GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 24 Sep 2018, 10:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5001
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2015, 10:07
2
14
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

63% (01:48) correct 37% (01:55) wrong based on 845 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A system that combines radar and infrared can be installed in cargo ships and passenger liners to provide a ship’s crew with a warning if another vessel is in the shipping lane directly ahead. The early warning allows a ship’s captain to attempt an abrupt course change to avert a possible collision. Even though cargo ships and passenger liners need a considerable distance to maneuver and that most warnings are false, such an early warning system undoubtedly better protects cargo and passengers. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. The system can detect not only the physical presence of a ship by radar but it can also detect a ship's heat signature by infrared.

B. A maritime safety commission report determined that over 82% of the system’s warnings were false.

C. Ship collisions in the major oceanic shipping lanes are extremely rare.

D. The risk of a cargo ship or passenger liner being involved in a collision is substantially greater at port than at sea.

E. Abrupt course changes do not involve risk to a ship’s cargo or passengers.

Day 1 Question of the Verbal Contest: Race Against the GMAT Club Timer

_________________
Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 70
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 13 Jul 2015, 12:26
1
fingers crossed. waiting for the OA. when can I expect the update on OA?

Originally posted by grr8pe on 13 Jul 2015, 11:40.
Last edited by grr8pe on 13 Jul 2015, 12:26, edited 2 times in total.
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2014
Posts: 6
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2015, 11:43
1
1
souvik101990 wrote:

A system that combines radar and infrared can be installed in cargo ships and passenger liners to provide a ship’s crew with a warning if another vessel is in the shipping lane directly ahead. The early warning allows a ship’s captain to attempt an abrupt course change to avert a possible collision. Even though cargo ships and passenger liners need a considerable distance to maneuver and that most warnings are false, such an early warning system undoubtedly better protects cargo and passengers. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. The system can detect not only the physical presence of a ship by radar but it can also detect a ship's heat signature by infrared.

B. A maritime safety commission report determined that over 82% of the system’s warnings were false.

C. Ship collisions in the major oceanic shipping lanes are extremely rare.

D. The risk of a cargo ship or passenger liner being involved in a collision is substantially greater at port than at sea.

E. Abrupt course changes do not involve risk to a ship’s cargo or passengers.

Day 1 Question of the Verbal Contest: Race Against the GMAT Club Timer

Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2015
Posts: 2
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2015, 12:21
1
I like these promotions :D . I hope this question is about usefulness of the device . Waiting for the OA .
Intern
Joined: 22 Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2015, 14:04
1
Imo: A
Argument is about the radar and infrared helping the cargo and passengers. To strengthen this we must look for the ans which means these rays really helpful for cargo or passengers or both. And only one option does and gives some other features of being these rays.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Vikash Alex
(Do like the below link on FB and join us in contributing towards education to under-privilege children.)

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 199
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2015, 15:00
2
A. The system can detect not only the physical presence of a ship by radar but it can also detect a ship's heat signature by infrared.
Already given that the system has system will use IR and radar. how is heat signature useful nowhere mentioned.

B. A maritime safety commission report determined that over 82% of the system’s warnings were false.
Already given warnings are false. can't strengthen anyways

C. Ship collisions in the major oceanic shipping lanes are extremely rare.
So how will system be useful ?

D. The risk of a cargo ship or passenger liner being involved in a collision is substantially greater at port than at sea.
Thats what I marked because system might not be useful at sea but it can protect the ship while at port.

E. Abrupt course changes do not involve risk to a ship’s cargo or passengers.
But how is system more useful in this case ?

I was too slow in reading and not expecting a win today. please press the +1 Kudos if you like my post.
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Intern
Joined: 18 Dec 2014
Posts: 7
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2015, 21:09
1
Is the OA - E? Since it eliminates a possibility of weakness in the statement
Current Student
Joined: 29 May 2013
Posts: 108
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2015, 21:44
1
Quite a tricky one!...i choose D.
Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 20
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2015, 21:54
1
Question seemed extremely simple, so I won't be surprised if there is a trap!
Intern
Joined: 01 Mar 2015
Posts: 48
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q42 V42
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2015, 23:56
1
IMO E. It eliminates the only possible weakness of the argument and hence strengthens it.
_________________

In the pursuit of a better GMAT score. You can help me by giving me kudos if you like my post.

Intern
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 33
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.48
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2015, 03:42
1
A system that combines radar and infrared can be installed in cargo ships and passenger liners to provide a ship’s crew with a warning if another vessel is in the shipping lane directly ahead. The early warning allows a ship’s captain to attempt an abrupt course change to avert a possible collision. Even though cargo ships and passenger liners need a considerable distance to maneuver and that most warnings are false, such an early warning system undoubtedly better protects cargo and passengers. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

Option saying abrupt changes are safe and can be done without any harm will ensure the safety and hence strengthen the argument.
because this is the assumption here.

A. The system can detect not only the physical presence of a ship by radar but it can also detect a ship's heat signature by infrared.
Not relevant

B. A maritime safety commission report determined that over 82% of the system’s warnings were false.
It may be false but does it harm the cargos or passengers? It rather weakens if it harms.

C. Ship collisions in the major oceanic shipping lanes are extremely rare.
Not relevant

D. The risk of a cargo ship or passenger liner being involved in a collision is substantially greater at port than at sea.
Not relevant

E. Abrupt course changes do not involve risk to a ship’s cargo or passengers.
Yes this option explains it.
Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Posts: 35
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2015, 07:41
1
rockinsitu wrote:
A system that combines radar and infrared can be installed in cargo ships and passenger liners to provide a ship’s crew with a warning if another vessel is in the shipping lane directly ahead. The early warning allows a ship’s captain to attempt an abrupt course change to avert a possible collision. Even though cargo ships and passenger liners need a considerable distance to maneuver and that most warnings are false, such an early warning system undoubtedly better protects cargo and passengers. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

Option saying abrupt changes are safe and can be done without any harm will ensure the safety and hence strengthen the argument.
because this is the assumption here.

A. The system can detect not only the physical presence of a ship by radar but it can also detect a ship's heat signature by infrared.
Not relevant

B. A maritime safety commission report determined that over 82% of the system’s warnings were false.
It may be false but does it harm the cargos or passengers? It rather weakens if it harms.

C. Ship collisions in the major oceanic shipping lanes are extremely rare.
Not relevant

D. The risk of a cargo ship or passenger liner being involved in a collision is substantially greater at port than at sea.
Not relevant

E. Abrupt course changes do not involve risk to a ship’s cargo or passengers.
Yes this option explains it.

Im with you - E, but for other reasons.
A - Not relevant to the argument
B - Not relevant to the argument
C - This would weaken rather than strengthen (though also irrelevant)
D - This would weaken rather than strengthen
E - Correct choice (IMHO) as it eliminates possibility of weakness - conclusion is that the new system better PROTECTS the ship´s cargo and passengers, we could argue that it may protect the ship from collision but in doing so, passengers may get hurt, which would actually kill the argument. With this option we no longer can attack the argument
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Feb 2014
Posts: 256
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2015, 08:23
1
Asssumption: Such a security system would not pose any harm to the cargo while manoeuvring.....

Abrupt course changes do not involve risk to a ship’s cargo or passengers

So the system would not pose any harm to the passengers or the Cargo and hence strengthens the assumption.
_________________

Kudos if you like my post

Intern
Joined: 30 May 2015
Posts: 44
WE: Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2015, 12:03
1
souvik101990 wrote:

A system that combines radar and infrared can be installed in cargo ships and passenger liners to provide a ship’s crew with a warning if another vessel is in the shipping lane directly ahead. The early warning allows a ship’s captain to attempt an abrupt course change to avert a possible collision. Even though cargo ships and passenger liners need a considerable distance to maneuver and that most warnings are false, such an early warning system undoubtedly better protects cargo and passengers. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. The system can detect not only the physical presence of a ship by radar but it can also detect a ship's heat signature by infrared.

B. A maritime safety commission report determined that over 82% of the system’s warnings were false.

C. Ship collisions in the major oceanic shipping lanes are extremely rare.

D. The risk of a cargo ship or passenger liner being involved in a collision is substantially greater at port than at sea.

E. Abrupt course changes do not involve risk to a ship’s cargo or passengers.

Day 1 Question of the Verbal Contest: Race Against the GMAT Club Timer

My answer and approach is described below:
Breaking down the para:
Premise->Can be used to avoid collisions
Counter Premise->Most warnings are false
Conclusion->this warning system better protects cargo as well as ships

Going through the options:
A. The system can detect not only the physical presence of a ship by radar but it can also detect a ship's heat signature by infrared.->if it is so then it will help ships in avoiding collision

B. A maritime safety commission report determined that over 82% of the system’s warnings were false.->emphasizes counter premise but does not hit the conclusion - irrelevant

C. Ship collisions in the major oceanic shipping lanes are extremely rare.->not relevant; does not relate the collisions and radars

D. The risk of a cargo ship or passenger liner being involved in a collision is substantially greater at port than at sea.->it is possible that this use case is more relevant to situation where cargo ships DO NOT have substantial space to maneuver

E. Abrupt course changes do not involve risk to a ship’s cargo or passengers.->Not relevant; we need to hit the conclusion

I chose A for an answer, however, looking back I am convinced it should be D. Awaiting OA.

Rgds,
Dhruva
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2015
Posts: 83
Location: United States
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2015, 20:16
1
Not so complex question. Possibility of a trap in the options. Fingers crossed.
Current Student
Joined: 28 Sep 2013
Posts: 94
Location: United States (NC)
Concentration: Operations, Technology
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2015, 23:33
1
Good qn. Tricky logic. Hope I am correct.
_________________

_________________________________

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5001
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2015, 10:26
OA posted. Kudos awarded to all the participants.
_________________
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 317
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2015, 21:30
2
1

A system that combines radar and infrared can be installed in cargo ships and passenger liners to provide a ship’s crew with a warning if another vessel is in the shipping lane directly ahead. The early warning allows a ship’s captain to attempt an abrupt course change to avert a possible collision. Even though cargo ships and passenger liners need a considerable distance to maneuver and that most warnings are false, such an early warning system undoubtedly better protects cargo and passengers. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. The system can detect not only the physical presence of a ship by radar but it can also detect a ship's heat signature by infrared.

B. A maritime safety commission report determined that over 82% of the system’s warnings were false.

C. Ship collisions in the major oceanic shipping lanes are extremely rare.

D. The risk of a cargo ship or passenger liner being involved in a collision is substantially greater at port than at sea.

E. Abrupt course changes do not involve risk to a ship’s cargo or passengers.

Official Explanation
Type: Strengthen
Boil It Down: System warns captain -> Better protection
Missing Information: There are not any significant downsides to the system
Goal: Find the option that reinforces the notion that cargo and passengers will be better protected

This option just describes some of the details of HOW the technology works, but better knowing how it works in no way helps us know that it actually works, or will ultimately better protect cargo and passengers. By gaining a brief run-through of the systems involved, we are in no way better able to say that the system is more likely to achieve its goal—protection.

No effect. A high volume of false alarms wouldn’t help reinforce the positive outcome of the system, in fact, if anything, this option appears to even weaken the notion of how effective the system is if false alarms make up that big a fraction of the system’s warnings.

We’re not concerned with how rare or how common collisions are. Even if they’re rare, preventing them could be extremely valuable in protecting cargo, passengers, and ships. The notion of how rare such collisions are in no way reinforces the argument.

This option is utterly useless. It stresses the severity of locations outside of the scope of where we need it (avoiding collisions in sea lanes). This is what we call an Out Of Focus option. It just has no obvious impact on the argument concerning collision warning in sea lanes.

Yes! Although this option doesn’t DEFINITIVELY prove that the system will better protect cargo or passengers, it rules out a factor that could completely undercut the value of the system. Consider the alternative: what if the course changes did involve risk to a ship’s cargo or passengers? Then the system, especially if it had a significant number of false alarms, could, surprisingly, end up harming a ship’s cargo or passengers. By ruling out that risk, we reinforce the prediction that a ship’s cargo or passengers will be better protected.

Bigger GMAT Picture: Eliminating a likely alternative factor can reinforce the predicted outcome.
_________________

"Students study. GMAT assassins train."

★★★★★ GMAT Club Verified Reviews for EMPOWERgmat & Special Discount

GMAT Club Verbal Advantage EMPOWERgmat Critical Reasoning Question Pack

EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 317
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2015, 21:40
vikal wrote:
Imo: A
Argument is about the radar and infrared helping the cargo and passengers. To strengthen this we must look for the ans which means these rays really helpful for cargo or passengers or both. And only one option does and gives some other features of being these rays.

Hi vikal,

Thanks for weighing in, and for your speed in doing so! Option A merely describes the system's sensors, but that would only strengthen the argument if we assume that these features contributes to the goal of better protection of cargo and passengers (the goal isn't detection--the goal is protection). Does knowing what gizmos the system uses automatically help show that the system is any good at better protecting cargo and passengers? No.

This option would be like running through all of the specs on a car, but would that necessarily help prove an argument that the car is likely to win the race? Same flaw in A here.
_________________

"Students study. GMAT assassins train."

★★★★★ GMAT Club Verified Reviews for EMPOWERgmat & Special Discount

GMAT Club Verbal Advantage EMPOWERgmat Critical Reasoning Question Pack

EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 317
Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2015, 21:49
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
A. The system can detect not only the physical presence of a ship by radar but it can also detect a ship's heat signature by infrared.
Already given that the system has system will use IR and radar. how is heat signature useful nowhere mentioned.

B. A maritime safety commission report determined that over 82% of the system’s warnings were false.
Already given warnings are false. can't strengthen anyways

C. Ship collisions in the major oceanic shipping lanes are extremely rare.
So how will system be useful ?

D. The risk of a cargo ship or passenger liner being involved in a collision is substantially greater at port than at sea.
Thats what I marked because system might not be useful at sea but it can protect the ship while at port.

E. Abrupt course changes do not involve risk to a ship’s cargo or passengers.
But how is system more useful in this case ?

I was too slow in reading and not expecting a win today. please press the +1 Kudos if you like my post.

Hi PUNEETSCHDV and jayanthjanardhan,

Thanks for chiming in on the thread! The problem with D is that how do we know the system is any good at all at port? With D, we'd have to assume that that it is and on top of that, according to the prompt the system scans in front of the ship. While at port, a forward-looking sensor might not be of much use at all.
_________________

"Students study. GMAT assassins train."

★★★★★ GMAT Club Verified Reviews for EMPOWERgmat & Special Discount

GMAT Club Verbal Advantage EMPOWERgmat Critical Reasoning Question Pack

Re: RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared &nbs [#permalink] 20 Jul 2015, 21:49

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 27 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# RAGCT 2015 Day 1: A system that combines radar and infrared

## Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.