Last visit was: 15 Dec 2024, 08:53 It is currently 15 Dec 2024, 08:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Hovkial
Joined: 23 Apr 2019
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
2,089
 []
Given Kudos: 203
Status:PhD trained. Education research, management.
Posts: 805
Kudos: 2,089
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
rodney19
Joined: 17 May 2018
Last visit: 15 Aug 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 []
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rvgmat12
Joined: 19 Oct 2014
Last visit: 24 Jul 2024
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
345
 []
Given Kudos: 188
Location: United Arab Emirates
Products:
Posts: 362
Kudos: 345
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 2,741
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 764
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,741
Kudos: 2,011
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Principle: If you sell an item that you know to be defective, telling the buyer that the item is sound, you thereby commit fraud.

Application: Wilton sold a used bicycle to Harris, knowing very little about its condition. Wilton told Harris that the bicycle was in good working condition, but Harris soon learned that the brakes were defective. Wilton was therefore guilty of fraud.

The application of the principle is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

The argument clearly states that Wilton was not properly aware of bicycle's condition.

(A) the application fails to establish whether Wilton was given the opportunity to repair the brakes - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(B) the application fails to indicate how much money Wilton received for the bicycle - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(C) the application uses the word “defective” in a sense that is crucially different from how it is used in the statement of the principle - WRONG. Nothing such sort of is concluded. They both mean same.

(D) Harris might not have believed Wilton’s statement about the bicycle’s condition - WRONG. True in the sense if Harris surely didn't believe Wilton but fails if he doesn't.

(E) asserting something without justification is not the same as asserting something one knows to be false - CORRECT. Had Wilton knowingly done it then he would have been at fault. But since he didn't know of defects, it might not be his fault. Both are different scenaios.

Answer E.
User avatar
Dinesh654
Joined: 08 Jun 2021
Last visit: 11 Aug 2024
Posts: 156
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Status:In learning mode...
Location: India
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Posts: 156
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hovkial
Principle: If you sell an item that you know to be defective, telling the buyer that the item is sound, you thereby commit fraud.

Application: Wilton sold a used bicycle to Harris, knowing very little about its condition. Wilton told Harris that the bicycle was in good working condition, but Harris soon learned that the brakes were defective. Wilton was therefore guilty of fraud.

The application of the principle is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

(A) the application fails to establish whether Wilton was given the opportunity to repair the brakes

(B) the application fails to indicate how much money Wilton received for the bicycle

(C) the application uses the word “defective” in a sense that is crucially different from how it is used in the statement of the principle

(D) Harris might not have believed Wilton’s statement about the bicycle’s condition

(E) asserting something without justification is not the same as asserting something one knows to be false

according to the principal- If you sell an item that you know to be defective.
But, Wilton didn’t know about the bike’s condition and he said its good.

Hence, Wilton is missing the condition of knowing about the item before actually doing the fraud.

E- is the closest one.
Cheers!
User avatar
sanjayparihar16
Joined: 12 Apr 2018
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 159
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 426
Posts: 159
Kudos: 143
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Didn’t understand option E but was able to eliminate other 4 options.

A - Opportunity to repair breaks is not impacting argument in any sense

B - How much money is not important. Only selling/buying is important

C - usage of word “defective” in other sense? No way

D - not believing is also irrelevant

Pickup E

Posted from my mobile device
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts