GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Feb 2019, 00:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

February 16, 2019

February 16, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
• ### Free GMAT Algebra Webinar

February 17, 2019

February 17, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Attend this Free Algebra Webinar and learn how to master Inequalities and Absolute Value problems on GMAT.

# The international team of scientists, whose research was

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Status: To infinity and beyond
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 253
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.31
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
The international team of scientists, whose research was  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2017, 10:47
1
4
Question 1
00:00

based on 158 sessions

44% (02:49) correct 56% (02:48) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

based on 153 sessions

65% (01:13) correct 35% (01:29) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

based on 142 sessions

60% (01:15) correct 40% (01:23) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

based on 146 sessions

54% (01:22) correct 46% (01:14) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

The international team of scientists, whose research was conducted under the European Commission-funded CARBO-Extreme Project, contends that extreme climate events, such as droughts, heat waves and storms, weaken the buffer effect that terrestrial ecosystems have on the climate system. The researchers discovered that drought has a particular capacity to reduce the amount of carbon that is absorbed by forests, meadows and agricultural land. Their findings suggest that by diminishing the natural environment’s ability to absorb carbon, extreme weather simultaneously results from, and perpetuates, climate change. During the course of their study, the CARBO-Extreme team, headed by Dr Reichstein, examined how extreme weather affects forests, bogs, grassy landscapes and arable areas across the planet. The team, whose findings have been published in the latest issue of the journal “Nature”, enlisted the help of complex computer models to calculate the global effect of extreme climate events on the carbon balance. They discovered that drought, as opposed to heat, has the most pronounced effect on an ecosystem’s ability to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. As climate change continues to gather pace, many experts believe that extreme weather events will occur more frequently than they do at present. If the CARBO-Extreme team is correct and extreme weather is a significant driver of climate change, this relationship could turn out to be a self-fulfilling prophesy. Unfortunately, it is very difficult for scientists to categorically state whether or not extreme weather is becoming more frequent. Whilst there is a great deal of evidence to suggest that heat waves and droughts will increase in frequency over the course of the next century, data pertaining to other extreme climate events remains inconclusive.

Question: 1

The author of this passage is primarily concerned with
a) providing a list of evidences that suggests a correlation between drought and climate change

b) resolving a contention between two schools of thought regarding a perceived natural occurrence

c) arguing for a change in National policies to incorporate a more ecologically conscientious view to the use of natural resources

d) evaluating a theory put forth by a team of scientists regarding a possible phenomenon

e) detailing the research findings of the CARBO-Extreme team

Question: 2

Which of the following can be best inferred from the passage?
a) Increase in droughts is the cause for extreme climate changes.

b) Extreme climate changes are the sole causative factors for drought and other extreme climate events

c) Accumulation of carbon-dioxide in the environment can cause climatic changes that are deleterious

d) Apart from droughts, other extreme climate events have no apparent connection with climatic change.

e) Aquatic ecosystems have a less pronounced mitigatory effect on climate change than do terrestrial ecosystems

Question: 3

The journal “Nature” is introduced in the 2nd paragraph primarily to
a) cite the source used by the CARBO-extreme team to substantiate their hypotheses.

b) forestall potential criticisms that might call into question the authenticity of the teams findings

c) provide a recorded instance of the teams work from which information about the teams findings could be obtained.

d) show the magnitude to which the teams research findings have had an impact.

e) highlight the fact that - extreme climate change is an issue that even the common-man has become concerned about.

Question: 4

Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage
a) An opinion is discussed; evidences suggesting the fallaciousness of the opinion are then provided.

b) A phenomenon is discussed, this phenomenon is then compared to another to understand the similarities shared.

c) A teams perspective about a natural occurrence is discussed; some evidence suggesting the validity of the theory are provided.

d) An explanation to a phenomenon is provided; evidences provided to substantiate this explanation are evaluated.

e) An assumption is put forth and the validity of this assumption is analyzed in light of new scientific findings.

Source: crackverbal

_________________

Please give kudos if you like my post.Thanks

Intern
Joined: 04 Oct 2017
Posts: 9
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2018, 08:57
Manager
Joined: 28 May 2018
Posts: 75
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2018, 01:41
devikeerthansr
Need help with Q4 ?
Not able to eliminate option D thanks
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Posts: 408
Location: Germany
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.6
WE: Analyst (Transportation)
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2018, 02:41
I went with "D" on Q4, could someone enlighten me on why it was the wrong choice?
_________________

A couple of things that helped me in verbal:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/verbal-strategies-268700.html#p2082192

Gmat Prep CAT #1: V42, Q34, 630
Gmat Prep CAT #2: V46, Q35, 660
Gmat Prep CAT #3: V41, Q42, 680

On the mission to improve my quant score, all help is appreciated!

Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2017
Posts: 89
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GPA: 3.56
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2018, 06:31
Question: 4

Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage
a) An opinion is discussed; evidences suggesting the fallaciousness of the opinion are then provided. : No evidence discussed to prove fallaciousness.

b) A phenomenon is discussed, this phenomenon is then compared to another to understand the similarities shared.: No comparison of two phenomenons.

c) A teams perspective about a natural occurrence is discussed; some evidence suggesting the validity of the theory are provided. Correct

d) An explanation to a phenomenon is provided; evidences provided to substantiate this explanation are evaluated. :Evidences are provided to substantiate the perspective and this perspective is evaluated to some extent.But the evidences are not at all evaluated.

e) An assumption is put forth and the validity of this assumption is analyzed in light of new scientific findings.: No assumption is mentioned.
Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2017
Posts: 89
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GPA: 3.56
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2018, 06:34
Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 233
Concentration: Finance, Economics
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2018, 08:27
Why D is wrong in q 4 ?

1. It is not a phenomenon , it is a possible phenomenon.
2 Evidences are not evaluated. No where it is mentioned in the passage that the research has been evaluated or the findings have been evaluated.
The organization is Theory> Possible Phenomenon> Research> Findings> Final conclusion of the author .
_________________

Even if it takes me 30 attempts, I am determined enough to score 740+ in my 31st attempt. This is it, this is what I have been waiting for, now is the time to get up and fight, for my life is 100% my responsibility.

Dil ye Ziddi hai !!!

Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 37
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2019, 16:51
In question 2 , Why A is incorrect?

Thank you
Re: The international team of scientists, whose research was   [#permalink] 30 Jan 2019, 16:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by