Hello again,
lakshya14. I agree with what others have written, but if you are talking about
grammatical parallelism, as in something you would expect to see in a Sentence Correction question, then the answer is no, the two sides do not have to be parallel. Consider the following example:
Jay Leno enjoys his cars; he is something of an aficionado.The first clause is S-V-DO, while the second is S-V, with a subject complement or predicate noun in
an aficionado. You could also change the verb tense from one clause to the other and still use a semicolon:
Jay Leno enjoys his cars; he used to acquire several a year.As long as you join two standalone sentences in the same way you would if you were using a period--without conjunctions--then a semicolon will do.
By the way, you should know how to use semicolons to separate items in a list as well, since I have seen official SC questions that test this rule. If there is internal punctuation at any point in the list, then everything needs to be separated by a semicolon instead of a comma. Here is an example:
The teacher read out the names of the students for roll call: Jane; John; Michael (a recent addition to the list, written in pencil); Ralph; and Stanley.I hope that helps with your inquiry. If you have further questions, feel free to ask.
- Andrew