Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 23:10 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 23:10

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
VP
VP
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Status:It's near - I can see.
Posts: 1479
Own Kudos [?]: 1601 [14]
Given Kudos: 1002
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Posts: 243
Own Kudos [?]: 122 [0]
Given Kudos: 50
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Jul 2017
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [1]
Given Kudos: 1158
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2019
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [1]
Given Kudos: 193
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q51 V29
GPA: 3.3
Send PM
Re: Senior management is assembling a committee to evaluate proposals for [#permalink]
1
Kudos
vivapopo wrote:
Senior management is assembling a committee to evaluate proposals for new product lines, which are necessary for the continued growth of the company. Although Humphries, one candidate for the committee, has extensive experience with the launch of new products, his past behavior shows that he strongly favors risky ventures, which offer the potential for spectacular growth but also have a higher chance of failure than do more conservative ventures. The committee must be able to objectively consider the merits of each proposal and provide an unbiased recommendation.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest basis to counter a conclusion based on the argument above that Humphries would not be an appropriate selection for the committee?

a. A person with a strong preference derived from past experience usually has encountered success from following that preference or failure from not following it.

b. The decisions made by a committee composed of one person with a strong preference and other people with weak preferences usually will be dominated by the opinions of the person possessing the strong preference.

c. Risky ventures are objectively preferable to conservative ventures if and only if the magnitude of the potential reward is great enough to offset the greater probability of failure.

d. A committee composed of experienced people with strong but conflicting preferences is more likely to make an unbiased recommendation than is a committee composed of people with unknown or weak preferences.

e. The most successful products are generally those that were considered risky by objective evaluators at the time they were initially proposed.



A. A person with a strong preference derived from past experience usually has encountered success from following that preference or failure from not following it.(doesn't address the issue to consider the merits of each proposal objectively)

B. The decisions made by a committee composed of one person with a strong preference and other people with weak preferences usually will be dominated by the opinions of the person possessing the strong preference. (it will support the conclusion)

C. Risky ventures are objectively preferable to conservative ventures if and only if the magnitude of the potential reward is great enough to offset the greater probability of failure.(doesn't counter the conclusion)

D. A committee composed of experienced people with strong but conflicting preferences is more likely to make an unbiased recommendation than is a committee composed of people with unknown or weak preferences.(contender)

E. The most successful products are generally those that were considered risky by objective evaluators at the time they were initially proposed.(doesn't address the conclusion)

Hence, the answer should be D.
___________________________________
Please give kudos if you liked the answer.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618859 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: Senior management is assembling a committee to evaluate proposals for [#permalink]
Expert Reply
vivapopo wrote:
Senior management is assembling a committee to evaluate proposals for new product lines, which are necessary for the continued growth of the company. Although Humphries, one candidate for the committee, has extensive experience with the launch of new products, his past behavior shows that he strongly favors risky ventures, which offer the potential for spectacular growth but also have a higher chance of failure than do more conservative ventures. The committee must be able to objectively consider the merits of each proposal and provide an unbiased recommendation.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest basis to counter a conclusion based on the argument above that Humphries would not be an appropriate selection for the committee?

a. A person with a strong preference derived from past experience usually has encountered success from following that preference or failure from not following it.

b. The decisions made by a committee composed of one person with a strong preference and other people with weak preferences usually will be dominated by the opinions of the person possessing the strong preference.

c. Risky ventures are objectively preferable to conservative ventures if and only if the magnitude of the potential reward is great enough to offset the greater probability of failure.

d. A committee composed of experienced people with strong but conflicting preferences is more likely to make an unbiased recommendation than is a committee composed of people with unknown or weak preferences.

e. The most successful products are generally those that were considered risky by objective evaluators at the time they were initially proposed.



Merging topics. Please search before posting. Thank you.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 181
Own Kudos [?]: 59 [0]
Given Kudos: 289
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.54
Send PM
Re: Senior management is assembling a committee to evaluate proposals for [#permalink]
I dont understand how OA is D. We dont know anything about the other people in the committee. These people may be experienced with strong preference or experienced with weak preferences. Kindly clarify.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.99
WE:Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Send PM
Re: Senior management is assembling a committee to evaluate proposals for [#permalink]
1
Kudos
sunny91 wrote:
I dont understand how OA is D. We dont know anything about the other people in the committee. These people may be experienced with strong preference or experienced with weak preferences. Kindly clarify.


Hi Sunny,
The conclusion is "Humphries would not be an appropriate selection for the committee". Now to counter this conclusion we need something which tells us that he is appropriate selection. Option D says people with strong preferences are more likely to make an unbiased recommendation than a committee composed of people with unknown or weak preferences.

So other members of the committee is beyond the scope of the argument here.

hope it helps.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 181
Own Kudos [?]: 59 [0]
Given Kudos: 289
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.54
Send PM
Re: Senior management is assembling a committee to evaluate proposals for [#permalink]
ruchik wrote:
sunny91 wrote:
I dont understand how OA is D. We dont know anything about the other people in the committee. These people may be experienced with strong preference or experienced with weak preferences. Kindly clarify.


Hi Sunny,
The conclusion is "Humphries would not be an appropriate selection for the committee". Now to counter this conclusion we need something which tells us that he is appropriate selection. Option D says people with strong preferences are more likely to make an unbiased recommendation than a committee composed of people with unknown or weak preferences.

So other members of the committee is beyond the scope of the argument here.

hope it helps.

hi Ruchik,
Option D states -A committee composed of experienced people with strong but conflicting preferences is more likely to make an unbiased recommendation than is a committee composed of people with unknown or weak preferences.

As the option mentions committee, so other people are in consideration
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2019
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Re: Senior management is assembling a committee to evaluate proposals for [#permalink]
ruchik wrote:
sunny91 wrote:
I dont understand how OA is D. We dont know anything about the other people in the committee. These people may be experienced with strong preference or experienced with weak preferences. Kindly clarify.


Hi Sunny,
The conclusion is "Humphries would not be an appropriate selection for the committee". Now to counter this conclusion we need something which tells us that he is appropriate selection. Option D says people with strong preferences are more likely to make an unbiased recommendation than a committee composed of people with unknown or weak preferences.

So other members of the committee is beyond the scope of the argument here.

hope it helps.



Option D doesn't say anything about people with strong preferences; instead, it talks about a committee composed of people with strong but conflicting preferences. In short, it implies that assertive people, irrespective of their lines of opinion, would form a better committee than would indifferent or weakly-opinionated people.

The word "conflicting" doesn't make sense if the option is talking only about the preference of only one member of the committee. So, I highly doubt whether other members of the committee are really beyond the scope of the argument if this is the correct option.

Option A, on the other hand, seems more correct as -
i. it keeps the scope of the discussion limited to one person (as Humphries' appointment is being tested)
ii. is at least not a weakener (if not is a strengthener) of the decision to select Humphries

Thoughts?

P.S. this doesn't sound like one of the best-worded questions, honestly.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Oct 2018
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 33 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Send PM
Re: Senior management is assembling a committee to evaluate proposals for [#permalink]
ruchik wrote:
sunny91 wrote:
I dont understand how OA is D. We dont know anything about the other people in the committee. These people may be experienced with strong preference or experienced with weak preferences. Kindly clarify.


Hi Sunny,
The conclusion is "Humphries would not be an appropriate selection for the committee". Now to counter this conclusion we need something which tells us that he is appropriate selection. Option D says people with strong preferences are more likely to make an unbiased recommendation than a committee composed of people with unknown or weak preferences.

So other members of the committee is beyond the scope of the argument here.

hope it helps.


This is the correct way of answering. It helps people understand why the answer is correct.

Thank you :)
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17214
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Senior management is assembling a committee to evaluate proposals for [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Senior management is assembling a committee to evaluate proposals for [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne