Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:23 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:23
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   
User avatar
NinetyFour
User avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Last visit: 22 Dec 2019
Posts: 188
Own Kudos:
210
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 188
Kudos: 210
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 08 Dec 2018, 00:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sondenso
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.


(A) due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are

(B) due to the reproduction or survival they enhance, but they are

(C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but

(D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are

(E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are
Show more

Please let me know if my reasoning is flawed:

a,b) DUE TO is incorrect because substituting in "caused by" makes the sentence non sensical
C) Missing a linking verb after BUT
D) Correct
E) Need a noun in the subordinate clause started by BECAUSE
User avatar
thangvietnam
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
418
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait Updated on: 03 Sep 2020, 02:26
Originally posted by thangvietnam on 23 Jan 2019, 04:01.
Last edited by thangvietnam on 03 Sep 2020, 02:26, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
choice D is wrong because "simply" is wrong. so, we need verb "are" , and choice D is right.
User avatar
KanishkM
User avatar
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 759
Own Kudos:
503
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
Schools: DeGroote'21 Desautels '21 NUS '21
Schools: DeGroote'21 Desautels '21 NUS '21
Posts: 759
Kudos: 503
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 23 Jan 2019, 04:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sondenso
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.


(A) due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are

(B) due to the reproduction or survival they enhance, but they are

(C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but

(D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are

(E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are
Show more

I inflated my SC score by one, WHYYYY didnt i check the TAG :roll:

Nevertheless, Inline is my reasoning

Due to is used in place of caused by, we are comparing something not providing a reason, with that eliminate A and B

(C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but
Showing a contrast by using but, nothing after "but"

(E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are
is it still enhancing, the intent is never that, OUT

So parallelism could have maintained by -> are not the products of x, but are the products of y

This is correctly done in D
User avatar
thangvietnam
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
418
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait Updated on: 25 Feb 2022, 05:24
Originally posted by thangvietnam on 10 Mar 2019, 08:08.
Last edited by thangvietnam on 25 Feb 2022, 05:24, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"simply" can not modify "random" logically. it is not logical to have modification this way. "simply" must be an adverb.

so, in choice C , the pattern is
"are not X but simply Y". this is incorrect because we can not insert an adverb "simply", here. the correct idiom is
"are not X but Y
User avatar
GKomoku
User avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2018
Last visit: 23 Mar 2022
Posts: 301
Own Kudos:
953
Given Kudos: 3,681
Status:To infinity and beyond
Location: Kazakhstan
Concentration: Technology, Finance
Schools: Stanford '23 Sloan '23
GPA: 3.87
Schools: Stanford '23 Sloan '23
Posts: 301
Kudos: 953
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 10 Mar 2019, 08:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
crashVcrush
tsheshraj
43. Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.

A due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are
B due to the reproduction or survival they enhance, but they are
C because they enhance reproduction or survival, but
D because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are
E because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are

hi all, i used the POE technique to eliminate (due to vs Because of) the wrong answers and was left with C & D as the choices for the following questions. I eliminated D because of the expression are not X, but are Y and selected C which has Not X, But Y construction. The OA seems to be D. Can you help pls?


For parallelism : to avoid confusion I follow this Crude method ..........

A ( B+ C) = AB...................+.......................AC = AB & AC should make sense logically / structurally : + = But / AND, parallel markers

Biological traits are not the products of natural selection......................BUT...............are by-products

For option C :

Let : A = Biological traits are not , X = the prodcuts of natural selection , Y = By products

lets substitute these variables in the above eqn and check :

Biological traits are not ( the products of natural selection )..............................BUT..........................Biological traits are not (by products) = Does it make any sense ?

Now Option D ; Rearrangement of variables :

Let : A = Biological traits are , X = Not THE prodcuts of natural selection , Y = By products

Substitution yields :

Biological traits are (not the products of natural selection)..............................BUT..........................Biological traits are ( by products ) = perfect

Leading to D, my take
Show more


perfect explanation!!! thank you crashVcrush
avatar
sayiurway
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2013
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 39
Schools: Goizueta '21 (A$)
Schools: Goizueta '21 (A$)
Posts: 33
Kudos: 14
 [1]
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 04 Apr 2019, 18:33
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone elaborate on the role of "favored" in the correct answer choice? Does it modify "the products of natural selection" only or does it modify the preceding phrase?

And
What do "they" in "because they enhance production" refer to?
Tks
avatar
Meisme
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2018
Last visit: 06 Apr 2023
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
8
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 20
Kudos: 8
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 18 Feb 2020, 03:58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Isn't Not x but y a closed parallelism marker? what's inside the two parallelism elements should match? There is no "are" after Not, so there should be no "are" after but as well?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [1]
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 25 Feb 2020, 00:11
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Meisme I was going to put together a response to your question, but on looking back through the thread I see I already wrote about this a few years ago. :) I hope it helps!

DmitryFarber
You can read the structure two ways:

1) are NOT x BUT y
2) are not x BUT are y

In other words, we can see the parallel markers as "NOT/BUT," or we can see a single parallel marker: "BUT." The interpretation the GMAT is going with on this one is 2. It's really a matter of emphasis: I am not this but I AM that. As my colleague Kyle points out above, the use of "are" in this case helps us to interpret the overall meaning more clearly. It's very common (both on the GMAT and in "real" writing) to use seemingly unneeded structuring words or punctuation to make the meaning clear.
Show more
User avatar
GMATBuddha
User avatar
Joined: 25 Feb 2020
Last visit: 27 Jan 2023
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
20
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
Schools: HEC '22 EDHEC ESSEC
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V32
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: HEC '22 EDHEC ESSEC
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V32
Posts: 26
Kudos: 20
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 25 Feb 2020, 05:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.

(A) due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are
(B) due to the reproduction or survival they enhance, but they are
(C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but
(D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are
(E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are

Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits [ are not the products of natural selection, favored due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival,] [ but that they are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.]
I don't think that "that they" after the "but" is necessary.
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits [ are .... ,] [ but are ....]
This leaves us with option (D) and (E)
(D).
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits [ are not the products of natural selection, favored because biological traits enhance reproduction or survival,] [ but are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.]
(E)
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits [ are not the products of natural selection, because of enhancing reproduction or survival, ][ but are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.]
"because" should be followed by a noun. This makes (E) wrong.
Which leaves us with option (D) as our answer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GMATBuddha
Quitters never win, WInners never quit.
avatar
agarwal1993
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2020
Last visit: 21 Sep 2021
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
30
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
Schools: McCombs '23 (D) Ross '23 (D) Tepper '23 (D) IESE'23 (D) ISB'22 (D)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.8
Schools: McCombs '23 (D) Ross '23 (D) Tepper '23 (D) IESE'23 (D) ISB'22 (D)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 27
Kudos: 30
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 27 Apr 2020, 22:11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sondenso
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.


(A) due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are

(B) due to the reproduction or survival they enhance, but they are

(C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but

(D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are

(E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are
Show more


Can anyone explain why in option D and Option C, why the usage of 'they' is not ambiguous?
According to me, 'they' could refer to both 'The products of natural selection' and 'Many Bio Traits'.
Because of this ambiguity, I chose Option E. Since verb+ing modifier is used, so I thought this modifier is being used for 'The products of natural selection'.
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 27 Apr 2020, 22:33
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
agarwal1993
Can anyone explain why in option D and Option C, why the usage of 'they' is not ambiguous? According to me, 'they' could refer to both 'The products of natural selection' and 'Many Bio Traits'.
Show more
Hi agarwal1993, pronoun ambiguity, for one thing, should never be a reason to eliminate an answer choice.

Also, in case of pronoun ambiguity, application of following rule often comes in handy:

Pronoun-subject in one clause can be presumed to refer to noun-subject of another clause.

With option D, the sentence is:

Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.

Two clauses are:

i) many biological traits are not the products of natural selection - many biological traits is the noun-subject

ii) they enhance reproduction or survival - they is the pronoun-subject

So, going by the above rule, they would correctly refer to many biological traits.

In any case, as I mentioned above, pronoun ambiguity should not be the only reason to eliminate an answer choice.

Quote:
Because of this ambiguity, I chose Option E. Since verb+ing modifier is used, so I thought this modifier is being used for 'The products of natural selection'.
Show more
E would be incorrect because the doer of enhancing reproduction or survival is not coming out clearly.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Pronoun ambiguity, its application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
avatar
Anagarwal15
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 Apr 2020
Last visit: 16 Jul 2021
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
13
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Schools:  (A$) UT Dallas (A) GWU (A$)
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.83
Schools:  (A$) UT Dallas (A) GWU (A$)
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
Posts: 17
Kudos: 13
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 27 Apr 2020, 23:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
agarwal1993
sondenso
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.


(A) due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are

(B) due to the reproduction or survival they enhance, but they are

(C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but

(D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are

(E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are


Can anyone explain why in option D and Option C, why the usage of 'they' is not ambiguous?
According to me, 'they' could refer to both 'The products of natural selection' and 'Many Bio Traits'.
Because of this ambiguity, I chose Option E. Since verb+ing modifier is used, so I thought this modifier is being used for 'The products of natural selection'.
Show more


Hey there,
Thank you for posting the question. Let me try and help you out!
The Important thing first. Let’s start by looking at the intended logical meaning.

Meaning Analysis:
The sentence talks about an argument presented by the Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould. So Gould argued that various biological features are not the product of natural selection. In fact the biological features are random by-products made while other evolutionary developments. The belief that the features are the product of natural selection is favored because of the fact that these biological features improve reproduction or survival. This is the intended logical meaning.
Now let's look at your question

In the meaning analysis, we talked about biological traits to be the products of natural selection.
That means many biological traits = products of natural selection.
Now whether 'they' refers to many biological traits or products of natural selection, it actually means the same.

eg if A=B and B=C ,then A=B=C.
Therefore the usage of they is not ambiguous.

(C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but

When you read this choice, it is a little confusing that 'but simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.' is an extension of "reproduction or survival" or the contrast for "products of natural selection". Logically it should be the contrast for natural selection but this is not clear from this choice. It seems that 'but...' is adding more details to the reproduction or survival part.

(D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are
Here because of the repetition of are after but, the author clarifies that "the modifier is over" and now we are back to the contrast. Hence the logical intended meaning is clear and is correct.

(E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are
This choice does not convey the meaning. We do not know from the sentence what is enhancing reproduction or survival. Incorrect

I hope this helps
thanks
Anmol :)
User avatar
Kritisood
User avatar
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Last visit: 19 Jul 2023
Posts: 492
Own Kudos:
1,271
Given Kudos: 1,090
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Posts: 492
Kudos: 1,271
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 28 Apr 2020, 00:59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
Meisme I was going to put together a response to your question, but on looking back through the thread I see I already wrote about this a few years ago. :) I hope it helps!

DmitryFarber
You can read the structure two ways:

1) are NOT x BUT y
2) are not x BUT are y

In other words, we can see the parallel markers as "NOT/BUT," or we can see a single parallel marker: "BUT." The interpretation the GMAT is going with on this one is 2. It's really a matter of emphasis: I am not this but I AM that. As my colleague Kyle points out above, the use of "are" in this case helps us to interpret the overall meaning more clearly. It's very common (both on the GMAT and in "real" writing) to use seemingly unneeded structuring words or punctuation to make the meaning clear.
Show more

Hi DmitryFarber egmat
the rule is once outside or twice inside.
If "are" is outside i.e "are NOT x" then why would we use "are" again after BUT? now the sentence reads "are NOT x but ARE y" isn't this incorrect grammatically. you would eliminate it before even thinking of the meaning cus of the rule.

would love some clarity.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [1]
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 29 Apr 2020, 00:19
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kritisood Sure, your point holds just fine if we are using the first structure I mentioned, in which NOT and BUT are the parallel markers. However, it doesn't apply if we read BUT as a single, open parallel marker. It's perfectly fine to say "I am not rich but I am happy." In this case, the parallel terms are the entire clauses ("I am not rich"; "I am happy."). The "but" simply links the two, so we don't read this as "I am (NOT rich BUT I am happy)." That reading would definitely be bad! Does that distinction make sense?
User avatar
Kritisood
User avatar
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Last visit: 19 Jul 2023
Posts: 492
Own Kudos:
1,271
Given Kudos: 1,090
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Posts: 492
Kudos: 1,271
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 29 Apr 2020, 01:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
Kritisood Sure, your point holds just fine if we are using the first structure I mentioned, in which NOT and BUT are the parallel markers. However, it doesn't apply if we read BUT as a single, open parallel marker. It's perfectly fine to say "I am not rich but I am happy." In this case, the parallel terms are the entire clauses ("I am not rich"; "I am happy."). The "but" simply links the two, so we don't read this as "I am (NOT rich BUT I am happy)." That reading would definitely be bad! Does that distinction make sense?
Show more

It def does :) though I doubt I would get this question correct because the Not x But y parallel markers are so ingrained in our heads for GMAT :S

Also, how to know which structure to use when in this case?
I havent seen this construction before where the once outside twice inside rule doesn't apply. Should i just consider this as an exception and move on?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [1]
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 29 Apr 2020, 14:12
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sure, you could go with that. I think what it comes down to is that on really hard SC questions, the sentence may not be doing quite what we think it is. There is often more than one way to read a sentence, and what seems to be clearly breaking a rule from one perspective is actually okay from another one. I don't mean that the rules are inconsistent (although that can be the case), but that there are cases when they aren't invoked. In this case, we're not breaking "once outside, twice inside." Rather, we're backing up and making two parallel verb phrases rather than two parallel modifiers.
User avatar
Adi88
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Aug 2017
Last visit: 09 Jun 2021
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
40
Given Kudos: 430
Location: India
Schools: McDonough'23 (A$)
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V39 (Online)
Schools: McDonough'23 (A$)
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V39 (Online)
Posts: 51
Kudos: 40
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 10 Jun 2020, 12:57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.

In the above sentence what does the clause "favored because they enhance reproduction or survival" modifies ?
avatar
jaisonsunny77
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Last visit: 25 Aug 2021
Posts: 459
Own Kudos:
381
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 459
Kudos: 381
 [1]
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 11 Jun 2020, 00:32
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.

key idea: ''Due to'' is used to describe a noun and is usually preceded by a variant of the verb form ''to be''.

In (A) and (B), we do not have a noun that precedes ''due to''. Instead, we have the verb ''favored''. Hence, eliminate (A) and (B).

(C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but - (C) introduces the following structure: Stephen Jay....has argued that...traits are not ......., ....., but... " In the clause that follows ''but'', we do not have the verb 'are'. Without the ''are'', we do not have a full clause.

(D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are - does not introduce any error. Hence, (D) is the correct answer choice.

(E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are - the verb ''enhancing'' does not have a clear subject.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [4]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [4]
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 19 Sep 2020, 05:46
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kritisood
the rule is once outside or twice inside.
If "are" is outside i.e "are NOT x" then why would we use "are" again after BUT? now the sentence reads "are NOT x but ARE y" isn't this incorrect grammatically. you would eliminate it before even thinking of the meaning cus of the rule.

would love some clarity.
Show more
This question is a little sketchy.

Yes, "are not X but are Y" can be correct in certain contexts, but this sentence is not really one of those contexts. Hence all the confusion.

The writer used an "are not X but are Y" construction, when the point made, that the traits are not one thing but another, calls for a "not X but Y" structure.
User avatar
svasan05
User avatar
CrackVerbal Representative
Joined: 02 Mar 2019
Last visit: 24 Feb 2023
Posts: 269
Own Kudos:
302
 [1]
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 269
Kudos: 302
 [1]
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological trait 31 Jan 2021, 09:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.

(A) due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are "due to" should modify only a noun and not a clause. Eliminate.

(B) due to the reproduction or survival they enhance, but they are "due to" should modify only a noun and not a clause. Eliminate.

(C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but This is a close one but has a meaning problem. This can be interpreted to mean that "they" (biological traits) favor "random by-products of other evolutionary developments" rather than being by-products themselves. I will hold on to this option at the moment and go with it if there is no better choice.

(D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are Correct answer. Removes the ambiguity in (C) perfectly and there are no other errors. We can now eliminate option (C).

(E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are "because of" must be followed by a noun. Eliminate.

Hope this helps.
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts