GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 13 Dec 2018, 17:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • GMATbuster's Weekly GMAT Quant Quiz, Tomorrow, Saturday at 9 AM PST

     December 14, 2018

     December 14, 2018

     09:00 AM PST

     10:00 AM PST

    10 Questions will be posted on the forum and we will post a reply in this Topic with a link to each question. There are prizes for the winners.
  • The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

     December 13, 2018

     December 13, 2018

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.

Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 1
Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 08 Nov 2017, 04:07
12
1
38
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (01:23) correct 57% (01:23) wrong based on 1215 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have been steadily declining, which can only be the result of overcrowding in the schools.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument expressed above?

a) The high school system in Gotham succeeds in giving students a good education at considerably less cost than do most systems.
b) Several cities have found that overcrowding in the schools is not always associated with lower reading scores.
c) Gotham schools have a greater teacher-to-student ratio than most other school systems.
d) Students' reading skills have not declined in other cities where the high schools are just as crowded as those of Gotham.
e) Schools are not overcrowded in many cities where high school reading scores have declined more than they have in Gotham.

Spoiler: :: Poster's comment
Please justify your options. I feel two options (d & e) are correct. Stimulus suggests that overcrowding in the schools (cause) leads to decline in reading skills among high school students in Gotham (Effect).
Option d states effect does not occur even when the cause occurs.
Option e states effect occurs even when cause has not occurred.
How do you justify one option over the other as both seem to weaken the argument.

Originally posted by danj on 13 Sep 2010, 08:59.
Last edited by Mahmud6 on 08 Nov 2017, 04:07, edited 1 time in total.
Formatted
Most Helpful Community Reply
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 112
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2010, 10:58
9
Cause -> Effect

Overcrowding -> Declining in reading skills

Both options are equally attractive. But this is one slight different. It is the use of the word "crowd" vs "overcrowd". A typical shell game. D is saying that the other cities' high school do not experiene decline in the reading skill even though the schools are as crowded as those of Gotham. "Crowd" does not mean "overcrowd". It could also mean "same population" and the other cities's schools have more teachers.

E is specific about the word "overcrowd". Also, it is saying that schools that are not "overcrowded" are also experiening the same effect (i.e. decline in reading skills)
_________________

----------------------------------------------
My GMAT Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/name-of-the-game-do-not-giveup-112609.html

If you like my post, Kudos me.

Don't forget to visit me - http://mbaido.wordpress.com/

General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 67
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2010, 10:02
6
1
My thoughts:

Keyword is ONLY. i.e. Overcrowding is a necessary condition for decline in reading skills. Hence, conclusion is: If Decline, then Overcrowding.

E states: some non-overcrowded schools experience decline reading skills. It effectively means that if Decline then NOT necessarily overcrowding. Hence, weakens conclusion.

D simply says that there is no decline in reading skills for some overcrowded schools. It does nothing to the conclusion because the conclusion does not talk about the scenario when there is no decline in reading skills.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 137
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2010, 23:11
3
1
the conclusion says the overcrowd in the school is causing the decline in the reading skills.
To weaken this one, we have to show that the overcrowd is not the only reason for the decine in reading skills.

Now in D
Students' reading skills have not declined in other cities where the high schools are just as crowded as those of Gotham.
it says, there are other cities which are as crowded as Gotham, where the reading skills have not declined. But it doesn't give any information regarding the other reasons for the decline.

In E
Schools are not overcrowded in many cities where high school reading scores have declined more than they have in Gotham.
it says in some less crowded cities the reading skills have declined. So there has to some reason for this delcine other than the overcrowd. This one weakens the argument by introducing some other factors.

So E is the ans
VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1033
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jun 2011, 18:20
E says !overcrowding => reading decline.
Meaning effect occurs even if cause does not.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 243
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jun 2011, 21:13
danj wrote:
Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have been steadily declining, which can only be the result of overcrowding in the schools.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument expressed above?

a) The high school system in Gotham succeeds in giving students a good education at considerably less cost than do most systems.
b) Several cities have found that overcrowding in the schools is not always associated with lower reading scores.
c) Gotham schools have a greater teacher-to-student ratio than most other school systems.
d) Students' reading skills have not declined in other cities where the high schools are just as crowded as those of Gotham.
e) Schools are not overcrowded in many cities where high school reading scores have declined more than they have in Gotham.

Please justify your options. I feel two options (d & e) are correct. Stimulus suggests that overcrowding in the schools (cause) leads to decline in reading skills among high school students in Gotham (Effect).
Option d states effect does not occur even when the cause occurs.
Option e states effect occurs even when cause has not occurred.
How do you justify one option over the other as both seem to weaken the argument.


Though I went with E but didnt like D and E both for the above highlighted portions that have nowhere been mentioned in the argument.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 193
Schools: UNC Duke Kellogg
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2011, 13:27
Great question!!!!

Weakening an argument by introducing an "alternate causation"...

D is close -- but subtle differences between schools and high schools, and between reading scores and reading scores among high school students...

E wins!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2015
Posts: 21
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2015, 08:14
Pretty good explanations.

It is a cause + effect situation. To weaken it, you must "prove" otherwise in similar conditions (ex.: A place where the effect is present, i mean, the skills have also been constantly decreasing), but for any reason other than "overcrowded". It could even be a random X reason, as long as it is different than "overcrowded".

D is wrong because the effect was different.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2015
Posts: 13
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2015, 14:02
2
Here is the difference between D and E:

D is saying that overcrowding did not cause a decrease in reading skills among some schools. If the conclusion was overcrowding ALWAYS causes a decrease in reading skills, then this answer would be correct. However, the conclusion is that overcrowding is the ONLY cause of a decline in reading skills. E states that there must be other causes for a decline in reading skills than overcrowding. This directly addresses the conclusion.

Thus E. It boils down to the difference between ONLY and ALWAYS.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2012
Posts: 23
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Feb 2016, 05:32
ohfred wrote:
My thoughts:

Keyword is ONLY. i.e. Overcrowding is a necessary condition for decline in reading skills. Hence, conclusion is: If Decline, then Overcrowding.

E states: some non-overcrowded schools experience decline reading skills. It effectively means that if Decline then NOT necessarily overcrowding. Hence, weakens conclusion.

D simply says that there is no decline in reading skills for some overcrowded schools. It does nothing to the conclusion because the conclusion does not talk about the scenario when there is no decline in reading skills.

Dude, could seem that what others cities do is out of scope. Doesn't have the answer to be a subset of the stimulus? In any other question this would be out of scope. ..
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 118
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.38
Reviews Badge
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Sep 2016, 04:11
Here, The cause is overcrowding which has resulted into declining reading skills.

Hence, if we can identify that some other cause has given resulted in declining reading skills, we can weaken the argument.
Option B says that overcrowding is not associated with lower reading scores. Hence, something else is associated with it .

Please advise, what flaw is there in this reasoning.

abhimahna wrote:
1988achilles wrote:
Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have been steadily declining, which can only be the result of overcrowding in the schools


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument expressed above?
(A) The high school system in Gotham succeeds in giving students a good education at considerably less cost than do most systems.
(B) Several cities have found that overcrowding in the schools is not always associated with lower reading scores.
(C) Gotham schools have a greater teacher-to-student ratio than most other school systems.
(D) Students' reading skills have not declined in other cities where the high schools are just as crowded as those of Gotham.
(E) Schools are not overcrowded in many cities where high school reading scores have declined more than they have in Gotham.

Pls help why option B is incorrect?


Please provide your reasoning while marking B as the answer. Based on that only, we can find out where you were missing.
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2620
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2016, 06:32
danj wrote:
Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have been steadily declining, which can only be the result of overcrowding in the schools.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument expressed above?

a) The high school system in Gotham succeeds in giving students a good education at considerably less cost than do most systems.
b) Several cities have found that overcrowding in the schools is not always associated with lower reading scores.
c) Gotham schools have a greater teacher-to-student ratio than most other school systems.
d) Students' reading skills have not declined in other cities where the high schools are just as crowded as those of Gotham.
e) Schools are not overcrowded in many cities where high school reading scores have declined more than they have in Gotham.

Please justify your options. I feel two options (d & e) are correct. Stimulus suggests that overcrowding in the schools (cause) leads to decline in reading skills among high school students in Gotham (Effect).
Option d states effect does not occur even when the cause occurs.
Option e states effect occurs even when cause has not occurred.
How do you justify one option over the other as both seem to weaken the argument.


clearly, all but D and E can easily be eliminated.
I chose E.
no cause -> effect still is present. thus, cause does not lead to effect.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 25 Sep 2017
Posts: 18
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2017, 14:49
danj wrote:
Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have been steadily declining, which can only be the result of overcrowding in the schools.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument expressed above?

a) The high school system in Gotham succeeds in giving students a good education at considerably less cost than do most systems.
b) Several cities have found that overcrowding in the schools is not always associated with lower reading scores.
c) Gotham schools have a greater teacher-to-student ratio than most other school systems.
d) Students' reading skills have not declined in other cities where the high schools are just as crowded as those of Gotham.
e) Schools are not overcrowded in many cities where high school reading scores have declined more than they have in Gotham.

Spoiler: :: Poster's comment
Please justify your options. I feel two options (d & e) are correct. Stimulus suggests that overcrowding in the schools (cause) leads to decline in reading skills among high school students in Gotham (Effect).
Option d states effect does not occur even when the cause occurs.
Option e states effect occurs even when cause has not occurred.
How do you justify one option over the other as both seem to weaken the argument.

Please clear my doubt

E says many cities but not all other cities, leaving a scope for some other cities similar to Gotham?

D says about all other schools that are just as crowded as Gotham, so narrowed down to the required comparison?

B says not always, meaning sometimes may be possible, same like E says ?

C is saying a different reason but that reason was not properly associated with the decline or incline in the scores, so can be skipped

A This adds no value

Sent from my Redmi 4 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________

GA800

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 314
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Feb 2018, 06:49
1
E.

Because in causality weakeners, we need to find if effect is present even in the absence of the said cause. A, B and C are out.

D. Students' reading skills have not declined. So, they may have increased or remained constant in schools that are as crowded as Gotham is. Close contender. But we are more concerned about schools with declining reading skills of students. Hold but check the one remaining answer choice.

E. Clearly mentions that in "many" schools, the reading scores have "declined" even without "overcrowding". Goes in line with our pre-thinking. Correct.
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 51185
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2018, 01:14
1
1
danj wrote:
Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have been steadily declining, which can only be the result of overcrowding in the schools.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument expressed above?

a) The high school system in Gotham succeeds in giving students a good education at considerably less cost than do most systems.
b) Several cities have found that overcrowding in the schools is not always associated with lower reading scores.
c) Gotham schools have a greater teacher-to-student ratio than most other school systems.
d) Students' reading skills have not declined in other cities where the high schools are just as crowded as those of Gotham.
e) Schools are not overcrowded in many cities where high school reading scores have declined more than they have in Gotham.

Spoiler: :: Poster's comment
Please justify your options. I feel two options (d & e) are correct. Stimulus suggests that overcrowding in the schools (cause) leads to decline in reading skills among high school students in Gotham (Effect).
Option d states effect does not occur even when the cause occurs.
Option e states effect occurs even when cause has not occurred.
How do you justify one option over the other as both seem to weaken the argument.


KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



The important word in the author's conclusion is the word only. She states that the problem of declining reading skills can only have one cause: overcrowding. Anything that renders doubtful the causal connection between Gotham's overcrowding and Gotham's declining reading scores will seriously weaken the argument. (E) does this by pointing out a case in which skills have declined, yet there is no overcrowding. So something other than overcrowding can account for a decline in reading skills. (E) wins. (Note: This ties in perfectly with the logical element present in the next question.)

(A) just tries to make an excuse for Gotham schools by pointing out that they spend less money. While this may furnish a reason for the overcrowding, it does nothing to hurt the argument that the overcrowding causes declining scores.

(B) and (D) point to overcrowding without declining skills. Yet the author didn't say that overcrowding always leads to declines in skills, but rather that declines in skills are always a result of overcrowding. Be careful to keep the causal mechanism straight!

(C), if anything, strengthens the argument by pointing out that the decline in reading scores cannot be attributed to a low teacher-to-student ratio. It must, therefore, be attributed to some other cause (e.g., overcrowding).
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 377
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2018, 20:03
Bunuel wrote:
danj wrote:
Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have been steadily declining, which can only be the result of overcrowding in the schools.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument expressed above?

a) The high school system in Gotham succeeds in giving students a good education at considerably less cost than do most systems.
b) Several cities have found that overcrowding in the schools is not always associated with lower reading scores.
c) Gotham schools have a greater teacher-to-student ratio than most other school systems.
d) Students' reading skills have not declined in other cities where the high schools are just as crowded as those of Gotham.
e) Schools are not overcrowded in many cities where high school reading scores have declined more than they have in Gotham.

Spoiler: :: Poster's comment
Please justify your options. I feel two options (d & e) are correct. Stimulus suggests that overcrowding in the schools (cause) leads to decline in reading skills among high school students in Gotham (Effect).
Option d states effect does not occur even when the cause occurs.
Option e states effect occurs even when cause has not occurred.
How do you justify one option over the other as both seem to weaken the argument.


KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



The important word in the author's conclusion is the word only. She states that the problem of declining reading skills can only have one cause: overcrowding. Anything that renders doubtful the causal connection between Gotham's overcrowding and Gotham's declining reading scores will seriously weaken the argument. (E) does this by pointing out a case in which skills have declined, yet there is no overcrowding. So something other than overcrowding can account for a decline in reading skills. (E) wins. (Note: This ties in perfectly with the logical element present in the next question.)

(A) just tries to make an excuse for Gotham schools by pointing out that they spend less money. While this may furnish a reason for the overcrowding, it does nothing to hurt the argument that the overcrowding causes declining scores.

(B) and (D) point to overcrowding without declining skills. Yet the author didn't say that overcrowding always leads to declines in skills, but rather that declines in skills are always a result of overcrowding. Be careful to keep the causal mechanism straight!

(C), if anything, strengthens the argument by pointing out that the decline in reading scores cannot be attributed to a low teacher-to-student ratio. It must, therefore, be attributed to some other cause (e.g., overcrowding).


Which is that next question mentioned in above solution-->(Note: This ties in perfectly with the logical element present in the next question.)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Posts: 358
Location: Germany
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.6
WE: Analyst (Transportation)
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2018, 14:26
The tags mention both Kaplan and Veritas as a source... I take it this is a Kaplan question?
_________________

A couple of things that helped me in verbal:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/verbal-strategies-268700.html#p2082192

Gmat Prep CAT #1: V42, Q34, 630
Gmat Prep CAT #2: V46, Q35, 660
Gmat Prep CAT #3: V41, Q42, 680

On the mission to improve my quant score, all help is appreciated! :)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 143
Location: Taiwan
GPA: 3.34
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2018, 06:51
I don't think this is a good question

(E) says Schools are not overcrowded in many cities where high school reading scores have declined more than they have in Gotham.

Aren't we focusing on what happened in Gotham? Even though it may be true that overcrowding is not the cause in many cities, overcrowding can still be the cause in "Gotham".

Experts please chime in, thank you
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have &nbs [#permalink] 28 Nov 2018, 06:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Reading skills among high school students in Gotham have

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.