can focus on:
1. that the coming year / the coming year (Idioms)
2. to be / would be / will be (Verb Tense)
3. than / compared to (Comparisons/Meaning)
4. the previous one / the previous one had been (Verb Tense)
Since #1 on our list is an “either/or” split, let’s start there. No matter which direction we go in, we’ll eliminate 2-3 options rather quickly. This is an idiom issue. The idiom we’re focusing on is “predict that X.” We need to eliminate any options that don’t follow this idiom structure:
(A) the coming year to be no less challenging than the previous one had been
(B) the coming year to be no less challenging compared to the previous one
(C) that the coming year would be no less challenging compared to the previous one
(D) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one had been
(E) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one
We can eliminate options A & B because “predict the coming year” is not idiomatic. Now that we have it narrowed down to 3 options, let’s look at the next “either/or” split on our list: would be vs. will be. “Would be” is a hypothetical verb tense, whereas “will be” is a future tense. Since the sentence is focusing on a real future, not a hypothetical one, let’s eliminate any options that use the hypothetical tense:
(C) that the coming year would be no less challenging compared to the previous one
(D) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one had been
(E) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one
We can eliminate option C because we’re not discussing a hypothetical event here - we’re discussing a real future event. Now that we have it narrowed down to only 2 options, let’s take a closer look at the other major differences and see if we can find any problems:
(D) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one had been
This is INCORRECT because the past perfect “had been” isn’t necessary here. We only use the past perfect tense when discussing 2 past events, and need to determine which one came first.
(E) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one
This is CORRECT! There aren’t any issues with idioms or verb tenses here!
There you have it - option E is our winner! By focusing on quick “either/or” splits, we were able to narrow down our options quickly, giving us more time to tackle more complicated questions!
Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.
Rich,
Thanks for the detailed analysis. Couple of questions:
a) is the option D incorrect only because it adds unnecessary “had been”? In other words, is it grammatically correct?
b) if not, would the following sentence be correct?
“ .... no less challenging than the previous one was ....”
c) in option E, what verb form after the comparison is understood?
Thanks!
Posted from my mobile deviceThanks for the questions,
lemonmelon! Let's go through them one by one:
a) Yes, the only problem with option D is the use of "had been." It's the only difference between option D and the correct answer!
b) Yes, I suppose you could add "was" at the end of D and it would be correct. However, you don't need it - as we can see from the correct answer, option E.
c) Yes, the verb is implied in some comparisons. Again, you could put it if you wanted to - but you don't need to.
I hope that clears things up! Make sure to tag us at
EMPOWERgmatVerbal if you have any other questions!